Fanconi's syndrome and nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in an adult treated with ifosfamide.

Fanconi's syndrome is a serious condition characterized by type II proximal renal tubular dysfunction, with urinary loss of glucose, amino acids, phosphate, bicarbonate, and potassium. Ifosfamide-induced Fanconi's syndrome is reported in about 1.4-5% of children being treated for solid tumors, yet only a few cases have been reported in adults. We describe a 54-year-old man who came to the hospital with symptoms of neutropenic fever 4 days after his fourth cycle of ifosfamide and doxorubicin treatment for recurrent sarcoma with metastases to the lung. During admission, he was noted to have severe renal tubular dysfunction; ifosfamide-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus and Fanconi's syndrome were suspected. He received supportive therapy that resulted in incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms. The patient was discharged after a 5-day hospital stay when his white blood cell count increased from 0.1-2.5 × 10(3) /mm(3) and his fever had resolved. Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated a probable relationship (score of 7) between the patient's development of diabetes insipidus and Fanconi's syndrome and his use of ifosfamide. This dual diagnosis of diabetes insipidus and Fanconi's syndrome in an adult makes this case unusual, as well as therapeutically challenging. We conducted a review of the existing literature regarding ifosfamide-induced Fanconi's syndrome and describe the proposed mechanisms and therapeutic options. This case suggests that patients treated with ifosfamide should be monitored closely for renal function to identify, and perhaps prevent, these rare adverse events. Preliminary animal models show promise for adding N-acetylcysteine to ifosfamide treatment, but more research is necessary before using this drug as a therapeutic option.

Insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn in patients with severe insulin resistance: Is there a benefit?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin compared with insulin glargine in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe insulin resistance. METHODS: We describe the patient's clinical findings and treatment course. RESULTS: A 52-year-old man with a 3-year history of type 2 diabetes mellitus did not achieve adequate glucose control despite escalation of his treatment regimen to insulin glargine, 80 units twice daily; insulin lispro, 60 units before each meal; and metformin. Dietary and lifestyle changes were emphasized and implemented while medication adherence with appropriate insulin technique was reviewed at each visit. Insulin glargine was replaced with the same dosage of NPH insulin. After 3 months, a significant drop in hemoglobin A1c was noted, from 9.5% to 6.1%, consistent with the improved capillary glucose measurements. The effect was maintained over the following year, without any major hypoglycemic events. CONCLUSION: NPH insulin might be superior to the long-acting analogue insulin glargine in cases of severe insulin resistance, but randomized studies are needed to confirm our finding and clarify the involved mechanisms.