[Qualitative evaluation of a participatory process of adaptation of a health promotion guide.] / Evaluación cualitativa de un proceso participativo de adaptación de una guía de promoción de la salud.

OBJECTIVE: In the last decades, in Spain, the interest shown towards community participation in health has been growing. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines to promote community participation in health. For this reason, between 2017 and 2018 the AdaptA GPS project was carried out through 10 working groups from 10 autonomous communities, to adapt the NG44 community participation guide in health from the NICE institute in the United Kingdom to the Spanish context. The objective of this article was to evaluate the adaptation process (the aspects to be improved and the resulting learning) of the AdaptA GPS project through the evaluation of its participants. METHODS: A qualitative evaluation was carried out through two questionnaires with open-ended questions, self-administered in each working group, one by the group coordinator and one by the whole working group (between 6 and 10 people per group), and the answers were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified that reflect the perspectives of the participants about the adaptation process: positive factors (participatory methodology, collaborative work and diversity of participants), aspects that could be improved (scarce people's participation and lack of funding) and acquired learning (working in network and the importance of promoting research in this field). CONCLUSIONS: The AdaptA GPS project was an innovative project that favored the creation of networks and synergies, fostering co-production thanks to its participatory approach, which has laid the foundations for future collaborative processes of community engagement.

OBJETIVO: En las últimas décadas, en España, el interés mostrado hacia la participación comunitaria en salud ha ido creciendo. Sin embargo, no existen guías basadas en la evidencia para promover la participación comunitaria en salud. Por eso, entre 2017 y 2018 se llevó a cabo el proyecto AdaptA GPS a través de 10 nodos de trabajo en 10 comunidades autónomas, para adaptar al contexto español la guía de participación comunitaria en salud NG44 del instituto NICE de Reino Unido. El objetivo de este artículo fue evaluar el proceso de adaptación (los aspectos a mejorar y los aprendizajes resultantes) del proyecto AdaptA GPS a través de la valoración de sus participantes. METODOS: Se realizó una evaluación cualitativa a través de dos cuestionarios con respuestas abiertas, autoadministrados en cada nodo de trabajo, uno por la persona coordinadora y uno por las personas del nodo (entre 6 y 10 personas por nodo), y se realizó un análisis temático. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron tres temas principales que reflejan las perspectivas de las personas participantes sobre el proceso de adaptación: factores positivos (metodología participativa, trabajo multicéntrico y diversidad de participantes), aspectos mejorables (escasa participación ciudadana y falta de financiación) y aprendizajes adquiridos (trabajo en red y la importancia de impulsar investigaciones en este campo). CONCLUSIONES: El proyecto AdaptA GPS fue un proyecto innovador que favoreció la creación de vínculos y sinergias, fomentando la coproducción gracias a su enfoque participativo, que ha sentado las bases para futuros procesos colaborativos de participación comunitaria.

Childhood, families and the Internet: a qualitative approach on health assets / Infancia, familias e Internet: un enfoque cualitativo sobre activos para la salud

Objective: To explore the views of the Internet in childhood, identifying both health assets and risks. Method: A qualitative study was performed using 14 focus groups, eight of which comprised boys and girls, four of which comprised parents and two of which were mixed (children and parents) in primary schools in urban and rural settings in Andalusia (Spain). Teachers in these schools were also asked to complete an online questionnaire using LimeSurvey. This study involved 114 individuals: 64 pupils (33 girls and 31 boys), 28 parents (18 mothers and 10 fathers), and 22 teachers (14 women and 8 men). Analysis of manifest content and underlying meanings was carried out. QSR NVivo 9 software was used to facilitate analysis and make it systematic. Results: Our findings show how the differences in the way parents and children understand health and wellbeing affect the way they discuss the Internet and health. The discussion of results looks at the implications of computer literacy for public health and wellbeing, particularly with regard to health assets. Conclusions: Parents and children understand the contribution of the Internet to health and wellbeing differently. Whilst parents emphasize the risks (unsafe environment, relationships and quality of information, social networks, physical problems and addiction), the children emphasize the assets offered by the Internet. (AU)

Objetivo: Explorar la visión de Internet en la infancia, identificando riesgos y activos para la salud. Método: Estudio cualitativo con 14 grupos focales: ocho con niños y niñas, cuatro con familias y dos mixtos con niños/as y familias en centros de educación primaria de los ámbitos rural y urbano en Andalucía (España). También se aplicó un cuestionario on-line al profesorado de los centros educativos. En total participaron 114 personas (33 chicas y 31 chicos; 18 madres y 10 padres; 14 maestras y 8 maestros). Se llevó a cabo un análisis de contenido manifiesto y contenido latente, utilizando el software QSR NVivo 9 para facilitar dicho análisis y hacerlo más sistemático. Resultados: Los resultados ponen de manifiesto cómo la forma diferencial de entender la salud y el bienestar entre padres/madres e hijos/as influye en la orientación de los discursos sobre Internet y salud. Los resultados son discutidos ampliando el debate existente en torno a las implicaciones en salud pública de la alfabetización digital y su conexión con el enfoque de activos para la salud. Conclusión: Las familias y la infancia entienden la contribución de Internet a la salud y al bienestar de manera muy diferente. Mientras los padres y las madres enfatizan los riesgos (ambiente inseguro, relaciones y calidad de la información, redes sociales, problemas físicos y adicciones), los/las niños/as se centran en enfatizar las potencialidades de Internet, descritas como activos. (AU)

Childhood, families and the Internet: a qualitative approach on health assets.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of the Internet in childhood, identifying both health assets and risks. METHOD: A qualitative study was performed using 14 focus groups, eight of which comprised boys and girls, four of which comprised parents and two of which were mixed (children and parents) in primary schools in urban and rural settings in Andalusia (Spain). Teachers in these schools were also asked to complete an online questionnaire using LimeSurvey. This study involved 114 individuals: 64 pupils (33 girls and 31 boys), 28 parents (18 mothers and 10 fathers), and 22 teachers (14 women and 8 men). Analysis of manifest content and underlying meanings was carried out. QSR NVivo 9 software was used to facilitate analysis and make it systematic. RESULTS: Our findings show how the differences in the way parents and children understand health and wellbeing affect the way they discuss the Internet and health. The discussion of results looks at the implications of computer literacy for public health and wellbeing, particularly with regard to health assets. CONCLUSIONS: Parents and children understand the contribution of the Internet to health and wellbeing differently. Whilst parents emphasize the risks (unsafe environment, relationships and quality of information, social networks, physical problems and addiction), the children emphasize the assets offered by the Internet.

[Who, how and what: community health and local administration]. / Quién, cómo y qué: salud comunitaria y administración local.

The thirteenth SESPAS (Spanish society of public health and health management) report is structured in three blocks Who, How and What about community health and local governance. In the who block the main agents working in community health are described: communities, health care system, and local government; and how their relations and implication in community health have evolved; which concepts are used; what is the current situation and which challenges they have. The How block contains methodological views, oriented towards implementation of community interventions, based upon participatory tools, development of networks and review of evidence and evaluations to build a National Strategy of Health Promotion of the Spanish Ministry of Health, welfare and consumers affairs including suitable deontologic principles. Finally, the what block refers to a wide range of experiences of community health at the local level as well as training in community health, urbanism, gender, neighborhoods, healthy universities. Additionally, besides regular papers, we show dialogs including debates to further develop community health. It contains 18 papers, without taking into account this introduction, authored by 40 men and 49 women.

Quién, cómo y qué: salud comunitaria y administración local / Who, how and what: community health and local administration

El decimotercer informe bienal de SESPAS se estructura en tres bloques que corresponden a quién, cómo y qué sobre la salud comunitaria y la administración local. En el bloque del quién, se describen los agentes principales que trabajan en la salud comunitaria: la comunidad, el sistema sanitario y la administración local; y cómo ha evolucionado su relación e implicación con la salud comunitaria, qué conceptos manejan, cómo se encuentran en este momento y cuáles son sus retos futuros. El bloque del cómo recoge aportaciones más metodológicas, orientadas a la implementación práctica de las intervenciones comunitarias; desde las herramientas para promover la participación, a la creación de redes de actividades, la revisión de las evidencias o la evaluación de la puesta en marcha de la Estrategia Nacional de Promoción de la Salud, del hoy Ministerio de Salud, Consumo y Bienestar Social, incluyendo los principios deontológicos que son de aplicación. Finalmente, el del qué, hace acopio de algunas experiencias sobre aspectos determinados de la salud comunitaria en el ámbito local, así como sobre la formación en salud comunitaria, el urbanismo, el género, los barrios o las universidades saludables. Además del formato habitual se incluyen 5 diálogos en los que se plantean debates para continuar desarrollando la salud comunitaria. En resumen 18 artículos, sin contar esta presentación, firmados por 49 autoras y por 40 autores

The thirteenth SESPAS (Spanish society of public health and health management) report is structured in three blocks Who, How and What about community health and local governance. In the who block the main agents working in community health are described: communities, health care system, and local government; and how their relations and implication in community health have evolved; which concepts are used; what is the current situation and which challenges they have. The How block contains methodological views, oriented towards implementation of community interventions, based upon participatory tools, development of networks and review of evidence and evaluations to build a National Strategy of Health Promotion of the Spanish Ministry of Health, welfare and consumers affairs including suitable deontologic principles. Finally, the what block refers to a wide range of experiences of community health at the local level as well as training in community health, urbanism, gender, neighborhoods, healthy universities. Additionally, besides regular papers, we show dialogs including debates to further develop community health. It contains 18 papers, without taking into account this introduction, authored by 40 men and 49 women

Activos: de los mapas al territorio. Informe SESPAS 2018 / Assets: from maps to territory. SESPAS Report 2018

En los últimos años, los mapas de activos para la salud se están convirtiendo en herramientas cada vez más presentes en el ámbito de la promoción de la salud. Se están incorporando a la práctica diaria de muchos profesionales de la salud, tanto en la atención individualizada en las consultas (mediante la prescripción social) como en grupos o en procesos de desarrollo comunitario. Es necesario reflexionar sobre cómo se están produciendo los mapas de activos, analizando de qué manera las diferentes etapas del proceso pueden intervenir en su construcción. Tanto los formatos en que se presentan los datos obtenidos mediante la identificación de activos para la salud como los propios procesos de producción de la información, procesos participativos y evaluados, son clave para que los mapas sean útiles tanto a los profesionales como a la ciudadanía y las instituciones

In recent years, health asset maps have become increasingly important tools in the field of health promotion. They are being incorporated into the daily practice of many healthcare workers, in individualized care in consultations (through social prescription), and in groups or community development processes. It is necessary to reflect on how the asset maps are being produced, analyzing how the different stages of the process can be involved in their construction. The formats in which the data is obtained through the identification of health assets are presented, as well as the processes of production of the information, participative and evaluated processes, are crucial for the maps to be useful, for professionals as well as citizens and institutions

[Assets: from maps to territory. SESPAS Report 2018]. / Activos: de los mapas al territorio. Informe SESPAS 2018.

In recent years, health asset maps have become increasingly important tools in the field of health promotion. They are being incorporated into the daily practice of many healthcare workers, in individualized care in consultations (through social prescription), and in groups or community development processes. It is necessary to reflect on how the asset maps are being produced, analyzing how the different stages of the process can be involved in their construction. The formats in which the data is obtained through the identification of health assets are presented, as well as the processes of production of the information, participative and evaluated processes, are crucial for the maps to be useful, for professionals as well as citizens and institutions.

Understanding children: a qualitative study on health assets of the Internet in Spain.

OBJECTIVES: This research was designed to explore the opinions held by primary school pupils about the Internet as a source of assets for health and well-being. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out based on 8 focus groups comprising 64 pupils from 8 primary schools in Spain. RESULTS: Our findings describe the Internet as a tool for learning, communication, fun and health care. In addition, they reveal how children understand influences on health and well-being in relation to their view of the Internet. The results are discussed in terms of the public-health implications of digital literacy, as well as its connection to well-being, especially in relation to health assets. CONCLUSIONS: The Internet is an important resource for children's health and well-being, which, through learning, communication, fun and health care, encourages them to make use of it. Digital and health literacy constitutes the foundation required for browsing the Internet in a positive way, as identified by the children interviewed in this study, and especially in relation to the health assets that the Internet can contain.