A laboratory-based evaluation of tube blocking and microbial risks associated with one blended enteral feed recipe.

BACKGROUND: Concerns associated with blended enteral feeds include the risk of blocked tubes and microbial contamination, although the available evidence is limited. The present laboratory-based investigation aimed to examine these risks in a blended feed providing a nutritionally adequate intake for a hypothetical patient. METHODS: A one-blended feed recipe was made using three different methods (professional, jug and stick blenders) and three storage procedures. Feed samples were syringed via 10-, 12- and 14-French (Fr) enteral feeding tubes and both blockages and the time taken were recorded. Feed samples were diluted, plated on agars, incubated and bacterial colony-forming units (CFU) counted. After storage at -80 °C, identification was undertaken using 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction sequencing. RESULTS: Two blockages occurred during 27 administrations of feed made using a professional blender, although they were resolved with a water flush. No blockages occurred with the 14-Fr tube and administration was quicker with wider tubes (P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference between the total bacterial CFU of feeds prepared using different methods (P = 0.771) or stored differently. The genus of bacteria identified included Enterococcus, Bacillus, lactose-fermenting Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus. Pathogens, such as Clostridium spp., Salmonella spp. and Vibrio spp., were not identified by phenotypic tests used. Sequencing identified Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Streptococcus lutetiensis and Staphylococcus epidermidis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found no risk of tube blockages when one blended feed recipe made using three methods was delivered via a 14-Fr tube. There is concern about bacterial contamination, although this was not influenced by the methods of preparation or storage used in the present study.

Neuronal hypertrophy in the neocortex of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

The underlying cause of neocortical involvement in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) remains a fundamental and unanswered question. Magnetic resonance imaging has shown a significant loss in temporal lobe volume, and it has been proposed that neocortical circuits are disturbed functionally because neurons are lost. The present study used design-based stereology to estimate the volume and cell number of Brodmann's area 38, a region commonly resected in anterior temporal lobectomy. Studies were conducted on the neocortex of patients with or without hippocampal sclerosis (HS). Results provide the surprising finding that TLE patients have significant atrophy of neocortical gray matter but no loss of neurons. Neurons are also significantly larger, dendritic trees appear sparser, and spine density is noticeably reduced in TLE specimens compared with controls. The increase in neuronal density we found in TLE patients is therefore attributable to large neurons occupying a much smaller volume than in normal brain. Neurons in the underlying white matter are also increased in size but, in contrast to other reports, are not significantly elevated in number or density. Neuronal hypertrophy affects HS and non-HS brains similarly. The reduction in neuropil and its associated elements therefore appears to be a primary feature of TLE, which is not secondary to cell loss. In both gray and white matter, neuronal hypertrophy means more perikaryal surface area is exposed for synaptic contacts and emerges as a hallmark of this disease.

Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report.

Current emphasis on early case finding, outpatient care, and on longitudinal studies of asymptomatic patients has focused attention on the community adjustment of psychiatric patients. Thus, simple and inexpensive methods such as self-report scales, which allow the routine assessment of patient adjustment, are potentially useful. The derivation and testing of such a method, the Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report, is described. This scale covers the patient's role performance, interpersonal relationships, friction, feelings and satisfaction in work, and social and leisure activities with the extended family, as a spouse, parent, and member of a family unit. Self-report results based on 76 depressed outpatients were comparable to those obtained from relatives as well as by a rater who interviewed the patient directly.

A double-blind trial of maprotiline (Ludiomil) and amitriptyline in depressed outpatients.

The results of a double-blind trial of a tetracyclic antidepressant, maprotiline (Ludiomil) and a conventional tricyclic, amitriptyline (Elavil), in 67 ambulatory depressives are reported. Hamilton's Rating Scale for Depression was the main outcome criterion. No statistically significant differences were found between the drugs in onset of action, efficacy, side effects or predictors of response. Patients on either drug showed a significant reduction in symptoms after 1 week of treatment and at the end of the trial. Both drugs were tolerated well. A review of double-blind comparisons of maprotiline and tricyclic antidepressants, spanning 13 countries, and including over 900 patients, both ambulatory and inpatient, shows essentially similar results. The main outcome criterion in all these studies was manifest psychopathology assessed on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by the treating physician. The absence of additional types of outcome criteria or assessment techniques, which may have detected differences in motor activity or drive as originally postulated, may have obscured results which were expected to be subtle.