Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
Br J Cancer ; 113(1): 20-9, 2015 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26035702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This analysis compared the quality-adjusted survival and clinical outcomes of albumin-bound paclitaxel+carboplatin (nab-PC) vs solvent-based paclitaxel+carboplatin (sb-PC) as first-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in older patients. METHODS: Using age-based subgroup data from a randomised Phase-3 clinical trial, nab-PC and sb-PC were compared with respect to overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life (QoL), safety/toxicity, and quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) with ages ⩾60 and ⩾70 years as cut points. RESULTS: Among patients aged ⩾60 years (N=546), nab-PC (N=265) significantly increased ORR and prolonged OS, despite a non-significant improvement in PFS, vs sb-PC (N=281). Nab-PC improved QoL and was associated with less neuropathy, arthralgia, and myalgia but resulted in more anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Nab-PC yielded significant Q-TWiST benefits (11.1 vs 9.8 months; 95% CI of gain: 0.2-2.6), with a relative Q-TWiST gain of 10.8% (ranging from 6.4% to 15.1% in threshold analysis). In the ⩾70 years age group, nab-PC showed similar, but non-significant, ORR, PFS, and Q-TWiST benefits and significantly improved OS and QoL. CONCLUSION: Nab-PC as first-line therapy in older patients with advanced NSCLC increased ORR, OS, and QoL and resulted in quality-adjusted survival gains compared with standard sb-PC.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Análise de Sobrevida , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Paclitaxel Ligado a Albumina , Albuminas/efeitos adversos , Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 68(7): 900-18, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24698515

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relative efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), multiple sclerosis (MS)-related pain, posttraumatic pain, central poststroke pain (CPSP) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related neuropathic pain (NeP). METHODS: This systematic review (through June 2011) identified randomised, controlled trials of treatments for these conditions. Bayesian mixed treatment comparison (MTC) methods were used to determine the relative efficacy and safety among the treatments within each pain condition. RESULTS: Fifty studies were identified: 33 PHN, 2 MS-related pain, 3 CPSP, 3 posttraumatic pain and 9 HIV-related NeP. Data from 28 PHN studies including 21 interventions and 4317 patients were included into the PHN MTC. Of treatments studied in ≥ 50 patients, opioids had the greatest mean pain reduction of -1.70 vs. placebo on an 11-point numeric rating scale. Pregabalin ≥ 300 mg/day was most effective for ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% pain reduction [relative risk (RR) vs. placebo = 2.44 and 2.13, respectively]. Data identified for MS-related pain, CPSP, posttraumatic pain and HIV-related NeP were sparse; only 7 of 17 studies had ≥ 50 patients. Adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations for most treatments were not significantly greater than placebo except in PHN, where 8 of 12 treatments had higher risks of AEs compared with placebo and tricyclic antidepressants and opioids had higher risk of discontinuation compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-recommended treatments for PHN were more effective than placebo on the pain NRS and for ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% pain reduction. Although guidelines exist for the management of less common NeP conditions, little published evidence supports them. These results highlight the need for additional evaluations and more complete reporting of outcomes to help guide physicians' treatment selections.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos e Lesões/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Neuralgia/complicações , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações
3.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 68(8): 953-8, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24667748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a serious problem leading to increased morbidity, longer hospital stay, and hence, additional costs. This study evaluated the risk of BSI and the cost of parenteral nutrition (PN) in Germany. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A retrospective observational chart review of patients hospitalized from October 2009 to April 2011 and receiving PN via ready-to-use three-chamber bag (MCB), single bottle (SB) or hospital compounded admixture (CPN) was conducted across Germany. Propensity score-adjusted models were used to evaluate the association between the type of PN, BSI (Cox Proportional Hazards) and hospitalization cost (generalized linear models) within a subgroup receiving all three macronutrients (lipids, amino acids, glucose). RESULTS: Of the 1995 patient records reviewed (MCB=816; CPN=584; SB=595), 1457 patients received all three macronutrients. After adjustment, SB was associated with an increased hazard of BSI, vs MCB without additions (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI))=2.53 (1.66-3.86)) in the total cohort. Adding supplements to MCB on the ward also increased the BSI risk in both total and subgroup analyses. In patients receiving all three macronutrients, adjusted total costs were MCB (no additions): \[euro]6,572 (95% CI: \[euro]6,896-6263); CPN: \[euro]6,869 (\[euro]7,283-6479); SB: \[euro]6,872 (\[euro]7,242-6521); MCB (ward additions): \[euro]7,402 (\[euro]7,878-6955); P<0.001; P<0.001. CONCLUSION: Use of MCB does not appear to increase treatment costs, possibly by reducing the risk of infection. This study identified several PN preparation methods associated with a significantly increased hazard for BSI; definitive CPN findings are limited by our inability to distinguish automated from manual pharmacy compounding.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Soluções de Nutrição Parenteral , Nutrição Parenteral/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Bacteriemia/economia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nutrição Parenteral/economia , Nutrição Parenteral/métodos , Soluções de Nutrição Parenteral/economia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
J Med Econ ; 14(3): 288-98, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21469915

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Zoledronic acid (ZOL) reduces the risk of skeletal related events (SREs) in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients with bone metastases. This study assessed the cost effectiveness of ZOL for SRE management in French, German, Portuguese, and Dutch HRPC patients. METHODS: This analysis was based on the results of a randomized phase III clinical trial wherein HRPC patients received up to 15 months of ZOL (n = 214) or placebo (n = 208). Clinical inputs were obtained from the trial. Costs were estimated using hospital tariffs, published, and internet sources. Quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were estimated from a separate analysis of EQ-5D scores reported in the trial. Uncertainty surrounding outcomes was addressed via univariate sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: ZOL patients experienced an estimated 0.759 fewer SREs and gained an estimated 0.03566 QALYs versus placebo patients. ZOL was associated with reduced SRE-related costs [net costs] (-€2396 [€1284] in France, -€2606 [€841] in Germany, -€3326 [€309] in Portugal and -€3617 [€87] in the Netherlands). Costs per QALY ranged from €2430 (Netherlands) to €36,007 (France). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis is subject to the limitations of most cost-effectiveness analyses: it combines data from multiple sources. Nevertheless, the results strongly suggest that ZOL is cost effective versus placebo in French, German, Portuguese, and Dutch HRPC patients.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Osso e Ossos/efeitos dos fármacos , Difosfonatos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Imidazóis/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Osso e Ossos/fisiopatologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Europa (Continente) , Hormônios/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Ácido Zoledrônico
10.
Eur J Health Econ ; 12(6): 575-88, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20809091

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of zoledronic acid (ZOL) has recently been shown to significantly reduce the risk of new skeletal-related events (SREs) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with bone metastases. The present exploratory study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ZOL in this population, adopting a French, German, and United Kingdom (UK) government payer perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cost-effectiveness model was based on a post hoc retrospective analysis of a subset of patients with RCC who were included in a larger randomized clinical trial of patients with bone metastases secondary to a variety of cancers. In the trial, patients were randomized to receive ZOL (n = 27) or placebo (n = 19) with concomitant antineoplastic therapy every 3 weeks for 9 months (core study) plus 12 months during a study extension. Since the trial did not collect costs or data on the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of the patients, these outcomes had to be assumed via modeling exercises. The costs of SREs were estimated using hospital DRG tariffs. These estimates were supplemented with literature-based costs where possible. Drug, administration, and supply costs were obtained from published and internet sources. Consistent with similar economic analyses, patients were assumed to experience quality of life decrements lasting 1 month for each SRE. Uncertainty surrounding outcomes was addressed via multivariate sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Patients receiving ZOL experienced 1.07 fewer SREs than patients on placebo. Patients on ZOL experienced a gain in discounted QALYs of approximately 0.1563 in France and Germany and 0.1575 in the UK. Discounted SRE-related costs were substantially lower among ZOL than placebo patients (-€ 4,196 in France, - € 3,880 in Germany, and -€ 3,355 in the UK). After taking into consideration the drug therapy costs, ZOL saved € 1,358, € 1,223, and € 719 in France, Germany, and the UK, respectively. In the multivariate sensitivity analyses, therapy with ZOL saved costs in 67-77% of simulations, depending on the country. The cost per QALY gained for ZOL versus placebo was below € 30,000 per QALY gained threshold in approximately 93-94% of multivariate sensitivity analyses simulations. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggests that ZOL saves costs and increases QALYs compared to placebo in French, German, and UK RCC patients with bone metastases. Additional prospective research may be needed to confirm these results in a larger sample of patients.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Osso e Ossos/efeitos dos fármacos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Difosfonatos/economia , Imidazóis/economia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Osso e Ossos/fisiopatologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental , França , Alemanha , Humanos , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Modelos Econômicos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Reino Unido , Ácido Zoledrônico
11.
Ann Oncol ; 21(7): 1529-1536, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19955334

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors are used as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (BC) and are associated with accelerated bone loss. Zoledronic acid (ZOL) prevents aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL) in postmenopausal women with BC. This analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of ZOL for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to project lifetime incidence of fractures, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and costs as a function of bone mineral density (BMD) for women with early-stage BC receiving letrozole alone or with ZOL. Two strategies of ZOL therapy were compared with no treatment: starting ZOL treatment only when BMD levels decreased ('delayed ZOL') and starting ZOL simultaneously with letrozole therapy ('upfront ZOL'). RESULTS: Delayed ZOL therapy was estimated to cost 16,069 pounds per QALY, when compared with not administering bisphosphonates for AIBL prevention. The corresponding cost per QALY gained for upfront ZOL versus no treatment was estimated at 21,973 pounds. The cost-effectiveness ratio for upfront versus delayed therapy was estimated at 24,868 pounds per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Both delayed and upfront therapy with ZOL for the prevention of AIBL and fractures in BC patients in the UK appear to result in highly acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/economia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Letrozol , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nitrilas/efeitos adversos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Terapia de Salvação , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazóis/efeitos adversos , Ácido Zoledrônico
12.
Haemophilia ; 15(2): 420-36, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19335751

RESUMO

The optimal on-demand treatment of joint bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors is a source of debate, with studies reporting various efficacy levels for different drugs and dosage regimens. To analyse, in a unified Bayesian meta-regression model, the published efficacy of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and/or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) as on-demand treatments for joint bleeds in haemophilia patients with inhibitors. A systematic search was carried out to identify studies reporting on dosage and efficacy of rFVIIa and aPCC in the treatment of joint bleeds in the target patient population. Data were abstracted and included in the model and adjusted for potential sources of heterogeneity. Pooled efficacy levels for typical rFVIIa and aPCC regimens were estimated. Seventeen studies, collectively reporting on >2000 joint bleeds, were included. Medication type combined with dosage was the only significant explanatory parameter. The model predicts that a typical regimen of 90 microg kg(-1) rFVII repeated every 3 h if needed results in cumulative joint bleed resolution of 66%, 88% and 95% after 12, 24 and 36 h, respectively. In comparison, a typical regimen of 75 IU kg(-1) aPCC repeated every 12 h if needed results in cumulative joint bleed resolution of 39%, 62% and 76%, respectively. These differences were statistically significant and were also robust in sensitivity analyses. This analysis suggests that a typical rFVIIa regimen will resolve joint bleeds more effectively than a typical aPCC regimen after 12, 24 and 36 h.


Assuntos
Inibidores dos Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/uso terapêutico , Fator VIIa/uso terapêutico , Hemofilia A/tratamento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Teorema de Bayes , Inibidores dos Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos adversos , Fator VIIa/efeitos adversos , Hemofilia A/complicações , Hemofilia B/complicações , Hemorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos
13.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 46(8): 1320-8, 2007 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17545684

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of adalimumab vs conventional therapy in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: The analysis was based on pooled data from two Phase III studies of adalimumab in active AS. Patients with an inadequate response to >/=1 NSAID received adalimumab 40 mg every other week (n = 246) or placebo (n = 151) for 24 weeks. A microsimulation model was developed with patients being treated with adalimumab according to the International ASAS Consensus Statement and BSR guidelines. The pooled adalimumab data, as well as data from the Outcome Assessment in AS International Study (OASIS) database and the literature, were used to model patients' BASDAI and BASFI scores and costs and health-related quality of life associated with various degrees of disease activity. Costs (in 2004 British pound) of AS, drug, administration, monitoring, hospitalization and AEs were calculated from the perspective of the UK NHS. Discounting was applied at 3.5% per year for costs and benefits as per the NICE reference case for economic evaluations. Uncertainty was addressed via sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of adalimumab vs conventional therapy was estimated to improve with longer time horizons (48 weeks to 5 and 30 yrs). The central estimate was that, over 30 yrs, adalimumab therapy yielded 1.03 more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient initiating therapy. Some AS treatment-related costs were estimated to be offset by adalimumab (at 10,750 pounds/patient), leaving a total incremental cost (adalimumab vs conventional therapy) at 23,857 pounds per patient. The 30-yr ICER of adalimumab vs conventional therapy was estimated at 23 pounds 097/QALY. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness of results. When indirect costs were also included (analysis from societal perspective), ICER improved to 5093 pounds/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates that adalimumab, when used according to UK treatment guidelines, is cost-effective vs conventional therapy for treating AS patients.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Espondilite Anquilosante/economia , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antirreumáticos/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Reino Unido
14.
Clin Drug Investig ; 27(6): 381-96, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17506589

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients receiving cancer treatments commonly experience haematological adverse effects (AEs) related to chemotherapy or molecularly targeted therapies, which may be associated with high healthcare costs. The objective of this review was to summarise the published literature on the economic burden of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia as AEs of cancer treatment. METHODS: A systematic search of the medical literature published between 1990 and 2006 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, related article links and supplemental searches. References selected for inclusion were prospective or retrospective studies specifically designed to examine the burden of illness, direct medical costs, indirect costs and/or cost drivers associated with neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anaemia in adult cancer patients. All costs are reported as originally published and adjusted to 2006 US dollars. RESULTS: In the US, the cost of neutropenia ranged from $US 1893 (2006 value $US 2632) per outpatient episode to $US 38,583 ($US 49,917) per febrile neutropenia hospitalisation. For countries outside the US, the cost of neutropenia appeared to be lower. The cost of thrombocytopenia ranged from $US 1035 ($US 1395) to $US 5328 ($US 7635) per cycle or episode in the US. Costs attributable to anaemia ranged from $US 18,418 ($US 22,775) to $US 69,478 ($US 93,454) per year in the US. The costs of AEs for patients with haematological malignancies appeared to be up to 2-3 times higher than those for patients with solid tumours. Economic studies of the cost of haematological AEs specific to new molecularly targeted treatments for haematological malignancy have not been published. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy-related haematological AEs result in a substantial economic burden on patients, payers, caregivers and society in general. Because of their burden, the frequency and severity of these toxicities should be one of the key factors in the selection of optimal treatments for patients with cancer, especially those with haematological malignancies. Future research is needed to assess the economic burden of AEs associated with new molecularly targeted treatments for haematological malignancies.


Assuntos
Anemia/economia , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/economia , Neutropenia/economia , Trombocitopenia/economia , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente
15.
Ann Oncol ; 17(7): 1072-82, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16670202

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are recommended to prevent skeletal related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases (BCBM). However, their clinical and economic profiles vary from one agent to the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using modeling techniques, we simulated from the perspective of the UK's National Health Service (NHS) the cost and quality adjusted survival (QALY) associated with five commonly-used bisphosphonates or no therapy in this patient population. The simulation followed patients into several health states (i.e. alive or dead, experiencing an SRE or no SRE, and receiving first or second line therapy). Drugs costs, infusion costs, SREs costs, and utility values were estimated from published sources. Utilities were applied to time with and without SREs to capture the impact on quality of life. RESULTS: Compared to no therapy, all bisphosphonates are either cost saving or highly cost-effective (with a cost per QALY < or = 6126 pounds sterlings). Within this evaluation, zoledronic acid was more effective and less expensive than all other options. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our model, the use of bisphosphonates in breast cancer patients with bone metastases should lead to improved patient outcomes and cost savings to the NHS and possibly other similar entities.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Difosfonatos/economia , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Ósseas/economia , Doenças Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Ósseas/complicações , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Expectativa de Vida , Modelos Estatísticos , Análise Multivariada , Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
16.
Transfus Med ; 15(5): 379-87, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16202052

RESUMO

The objective of this study is to estimate cost-effectiveness of pathogen inactivation for platelet transfusions in the Netherlands. We used decision tree analysis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the addition of pathogen inactivation of pooled platelets to standard procedures for platelet transfusion safety (such as, donor recruitment and screening). Data on transfusions were derived from the University Medical Centre Groningen (the Netherlands) for 1997. Characteristics of platelet recipients (patient group, age, gender and survival) and data/assumptions on viral and bacterial risks were linked to direct and indirect costs/benefits of pathogen inactivation. Post-transfusion survival was simulated with a Markov model. Standard methods for cost-effectiveness were used. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in net costs per life-year gained (LYG) and estimated in baseline- and sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity was analysed with respect to various assumptions including sepsis risk, reduction of the discard rate and discounting. Stochastic analysis to derive 90% simulation intervals (SIs) was performed on sepsis risk. Net costs per LYG for pathogen inactivation were estimated 554,000 euro in the baseline-weighted average over the three patient groups (90% SI: 354,000-1092,500 euro). Sensitivity analysis revealed that cost-effectiveness was insensitive to viral risks and indirect costing, but highly sensitive to the assumed excess transfusions required and discounting of LYG. Given relatively high net costs per LYG that are internationally accepted for blood transfusion safety interventions, our estimated cost-effectiveness figures for pathogen inactivation may reflect acceptable cost-effectiveness in this specific area. Two main assumptions of our model were that the pathogen inactivation was 100% effective in preventing transmission of the pathogens considered and was not associated with major and/or costly adverse reactions. Validation of several crucial parameters is required, in particular the Dutch risk for acquiring and dying of transfusion-related sepsis.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/economia , Transfusão de Plaquetas/economia , Viroses/economia , Inativação de Vírus , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Transfusão de Plaquetas/métodos , Viroses/prevenção & controle , Viroses/transmissão
17.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 14(1): 53-62, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15698386

RESUMO

Our goal was to identify and summarize the published literature pertaining to the incidence, prevalence, mortality, aetiology, clinical diagnosis, and management of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia represents 12% of all leukaemia cases, with a worldwide incidence projected to be 1-4.75 per 100,000 people. Italy, the United States (US), Switzerland, and Costa Rica are the countries with the highest incidence of ALL. Hereditary link, genetic defects, and possibly radiation or chemical exposures are listed amongst the most significant risk factors. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is predominantly a disease of childhood, but it affects adults as well. It accounts for 80% of all leukaemia cases in children. The incidence is slightly higher in men than in women and greater in white people than in black people. In 2003 in the US, there were an estimated 5800 deaths from ALL. Presenting signs and symptoms of ALL are fairly non-specific and include fever, anaemia, petechiae, and bone and joint pain. Staging of the disease and patient risk profile are routinely performed to define ALL subtypes and guide management. Chemotherapy, cranial radiation in patients with high-risk disease, and stem cell transplantation for selected patients are the prevalent therapies. Complete remission rates are high, especially amongst children (even 100%); however, long-term survival at 10 years (event-free survival) is in the range of 63% for children and 25-35% for adults. This implies that there is still a strong need for new therapies to maintain remission and prolong survival. Future treatment strategies may be driven by the patient's minimal residual disease status, a measure that more precisely defines remission, prognosis, responsiveness to therapy, and expected long-term survival.


Assuntos
Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiologia , Distribuição por Idade , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos
18.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 13(3): 279-87, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15196232

RESUMO

The purpose of this literature review was to identify and summarize published studies describing the epidemiology and management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia represents 22-30% of all leukaemia cases with a worldwide incidence projected to be between < 1 and 5.5 per 100,000 people. Australia, the USA, Ireland and Italy have the highest CLL incidence rates. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia presents in adults, at higher rates in males than in females and in whites than in blacks. Median age at diagnosis is 64-70 years. Five-year survival rate in the USA is 83% for those < 65 years old and 68% for those 65 + years old. Hereditary and genetic links have been noted. Persons with close relatives who have CLL have an increased risk of developing it themselves. No single environmental risk factor has been found to be predictive for CLL. Patients are usually diagnosed at routine health care visits because of elevated lymphocyte counts. The most common presenting symptom of CLL is lymphadenopathy, while difficulty exercising and fatigue are common complaints. Most patients do not receive treatment after initial diagnosis unless presenting with clear pathologic conditions. Pharmacological therapy may consist of monotherapy or combination therapy involving glucocorticoids, alkylating agents, and purine analogs. Fludarabine may be the most effective single drug treatment currently available. Combination therapy protocols have not been shown to be more effective than fludarabine alone. As no cure is yet available, a strong unmet medical need exists for innovative new therapies. Experimental treatments under development include allogeneic stem cell transplant, mini-allogeneic transplants, and monoclonal antibodies (e.g. alemtuzumab against CD52; rituximab against CD20).


Assuntos
Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/diagnóstico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida
19.
Qual Life Res ; 12(6): 675-88, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14516177

RESUMO

Not much is generally known regarding the burden imposed by bladder cancer upon patient health-related quality of life (HRQL). The role of HRQL in affecting patient preferences and utility assessment and, ultimately, the selection of therapeutic regimen, or patient satisfaction with that selection, is considered increasingly important by the medical community. Therefore, the main focus of this evaluation was to review the international medical literature to better understand the impact of bladder cancer on patient HRQL. A search was performed using electronic and manual databases for published articles on HRQL and bladder cancer for the years 1966 onward. Thirty-five references dealing with HRQL were analyzed as part of this review. Of these, 29 were published after 1989. Most studies have identified urinary and sexual HRQL domains as being of greatest concern to patients. However, little is known about the short- and long-term impacts of specific therapeutic options for either superficial bladder cancer (SBC) or invasive bladder cancer (IBC). Increased awareness and use of the HRQL instruments such as the FACT-BL as well as the EORTC-QLQ-BLS24 and the EORTC-QLQ-BLM30 (when they are validated for SBC and IBC, respectively), should increase our understanding of the impact of this disease and its management options on patient HRQL.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia , Cistectomia , Humanos , Autoeficácia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/psicologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia
20.
Qual Life Res ; 11(4): 317-27, 2002 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12086117

RESUMO

This paper is the first of its kind to study the impact of Fabry disease (FD) in affected males, and shows that FD is associated with a significant decline in several domains. Using the medical outcomes study (MOS) SF-36 and a FD-specific questionnaire, we compared the observations found among these patients with that obtained for the general US population and other chronic disease states, including Gaucher disease (GD) (another lysosomal storage disorder), end-stage renal disease, stoke and AIDS. Patients with FD have a score profile most similar to patients with AIDS. In comparison with patients with GD, Fabry patients score substantially lower across all domains. Using simple linear regression, potential predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for Fabry patients were also determined. As in the general population, stroke, cardiac problems and renal disease lead to substantial decrement in HRQOL. In addition, two disease specific symptoms (acroparesthesia and anhidrosis) and pain are also predictors of decreased quality of life. Currently, no specific therapy for FD exists. As enzyme therapy for FD becomes increasingly available, it will be interesting to evaluate the therapy's impact on the quality of life of patients.


Assuntos
Doença de Fabry/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA