Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
4.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(11): e0109321, 2021 10 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34370582

RESUMO

Susceptibility testing is an important tool in the clinical setting; its utility is based on the availability of categorical endpoints, breakpoints (BPs), or epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs). CLSI and EUCAST have developed antifungal susceptibility testing, BPs, and ECVs for some fungal species. Although the concentration gradient strip bioMérieux Etest is useful for routine testing in the clinical laboratory, ECVs are not available for all agent/species; the lack of clinical data precludes development of BPs. We reevaluated and consolidated Etest data points from three previous studies and included new data. We defined ECOFFinder Etest ECVs for three sets of species-agent combinations: fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole and 9 Candida spp.; amphotericin B and 3 nonprevalent Candida spp.; and caspofungin and 4 Aspergillus spp. The total of Etest MICs from 23 laboratories (Europe, the Americas, and South Africa) included (antifungal agent dependent): 17,242 Candida albicans, 244 C. dubliniensis, 5,129 C. glabrata species complex (SC), 275 C. guilliermondii (Meyerozyma guilliermondii), 1,133 C. krusei (Pichia kudriavzevii), 933 C. kefyr (Kluyveromyces marxianus), 519 C. lusitaniae (Clavispora lusitaniae), 2,947 C. parapsilosis SC, 2,214 C. tropicalis, 3,212 Aspergillus fumigatus, 232 A. flavus, 181 A. niger, and 267 A. terreus SC isolates. Triazole MICs for 66 confirmed non-wild-type (non-WT) Candida isolates were available (ERG11 point mutations). Distributions fulfilling CLSI ECV criteria were pooled, and ECOFFinder Etest ECVs were established for triazoles (9 Candida spp.), amphotericin B (3 less-prevalent Candida spp.), and caspofungin (4 Aspergillus spp.). Etest fluconazole ECVs could be good detectors of Candida non-WT isolates (59/61 non-WT, 4 of 6 species).


Assuntos
Anfotericina B , Candida , Anfotericina B/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Aspergillus , Caspofungina , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Kluyveromyces , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pichia , Saccharomycetales , Triazóis/farmacologia
5.
Med Mycol ; 59(2): 126-138, 2021 Feb 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32534456

RESUMO

Interlaboratory evaluations of Mucorales qPCR assays were developed to assess the reproducibility and performance of methods currently used. The participants comprised 12 laboratories from French university hospitals (nine of them participating in the Modimucor study) and 11 laboratories participating in the Fungal PCR Initiative. For panel 1, three sera were each spiked with DNA from three different species (Rhizomucor pusillus, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Rhizopus oryzae). For panel 2, six sera with three concentrations of R. pusillus and L. corymbifera (1, 10, and 100 genomes/ml) were prepared. Each panel included a blind negative-control serum. A form was distributed with each panel to collect results and required technical information, including DNA extraction method, sample volume used, DNA elution volume, qPCR method, qPCR template input volume, qPCR total reaction volume, qPCR platform, and qPCR reagents used. For panel 1, assessing 18 different protocols, qualitative results (positive or negative) were correct in 97% of cases (70/72). A very low interlaboratory variability in Cq values (SD = 1.89 cycles) were observed. For panel 2 assessing 26 different protocols, the detection rates were high (77-100%) for 5/6 of spiked serum. There was a significant association between the qPCR platform and performance. However, certain technical steps and optimal combinations of factors may also impact performance. The good reproducibility and performance demonstrated in this study support the use of Mucorales qPCR as part of the diagnostic strategy for mucormycosis.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , DNA Fúngico/genética , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/normas , Mucorales/genética , Mucormicose/sangue , Mucormicose/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/normas , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/instrumentação , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , França , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
J Mycol Med ; 30(2): 100970, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32334948

RESUMO

A survey of mycology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) was undertaken in France in 2018, to better understand the difference in practices between the participating centers and to identify the difficulties they may encounter as well as eventual gaps with published standards and guidelines. The survey captured information from 45 mycology laboratories in France on how they perform AFST (number of strains tested, preferred method, technical and quality aspects, interpretation of the MIC values, reading and interpretation difficulties). Results indicated that 86% of respondents used Etest as AFST method, with a combination of one to seven antifungal agents tested. Most of the participating laboratories used similar technical parameters to perform their AFST method and a large majority used, as recommended, internal and external quality assessments. Almost all the participating mycology laboratories (98%) reported difficulties to interpret the MIC values, especially when no clinical breakpoints are available. The survey highlighted that the current AFST practices in France need homogenization, particularly for MIC reading and interpretation.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Laboratórios , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Micologia , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , França , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Laboratórios/normas , Laboratórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/métodos , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Micologia/história , Micologia/métodos , Micologia/normas , Micologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/normas , Controle de Qualidade , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(3): 105901, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954831

RESUMO

Antifungal combination is an interesting approach for the treatment of several fungal infections but there is currently little evidence to support combined therapy in Candida auris infections. The antibacterial colistin has recently been shown to interact synergistically with antifungals against Candida spp., including azole-resistant isolates. The current study evaluated the in vitro interaction between colistin and either caspofungin or micafungin against 15 C. auris isolates by a checkerboard methodology based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) reference method. Results were analysed by two approaches: calculation of the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and response surface analysis based on the Bliss model. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range (geometric mean [Gmean]) of caspofungin and micafungin was 0.25 to 1 µg/mL (0.691 µg/mL) and 0.03 to 0.125 µg/mL (0.114 µg/mL), respectively. No activity was observed for colistin alone with MIC of >64 µg/mL for all the isolates. When colistin was combined with caspofungin, synergistic interactions were observed for all strains with FICI values of 0.08 to 0.14. In contrast, indifferent interactions were observed for the combination of colistin with micafungin with FICI values of 0.51 to 1.01. Synergy was also demonstrated using the Bliss model against all isolates for the colistin-caspofungin combination and in 60% of isolates for the colistin-micafungin combination. Antagonism was not observed for any combination.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Colistina/farmacologia , Equinocandinas/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/microbiologia , Caspofungina/farmacologia , Caspofungina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Equinocandinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Micafungina/farmacologia , Micafungina/uso terapêutico
9.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31844011

RESUMO

Reference methods used to assess the drug susceptibilities of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates consisted of EUCAST and CLSI standardized broth microdilution techniques. Considering the increasing rate and the potential impact on the clinical outcome of azole resistance in A. fumigatus, more suitable techniques for routine testing are needed. The gradient concentration strip (GCS) method has been favorably evaluated for yeast testing. The aim of this study was to compare the CGS test with EUCAST broth microdilution for amphotericin B (AMB), posaconazole (PCZ), itraconazole (ITZ), voriconazole (VRZ), and isavuconazole (ISA). A total of 121 Aspergillus section Fumigati strains were collected, including 24 A. fumigatus sensu stricto strains that were resistant to at least one azole drug. MICs were determined using GCS and EUCAST methods. Essential agreement between the 2 methods was considered when MICs fell within ±1 dilution or ±2 dilutions of the 2-fold dilution scale. Categorical agreement was defined as the percentage of strains classified in the same category (susceptible, intermediate, or resistant) with both methods. Essential agreements with ±1 dilution and ±2 dilutions were 96.7, 93.4, 90.0, 89.3, and 95% and 100, 99.2, 100, 97.5, and 100% for AMB, PCZ, ITZ, VRZ, and ISA, respectively. Categorical agreements were 94.3, 86.1, 89.3, and 88.5% for AMB, PCZ, ITZ, and VRZ, respectively. Detection of resistance was missed with the GCS for one strain (4.1%) for PCZ and for 2 strains (8.3%) for ISA. Determination of ITZ MICs using the GCS allowed the detection of 91.7% of azole-resistant strains. The GCS test appears to be a valuable method for screening azole-resistant A. fumigatus clinical isolates.


Assuntos
Anfotericina B/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Azóis/farmacologia , Aspergillus/efeitos dos fármacos , Aspergillus/genética , Aspergillus fumigatus/efeitos dos fármacos , Aspergillus fumigatus/genética , Farmacorresistência Fúngica/genética , Proteínas Fúngicas/genética , Itraconazol/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Nitrilas/farmacologia , Piridinas/farmacologia , Triazóis/farmacologia , Voriconazol/farmacologia
10.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 63(12)2019 09 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31591129

RESUMO

Candida auris is an emerging, multidrug resistant pathogen, responsible for invasive hospital-acquired infections. Flucytosine is an effective anti-Candida drug, but which cannot be used as a monotherapy because of the risk of development of resistant mutants during treatment. It is therefore noteworthy to test possible combinations with flucytosine that may have a synergistic interaction. In this study, we determined the in vitro interaction between flucytosine and amphotericin B, micafungin, or voriconazole. These combinations have been tested against 15 C. auris isolates. The MIC range (Gmean) of flucytosine, amphotericin B, micafungin and voriconazole were 0.125 to 1 µg/mL (0.42 µg/ml), 0.25 to 1 µg/ml (0.66 µg/ml), 0.125 to 0.5 µg/ml (0.3 µg/ml) and 0.03 to 4 µg/ml (1.05 µg/ml), respectively. When tested in combination, indifferent interactions were mostly observed with fractional inhibitory concentration index values from 0.5 to 1, 0.31 to 1.01 and 0.5 to 1.06 for the combination of flucytosine with amphotericin B, micafungin and voriconazole, respectively. A synergy was observed for the strain CBS 10913 from Japan. No antagonism was observed for any combination. Combination of flucytosine with amphotericin B or micafungin may be relevant for the treatment of C. auris infections.

12.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 25(12): 1546-1552, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31082487

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the Etest-based epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) for antifungal agents against the most frequent yeast and Aspergillus fumigatus species isolated in 12 French hospitals. METHODS: For each antifungal agent, the Etest MICs in yeast and A. fumigatus isolates from 12 French laboratories were retrospectively collected from 2004 to 2018. The ECVs were then calculated using the iterative statistical method with a 97.5% cut-off. RESULTS: Forty-eight Etest ECVs were determined for amphotericin B, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and itraconazole, after pooling and analysing the MICs of 9654 Candida albicans, 2939 Candida glabrata SC, 1458 Candida parapsilosis SC, 1148 Candida tropicalis, 575 Candida krusei, 518 Candida kefyr, 241 Candida lusitaniae, 131 Candida guilliermondii and 1526 Aspergillus fumigatus species complex isolates. These ECVs were 100% concordant (identical or within one two-fold dilution) with the previously reported Etest-based ECVs (when available), and they were concordant in 76.1% of cases with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute ECVs and in 81.6% of cases with the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ECVs. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these and other previous results, we recommend the determination of method-dependent ECVs. Etest ECVs should not be used instead of breakpoints, but may be useful to identify non-wild-type isolates with potential resistance to antifungal agents, and to indicate that an isolate may not respond as expected to the standard treatment.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Aspergillus fumigatus/efeitos dos fármacos , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Aspergillus fumigatus/isolamento & purificação , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Determinação de Ponto Final , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/estatística & dados numéricos , Micoses/epidemiologia , Micoses/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30323038

RESUMO

Although the Sensititre Yeast-One (SYO) and Etest methods are widely utilized, interpretive criteria are not available for triazole susceptibility testing of Candida or Aspergillus species. We collected fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole SYO and Etest MICs from 39 laboratories representing all continents for (method/agent-dependent) 11,171 Candida albicans, 215 C. dubliniensis, 4,418 C. glabrata species complex, 157 C.guilliermondii (Meyerozyma guilliermondii), 676 C. krusei (Pichia kudriavzevii), 298 C.lusitaniae (Clavispora lusitaniae), 911 C.parapsilosissensu stricto, 3,691 C.parapsilosis species complex, 36 C.metapsilosis, 110 C.orthopsilosis, 1,854 C.tropicalis, 244 Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 1,409 Aspergillus fumigatus, 389 A.flavus, 130 A.nidulans, 233 A.niger, and 302 A.terreus complex isolates. SYO/Etest MICs for 282 confirmed non-wild-type (non-WT) isolates were included: ERG11 (C. albicans), ERG11 and MRR1 (C. parapsilosis), cyp51A (A. fumigatus), and CDR2 and CDR1 overexpression (C. albicans and C. glabrata, respectively). Interlaboratory modal agreement was superior by SYO for yeast species and by the Etest for Aspergillus spp. Distributions fulfilling CLSI criteria for epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) definition were pooled, and we proposed SYO ECVs for S. cerevisiae and 9 yeast and 3 Aspergillus species and Etest ECVs for 5 yeast and 4 Aspergillus species. The posaconazole SYO ECV of 0.06 µg/ml for C. albicans and the Etest itraconazole ECV of 2 µg/ml for A. fumigatus were the best predictors of non-WT isolates. These findings support the need for method-dependent ECVs, as, overall, the SYO appears to perform better for susceptibility testing of yeast species and the Etest appears to perform better for susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp. Further evaluations should be conducted with more Candida mutants.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Aspergillus/efeitos dos fármacos , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Triazóis/farmacologia , Aspergilose/tratamento farmacológico , Aspergilose/epidemiologia , Aspergilose/microbiologia , Aspergillus/classificação , Aspergillus/isolamento & purificação , Candida/classificação , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candidíase/tratamento farmacológico , Candidíase/epidemiologia , Candidíase/microbiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Fluconazol/farmacologia , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Itraconazol/farmacologia , Voriconazol/farmacologia
14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29439956

RESUMO

Aspergillus section Terrei is a species complex currently comprised of 14 cryptic species whose prevalence in clinical samples as well as antifungal susceptibility are poorly known. The aims of this study were to investigate A. Terrei clinical isolates at the species level and to perform antifungal susceptibility analyses by reference and commercial methods. Eighty-two clinical A. Terrei isolates were collected from 8 French university hospitals. Molecular identification was performed by sequencing parts of beta-tubulin and calmodulin genes. MICs or minimum effective concentrations (MECs) were determined for 8 antifungal drugs using both EUCAST broth microdilution (BMD) methods and concentration gradient strips (CGS). Among the 79 A. Terrei isolates, A. terreus stricto sensu (n = 61), A. citrinoterreus (n = 13), A. hortai (n = 3), and A. alabamensis (n = 2) were identified. All strains had MICs of ≥1 mg/liter for amphotericin B, except for two isolates (both A. hortai) that had MICs of 0.25 mg/liter. Four A. terreus isolates were resistant to at least one azole drug, including one with pan-azole resistance, yet no mutation in the CYP51A gene was found. All strains had low MECs for the three echinocandins. The essential agreements (EAs) between BMD and CGS were >90%, except for those of amphotericin B (79.7%) and itraconazole (73.4%). Isolates belonging to the A section Terrei identified in clinical samples show wider species diversity beyond the known A. terreus sensu stricto Azole resistance inside the section Terrei is uncommon and is not related to CYP51A mutations here. Finally, CGS is an interesting alternative for routine antifungal susceptibility testing.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Aspergillus/efeitos dos fármacos , Aspergillus/genética , Anfotericina B/farmacologia , Azóis/farmacologia , Equinocandinas/farmacologia , Humanos , Itraconazol/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29437624

RESUMO

Estimating epidemiological cutoff endpoints (ECVs/ECOFFS) may be hindered by the overlap of MICs for mutant and nonmutant strains (strains harboring or not harboring mutations, respectively). Posaconazole MIC distributions for the Aspergillus fumigatus species complex were collected from 26 laboratories (in Australia, Canada, Europe, India, South and North America, and Taiwan) and published studies. Distributions that fulfilled CLSI criteria were pooled and ECVs were estimated. The sensitivity of three ECV analytical techniques (the ECOFFinder, normalized resistance interpretation [NRI], derivatization methods) to the inclusion of MICs for mutants was examined for three susceptibility testing methods (the CLSI, EUCAST, and Etest methods). The totals of posaconazole MICs for nonmutant isolates (isolates with no known cyp51A mutations) and mutant A. fumigatus isolates were as follows: by the CLSI method, 2,223 and 274, respectively; by the EUCAST method, 556 and 52, respectively; and by Etest, 1,365 and 29, respectively. MICs for 381 isolates with unknown mutational status were also evaluated with the Sensititre YeastOne system (SYO). We observed an overlap in posaconazole MICs among nonmutants and cyp51A mutants. At the commonly chosen percentage of the modeled wild-type population (97.5%), almost all ECVs remained the same when the MICs for nonmutant and mutant distributions were merged: ECOFFinder ECVs, 0.5 µg/ml for the CLSI method and 0.25 µg/ml for the EUCAST method and Etest; NRI ECVs, 0.5 µg/ml for all three methods. However, the ECOFFinder ECV for 95% of the nonmutant population by the CLSI method was 0.25 µg/ml. The tentative ECOFFinder ECV with SYO was 0.06 µg/ml (data from 3/8 laboratories). Derivatization ECVs with or without mutant inclusion were either 0.25 µg/ml (CLSI, EUCAST, Etest) or 0.06 µg/ml (SYO). It appears that ECV analytical techniques may not be vulnerable to overlap between presumptive wild-type isolates and cyp51A mutants when up to 11.6% of the estimated wild-type population includes mutants.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Aspergillus fumigatus/efeitos dos fármacos , Aspergillus fumigatus/genética , Mutação/genética , Triazóis/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Fúngica/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Voriconazol/farmacologia
16.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 24(11): 1205-1209, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29454845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Besides the potential to identify a wide variety of gastrointestinal parasites, microscopy remains the reference standard in clinical microbiology for amoeba species identification and, especially when coupled with adhesin detection, to discriminate the pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica from its sister but non-pathogenic species Entamoeba dispar/Entamoeba moshkovskii. However, this approach is time-consuming, requires a high-level of expertise that can be jeopardized considering the low prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in non-endemic countries. Here, we evaluated the CE-IVD-marked multiplex PCR (ParaGENIE G-Amoeba, Ademtech) targeting E. histolytica and E. dispar/E. moshkovskii and Giardia intestinalis. METHODS: This evaluation was performed blindly on a reference panel of 172 clinical stool samples collected prospectively from 12 laboratories and analysed using a standardized protocol relying on microscopy (and adhesin detection by ELISA for the detection of E. histolytica) including G. intestinalis (n = 37), various amoeba species (n = 55) including E. dispar (n = 15), E. histolytica (n = 5), as well as 17 other gastrointestinal parasites (n = 80), and negative samples (n = 37). RESULTS: This new multiplex PCR assay offers fast and reliable results with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of G. intestinalis and E. dispar/E. moshkovskii from stools (89.7%/96.9% and 95%/100%, respectively). Detection rate and specificity were greatly improved by the PCR assay, highlighting several samples misidentified by microscopy, including false-negative and false-positive results for both E. dispar/E. moshkovskii and E. histolytica. CONCLUSION: Given the clinical relevance of amoeba species identification, microbiologists should be aware of the limitations of using an algorithm relying on microscopy coupled with adhesin detection by ELISA.


Assuntos
Entamoeba/isolamento & purificação , Entamebíase/diagnóstico , Fezes/parasitologia , Giardia lamblia/isolamento & purificação , Giardíase/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos , Entamebíase/parasitologia , Giardíase/parasitologia , Humanos , Microscopia , Especificidade da Espécie
17.
Med Mycol ; 56(3): 315-321, 2018 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28992337

RESUMO

Mucormycosis is a life-threatening invasive fungal disease that affects a variety of patient groups. Although Mucorales are mostly opportunistic pathogens originating from soil or decaying vegetation, there are currently few data on prevalence of this group of fungi in the environment. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and diversity of species of Mucorales from soil samples collected in France. Two grams of soil were homogenized in sterile saline and plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar and RPMI agar supplemented with itraconazole or voriconazole. Both media contained chloramphenicol and gentamicin. The plates were incubated at 35 ± 2 °C and checked daily for fungal growth for a maximum of 7 d. Mucorales were subcultured for purity. Each isolate was identified phenotypically and molecular identification was performed by ITS sequencing. A total of 170 soil samples were analyzed. Forty-one isolates of Mucorales were retrieved from 38 culture-positive samples. Among the recovered isolates, 27 Rhizopus arrhizus, 11 Mucor circinelloides, one Lichtheimia corymbifera, one Rhizopus microsporus and one Cunninghamella bertholletiae were found. Positive soil samples came from cultivated fields but also from other types of soil such as flower beds. Mucorales were retrieved from samples obtained in different geographical regions of France. Voriconazole-containing medium improved the recovery of Mucorales compared with other media. The present study showed that pathogenic Mucorales are frequently recovered from soil samples in France. Species diversity should be further analyzed on a larger number of soil samples from different geographic areas in France and in other countries.


Assuntos
Mucorales/fisiologia , Microbiologia do Solo , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , DNA Espaçador Ribossômico/genética , França , Geografia , Humanos , Concentração Inibidora 50 , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mucorales/classificação , Mucorales/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucorales/isolamento & purificação , Mucormicose/microbiologia
18.
Rev Med Interne ; 38(1): 17-27, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27372516

RESUMO

Cutaneous parasitic skin diseases are frequent in human pathology. There are few reliable epidemiological data on the prevalence and/or incidence of such diseases. Skin parasites are cosmopolitan but their global distribution is heterogenous; prevalence is especially high in subtropical and tropical countries. They are mainly due to arthropods (insects and mites). Many species of parasites are involved, explaining the diversity of their clinical signs. The most common are caused by ectoparasites such as scabies or pediculosis (head lice, body lice and pubic lice). Clinical signs may be related to the penetration of the parasite under the skin, its development, the inoculation of venom or allergic symptoms. Diagnosis can be easy when clinical signs are pathognomonic (e.g. burrows in the interdigital web spaces in scabies) or sometimes more difficult. Some epidemiological characteristics (diurnal or nocturnal bite, seasonality) and specific clinical presentation (single or multiple bites, linear or grouped lesions) can be a great diagnostic help. Modern non-invasive tools (dermoscopy or confocal microscopy) will play an important role in the future but the eye and experience of the specialist (dermatologist, parasitologist, infectious disease specialist or entomologist) remains for the time the best way to guide or establish a diagnosis. For most skin parasites, therapeutic proposals are rarely based on studies of high level of evidence or randomized trials but more on expert recommendations or personal experience.


Assuntos
Dermatopatias Parasitárias/classificação , Animais , Humanos , Infestações por Piolhos/epidemiologia , Infestações por Piolhos/parasitologia , Ácaros , Prevalência , Escabiose/epidemiologia , Escabiose/parasitologia , Dermatopatias Parasitárias/epidemiologia , Dermatopatias Parasitárias/parasitologia
19.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(8): 5088-91, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27297480

RESUMO

In vitro susceptibility of 933 Candida isolates, from 16 French hospitals, to micafungin was determined using the Etest in each center. All isolates were then sent to a single center for determination of MICs by the EUCAST reference method. Overall essential agreement between the two tests was 98.5% at ±2 log2 dilutions and 90.2% at ±1 log2 dilutions. Categorical agreement was 98.2%. The Etest is a valuable alternative to EUCAST for the routine determination of micafungin MICs in medical mycology laboratories.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Equinocandinas/farmacologia , Lipopeptídeos/farmacologia , Candida/genética , Farmacorresistência Fúngica/genética , Micafungina , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
20.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 22(2): 190.e1-190.e8, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26548509

RESUMO

Microscopy is the reference standard for routine laboratory diagnosis in faecal parasitology but there is growing interest in alternative methods to overcome the limitations of microscopic examination, which is time-consuming and highly dependent on an operator's skills and expertise. Compared with microscopy, DNA detection by PCR is simple and can offer a better turnaround time. However, PCR performances remain difficult to assess as most studies have been conducted on a limited number of positive clinical samples and used in-house PCR methods. Our aim was to evaluate a new multiplex PCR assay (G-DiaParaTrio; Diagenode Diagnostics), targeting Giardia intestinalis, Cryptosporidium parvum/Cryptosporidium hominis and Entamoeba histolytica. To minimize the turnaround time, PCR was coupled with automated DNA extraction (QiaSymphony; Qiagen). The PCR assay was evaluated using a reference panel of 185 samples established by routine microscopic examination using a standardized protocol including Ziehl-Neelsen staining and adhesin detection by ELISA (E. histolytica II; TechLab). This panel, collected from 12 French parasitology laboratories, included 135 positive samples for G. intestinalis (n = 38), C. parvum/C. hominis (n = 26), E. histolytica (n = 5), 21 other gastrointestinal parasites, together with 50 negative samples. In all, the G-DiaParaTrio multiplex PCR assay identified 38 G. intestinalis, 25 C. parvum/C. hominis and five E. histolytica leading to sensitivity/specificity of 92%/100%, 96%/100% and 100%/100% for G. intestinalis, C. parvum/C. hominis and E. histolytica, respectively. This new multiplex PCR assay offers fast and reliable results, similar to microscopy-driven diagnosis for the detection of these gastrointestinal protozoa, allowing its implementation in routine clinical practice.


Assuntos
Cryptosporidium parvum/isolamento & purificação , Entamoeba histolytica/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/parasitologia , Giardia lamblia/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Multiplex/métodos , Cryptosporidium parvum/genética , Entamoeba histolytica/genética , Giardia lamblia/genética , Humanos , Enteropatias Parasitárias/diagnóstico , Enteropatias Parasitárias/parasitologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...