Launching a multidisciplinary European collaboration towards a cure for HIV: The EU2Cure Consortium.

We felt the urgency to launch the EU2Cure Consortium to support research and find a cure for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection through intensified collaboration within Europe. This consortium is open to stakeholders on cure in Europe from academia and the community to connect. The aim of this consortium is to intensify the research collaboration amongst European HIV cure groups and the community and facilitate interactions with other academic and community cure consortia, private parties, and policy makers. Our main aim is to create a European research agenda, data sharing, and development of best practice for clinical and translational science to achieve breakthroughs with clinically feasible HIV cure strategies. This consortium should also enable setting up collaborative studies accessible to a broader group of people living with HIV. Besides reservoir studies, we have identified three overlapping scientific interests in the consortium that provide a starting point for further research within a European network: developing "shock and kill" cure strategies, defining HIV cure biomarkers, and connecting cure cohorts. This strategy should aid stakeholders to sustain progress in HIV cure research regardless of coincidental global health or political crises.

Ending the epidemic: Critical role of primary HIV infection.

Early identification and immediate treatment of individuals newly infected with HIV is important for two reasons: it benefits the long-term health of the infected patient, and it reduces onward HIV transmission. Primary HIV infection (PHI) reflects the period following HIV acquisition during which viraemia bursts until the establishment of a stable plasma HIV-RNA level approximately six months post infection. During this period, patients are particularly contagious and are often unaware of the infection. As a consequence, PHI disproportionally affects onward transmission. During PHI the immune system is irreparably damaged and persistent viral reservoirs are formed. Initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) during PHI could potentially lead to a functional cure through early and prolonged viral suppression. Unfortunately, symptoms of PHI are nonspecific and the diagnosis is frequently missed. This impedes timely diagnosis and prompt initiation of ART. To increase awareness and underscore the importance of immediate ART initiation, we describe here the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and impact of treating PHI.

Primary resistance to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors in Europe.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to define the natural genotypic variation of the HIV-1 integrase gene across Europe for epidemiological surveillance of integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (InSTI) resistance. METHODS: This was a multicentre, cross-sectional study within the European SPREAD HIV resistance surveillance programme. A representative set of 300 samples was selected from 1950 naive HIV-positive subjects newly diagnosed in 2006-07. The prevalence of InSTI resistance was evaluated using quality-controlled baseline population sequencing of integrase. Signature raltegravir, elvitegravir and dolutegravir resistance mutations were defined according to the IAS-USA 2014 list. In addition, all integrase substitutions relative to HXB2 were identified, including those with a Stanford HIVdb score ≥ 10 to at least one InSTI. To rule out circulation of minority InSTI-resistant HIV, 65 samples were selected for 454 integrase sequencing. RESULTS: For the population sequencing analysis, 278 samples were retrieved and successfully analysed. No signature resistance mutations to any of the InSTIs were detected. Eleven (4%) subjects had mutations at resistance-associated positions with an HIVdb score ≥ 10. Of the 56 samples successfully analysed with 454 sequencing, no InSTI signature mutations were detected, whereas integrase substitutions with an HIVdb score ≥ 10 were found in 8 (14.3%) individuals. CONCLUSIONS: No signature InSTI-resistant variants were circulating in Europe before the introduction of InSTIs. However, polymorphisms contributing to InSTI resistance were not rare. As InSTI use becomes more widespread, continuous surveillance of primary InSTI resistance is warranted. These data will be key to modelling the kinetics of InSTI resistance transmission in Europe in the coming years.

Efficacy of tenofovir and efavirenz in combination with lamivudine or emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive patients in Europe.

BACKGROUND: The combination of tenofovir and efavirenz with either lamivudine or emtricitabine (TELE) has proved to be highly effective in clinical trials for first-line treatment of HIV-1 infection. However, limited data are available on its efficacy in routine clinical practice. METHODS: A multicentre cohort study was performed in therapy-naive patients initiating ART with TELE before July 2009. Efficacy was studied using ITT (missing or switch = failure) and on-treatment (OT) analyses. Genotypic susceptibility scores (GSSs) were determined using the Stanford HIVdb algorithm. RESULTS: Efficacy analysis of 1608 patients showed virological suppression to <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks in 91.5% (OT) and 70.6% (ITT). Almost a quarter of all patients (22.9%) had discontinued TELE at week 48, mainly due to CNS toxicity. Virological failure within 48 weeks was rarely observed (3.3%, n = 53). In multilevel, multivariate analysis, infection with subtype B (P = 0.011), baseline CD4 count <200 cells/mm³ (P < 0.001), GSS <3 (P = 0.002) and use of lamivudine (P < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of virological failure. After exclusion of patients using co-formulated compounds, virological failure was still more often observed with lamivudine. Following virological failure, three-quarters of patients switched to a PI-based regimen with GSS <3. After 1 year of second-line therapy, viral load was suppressed to <50 copies/mL in 73.5% (OT). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, treatment failure on TELE regimens is relatively frequent due to toxicity. Virological failure is rare and more often observed with lamivudine than with emtricitabine. Following virological failure on TELE, PI-based second-line therapy was often successful despite GSS <3.

Dutch guidance for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in a new therapeutic era.

BACKGROUND: A new era for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C is about to transpire. With the introduction of the first-generation protease inhibitors the efficacy of hepatitis C treatment improved significantly. Since then, the therapeutic agenda has moved further forward with the recent approval of sofosbuvir and the expected approval of agents such as simeprevir and daclatasvir. This paper, developed parallel to the approval of sofosbuvir, is to serve as a guidance for the therapeutic management of chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: We performed a formal search through PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all clinical trials that have been conducted with EMA-approved new agents in hepatitis C; for this version (April 2014) we focused on sofosbuvir. For each disease category, the evidence was reviewed and recommendations are based on GRADE. RESULTS: We identified 11 clinical trials with sofosbuvir and for each disease category recommendations for treatment are made. Not all disease categories were studied extensively and therefore in some cases we were unable to provide recommendations. CONCLUSION: The recent approval of sofosbuvir will most likely change the therapeutic landscape of chronic hepatitis C. The use of sofosbuvir-containing regimens can shorten the duration of therapy, increase efficacy and result in less side effects, compared with standard of care. The efficacy relative to standard of care needs to be weighed against the increased costs of sofosbuvir. With future approval of the other direct-acting antivirals, the outcome of hepatitis C treatment will likely improve further and this guidance will be updated.

Leflunomide as part of the treatment for multidrug-resistant cytomegalovirus disease after lung transplantation: case report and review of the literature.

Treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in transplant patients is challenging and, with antiviral resistance to first-line drugs, it remains uncertain which treatment algorithm to follow. Some data suggest that leflunomide, a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, can be used to treat resistant CMV infections. We report a 57-year-old CMV immunoglobulin-G (IgG)-seronegative woman, who received a bilateral lung transplant (LuTx) from a CMV IgG-positive donor with CMV primary disease. The CMV strain was genotypically resistant to ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. After starting leflunomide as add-on therapy to a multidrug anti-CMV regimen, viral load declined substantially in 2 months without adverse events. This experience is discussed against the background of existing literature on the use of leflunomide as an anti-CMV agent in LuTx recipients.

Deep sequencing does not reveal additional transmitted mutations in patients diagnosed with HIV-1 variants with single nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to gain more insight into the relationship between transmitted singletons found at HIV diagnosis by population sequencing and the possible presence of clinically relevant viral minorities containing additional resistance mutations. METHODS: We studied the viral quasispecies and therapy response in 10 individuals with transmitted single nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-related resistance mutations as detected by population sequencing. RESULTS: Ultra-deep pyrosequencing did not reveal additional drug-resistance mutations in nine of 10 patients. In these nine patients, no breakthrough with resistant viruses was observed despite the use of low genetic nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that viral minority variants containing additional resistance mutations may be rare in patients with transmitted NRTI singletons in the Netherlands. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings and to determine the therapeutic consequences.

HIV testing and antiretroviral treatment strategies for prevention of HIV infection: impact on antiretroviral drug resistance.

'Test and treat' is a strategy in which widespread screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is followed by immediate antiretroviral therapy for those testing positive, thereby potentially reducing infectiousness in larger cohorts of infected patients. However, there is a concern that test and treat could lead to increased the levels of transmissible drug-resistant HIV, especially if viral load and/or drug resistance is not routinely monitored. Reviews of the existing literature show that up to now, even in the absence of laboratory tests, drug resistance has not created major problems in sub-Saharan Africa. Here, we discuss the current evidence for the effectiveness of a preventive test and treat approach and the challenges and implications for daily clinical practice and public health.

Evaluation of the antiviral response to zanamivir administered intravenously for treatment of critically ill patients with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection.

A retrospective nationwide study on the use of intravenous (IV) zanamivir in patients receiving intensive care who were pretreated with oseltamivir in the Netherlands was performed. In 6 of 13 patients with a sustained reduction of the viral load, the median time to start IV zanamivir was 9 days (range, 4-11 days) compared with 14 days (range, 6-21 days) in 7 patients without viral load reduction (P = .052). Viral load response did not influence mortality. We conclude that IV zanamivir as late add-on therapy has limited effectiveness. The effect of an immediate start with IV zanamivir monotherapy or in combination with other drugs need to be evaluated.

European guidelines on the clinical management of HIV-1 tropism testing.

Viral tropism is the ability of viruses to enter and infect specific host cells and is based on the ability of viruses to bind to receptors on those cells. Testing for HIV tropism is recommended before prescribing a chemokine receptor blocker. In most European countries, HIV tropism is identified with tropism phenotype testing. New data support genotype analysis of the HIV third hypervariable loop (V3) for the identification of tropism. The European Consensus Group on clinical management of tropism testing was established to make recommendations to clinicians and clinical virologists. The panel recommends HIV-tropism testing for the following groups: drug-naive patients in whom toxic effects are anticipated or for whom few treatment options are available; patients who have poor tolerability to or toxic effects from current treatment or who have CNS pathology; and patients for whom therapy has failed and a change in treatment is considered. In general, an enhanced sensitivity Trofile assay and V3 population genotyping are the recommended methods. Genotypic methods are anticipated to be used more frequently in the clinical setting because of their greater accessibility, lower cost, and faster turnaround time than other methods. For the interpretation of V3 loop genotyping, clinically validated systems should be used when possible. Laboratories doing HIV tropism tests should have adequate quality assurance measures. Similarly, close collaboration between HIV clinicians and virologists is needed to ensure adequate diagnostic and treatment decisions.

HIV-1 drug-resistance patterns among patients on failing treatment in a large number of European countries.

BACKGROUND: Information about patterns of HIV-1 drug resistance among treatment-exposed patients is crucial for the development of novel effective drugs. Currently no system exists that monitors patterns of resistance in patients failing therapy. METHODS: The study included 1,988 HIV-1 sequences from patients experiencing therapy failure collected between 2000 and 2004 in 15 European countries. Genotypic resistance was interpreted using the ANRS algorithm. Phenotypic resistance was predicted using the Virco geno- to phenotype system. RESULTS: 80.7% of the sequences included at least one drug-resistance mutation. Mutations were found for NRTIs (73.5%), NNRTIs (48.5%), and protease inhibitors (35.8%). Ninety percent of sequences with genotypic resistance harbored M184V, M41L, K103N, D67N, and/or T215Y. Among NRTIs, resistance was most frequently predicted for lamivudine. About half of all sequences had reduced susceptibility for NNRTIs. Resistance to most boosted protease inhibitors was found in < 25%. No sequence had resistance to all currently available drugs. CONCLUSION: Levels of resistance among patients with therapy failure were high. The patterns of resistance reflect resistance to drugs available for a longer time. Fully suppressive regimens can be designed even for the most mutated HIV because boosted protease inhibitors have remained active against most circulating viruses and new drug classes have become available.

Antiviral resistance and impact on viral replication capacity: evolution of viruses under antiviral pressure occurs in three phases.

Resistance development is a major obstacle to antiviral therapy, and all active antiviral agents have shown to select for resistance mutations. Aspects of antiviral resistance development are discussed for specific compounds or drug classes in the previous chapters, while this chapter provides an overview regarding the evolution of different viruses (HIV, HBV, HCV, and Influenza) under pressure of antiviral therapy. Virus replication is an error prone process resulting in a large number of variants (quasispecies) in patients. Resistance evolution under suboptimal therapy can be schematically distinguished into three phases. (1) preexisting variants less sensitive to the respective drug are selected from the quasispecies population, (2) outgrowing variants acquire additional mutations increasing their resistance, and (3) compensatory mutations accumulate to overcome the generally reduced replicative capacity of resistant variants. Successful therapy should be aimed at suppression of all existing viral variants, thus preventing selection of minority species and their subsequent evolution. This implies that the amount of mutations required for first escape to the viral regimen (genetic barrier) should be larger than the expected number of mutations present in viruses in the quasispecies. Accordingly, combination therapy can achieve complete inhibition of replication for most HIV, HBV, and Influenza infected patients without resistance development. However, resistant viruses can become selected under circumstances of suboptimal antiviral therapy and these resistant viruses can be transmitted. Proper use of drugs and worldwide monitoring for the presence and spread of drug resistant viruses are therefore of utmost importance.

[HIV should become a notifiable disease]. / Hiv moet meldingsplichtig worden.

In recent years, it has become evident that primary HIV infections are largely responsible for new cases. In order to identify the chains of transmission involved, HIV should become a notifiable disease in the Netherlands.

A novel real-time PCR assay to determine relative replication capacity for HIV-1 protease variants and/or reverse transcriptase variants.

The emergence of drug-resistant viruses is a major issue in the treatment of HIV-1 infections. Quite often these drug-resistant viruses have a reduced replication capacity. A novel assay was developed to study the impact of mutations selected during therapy on viral replication capacity. Two HIV-1 HXB2 reference clones were constructed for this assay based on viral competition experiments, which are identical except for the presence of two silent nucleotide changes in p24 in one of the two clones. Within these two reference clones, three different contiguous deletions were constructed: (I) the C-terminus of Gag and protease, (II) the N-terminus of RT and (III) the C-terminus of Gag and protease together with the N-terminus of RT. Using these reference clones, recombinant viruses were created and viral competition experiments were performed. The proportion of each virus during the competition experiments was determined with a real-time PCR assay based on the two silent nucleotide changes in p24 in one of the two reference clones. With this novel assay it was possible to detect accurately differences in replication capacity due to mutations in the C-terminus of Gag and protease and/or the N-terminus of RT.

Increased risk of early virological failure in non-European HIV-1-infected patients in a Dutch cohort on highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare early and late responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in European and non-European HIV-1 infected patients in a Dutch cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the response to HAART of 216 previously treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients using the University Medical Centre Utrecht HIV database. African (n=51), Asian (n=7), and Central/South American (n=6) patients were classified as non-European, and others as European (n=152). Early failure was defined as a viral load that remained above 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL after 6 months of treatment with HAART. Late-phase failure was determined in patients who were successfully treated in the early phase and was defined as two consecutive viral load measurements above 400 copies/mL, a new AIDS-defining event or death. RESULTS: In the early phase, four of 152 (2.6%) European and eight of 64 (12.5%) non-European patients failed HAART. A significant increased risk of virological failure in the early phase of treatment was observed for non-Europeans as compared to Europeans (odds ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-20.2). Low serum drug levels in the absence of resistant virus were often seen at the time of early failure. No difference in late-phase failure was observed between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.6; 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.2). CONCLUSIONS: Non-European patients had a 4.6 times higher risk of virological failure than their European counterparts in the first 6 months of treatment with HAART. This failure seemed to be associated with low serum drug levels at the time of failure. However, if HAART was successful in the early phase, response rates in the late phase were similar for Europeans and non-Europeans.

[Post-exposure prophylaxis following exposure to HIV: adaptation to the situation may be indicated]. / Postexpositieprofylaxe na blootstelling aan HIV: aanpassing aan de situatie kan geïndiceerd zijn.

A woman aged 36 injured herself on a needle that had been used to take an iliac-crest biopsy from an HIV-positive patient and a man aged 34 and a woman aged 35 had sexual contact with their HIV-positive partners during which the condom tore. They were given post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) which was formulated using medication and virus resistance data from the HIV-positive individual. At 3 and 6 months the patients were all still HIV-negative. After occupational or non-occupational exposure to HIV, PEP is initiated if there is a reasonable risk of transmission of HIV. In The Netherlands a combination of 3 antiretroviral drugs is advised based on demonstrated antiviral effectiveness in the regular treatment of HIV-infections. Frequently a standard PEP-regimen is prescribed. If the source patient has a history of antiretroviral therapy, the virus might be resistant to standard PEP-regimens. In these cases the choice of drugs in the PEP-regimen can be individualised based on the antiretroviral medication history of the source patient and known resistance patterns of the source virus.

Hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: where do we stand?

Both human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV) are globally infecting millions of people. Since these viruses are both transmitted through blood-blood contact the rate of coinfection is as high as 30% and among i.v. drug users in the Western world 70%. In The Netherlands, 8% of HCV-infected patients are coinfected with HIV. After the successful introduction of antiretroviral therapy (HAART) the survival of patients with HIV has increased considerably. Coinfection leads to accelerated progression of liver cirrhosis and liver failure but conflicting evidence exists about the effect of HCV on the natural course of HIV. Four randomised controlled trials have shown that treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin leads to an overall sustained viral response (SVR) rate between 27 and 44%. Divided by genotype the SVR is between 14 and 38% in genotype 1 (and 4) while between 53 and 73% for genotype 2 and 3. These percentages are calculated based on an intention-to-treat analysis. Although lower than in HCV-monoinfected patients this is much higher than achieved with conventional interferon. However, coinfected patients with genotypes 2 and 3 also need to be treated for 48 weeks in contrast to monoinfected patients. As the number and severity of side effects is low, coinfected patients now have a substantially better option for treatment.

[Patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis-B virus (HBV): the favourable effect of lamivudine, as part of combined antiretroviral therapy, on HBV may be dependent upon the number of CD4-cells]. / Patiënten met een coïnfectie van HIV en hepatitis-B-virus (HBV): gunstig effect van lamivudine, als onderdeel van antiretrovirale combinatiebehandeling, op HBV mogelijk afhankelijk van het CD4-celaantal.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of lamivudine on HBV co-infection in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Retrospective METHOD: The HBsAg status and the use of lamivudine were determined retrospectively in a cohort of 800 HIV-infected patients under treatment at the Infectious Diseases outpatient clinic of the University Medical Centre in Utrecht, The Netherlands. In the group of HBsAg-positive patients using lamivudine 150 mg twice daily as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), the HBV-DNA was measured quantitatively in the remaining plasma. In addition, the HBsAg, HBeAg, activity of alanineaminotransferase (ALAT) and CD4-count were obtained from the patient records. RESULTS: The study identified 29 (3.6%) HIV-infected patients to be HBsAg-positive. Plasma samples of 14 of these 29 patients were positive for HBV-DNA before the start of the therapy. Ten of these 14 patients had CD4 counts of at least 200 x 10(6) cells/l, while four patients had less than 200 x 10(6) cells/l. In contrast to the group with less than 200 x 10(6) cells/l, a significant decrease in HBV-DNA load was seen after six months of therapy in the patients with at least 200 x 10(6) CD4-cells/l (t-test for repeated measurements; p = o.oo1). The difference between the two groups in the effect of lamivudine was statistically significant (p = 0.021). At final evaluation after a mean follow-up of 32 and 13 months, respectively, HBV-DNA could no longer be detected in 7 patients; ALAT normalised in 9 patients (64%). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, lamivudine was effective in the therapy of HIV-infected patients with a HBV co-infection. The decrease in the amount of circulating HBV was associated with the number of CD4 cells.