Performance of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography with computed tomography to assess inflammatory and structural sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, respectively, in axial spondyloarthritis.

PURPOSE: To assess increased sacroiliac joint (SIJ) uptake on 18F-NaF PET/CT and to compare with MRI for inflammation and with CT scan for structural damages in a population of 23 patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS: Twenty-three patients with active SpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) and/or modified NY criteria were included. All patients had a pelvic radiograph, MRI, and CT scan of the SIJ and 18F-NaF PET/CT examinations within a month, analyzed by three blinded readers. MRIs were assessed according to the ASAS criteria and SPARCC method. On CT scans, erosion and ankylosis were quantified using the same methodology. On the 18F-NaF PET, abnormal uptake was assessed using a qualitative method inspired by the ASAS criteria and two quantitative approaches (the PET-activity score according to the SPARCC method and Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax)). RESULTS: Structural sacroiliitis was observed on 7 radiographs and 10 CT scans; 10 MRIs showed inflammatory sacroiliitis, and 20 patients had a positive PET. The inter-reader reliability was good for the PET activity score and good to excellent for the SUVmax. A positive PET was not correlated with a positive MRI or with a structural sacroiliitis on CT scan. The PET-activity score and SUVmax were correlated with the SPARCC inflammation score but not with erosion or ankylosis scores on CT scan. CONCLUSION: Abnormal uptake by the SIJ on 18F-NaF PET is more frequent than inflammatory and structural sacroiliitis in a population of SpA patients. The PET activity score and SUVmax had good correlations with inflammatory sacroiliitis but not with structural lesions on CT scan.

Performance of 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography with computed tomography to assess inflammatory and structural sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging in axial spondyloarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess increased sacroiliac joint (SIJ) uptake on 18F-NaF PET/CT according to a qualitative and quantitative approach and to compare with MRI SIJ assessments for structural and inflammatory sacroiliitis in a population of 23 patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) (IDRCB: 2012-A00568-35; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 02869100). METHODS: This single-center prospective study included 23 patients with active SpA according to the ASAS and/or modified NY criteria. All patients had a pelvic AP-view radiograph, MRI of the SIJ and 18F-NaF PET/CT examinations within a month, which were analysed by three blinded readers. For MRI data, the SIJs were assessed according to the ASAS criteria and SPARCC method for scoring structural lesions (erosion, sclerosis, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis) and inflammation. On the 18F-NaF PET, the SIJs were scored according to a slice-by-slice approach. Abnormal uptake was assessed using a qualitative method inspired by the ASAS criteria and two quantitative approaches (the PET-activity score according to the SPARCC method and the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) for each SIJ). RESULTS: Structural sacroiliitis was observed on 7 radiographs and 15 MRIs. 10 MRIs showed inflammatory sacroiliitis (mean SPARCC 18.7). Twenty patients had a positive PET with a mean PET-activity score of 18.2 (±8.7). The mean SUVmax for a positive PET was 1.78 vs. 1.45 for a negative one. The inter-reader reliability was good for the PET activity score (ICC= 0.56 [IC-95: 0.32; 0.76]) and good to excellent for the SUVmax (ICC=0.70-0.90 [IC-95: 0.41; 0.96]). According to a binary approach, a positive PET was not correlated with a positive MRI for structural sacroiliitis. The PET-activity score (r=0.61, p=0.001) and SUVmax (r=0.56, p=0.004) were correlated with the SPARCC inflammation score but not with structural sacroiliitis or for SPARCC structural lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal uptake by the SIJ on 18F-NaF PET is more frequent (87.0%) than inflammatory (43.5%) and structural sacroiliitis (65.2%) on MRI in a population of SpA patients. The PET activity score and SUVmax had good correlations with inflammatory sacroiliitis but not with structural lesions on MRI.

The computed tomography adrenal wash-out analysis properly classifies cortisol secreting adrenocortical adenomas.

PURPOSE: Adrenocortical lesions are characterized through imaging, hormonal and histopathological analysis. Our aim was to compare the radiological features of adrenocortical lesions with their cortisol-secreting status and histopathological Weiss score. METHODS: Seventy five patients operated between 2004 and 2016 in the University Hospital of Nancy for either adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) or adrenocortical adenomas (ACA) were enrolled in this study. We collected cortisol parameters, Computed Tomography (CT) scans (unenhanced density, wash-out (WO) analysis) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) datas. The histopathological Weiss score ultimately differentiates ACA (score ≤ 2) from ACC (score ≥ 3). One-way ANOVA, Fisher's exact and unpaired t tests were used for statistical analysis with significancy reached at p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 23 ACC and 52 ACA with 40 patients (53%) who had an autonomous secretion of cortisol. On CT scan, ACC were larger compared to ACA (108 vs. 37 mm, p < 0.0001). A roughly similar proportion of cortisol-secreting (22/25) and non-secreting (15/19) ACA were atypical (i.e., unenhanced density value ≥ 10 Hounsfield Units [HU]), however 85% of cortisol-secreting vs. 40% of non-secreting ACA were classified as benigns by the relative WO analysis (p = 0.08). Likewise, there was a trend for a higher 18F-FDG uptake in cortisol-secreting ACA compared to non-secreting ACA (p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The relative adrenal WO analysis consolidates the benign nature of an ACA, especially in case of cortisol oversecretion, a condition known to compromise the diagnostic accuracy of the 10 HU unenhanced CT attenuation threshold.