[Adapted physical activity and metastatic cancer: What needs and expectations?] / Activité Physique Adaptée et cancer métastatique : quels besoins et quelles attentes ?

This French study aimed to evaluate oncologists' and patients' perception of physical activity, particularly adapted physical activity, in order to identify the obstacles and levers to its practice in patients with metastatic cancer. METHOD: Between October 2019 and March 2020, 60 medical oncologists and 305 patients with metastatic cancer were asked to fill in a self-completed questionnaire. RESULTS: The benefits of physical activity are recognised by most oncologists and patients. These benefits were perceived more by oncologists in prevention (78%) or in the early stage (72%) of the disease than in the metastatic stage (55%) (P=0.01). Patient's physical condition (45%) and age (37%) but also the lack of time during the consultation to explain supportive care (35%) are the main obstacles identified by the oncologist to the integration of physical activity into patient care. Furthermore, lack of knowledge of adapted programmes is the main reason given by the physicians who have never prescribed physical activity (51%). On the patient side, while 88% of them had heard of the benefits of physical activity, only 11% had received a prescription. Most oncologists and patients were very interested in receiving information on where and what types of activities to practice, as well as what to avoid. CONCLUSION: Efforts in terms of information for both oncologists and patients seem necessary to increase the level of physical activity prescription and practice for patients followed for metastatic cancer.

[Nomadism of patients treated by radiotherapy in Île-de-France: Does our health system have as much money to waste?] / Nomadisme des patients traités par radiothérapie en Île-de-France : notre système de santé a-t-il autant d'argent à gaspiller ?

PURPOSE: Human, material, and financial resources being limited, the organization of the care system must allow an efficient allocation of resources. The management of cancers leads to specific and repetitive care for which the reimbursement of transport costs represents a high cost. We carried out an analysis of the additional transport costs, linked to the care of patients in Île-de-France, in a center other than the radiotherapy center closest to their home. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the Île-de-France Regional Health Agency, we have created a model evaluating the additional cost linked to transport generated by the care of a radiotherapy patient far from his home. In order to take into account the uncertainties linked to the hypotheses made in the development of the model, we carried out deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyzes. RESULTS: In the base case, the additional annual cost related to transport was 841,176 euros in Île-de-France. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis reports a total annual additional cost of 2,817,481 euros. CONCLUSION: Our results are similar to a report from the General Inspectorate of Social Affairs published in July 2011, which then pointed to an additional cost of between 4 and 6 million euros annually. The long-term care of cancer patients from their homes contributes to a deterioration in the quality of life linked to travel times, a delay in the care of potential treatment complications, and the spread of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, and bacteria resistant to antibiotics.

Prevalence and predictive value of pre-therapeutic sarcopenia in cancer patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To assess the prevalence of sarcopenia before cancer treatment and its predictive value during the treatment. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE via PubMed for articles published from 2008 to 2016 that reported prospective observational or interventional studies of the prevalence of pre-therapeutic sarcopenia and its consequences in adults with cancer who were 18 years or older. Two independent reviewers selected articles based on titles and/or abstracts before a complete review. Sarcopenia had to be measured before cancer treatment. Methods recommended by consensuses (CT scan, MRI, dual X-ray absorptiometry or bio-impedancemetry) to assess sarcopenia were considered. Characteristics of the studies included the prevalence of pre-therapeutic sarcopenia and the prognostic value for outcomes during the cancer treatment. RESULTS: We selected 35 articles involving 6894 participants (in/out patients, clinical trials). The mean age ranged from 53 to 69.6 years. Pre-therapeutic sarcopenia was found in 38.6% of patients [95% CI 37.4-39.8]. Oesophageal and small-cell lung cancers showed the highest prevalence of pre-therapeutic sarcopenia. Pre-therapeutic sarcopenia was significantly and independently associated with post-operative complications, chemotherapy-induced toxicity and poor survival in cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-therapeutic sarcopenia is highly prevalent in cancer patients and has severe consequences for outcomes of cancer patients.

A Practical Approach to Fatigue Management in Colorectal Cancer.

Cancer-related fatigue is serious and complex, as well as one of the most common symptoms experienced by patients with colorectal cancer, with the potential to compromise quality of life, activities of daily living, and ultimately survival. There is a lack of consensus about the definition of cancer-related fatigue; however, definitions have been put forward by the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Numerous cancer- and treatment-related factors can contribute to fatigue, including disease progression, comorbidities, medical complications such as anemia, side effects of other medications, and a number of physical and psychologic factors. This underlines the importance of tackling factors that may contribute to fatigue before reducing the dose of treatment. NCCN guidelines and the EAPC have proposed approaches to managing fatigue in cancer patients; however, relatively few therapeutic agents have been demonstrated to reduce fatigue in randomized controlled trials. It is recognized that physical activity produces many beneficial physiologic modifications to markers of physical performance that can help to counteract various causes of fatigue. In appropriately managed and monitored patients with colorectal cancer, emerging evidence indicates that exercise programs may have a favorable influence on cancer-related fatigue, quality of life, and clinical outcomes, and therefore may help patients tolerate chemotherapy. This review assesses fatigue in patients with colorectal cancer and proposes updates to a treatment algorithm that may help clinicians manage this common problem.

Impact of physical activity on cancer-specific and overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer.

Background. Physical activity (PA) reduces incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). Its influence on cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) is controversial. Methods. We performed a literature-based meta-analysis (MA) of observational studies, using keywords "colorectal cancer, physical activity, and survival" in PubMed and EMBASE. No dedicated MA was found in the Cochrane Library. References were cross-checked. Pre- and postdiagnosis PA levels were assessed by MET. Usually, "high" PA was higher than 17 MET hour/week. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and CSS were calculated, with their 95% confidence interval. We used more conservative adjusted HRs, since variables of adjustment were similar between studies. When higher PA was associated with improved survival, HRs for detrimental events were set to <1. We used EasyMA software and fixed effect model whenever possible. Results. Seven studies (8056 participants) were included, representing 3762 men and 4256 women, 5210 colon and 1745 rectum cancers. Mean age was 67 years. HR CSS for postdiagnosis PA (higher PA versus lower) was 0.61 (0.44-0.86). The corresponding HR OS was 0.62 (0.54-0.71). HR CSS for prediagnosis PA was 0.75 (0.62-0.91). The corresponding HR OS was 0.74 (0.62-0.89). Conclusion. Higher PA predicted a better CSS. Sustained PA should be advised for CRC. OS also improved (reduced cardiovascular risk).

Upfront association of carboplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma.

Approximately 10% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have brain metastases at the time of diagnosis. When surgical resection is not possible, whole brain radiotherapy is the standard of care, with a cerebral response rate of approximately 30%. We report our experience with an upfront association of carboplatin and pemetrexed (areas under the curve, 5 and 500 mg/m(2), respectively), every 3 weeks, in 30 patients presenting with newly diagnosed brain metastases and NSCLC. Cerebral MRIs were performed every 6-9 weeks. The radiologic response rates were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival was also determined. Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response, and the objective cerebral response rate (complete and partial response) in the intent-to-treat population was 40% (12 of 30 patients). Event-free survival was 31 weeks, and median overall survival was 39 weeks. The upfront association of carboplatin plus pemetrexed allows simultaneous treatment of cerebral and systemic disease in patients with NSCLC with newly diagnosed brain metastases and appears to be particularly interesting in terms of radiologic response and overall survival. Further clinical studies are warranted.

[Radiation-induced nephropathy]. / Néphropathie post-radique.

BACKGROUND: The kidneys are dose-limiting organs when total body irradiation or irradiation of the digestive tract is planned. The incidence of radiation-induced toxicity is probably underestimated due to its latency and confounding factors like chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search of the literature for radiation induced renal toxicity was performed. RESULTS: Most toxicities occur around 18 months. Renal mobility is significant in terms of dosimetric consequences, in particular in the young child. In case of total body irradiation, the dose responsible for a 5% risk of toxicities is around 16 Gy in 2 Gy fractions over 2 weeks. For partial renal irradiation, the volume receiving 20 Gy should be below 32% of the total renal volume. Compensatory mechanisms remain possible in areas receiving 12 Gy or less in 1 Gy fractions. When nephrotoxic chemotherapy, these tolerance doses must be lowered. Treatment of radiation-induced nephropathy may include ACE inhibitors. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Prospective assessment of dose-volume histograms and consideration of renal mobility in treatment plans along with improving radiation techniques should help to improve treatment plans including the kidneys.

[Nonsurgical treatment of chronic radiation-induced hemorrhagic proctitis]. / Traitement non chirurgical des rectites radiques chroniques hémorragiques.

The incidence of radiation-induced chronic hemorrhagic proctitis is less than 10 to 20%. The onset of this proctitis is delayed relative to the radiation therapy and generally develops from 6 to 24 months later. There are numerous predisposing factors, the most important of which is the radiation therapy dose: risk increases exponentially above 40-45 Gy. Its pathophysiology involves progressive obliterating endarteritis and transmural interstitial fibrosis, which induce chronic ischemia that is irreversible and progressive during the years after radiation therapy. Its diagnosis depends most often on the combination of clinical history and typical endoscopic appearance (congestive mucosa and/or telangiectases). Topical administrative of sucralfate or corticosteroids as well as argon plasma coagulation, with formalin treatment if necessary, provides relief for most patients.

[Initial pretherapeutic assessment of anal epidermoid carcinoma]. / Bilan préthérapeutique initial du carcinome épidermoïde invasif de l'anus.

Anal epidermoid carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor, comprising less than 5% of all carcinomas of the colon, rectum, and anus. The primary therapy now includes radiotherapy, often in combination with chemotherapy. Radical surgery is now rarely indicated. Therapeutic indications are based on locoregional staging, the presence of visceral metastases and an evaluation of the medical history. Anorectal endosonography is helpful in evaluating locoregional extension. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography scanning and inguinal sentinel lymph node procedure should play a role in a more selective approach in patients with anal carcinoma.

Phase II study of paclitaxel combined with vinorelbine in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine are two drugs active against breast cancer. A phase II study was initiated with the aim of assessing the efficacy and feasibility of the combination. Twenty-six patients presenting with advanced breast cancer with a taxane- and vinorelbine-free line of chemotherapy were included and treated with vinorelbine (20 mg/m2 on D1, D15), followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on D1), every 3 weeks. A 48% (95% CI: 35-61) response rate was obtained in the 23 patients evaluable for response. Vinorelbine was administered on D15, as scheduled, in 72% of cycles. The main toxicity observed was grade III to IV neutropenia in 73% of patients. Febrile neutropenia was reported in three patients. Disease-free survival was 118 days, and overall median survival was 361 days. This combination of paclitaxel and vinorelbine is feasible and effective in patients with early relapse or previously treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

[The interest of radiotherapy in cancer of the rectum]. / Intérêt de la radiothérapie dans le cancer du rectum.

CONTEXT: Surgery remains the standard treatment of rectal cancer. The risk of local recurrence is still a serious problem with an incidence of between 15 and 45%. This depends on the initial TNM stage and the surgical technique. In order to optimally improve local control and survival of the patients, radiotherapy has become an unavoidable adjuvant treatment in specific situations. ISOLATED RADIOTHERAPY: For locally advanced cancers (T3 or T4), pre-surgical radiotherapy followed by curative surgery is the standard treatment because of the improvement in global survival and good local control that has recently been confirmed. With radiotherapy it is also possible to schedule conservative sphincter surgery in the case of low rectal lesions and permit surgery of initially inoperable lesions. THE CONCOMITANT ASSOCIATION OF RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY DURING THE PRE-SURGICAL PERIOD: In rare cases in which the tumour stage was underestimated in the pre-surgical controls, post-surgical concomitant radio-chemotherapy is required. In cases in which surgery was performed first line, in the presence of histological factors of poor prognosis, post-surgical radio-chemotherapy is warranted. In the United States, the reference chemotherapy used in this association is 5 FU in continuous intravenous infusion. In the rare cases of contraindication for surgery, exclusive concomitant radio-chemotherapy is an appropriate solution, even if no treatment has been validated in this indication. Palliative surgery can be proposed in supplement: usually a colostomy or, more rarely excision using the endorectal route. MEDICAL TREATMENT: Exclusive radio-chemotherapy has only demonstrated interest in the palliative treatment of inoperable loco-regional relapses that have already undergone radiation or in metastatic stages as in colon cancers. Currently post-surgical chemotherapy is recommended in stage III cancer of the rectum as in colon cancers at the same stage.