Anticipating undiagnosed asthma in symptomatic adults with normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry: a decision tool for bronchial challenge testing.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with asthma demonstrate normal spirometry and remain undiagnosed without further testing. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical predictors of asthma in symptomatic adults with normal spirometry, and to generate a tool to help clinicians decide who should undergo bronchial challenge testing (BCT). METHODS: Using random-digit dialling and population-based case-finding, we recruited adults from the community with respiratory symptoms and no previous history of diagnosed lung disease. Participants with normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry subsequently underwent BCT. Asthma was diagnosed in those with symptoms and a methacholine provocative concentration (PC20) of < 8 mg/ml. Sputum and blood eosinophils, and exhaled nitric oxide were measured. Univariate analyses identified potentially predictive variables, which were then used to construct a multivariable logistic regression model to predict asthma. Model sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 132 symptomatic individuals with normal spirometry, 34 (26%) had asthma. Of those ultimately diagnosed with asthma, 33 (97%) answered 'yes' to a question asking whether they experienced cough, chest tightness or wheezing provoked by exercise or cold air. Other univariate predictors of asthma included female sex, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage predicted, and percent positive change in FEV1 post bronchodilator. A multivariable model containing these predictive variables yielded an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91), a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 66%. The model was used to construct a nomogram to advise clinicians which patients should be prioritized for BCT. CONCLUSIONS: Four readily available patient characteristics demonstrated a high sensitivity and AUC for predicting undiagnosed asthma in symptomatic adults with normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. These characteristics can potentially help clinicians to decide which individuals with normal spirometry should be investigated with bronchial challenge testing. However, further prospective validation of our decision tool is required.

Discrepancy in the suppressive function of regulatory T cells in allergic asthmatic vs. allergic rhinitis subjects upon low-dose allergen challenges.

Background: Regulatory T cells (Tregs) contribute to the maintenance of immunological tolerance. There is evidence of impaired function of these cells in people with asthma and allergy. In this study, we evaluated and compared the function of Tregs in allergic asthmatic and allergic non-asthmatic patients, both before and after low-dose allergen challenges. Methods: Three groups of subjects were recruited for a baseline evaluation: healthy controls without allergy or asthma, allergic asthmatic subjects, and allergic non-asthmatic subjects. All of them were subjected to expiratory flow measurements, sputum induction, and blood sampling. In addition, both groups of allergic subjects underwent low-dose allergen challenges. Tregs were isolated from whole blood using CD4+CD25high and CD127low staining. The suppression function was measured by flow cytometry. The levels of IL-10, IFN-γ, IgG4, IgA, and TGF-ß were measured using ELISA, and sputum Foxp3 was evaluated using qRT-PCR. Results: The suppressive function of Tregs in healthy controls was significantly higher than in allergic asthmatic or allergic non-asthmatic subjects. Repeated exposure to low doses of allergen increased the suppressor function of Tregs in allergic non-asthmatic subjects but decreased it in allergic asthmatic subjects. Foxp3 gene expression was increased in induced sputum in allergic non-asthmatic subjects, whereas it did not change in asthmatic subjects. Serum IL-10 level was decreased in allergic asthmatic subjects after allergen challenge but not in allergic non-asthmatic subjects. IFN-γ level increased upon allergen challenge in allergic non-asthmatic subjects. IgG4 level was higher in allergic non-asthmatic subjects than in allergic asthmatic subjects. Conclusions: Low-dose allergen challenges stimulate the suppressor function of Tregs in non-asthmatic allergic subjects but not in allergic asthmatic subjects.

Anti-IL5/IL5R Treatment in COPD: Should We Target Oral Corticosteroid-Dependent Patients?

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin 5 (IL5) or its receptor (IL5R) are frequently used in severe asthma, in which they reduce exacerbations rate and oral corticosteroids (OCS) exposure. Anti-IL5/IL5Rs have been studied in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) without convincing benefits. However, these therapies have been used in clinical practice in COPD with apparently good results. Purpose: To describe the clinical characteristics and therapeutic response of COPD patients treated with anti-IL5/IL5R in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients followed at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute COPD clinic. Men or women, with an established diagnosis of COPD, and treated either with Mepolizumab or Benralizumab were included. Demographics, disease and exacerbation-related data, airway comorbidities, lung function, and inflammatory profile were extracted from patients' hospital files at baseline visit and 12 months post-treatment. Therapeutic response to biologics was assessed by measuring change in annual exacerbation rate and/or OCS daily dose. Results: Seven COPD patients treated with biologics were identified (5M:2F). All were found to be OCSdependent at baseline. Radiological evidence of emphysema was found in all patients. One case was diagnosed with asthma before age 40. Residual eosinophilic inflammation was found in 5/6 patients (blood eosinophils count 237 ± 225×106 cells/L) despite chronic OCS use. After 12 months of anti-IL5 treatment, mean OCS dose dropped from 12.0 ± 7.6 to 2.6 ± 4.3 mg/day, representing a 78% decrease. Annual exacerbations rate was reduced by 88%, from 8.2 ± 3.3 to 1.0 ± 1.2 per year. Conclusion: Chronic OCS use is a common characteristic of patients treated with anti-IL5/IL5R biological therapies in this real-world setting. In this population, it may be effective in decreasing OCS exposure and exacerbation.

Heterogeneity of asthma with nasal polyposis phenotypes: A cluster analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) affects a significant number of asthmatic patients and is notably associated with a more difficult-to-control asthma and marked inflammation. We need more studies on this specific asthma phenotype and its possible subphenotypes, in order to better individualize treatments. AIM: The aim of this study is to identify and characterize subphenotypes of asthma patients with CRSwNP using clinical, physiological and inflammatory variables. METHODS: K-means cluster analysis was performed on 17 clinical, physiological, and inflammatory variables from 1263 patients of all asthma severity and on a subpopulation of patients with asthma and CRSwNP. Study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03694847). RESULTS: On the overall population, three groups were identified. Cluster T1 (n = 708) are young, have a short asthma duration and a low prevalence of CRSwNP. Cluster T2 (n = 263) have the longest asthma duration and Cluster T3 (n = 292) are older with the shortest asthma duration. Patients in Clusters T2 and T3 have similar prevalences of CRSwNP. On the subpopulation of asthma with CRSwNP, three clusters were also identified. Cluster S1 (n = 83) have mild-to-moderate asthma with normal lung function. Clusters S2 (N = 53) and S3 (N = 42) include patients with severe asthma and decreased lung function, but those in Cluster S2 have a longer asthma duration, whereas those Cluster S3 have late-onset asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite coexistence of asthma and CRSwNP, not all patients have the same evolution of their asthma. Different phenotypes of asthma with CRSwNP can be identified and exploration of the characteristics of these subgroups could lead to a better individualized, targeted management.

Airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in subjects with respiratory symptoms and normal spirometry.

BACKGROUND: Subjects without a previous history of asthma, presenting with unexplained respiratory symptoms and normal spirometry, may exhibit airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in association with underlying eosinophilic (type 2 (T2)) inflammation, consistent with undiagnosed asthma. However, the prevalence of undiagnosed asthma in these subjects is unknown. METHODS: In this observational study, inhaled corticosteroid-naïve adults without previously diagnosed lung disease reporting current respiratory symptoms and showing normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry underwent fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F ENO) measurement, methacholine challenge testing and induced sputum analysis. AHR was defined as a provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20) <16 mg·mL-1 and T2 inflammation was defined as sputum eosinophils >2% and/or F ENO >25 ppb. RESULTS: Out of 132 subjects (mean±sd age 57.6±14.2 years, 52% female), 47 (36% (95% CI 28-44%)) showed AHR: 20/132 (15% (95% CI 9-21%)) with PC20 <4 mg·mL-1 and 27/132 (21% (95% CI 14-28%)) with PC20 4-15.9 mg·mL-1. Of 130 participants for whom sputum eosinophils, F ENO or both results were obtained, 45 (35% (95% CI 27-43%)) had T2 inflammation. 14 participants (11% (95% CI 6-16%)) had sputum eosinophils >2% and PC20 ≥16 mg·mL-1, suggesting eosinophilic bronchitis. The prevalence of T2 inflammation was significantly higher in subjects with PC20 <4 mg·mL-1 (12/20 (60%)) than in those with PC20 4-15.9 mg·mL-1 (8/27 (30%)) or ≥16 mg·mL-1 (25/85 (29%)) (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Asthma, underlying T2 airway inflammation and eosinophilic bronchitis may remain undiagnosed in a high proportion of symptomatic subjects in the community who have normal pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry.

The cumulative effect of methacholine on large and small airways when deep inspirations are avoided.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effect of serial incremental concentrations of methacholine is only slightly cumulative when assessed by spirometry. This limited cumulative effect may be attributed to the bronchodilator effect of deep inspirations that are required between concentrations to measure lung function. Using oscillometry, the response to methacholine can be measured without deep inspirations. Conveniently, oscillometry can also dissociate the contribution of large versus small airways. Herein, oscillometry was used to assess the cumulative effect of methacholine in the absence of deep inspirations on large and small airways. METHODS: Healthy and asthmatic volunteers underwent a multiple-concentration methacholine challenge on visit 1 and a single-concentration challenge on visit 2 using the highest concentration of visit 1. The maximal response was compared between visits to assess the cumulative effect of methacholine. The lung volume was also measured after the final concentration to assess hyperinflation. RESULTS: In both healthy and asthmatic subjects, increases in resistance at 19 Hz (Rrs19 ), reflecting large airway narrowing, did not differ between the multiple- and the single-concentration challenge. However, increases in resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5 ) minus Rrs19 , reflecting small airway narrowing, were 117 and 270% greater in the multiple- than the single-concentration challenge in healthy (p = 0.006) and asthmatic (p < 0.0001) subjects, respectively. Hyperinflation occurred with both challenges and was greater in the multiple- than the single-concentration challenge in both groups. CONCLUSION: Without deep inspirations, the effect of methacholine is cumulative on small airways but not on large airways. Lung hyperinflation and derecruitment may partially explain these different responses.

Increase in FeNO Levels Following IL5/IL5R-Targeting Therapies in Severe Asthma: A Case Series.

Purpose: Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin-5 (IL5) and its receptor (IL5R), used for severe asthma treatment, reduce eosinophils to almost complete depletion. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a surrogate marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is expected to decrease after their initiation. Our center noticed increased FeNO levels in a few patients in whom anti-IL5/IL5R therapy was initiated. Limited data are available on the kinetics of T2 inflammation biomarkers after initiation of a biologic in that population. This study aims to identify if a subgroup of severe asthma patients experiences increased FeNO levels after initiation of anti-IL5/IL5R therapy and to describe their clinical characteristics. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 5 patients on Benralizumab (4M:1F) and 8 on Mepolizumab (5M:3F) who showed a significant increase in FeNO (>20% AND >25 ppb) following initiation of an anti-IL5/IL5R treatment. Clinical data, expiratory flows, and inflammation were extracted from the patients' chart at initiation of treatment (T0), 3 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) post-treatment. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: In patients treated with Benralizumab, the increase in FeNO was observed between T0 and T1 (mean delta = 82 ± 72 ppb) with a subsequent decrease (N = 3). In most patients taking Mepolizumab (N = 6), the FeNO increase was observed between T1 and T2 (mean delta = 57 ± 35 ppb). Under treatment, no Benralizumab patient experienced asthma exacerbation while two on Mepolizumab did. All patients had a significant decrease in blood eosinophils. Conclusion: Although initiation of anti-IL5/IL5R may cause a transient rise in FeNO levels in a subgroup of patients, it does not appear to affect clinical outcomes. A compensatory mechanism involving other inflammatory pathways such as IL13 or IL4, both involved in FeNO production, could theoretically explain these findings. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the actual underlying mechanisms.

Comparison of circulating fibrocytes from non-asthmatic patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis between in and out of pollen season samples.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a risk factor for asthma development. In asthma, fibroblast progenitors, fibrocytes, are increased in the blood and bronchial mucosa following allergen exposure. These cells may play a role in lower airways remodeling as observed in non-asthmatic subjects with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of seasonal allergen exposure on blood circulating fibrocytes in allergic rhinitic subjects without asthma. METHODS: Non-asthmatic subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis had blood sampling at baseline and at the peak of rhinitis symptoms. Cells were stained for fibrocyte markers (CD34, CD45, CXCR4, collagen I) and analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Data from 26 subjects (11M:15F) aged 29 ± 8 years were analysed. Compared to baseline, there was a significant decrease in blood fibrocytes during the pollen season in subjects sensitized to trees [median (25-75 percentile), 9.3 (6.4-20.7)% vs 7.0 (4.2-10.1)%, P = 0.007] and a significant increase in subjects sensitized to grass [12.7 (9.9-23.1)% vs 64.0 (57.6-73.6)%, P < 0.001] and ragweed [8.0 (7.4-10.8)% vs 48.2 (43.5-52.6)%, P < 0.001]. A significant decrease in CXCR4 mean fluorescence was also observed between the two visits [1814 (1261-2235) vs 1352 (814-1796) (arbitrary units), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results contribute to document dynamic variations in blood fibrocytes' activation and migration into the airways following natural exposure to allergens. These findings may help identify one of the potential factors involved in the development of asthma in allergic rhinitic subjects.

Asthma with Irreversible Airway Obstruction in Smokers and Nonsmokers: Links between Airway Inflammation and Structural Changes.

BACKGROUND: The development of irreversible airway obstruction (IRAO) in asthma is related to lung/airway inflammatory and structural changes whose characteristics are likely influenced by exposure to tobacco smoke. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interplay between airway and lung structural changes, airway inflammation, and smoking exposure in asthmatics with IRAO. METHODS: We studied asthmatics with IRAO who were further classified according to their smoking history, those with ≥20 pack-years of tobacco exposure (asthmatics with smoking-related IRAO [AwS-IRAO]) and those with <5 pack-years of tobacco exposure (asthmatics with nonsmoking-related IRAO [AwNS-IRAO]). In addition to recording baseline clinical and lung function features, all patients had a chest computed tomography (CT) from which airway wall thickness was measured and quantitative and qualitative assessment of emphysema was performed. The airway inflammatory profile was documented from differential inflammatory cell counts on induced sputum. RESULTS: Ninety patients were recruited (57 AwS-IRAO and 33 AwNS-IRAO). There were no statistically significant differences in the extent of emphysema and gas trapping between groups on quantitative chest CT analysis, although Pi10, a marker of airway wall thickness, was significantly higher in AwS-IRAO (p = 0.0242). Visual analysis showed a higher prevalence of emphysema (p = 0.0001) and higher emphysema score (p < 0.0001) in AwS-IRAO compared to AwNS-IRAO and distribution of emphysema was different between groups. Correlations between radiological features and lung function were stronger in AwS-IRAO. In a subgroup analysis, we found a correlation between airway neutrophilia and emphysematous features in AwS-IRAO and between eosinophilia and both airway wall thickness and emphysematous changes in AwNS-IRAO. CONCLUSIONS: Although bronchial structural changes were relatively similar in smoking and nonsmoking patients with asthma and IRAO, emphysematous changes were more predominant in smokers. However, neutrophils in AwS-IRAO and eosinophils in AwNS-IRAO were associated with lung and airway structural changes.

Suboptimal treatment response to anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies in severe eosinophilic asthmatics with airway autoimmune phenomena.

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, the two anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs: mepolizumab and reslizumab) approved to treat severe eosinophilic asthma reduce exacerbations by ∼50-60%. OBJECTIVE: To observe response to anti-IL-5 mAbs in a real-life clinical setting, and to evaluate predictors of suboptimal response. METHODS: In four Canadian academic centres, predefined clinical end-points in 250 carefully characterised moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients were collected prospectively to assess response to the two anti-IL-5 mAbs. Suboptimal response was determined based on failure to reduce maintenance corticosteroid (MCS) or asthma symptoms scores (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)) or exacerbations, in addition to persistence of sputum/blood eosinophils. Worsening in suboptimal responders was assessed based on reduced lung function by 25% or increase in MCS/ACQ. A representative subset of 39 patients was evaluated for inflammatory mediators, autoantibodies and complement activation in sputum (by ELISA) and for immune-complex deposition by immunostaining formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sputum plugs. RESULTS: Suboptimal responses were observed in 42.8% (107 out of 250) patients treated with either mepolizumab or reslizumab. Daily prednisone requirement, sinus disease and late-onset asthma diagnoses were the strongest predictors of suboptimal response. Asthma worsened in 13.6% (34 out of 250) of these patients. The majority (79%) of them were prednisone-dependent. Presence of sputum anti-eosinophil peroxidase immunoglobulin (Ig)G was a predictor of suboptimal response to an anti-IL-5 mAb. An increase in sputum C3c (marker of complement activation) and deposition of C1q-bound/IL-5-bound IgG were observed in the sputa of those patients who worsened on therapy, suggesting an underlying autoimmune-mediated pathology. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients who meet currently approved indications for anti-IL5 mAbs show suboptimal response to them in real-life clinical practice, particularly if they are on high doses of prednisone. Monitoring blood eosinophil count is not helpful to identify these patients. The concern of worsening of symptoms associated with immune-complex mediated complement activation in a small proportion of these patients highlights the relevance of recognising airway autoimmune phenomena and this requires further evaluation.

Family medicine physician teachers and residents' intentions to prescribe and interpret spirometry: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Background: Spirometry is the best test to demonstrate airway obstruction, but remains underused in primary care. Objectives: We assessed, among family medicine physician teachers and residents, their intention to prescribe spirometry in patients suspected of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their intention to interpret the results. This evaluation is based on the theoretical framework proposed by Godin et al. for the study of factors influencing healthcare professionals' behavior. Methods: Participants of this descriptive cross-sectional study were recruited from eight Family medicine units (FMUs) of Laval University's network. They completed a 23-item self-administered questionnaire measuring their intention to prescribe and to interpret spirometry as well as some determinants of this intention (beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, social influence and moral norm). Answers to each of the items were scored on a Likert scale (score 1 to 7) where a higher score indicated a greater agreement with the statement. Results: Of the 284 eligible physicians, 104 were included. The mean score ± standard deviation of physicians' intention to prescribe spirometry (6.6 ± 0.7) was higher than to interpret the results (5.8 ± 1.5). Mean scores for all determinants of intention measured were also higher for prescription than for interpretation of spirometry. Conclusion: The results suggest that participants have a very strong intention to prescribe spirometry. Although the intention to interpret the results is positive, it is weaker than for the prescription of the test. Further studies will be needed to assess the barriers to spirometry interpretation.

Use of a vibrating mesh nebulizer for allergen challenge.

BACKGROUND: Allergen inhalation tests are a valuable research tool. The allergen dose producing an early asthmatic response (EAR) can be predicted from methacholine responsiveness and allergen skin test endpoint (STE). The Wright® jet nebulizer, which is both inefficient and increasingly difficult to obtain, has been used historically. We assessed the Solo® vibrating mesh nebulizer as an alternative for allergen and methacholine challenges. METHODS: Eighteen mild atopic asthmatics completed the study. Doubling concentration allergen prick skin tests were performed to determine the STE in allergen units/mL. The Wright® protocol was used to measure the methacholine provocation dose causing a 20% forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) fall (PD20) (µg) and the allergen PD20 (units). The Solo® protocol (0.5 mL nebulized to completion, tidal breathing inhalation) was used to determine both methacholine PD20 and allergen PD20. The nebulizer order was randomized and separated by ≥ 2 weeks. RESULTS: All data were log transformed. The allergen PD20, predicted from the methacholine PD20 and the STE, was within 2 doubling doses of the PD20 measured with the Wright® and 2.64 doubling doses of that measured with Solo®. The Wright® allergen PD20 correlated with the Wright® methacholine PD20 (r = 0.74) and the STE (r = 0.78) and more strongly with the product of the two (Wright® methacholine PD20 × STE, r = 0.91, p < 0.00001). The Solo® allergen PD20 showed similar relationships with the Solo® methacholine PD20 (r = 0.61), the STE (r = 0.75) and the product of the two (Solo® methacholine PD20 × STE, r = 0.83, p < 0.00002). The Wright® and the Solo® methacholine geometric mean PD20s were not significantly different (49.3 and 54.5 µg respectively, p = 0.62). The Wright® allergen PD20 was slightly but significantly lower than the Solo® allergen PD20 (geometric means 6.7 and 10.5 units respectively, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The Solo® allergen PD20 showed the same relationship with methacholine responsiveness and STE as did the Wright®. The Solo® allergen PD20 was slightly but significantly higher than the Wright® allergen PD20. The Solo® vibrating mesh nebulizer was well tolerated and is an acceptable alternative for allergen challenge.Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03491358.

Longitudinal comparison of outcomes in patients with smoking-related asthma-COPD overlap and in non-smoking asthmatics with incomplete reversibility of airway obstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to characterize the impact of the smoking status on the clinical course of asthmatics with incomplete reversibility of airway obstruction (IRAO). OBJECTIVE: To compare longitudinal health care use, symptom control, and medication needs between smoking and non-smoking asthmatics with IRAO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 12-month follow-up of a cross-sectional study comparing asthmatics with IRAO according to their tobacco exposure. One group had a tobacco exposure ≥20 pack-years and was considered to have asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) and the second with a past tobacco exposure <5 pack-years was considered as non-smokers with IRAO (NS-IRAO). Study participants were contacted by telephone every 3 months to document exacerbation events and symptom control. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients completed all follow-up telephone calls: 71 ACO and 40 NS-IRAO. The number of exacerbations per patient over the 12-month follow-up was similar in both groups. However, ACO reported worse symptom control throughout the follow-up as compared to NS-IRAO, although no significant variations within a group were observed over the study period. CONCLUSION: Although asthma control scores were poorer in ACO patients over 1 year compared to NS-IRAO, exacerbation rate was similar and low in both groups of asthmatics. These observations suggest that poorer asthma control in ACO was not driven by the number of exacerbations but may reflect the influence of chronic airway changes related to the COPD component.

Asthma-COPD Overlap Phenotypes and Smoking :Comparative features of asthma in smoking or non-smoking patients with an incomplete reversibility of airway obstruction.

The development of COPD features, such as an incomplete reversibility of airway obstruction (IRAO), in smoking or non-smoking asthmatic patients, a condition often named Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO), has been recognized for decades. However, there is a need to know more about the sub-phenotypes of this condition according to smoking. This study aimed at comparing the clinical, physiological and inflammatory features of smoking and non-smoking asthmatic patients exhibiting IRAO. In this cross-sectional study, patients with an IRAO with (ACO, ≥20 pack-years) or without (NS-IRAO, <5 pack-years) significant smoking history completed questionnaires about asthma control (ACQ, score 0-6, 6 = better score) and quality of life (AQLQ, score 1-7, 1 = better score) and performed expiratory flows, lung volume and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity measurements. Blood sampling and induced sputum were obtained for systemic and lower airway inflammation assessment. A total of 115 asthmatic patients were included (75 ACO: age 61 ± 10 years, 60% women and 40 NS-IRAO: age 64 ± 9 years, 38% women). ACO patients had worse asthma control scores (1.8 ± 0.9 vs 1.4 ± 0.9, P = 0.02) and poorer asthma quality of life (5.3 ± 1.0 vs 5.9 ± 1.0, P = 0.003). In addition, ACO had higher residual volume (145 ± 45 vs 121 ± 29% predicted, P = 0.008) and a lower carbon monoxide diffusing capacity corrected for alveolar volume (90 ± 22 vs 108 ± 20% predicted, P = 0.0008). No significant differences were observed in systemic or lower airway inflammation. In conclusion, in smokers and non-smokers, the presence of IRAO in asthmatics is associated with different phenotypes that reflect the addition of smoking-induced changes to asthma physiopathology.

Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.

BACKGROUND: The latest methacholine challenge testing (MCT) guidelines published by the European Respiratory Society recommend the characterization of nebulizers before their use in clinics and research. Such investigations are necessary for accurately determining the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) delivered by a given device. The standard English Wright (Wright) jet nebulizer recommended in the 1999 guidelines by the American Thoracic Society has become difficult to obtain and possesses some characteristics that complicate the calculation of dose delivery from this device (e.g. evaporation). Our objective was to determine if the Aerogen® Solo (Solo) vibrating mesh nebulizer provides similar methacholine challenge test results compared to the currently used Wright jet nebulizer. METHODS: Sixty mild-to-moderate asthmatics were studied across three research sites in a randomized crossover study. Both methacholine challenges were completed at least 24 hours apart within a 2-week period. Testing with the Wright device was performed as per the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol. The Solo study arm followed the same procedure except for a shorter inhalation time of 1 minute. The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) and the methacholine PD20 were calculated following each methacholine challenge. RESULTS: The geometric mean methacholine PC20 values for the Solo and the Wright differed statistically (0.65 mg/mL vs. 2.58 mg/mL, respectively, p < 0.00001) and clinically. Between-nebulizer geometric mean methacholine PD20 results are comparable by clinical standards [81.7 µg (Solo) vs. 64.7 µg (Wright)], although the slight difference in dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The comparability of PD20 values between the Solo and the Wright validates the importance of reporting airway responsiveness to methacholine in terms of dose and not concentration, as stressed in the latest testing guidelines. This finding along with several benefits associated with the Solo make it a promising nebulizer for performing MCT.

Comparative features of Asthma with frequent or infrequent exacerbations: A longitudinal study of retrospective and prospective events.

BACKGROUND: A "frequent exacerbator phenotype" has been described, mostly in the population of patients with severe asthma. Further data are needed on such exacerbation-prone patients in milder asthma. AIM: To compare the characteristics of frequent and nonfrequent exacerbators in asthma of different severities and to assess the stability of the exacerbator status. METHODS: This was an observational study comparing baseline data from frequent (≥2 exacerbations in the past year) and nonfrequent (<2 exacerbations in the past year) exacerbators. Patients were also followed up for one year. Information regarding clinical, physiologic, and inflammatory characteristics was collected at baseline and one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-seven frequent and 53 nonfrequent exacerbators were recruited. No specific clinical, physiologic, or inflammatory characteristic was observed in the frequent as compared to the nonfrequent exacerbators at baseline. Fifty-eight percent of patients reporting frequent exacerbations at baseline remained in this group after one year of follow-up. Forty-two and 62% of patients with, respectively, mild-to-moderate asthma and severe asthma had frequent exacerbations. In a post hoc analysis according to asthma severity, frequent exacerbators with severe asthma had a higher body mass index and poorer asthma control, although they reported higher adherence to medication, in comparison to frequent exacerbators with mild-to-moderate asthma. No specific characteristics could discriminate between frequent and nonfrequent exacerbators of the same asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent exacerbators with severe asthma present some specific characteristics not observed in frequent exacerbators with mild-to-moderate disease. However, the latter group should be identified to reassess treatment needs and potential contributing factors.

Comparative Clinical, Physiological, and Inflammatory Characteristics of Elderly Subjects With or Without Asthma and Young Subjects With Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma seems to present in the elderly as a specific phenotype that remains to be further described. In this prospective observational study, we aimed to assess the multidimensional aspects of asthma in the elderly. METHODS: In young (18 to 35 years old) subjects with mild to moderate asthma and elderly subjects (aged ≥60 years) either with or without mild to moderate asthma, we compared asthma control, health care and medication use, lung function, markers of airway and systemic inflammation, and adherence to therapy. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were recruited in each group. Elderly people with asthma showed more marked airway obstruction compared with young people with asthma and elderly people without asthma. They also had poorer asthma control, mainly associated with a lower FEV1, compared with young people with asthma, although airway responsiveness, health care use, prescribed doses of inhaled corticosteroids, and adherence to treatment were similar in both groups. Elderly subjects had an increase in some markers of systemic inflammation and bronchial epithelial dysfunction compared with young people with asthma. Blood eosinophils were higher in both asthma groups, particularly in elderly people with asthma. Sputum neutrophils were increased in both groups of elderly subjects and sputum eosinophils were increased in elderly people with asthma compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma in the elderly presents as a specific phenotype associated with increased airway obstruction and mixed airway inflammation in addition to signs of systemic inflammation.

Comparative prevalence of co-morbidities in smoking and non-smoking asthma patients with incomplete reversibility of airway obstruction, non-smoking asthma patients with complete reversibility of airway obstruction and COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: Asthma with incomplete reversibility of airway obstruction (IRAO) may often be associated to smoking-induced changes. Nevertheless, a high proportion of patients showing IRAO have never smoked. These patients with IRAO often share features of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although IRAO is still a poorly defined condition, it has been associated with a higher morbidity and mortality than asthma with complete reversibility of airway obstruction (CRAO) or even COPD alone. A high prevalence of comorbidities could contribute to the reported poorer clinical outcome in IRAO, in comparison to CRAO or COPD alone. AIM: To determine the prevalence of past and current comorbidities in IRAO patients compared to patients with CRAO or COPD. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Demographic data, clinical characteristics and 36 predetermined comorbidities documented from self-report and chart review, were recorded from smoking-associated IRAO (S-IRAO), non-smoking IRAO (NS-IRAO), CRAO and COPD patients. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients were included in the final analysis (111F/88M, mean (±SD) age of 63 ± 10 years). The CRAO group had more comorbidities than the three other groups, but this difference was significant only with the NS-IRAO group (P = 0.04). For most comorbidities, the prevalence of comorbidities in both IRAO sub-groups was intermediate between CRAO and COPD, with significant differences between S-IRAO and NS-IRAO only for hypertension (P = 0.03), nasal polyps (P = 0.002) and pneumonia (P = 0.04). Typical asthma-associated comorbidities tended to be more prevalent in NS-IRAO patients and COPD-associated comorbidities in S-IRAO patients. CONCLUSION: In this study, the prevalence of comorbidities was not superior in patients with IRAO, compared to those with CRAO or COPD alone. The prevalence of comorbidities in the two main types of IRAO patients reflects exposure to cigarette smoke and asthma-related mechanisms.

Acute effects of nicotine-free and flavour-free electronic cigarette use on lung functions in healthy and asthmatic individuals.

We designed a crossover and placebo-controlled trial to investigate the impact of a 1-h acute vaping session of nicotine-free and flavour-free e-liquid on the pulmonary functions and respiratory mechanics of healthy and asthmatic individuals. This study shows that a 1-h vaping session of a high-grade and contaminant-free mixture of propylene glycol and glycerol using a commercially available electronic cigarette performed in a controlled environment does not significantly impact pulmonary functions, respiratory mechanics or symptoms in healthy or asthmatic subjects.