[Eosinopenia in 2018]. / L'éosinopénie en 2018.

Since 1893, eosinopenia is a biological test to help a diagnosis of bacterial infection. Several publications have confirmed this hypothesis, particularly in the intensive care, pneumology and pediatric units. The value of this marker has been identified in vascular cerebral diseases and coronary bypass. Its contribution seems as relevant as procalcitonin, without extra cost. The diagnostic performance of this test was reinforced by a composite score (CIBLE score) that may improve its value in daily routine. Finally, monitoring eosinopenia appears to be a reliable mortality marker.

[A predictive bacterial infection score according to eosinophil level: An observational study]. / Proposition d'un score prédictif d'infection bactérienne selon le taux d'éosinophiles : étude observationnelle.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that eosinopenia less than 0.04g/L is a marker of bacterial infection in the presence of unexplained inflammatory syndrome. The aim of our study was to test this hypothesis and to propose a predictive score for bacterial infection (score CIBLE, C reactive protein, bacterial infections, levels of leucocytes and eosinophils). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-center observational study of patients admitted to an internal medicine department in the year 2015 and presenting with an inflammatory biological syndrome. Patients were divided into 2 groups: bacterial infections (group 1) and nonbacterial inflammatory diseases (group 2). RESULTS: One hundred and ninety patients were included: 92 men (48.4 %) and 98 women (51.6 %). Mean age was 73.5±18.2 years [19-104]. Group 1 consisted of 124 patients (65.2 %) and group 2 of 66 patients (34.8 %). ROC analysis confirmed a cut-off level for eosinophils count at 0.04g/L as discriminant to predict bacterial infection. In a multivariate analysis, the eosinophil/neutrophil ratio, a history of COPD, the C reactive protein concentration, patient age and initial temperature were the most significant variables. They were used to build the CIBLE score. For a score higher than or equal to 87, the probability of a bacterial infection is at least 70 %. CONCLUSION: The CIBLE score appears to be a relevant and inexpensive tool to establish a probability for bacterial infection.