Immunogenicity of avelumab in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma or advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Like other monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be immunogenic in some patients, potentially affecting pharmacokinetics (PKs) and clinical outcomes. In post hoc analyses, we characterized antidrug antibody (ADA) development with avelumab monotherapy in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (first-line [1L; N = 116] and second-line or later [≥2L; N = 88] cohorts) or with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 (1L maintenance [N = 350]) and JAVELIN Solid Tumor (≥2L [N = 249]) trials. Treatment-emergent ADAs developed in a numerically higher proportion of patients with aUC (1L maintenance, 19.1%; ≥2L, 18.1%) versus mMCC (1L, 8.2%; ≥2L, 8.9%); incidences within tumor types were similar by line of therapy. In PK analyses, numerically lower avelumab trough concentration and higher baseline clearance were observed in treatment-emergent ADA+ versus ADA- subgroups; however, differences were not clinically relevant. Numerical differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, or objective response rate by ADA status were observed; however, no clinically meaningful trends were identified. Proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; any grade or grade 3/4), serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, or infusion-related reactions were similar, with overlapping 80% confidence intervals between ADA subgroups. Efficacy and safety observations were similar in subgroups defined by early development of ADA+ status during treatment. In conclusion, no meaningful differences in PKs, efficacy, and safety were observed between subgroups of avelumab-treated patients with different ADA status. Overall, these data suggest that ADAs are not relevant for treatment decisions with avelumab.

12th GCC Closed Forum: critical reagents; oligonucleotides; CoA; method transfer; HRMS; flow cytometry; regulatory findings; stability and immunogenicity.

The 12th GCC Closed Forum was held in Philadelphia, PA, USA, on 9 April 2018. Representatives from international bioanalytical Contract Research Organizations were in attendance in order to discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues discussed at the meeting included: critical reagents; oligonucleotides; certificates of analysis; method transfer; high resolution mass spectrometry; flow cytometry; recent regulatory findings and case studies involving stability and nonclinical immunogenicity. Conclusions and consensus from discussions of these topics are included in this article.

Recommendations for classification of commercial LBA kits for biomarkers in drug development from the GCC for bioanalysis.

Over the last decade, the use of biomarker data has become integral to drug development. Biomarkers are not only utilized for internal decision-making by sponsors; they are increasingly utilized to make critical decisions for drug safety and efficacy. As the regulatory agencies are routinely making decisions based on biomarker data, there has been significant scrutiny on the validation of biomarker methods. Contract research organizations regularly use commercially available immunoassay kits to validate biomarker methods. However, adaptation of such kits in a regulated environment presents significant challenges and was one of the key topics discussed during the 12th Global Contract Research Organization Council for Bioanalysis (GCC) meeting. This White Paper reports the GCC members' opinion on the challenges facing the industry and the GCC recommendations on the classification of commercial kits that can be a win-win for commercial kit vendors and end users.

11th GCC Closed Forum: cumulative stability; matrix stability; immunogenicity assays; laboratory manuals; biosimilars; chiral methods; hybrid LBA/LCMS assays; fit-for-purpose validation; China Food and Drug Administration bioanalytical method validation.

The 11th Global CRO Council Closed Forum was held in Universal City, CA, USA on 3 April 2017. Representatives from international CRO members offering bioanalytical services were in attendance in order to discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The second CRO-Pharma Scientific Interchange Meeting was held on 7 April 2017, which included Pharma representatives' sharing perspectives on the topics discussed earlier in the week with the CRO members. The issues discussed at the meetings included cumulative stability evaluations, matrix stability evaluations, the 2016 US FDA Immunogenicity Guidance and recent and unexpected FDA Form 483s on immunogenicity assays, the bioanalytical laboratory's role in writing PK sample collection instructions, biosimilars, CRO perspectives on the use of chiral versus achiral methods, hybrid LBA/LCMS assays, applications of fit-for-purpose validation and, at the Global CRO Council Closed Forum only, the status and trend of current regulated bioanalytical practice in China under CFDA's new BMV policy. Conclusions from discussions of these topics at both meetings are included in this report.

The 10th GCC Closed Forum: rejected data, GCP in bioanalysis, extract stability, BAV, processed batch acceptance, matrix stability, critical reagents, ELN and data integrity and counteracting fraud.

The 10th Global CRO Council (GCC) Closed Forum was held in Orlando, FL, USA on 18 April 2016. In attendance were decision makers from international CRO member companies offering bioanalytical services. The objective of this meeting was for GCC members to meet and discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues discussed at this closed forum included reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, biomarker assay validation, processed batch acceptance criteria, electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity, Health Canada's Notice regarding replicates in matrix stability evaluations, critical reagents and regulatory approaches to counteract fraud. In order to obtain the pharma perspectives on some of these topics, the first joint CRO-Pharma Scientific Interchange Meeting was held on 12 November 2016, in Denver, Colorado, USA. The five topics discussed at this Interchange meeting were reporting data from failed method validation runs, GCP for clinical sample bioanalysis, extracted sample stability, processed batch acceptance criteria and electronic laboratory notebooks and data integrity. The conclusions from the discussions of these topics at both meetings are included in this report.

9th GCC closed forum: CAPA in regulated bioanalysis; method robustness, biosimilars, preclinical method validation, endogenous biomarkers, whole blood stability, regulatory audit experiences and electronic laboratory notebooks.

The 9th GCCClosed Forum was held just prior to the 2015 Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) in Miami, FL, USA on 13 April 2015. In attendance were 58 senior-level participants, from eight countries, representing 38 CRO companies offering bioanalytical services. The objective of this meeting was for CRO bioanalytical representatives to meet and discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The issues selected at this year's closed forum include CAPA, biosimilars, preclinical method validation, endogenous biomarkers, whole blood stability, and ELNs. A summary of the industry's best practices and the conclusions from the discussion of these topics is included in this meeting report.

Recombinant protective antigen anthrax vaccine improves survival when administered as a postexposure prophylaxis countermeasure with antibiotic in the New Zealand white rabbit model of inhalation anthrax.

Inhalation anthrax is a potentially lethal form of disease resulting from exposure to aerosolized Bacillus anthracis spores. Over the last decade, incidents spanning from the deliberate mailing of B. anthracis spores to incidental exposures in users of illegal drugs have highlighted the importance of developing new medical countermeasures to protect people who have been exposed to "anthrax spores" and are at risk of developing disease. The New Zealand White rabbit (NZWR) is a well-characterized model that has a pathogenesis and clinical presentation similar to those seen in humans. This article reports how the NZWR model was adapted to evaluate postexposure prophylaxis using a recombinant protective antigen (rPA) vaccine in combination with an oral antibiotic, levofloxacin. NZWRs were exposed to multiples of the 50% lethal dose (LD(50)) of B. anthracis spores and then vaccinated immediately (day 0) and again on day 7 postexposure. Levofloxacin was administered daily beginning at 6 to 12 h postexposure for 7 treatments. Rabbits were evaluated for clinical signs of disease, fever, bacteremia, immune response, and survival. A robust immune response (IgG anti-rPA and toxin-neutralizing antibodies) was observed in all vaccinated groups on days 10 to 12. Levofloxacin plus either 30 or 100 µg rPA vaccine resulted in a 100% survival rate (18 of 18 per group), and a vaccine dose as low as 10 µg rPA resulted in an 89% survival rate (16 of 18) when used in combination with levofloxacin. In NZWRs that received antibiotic alone, the survival rate was 56% (10 of 18). There was no adverse effect on the development of a specific IgG response to rPA in unchallenged NZWRs that received the combination treatment of vaccine plus antibiotic. This study demonstrated that an accelerated two-dose regimen of rPA vaccine coadministered on days 0 and 7 with 7 days of levofloxacin therapy results in a significantly greater survival rate than with antibiotic treatment alone. Combination of vaccine administration and antibiotic treatment may be an effective strategy for treating a population exposed to aerosolized B. anthracis spores.

A novel method for quantitative measurement of a biomarker in the presence of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody directed against the biomarker.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) have become important tools in the treatment of numerous diseases. Many of these MoAb are present in the blood at very high levels due to high dosing and long half-lives. Quantification of biomarkers bound by these therapeutic MoAb can be an important factor in determining efficacy and dosing requirements. However, quantitation of these biomarkers with reasonable accuracy can be very difficult to accomplish due to concomitant binding of the therapeutic MoAb. We describe here a novel method for quantifying total (free plus bound) biomarker concentration in the presence of high levels of therapeutic MoAb using a single non-competing MoAb in a capture/elution format. This assay has the capability to accurately detect and quantitate circulating ng/ml biomarker levels in the presence of 200 microg/ml or more of therapeutic MoAb.

An Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) assay for detection of anti-drug antibody to monoclonal antibody therapeutics in the presence of high levels of drug.

Monoclonal antibody therapeutics typically have relatively long half-lives and can be dosed at high levels. Although formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is relatively rare, detection of these antibodies can be very difficult in the presence of high circulating levels of drug. Typically these ADA are detected by bridging ELISAs which can be very sensitive to even low levels of drug. We describe an ELISA method based on affinity capture of ADA on solid-phase drug followed by removal of excess free drug, release and transfer of bound ADA and subsequent detection using biotinylated drug. The assay is both sensitive and highly tolerant to free drug with detection of 500 ng/ml of ADA readily achieved in the presence of 500 mug/ml of drug.

Differential reactivity of anti-primate and anti-human secondary antibodies against human and monkey immunoglobulins: implications for determining the sensitivity of immunogenicity assays.

Development of immunogenicity assays for assessment of human antibodies to therapeutic proteins requires a quantitative determination of assay sensitivity. In the absence of true human positive controls, this is usually accomplished by utilizing affinity-purified antibodies from non-human primates or monoclonal antibodies. In the former case, it is generally considered that non-human primate antibodies will be recognized equally to human antibodies by secondary anti-human immunoglobulin reagents used in immunogenicity assays. We present results here demonstrating that this is not the case. In reality, anti-human immunoglobulin secondary antibodies do not recognize primate immunoglobulins as well as human immunoglobulins. As a result, the use of affinity purified primate antibodies to determine the sensitivity of an immunogenicity assay will likely result in the true sensitivity of the assay being underestimated.

Effect of double antigen bridging immunoassay format on antigen coating concentration dependence and implications for designing immunogenicity assays for monoclonal antibodies.

The double antigen bridging immunoassay has been used extensively for detection of immunogenicity responses to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. We have analyzed parameters affecting performance of this type of immunoassay including microtiter plate antigen coating concentration, enzyme-labeled antigen conjugate dilution and assay format (one-step versus two-step). We present results demonstrating that the format of the assay has a significant impact on the optimal parameters to maximize assay performance. A one-step assay format achieves maximal sensitivity across a broad range of coating concentrations and at a lower concentration of conjugate than that in a two-step format. In contrast, a two-step format requires very low coating concentrations and higher conjugate concentrations to achieve maximal sensitivity and suffers from significantly reduced sensitivity at higher coating concentrations. Together, these findings indicate that a one-step assay format can greatly reduce the effect of coating concentration variation on assay performance.