Hypofractionated postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for large resected brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present retrospective study was to report outcomes after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for resected brain metastases (BM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed results of patients with resected BM treated with postoperative HSRT (3×7.7Gy to the prescription isodose 70%) between May 2013 and June 2020. Local control (LC), distant brain control (DBC), overall survival (OS), leptomeningeal disease relapse (LMDR), and radiation necrosis (RN) occurrence were reported. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with 23 brain cavities were included. Karnofsky Performance status (KPS) was≥70 in 77.3%. Median preoperative diameter was 37mm [21.0-75.0] and median planning target volume (PTV) was 23 cm3 [9.9-61.6]. Median time from surgery to SRT was 69 days [7-101] and 48% of patients had a local relapse on pre-SRT imaging. Median follow-up was 17.5 months [1.6-95.9]. One and two-year LC rates were 60.9 and 52.2% respectively. One and 2-year DBC rates were 45.5 and 40.9%. Median OS was 16.5 months. Four patients (18.2%) presented LMDR during follow-up. RN occurred in 6 patients (27.2%). Three factors were associated with OS: ECOG-PS (P=0.009), KPS (P=0.04), cystic or solid nature of the metastasis before surgery (P=0.037). Several factors were related to RN occurrence: PTV diameter and volume, Normal brain V21, V21 and V24 isodoses volumes. CONCLUSION: HSRT is the most widely used scheme for larger brain cavities after surgery. The optimal dose and scheme remain to be defined as well as the optimal delay between postoperative SRT and surgery. Dose escalation may be necessary, especially in case of subtotal resection.

Optic nerve motion and gaze direction: Their impact on intraorbital tumor radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Management of inter- and intra-fraction movements of target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) during radiotherapy is essential. While there is little OAR or target volume movement, the movements and orientation of the eyes can be significant during radiotherapy and they can affect the position of the optic nerve. The objective of the present study was to assess the variations of the optic nerve position due to gaze direction and to discuss their clinical consequences on the radiation treatment of intraorbital tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three patients without a history of oculomotor nerve palsy underwent six CT acquisitions with a thermoplastic mask: eyes open with different gaze directions (straight ahead, left, right, up, down) and eyes closed. The acquisition with the straight-ahead gaze was chosen as the reference position. Left and right optic nerves were segmented on the six acquisitions, and total volumes and maximum amplitude motions were calculated in three dimensions. RESULTS: Maximum differences were observed while looking left and up, with a median maximum amplitude of 5 and 6mm [range: 2-7mm], respectively. These motions induced a position variation of more than 50% of the volume of the optic nerve (compared to the reference position). Greater variations of motion were observed for the anterior portion of the nerve. The gaze position with the fewest variations compared to the reference position was eyes closed. CONCLUSION: Optic nerve positions vary significantly due to the gaze direction, especially for the anterior portion of the nerve. These variations should be taken into account for the treatment of small intraorbital tumors involving the anterior third of the optic nerve.

[Role of immunotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer]. / Place de l'immunothérapie dans le cancer bronchique non à petites cellules localement avancé.

Concomitant radiochemotherapy has been the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), irrespective of histological sub-type or molecular characteristics. Currently, only 15-30 % of patients are alive five years after radiochemotherapy, and this figure remains largely unchanged despite multiple phase III randomised trials. In recent years, immune-checkpoint blockades with anti-PD-(L)1 have revolutionised the care of metastatic NSCLC, becoming the standard front- and second-line strategy. Several preclinical studies reported an increased tumour antigen release, improved antigen presentation, and T-cell infiltration in irradiated tumours. Immunotherapy has therefore recently been evaluated for patients with locally advanced stage III NSCLC. Following the PACIFIC trial, the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab antibody has emerged as a new standard consolidative treatment for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC whose disease has not progressed following concomitant platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Immunoradiotherapy therefore appears to be a promising association in patients with localised NSCLC. Many trials are currently evaluating the value of concomitant immunotherapy and chemoradiotherapy and/or consolidative chemotherapy with immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC.

[Prophylactic nodal radiotherapy in prostate cancer]. / Irradiation ganglionnaire prophylactique des cancers de prostate.

The risk of lymph node invasion, in case of prostate cancer, increases with the clinical stage of the disease, the Gleason score of prostate biopsies and the value of PSA at diagnosis. Historically, beyond 15% risk of lymph node involvement, irradiation of the pelvic areas was performed with prostate radiotherapy (RT) to take into account the risk of occult lymph node metastasis in patients at risk, but the benefit of this therapeutic approach remains to be demonstrated. The data from surgical lymph node dissection seem to question the risk levels, the escalation of the dose on the prostate increases the survival without relapse, the contribution of image-guided radiotherapy, (IGRT) and modulation of intensity (IMRT), decreases the toxicity of pelvic RT. This article reviews the principles of prophylactic ganglion irradiation for prostate cancer and discusses its relevance, current uncertainties, and prospective trials.

[Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: A critical review of the literature]. / Chimioradiothérapie des cancers de l'œsophage : revue critique de la littérature.

Locally advanced oesophageal cancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach with the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for preoperative and definitive strategy. Preoperative chemoradiation improves the locoregional control and overall survival after surgery for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Definitive chemoradiation can also be proposed for non-resectable tumours or medically inoperable patients. Besides, definitive chemoradiation is considered as an alternative option to surgery for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas. Chemotherapy regimen associated to radiotherapy consists of a combination of platinum derived drugs (cisplatinum or oxaliplatin) and 5-fluorouracil or a weekly scheme combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel according to CROSS protocol in a neoadjuvant strategy. Radiation doses vary from 41.4Gy to 45Gy for a preoperative strategy or 50 to 50.4Gy for a definitive treatment. The high risk of lymphatic spread due to anatomical features could justify the use of an elective nodal irradiation when the estimated risk of microscopic involvement is higher than 15% to 20%. An appropriate delineation of the gross tumour volume requires an exhaustive and up-to-date evaluation of the disease. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy represents a promising approach to spare organs-at-risk. This critical review of the literature underlines the roles of radiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancers and describes doses, volumes of treatment, technical aspects and dose constraints to organs-at-risk.