[Late complications of percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects with the Sideris occluder]. / Complications tardives après fermeture percutanée des communications interauriculaires par prothèse boutonnée de Sideris.

Between June 1992 and January 1996, 27 patients aged 3.9 to 74 years with an ostium secundum (22 patients) or patent foramen ovale with right-to-left shunts (5 patients) underwent percutaneous closure of their atrial septal defects with the Sideris occluder. After a thromboembolic complication, transesophageal echocardiography was performed routinely after the procedure in 15 patients between 1 month and 2 years, and in 6 patients on the 15th day. Two patients died, on the 2nd day and 21st month, of non-related causes. After an average follow-up of 33 months, 59% of patients had complete occlusion of the atrial septal defects or only a minimal residual shunt. Displacement of the prosthesis was defects or only a minimal residual shunt. Displacement of the prosthesis was observed in 7 cases with no relationship to size: 4 parallel to the septum with reappearance or increase in shunt, 3 with tilting of the prosthesis. All of these patients had a large residual defect compared with 20% with a normally positioned prosthesis (p < 0.05). Tilting of the occluder was associated with left atrial thrombosis (present in 40% of these patients), complicated by systemic embolism in one case: there were no cases of left atrial thrombus in the 9 with complete occlusion and the 5 patients with an isolated residual defect (p < 0.05). Occlusion of atrial septal defect with the Sideris device is effective and a safe method in the majority of cases. However, a badly positioned prosthesis with a residual shunt should be extracted as seen as possible or within three weeks if displacement is observed at control echocardiography.

[Medium-term follow-up after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty in the elderly. Clinical study apropos of 102 cases]. / Suivi à moyen terme après valvuloplastie aortique percutanée du sujet âgé. Etude clinique à propos de 102 procédures.

Percutaneous transluminal balloon aortic valvuloplasty was introduced in 1985 and, owing to its sometimes dramatic short-term results, it has rapidly become a useful procedure in the management of aortic stenosis in elderly subjects. The purpose of this study was to determine its clinical results at medium-term and to identify possible prognostic factors in order to improve the selection of patients suitable for this technique. Between January 1986 and December 1987, 78 patients (30 men, 48 women, aged from 60 to 93 years, mean 80 +/- 6.7 years) totalling 85 procedures were selected among 102 dilatations on the basis of a primary success without complications. Dilatation was performed by a technique similar to that described by Cribier et al. The follow-up period was 10 +/- 5.7 months (range: 1 to 27 months). The aortic valve area increased from 0.47 +/- 0.15 cm2 to 0.77 +/- 0.23 cm2, i.e. from 0.29 +/- 0.09 cm2/m2 to 0.48 +/- 0.13 cm2/m2 as regards the indexed area. The hospital mortality rate was 3.3 p. 100. At the end of the follow-up period 55 p. 100 of the patients were in NYHA class I or II; 29 p. 100 had died, 10 p. 100 had undergone a second dilatation and 13 p. 100 had had aortic valve replacement. This distribution into functional classes and major cardiac events was not significantly different in the subgroup of patients with an aortic valve area greater than 0.9 cm2 or in the subgroup of primary failure. The patients who died for cardiac reasons were older (p less than 0.01), had a lower cardiac output before and after dilatation (p less than 0.001) and a lower ejection fraction after dilatation (p less than 0.05) or even before in case of early death (p less than 0.05). Mortality and morbidity therefore were high at medium-term and unrelated to the haemodynamic effect of dilatation. On the other hand, the left ventricular systolic function was determinant, mainly because it could improve or remain stable when initially altered. These results suggest that only patients for whom aortic valve replacement is truly contra-indicated and who have a limited alteration of left ventricular function should be selected for aortic valvuloplasty.