Procedure planning and device positioning for left atrial appendage occlusion: insights from multi detector-row computed tomography with 3D fusion.

To compare planned and achieved device position in patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). It is unclear how devices used for LAAO position themselves compared to what is planned. All patients undergoing LAAO at our institution had pre- and post-procedural multi detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) at 3 months (N = 52). Using dedicated software, both datasets were fused to superimpose the left atria in all planes. The effective device position was traced on the post-procedural MDCT and then imported in the pre-procedural dataset to allow comparisons. Planned and effective landing zones were compared with respect to size, location and orientation. The device's final position was in a significantly larger landing zone than planned (452 ± 174 vs. 351 ± 112 mm2 for effective and planned landing zones, respectively, paired t-test: p < 0.0001), resulting in significantly less-than-intended area oversizing (41 ± 31 vs. 12 ± 28%, p < 0.0001). In terms of device orientation, there was a difference of 19.7° between the planned and effective landing zones (p < 0.0001). The Amplatzer device had a shallower-than-planned position in 70% of cases, whereas the Watchman device had a deeper-than-planned position in 75% of cases (p = 0.04). Incomplete occlusion was found in 17 patients (33%). In a multivariable model, oversizing at the effective landing zone was the only MDCT independent predictor of incomplete occlusion (OR: 0.96 per 1% increment, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, p = 0.009). MDCT fusion showed that LAAO device position and orientation are different than planned, and this is associated with incomplete occlusion of the LAA.

Development of a Risk Score Based on Aortic Calcification to Predict 1-Year Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a new scoring system based on thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) to predict 1-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. BACKGROUND: A calcified aorta is often associated with poor prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A risk score encompassing aortic calcification may be valuable in identifying poor TAVR responders. METHODS: The C4CAPRI (4 Cities for Assessing CAlcification PRognostic Impact) multicenter study included a training cohort (1,425 patients treated using TAVR between 2010 and 2014) and a contemporary test cohort (311 patients treated in 2015). TAC was measured by computed tomography pre-TAVR. CAPRI risk scores were based on the linear predictors of Cox models including TAC in addition to comorbidities and demographic, atherosclerotic disease and cardiac function factors. CAPRI scores were constructed and tested in 2 independent cohorts. RESULTS: Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality at 1 year was 13.0% and 17.9%, respectively, in the training cohort and 8.2% and 11.8% in the test cohort. The inclusion of TAC in the model improved prediction: 1-cm3 increase in TAC was associated with a 6% increase in cardiovascular mortality and a 4% increase in all-cause mortality. The predicted and observed survival probabilities were highly correlated (slopes >0.9 for both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality). The model's predictive power was fair (AUC 68% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 64% to 72%]) for both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The model performed similarly in the training and test cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The CAPRI score, which combines the TAC variable with classical prognostic factors, is predictive of 1-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Its predictive performance was confirmed in an independent contemporary cohort. CAPRI scores are highly relevant to current practice and strengthen the evidence base for decision making in valvular interventions. Its routine use may help prevent futile procedures.

Incidence and predictors of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the real world.

OBJECTIVES: Coronary obstruction (CO) is a rare but serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). There are very limited data regarding CO following TAVI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of CO after TAVI and identify the predictors including the valve type. METHODS: Between October 2006 and March 2015, 1,203 TAVI cases were performed in our institution. Of them, 814 cases whose coronary height was measured using computed tomography for screening were analyzed in this study. RESULTS: The Edwards SAPIEN/SAPIEN XT (S/XT) was used in 427 (52.4%) cases, the CoreValve in 265 (32.6%), and the S3 in 122 (15.0%). CO occurred in 8 (1.0%) cases, 1.6% with S/XT, 0.4% with CoreValve, and 0% with S3. All instances of CO occurred at the left coronary artery. The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in cases of CO (37.5% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.010). The frequency of CO tended to be lower in recipients of the CoreValve (0.4%) and S3 (0%) compared with the S/XT (1.6%) (P = 0.188 for CoreValve vs. S/XT, P = 0.022 for S3 vs. S/XT). CONCLUSIONS: CO has poor outcomes and identification of patients at risk of CO to take preventive measures is crucial. The preliminary data showing that the occurrence of CO is low in patients receiving the S3 despite increased prosthesis height need further confirmation. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: There are currently only limited data focusing on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) patients using the Edwards SAPIEN (Irvine, CA, USA) 3 (S3) valve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of TAVI using the S3 in patients with BAV. METHODS: A total of 153 TAVI cases performed with the S3 were included. BAV was detected by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in 10 (7%) patients. The other patients had tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). The BAV and TAV groups were compared. RESULTS: Patient age and logistic EuroSCORE were similar in the BAV and TAV groups. The calculated annulus average diameter (CAAD) by MDCT was significantly larger in the BAV group (26.5mm vs 23.7mm, p=0.036) as was the annular area by MDCT (562mm2 vs 446mm2, p=0.033). On the other hand, the valve diameter/CAAD ratio was significantly lower in the BAV group (1.01 vs 1.06, p=0.010) as was the annular area oversizing percentage (3% vs 11%, p=0.033). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the frequency of paravalvular aortic leakage (PVL) ≥2 (0% vs 6%, p=0.492) and the 30-day mortality rate (0% vs 1%, p=0.799). CONCLUSIONS: Although TAVI for BAV tended to be carried out with a less oversized valve compared to TAVI for TAV, the frequency of post-procedural PVL ≥2 was similarly low in the two groups. TAVI using the S3 in patients with BAV seems to be feasible.

Comparison of Edwards SAPIEN 3 versus SAPIEN XT in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Difference of valve selection in the real world.

BACKGROUND: The SAPIEN 3 (S3; Edwards Lifescience, Irvine, CA, USA) is a new-generation percutaneous aortic valve with better profile, more precise handling and positioning, designed to reduce the risk of post-procedural paravalvular aortic leak (PVL). The aim of this study was to compare the S3 valve and SAPIEN XT valve (SXT). METHODS: The last 89 transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cases using SXT were compared to the first 111 cases using the S3. RESULTS: Patient age and logistic EuroSCORE were similar (83.1 years vs 83.0 years and 18.2% vs 16.6%) in the S3 and SXT groups, respectively as were other baseline characteristics. The ratio of valve diameter/calculated annulus average diameter (CAAD) by multi-detector row computed tomography was significantly lower in the S3 group (1.06 vs 1.09, p<0.001) as was the annular area oversizing percentage (11.3% vs 20.5%, p<0.001). Furthermore, a smaller valve was selected in S3 cases with borderline CAAD compared to SXT cases. Nevertheless, the frequency of paravalvular aortic leakage (PVL) ≥2 tended to be reduced in the S3 group (5% vs 9%, p=0.339). The rate of major vascular complications was significantly lower with S3 (3% vs 12%, p=0.013). In addition, 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the S3 group (0% vs 5%, p=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Although TAVI using S3 tended to be carried out with a less oversized valve compared to TAVI using SXT, the frequency of post-procedural PVL ≥2 tended to be lower in the S3 group. The outcomes including vascular complications and 30-day mortality showed a trend in favor of the S3 group.

Comparison of Systematic Predilation, Selective Predilation, and Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With the SAPIEN S3 Valve.

BACKGROUND: Despite previously described feasibility, direct transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Edwards SAPIEN S3 device (S3-THV) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) has not been compared with either a systematic or a selective predilation approach. METHODS: Patients undergoing predilation were divided into a systematic group (regardless of anatomic features) and a selective group (in the context of high valvular calcium burden). Both groups were matched in a 2:1 fashion to patients who underwent direct TAVI. Outcomes were assessed according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) criteria. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one patients underwent TAVI with the S3-THV in our centre. Of these patients, 58 underwent predilation before device implantation (systematic, n = 26; selective, n = 32). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Patients in the selective predilation group had severe valve calcification volume-more than double that of the systematic group (445 ± 306 mm3 vs 970 ± 578 mm3, respectively; P < 0.0001). There was a trend for less dilation after the procedure in the systematic group compared with the selective group (4% vs 19%, respectively; P = 0.09). Device malposition necessitating a second device to be implanted occurred in 3 cases of direct TAVI (5%) and in none of the patients undergoing predilation (P = not significant). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality rates were similar between the patients who underwent direct TAVI and their predilation counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a moderate aortic valve calcification burden, direct TAVI appears to be feasible and safe. In those with high calcium burden, predilation should be considered after taking into account individual risk profiles.

Direct Comparison of Feasibility and Safety of Transfemoral Versus Transaortic Versus Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes among transfemoral (TF), transaortic (TAo), and transapical (TA) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Very few studies have investigated the differences among TF, TAo, and TA TAVR in terms of safety and feasibility. METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2014, 467 consecutive cases of TF TAVR, 289 cases of TAo TAVR, and 42 cases of TA TAVR were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were compared between TF and TAo and between TAo and TA approaches. RESULTS: Balloon-expandable prostheses were used in 320 cases of TF TAVR (69%), 209 cases of TAo TAVR (72%), and all cases of TA TAVR. The remaining cases were performed using self-expandable prostheses. Patient age and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were similar (83.8 years vs. 83.7 years vs. 81.3 years and 6.2% vs. 5.8% vs. 7.1%) among all groups. Although nonsignificant, a trend toward lower 30-day mortality (5% vs. 9%; p = 0.057) was observed with TF TAVR compared with TAo TAVR. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a trend toward a higher 1-year survival rate (log-rank p = 0.067) with TF TAVR compared with TAo TAVR. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between TAo and TA TAVR (9% vs. 14%; p = 0.283). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a trend toward a higher 1-year survival rate (log-rank p = 0.154) with TAo TAVR compared with TA TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 30-day mortality and 1-year survival rates were similar between TF and TAo TAVR patients, a trend in favor of the TF approach was observed. In addition, the TAo approach can be considered as an alternative to the TA approach when the TF approach seems unsuitable.

Mitral Annular Calcium and Mitral Stenosis Determined by Multidetector Computed Tomography in Patients Referred for Aortic Stenosis.

Mitral annular calcium (MAC) is a common finding in older patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) allows fine quantification of the calcific deposits. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of MAC and associated mitral stenosis (MS) in patients referred for TAVI using MDCT. A cohort of 346 consecutive patients referred for TAVI evaluation was screened by MDCT for MAC: 174 had MAC (50%). Of these patients, 165 patients (95%) had mitral valve area (MVA) assessable by MDCT planimetry (age 83.8 ± 5.9 years). Median mitral calcium volume and MVA were 545 mm3 (193 to 1,253 mm3) and 234 mm2 (187 to 297 mm2), respectively. The MS was very severe, severe, and moderate in 2%, 22%, and 10% patients, respectively. By multivariate analysis, MVA was independently correlated to mitral calcium volume, aortic annular area, and some specific patterns of mitral leaflet calcium. Based on these findings, a formula was elaborated to predict the presence of a significant MS. In conclusion, MDCT allows detailed assessment of MAC in TAVI populations, demonstrating a high prevalence. Mitral analysis should become routine during MDCT screening before TAVI as it may alter therapeutic strategy.

Impact of procedural volume on outcome optimization in transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: An adequate procedural volume seems to be required to minimize the complication rate in TAVI. However, very few studies have investigated the relationship between procedural volume and outcomes in TAVI especially via the transaortic approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of procedural volume on the outcomes of transaortic TAVI (TAo-TAVI). METHODS: 257 consecutive TAo-TAVI cases performed by 2 cardiac surgeons between January 2011 and June 2014 were included in the current analysis. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) failure analysis of combined 30-day safety endpoints was used in order to evaluate the learning curves. We divided the cases into two groups: early experience and late experience, respectively. Procedure and outcome variables were compared. RESULTS: The CUSUM analysis revealed a learning curve regarding the occurrence of adverse events at 30days with an improvement after the initial 128 cases. We divided the cases into two groups (early group: cases 1 to 128; late group: cases 129 to 257). Although the rate of 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the 2 groups (11% and 7%, p=0.268), the incidence of adverse events such as life-threatening bleeding, stroke and AKI was significantly decreased in the late phase group (9% and 1%, p=0.002; 5% and 0%, p=0.014; 16% and 6%, p=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of adverse events was significantly decreased in the late phase group. An appropriate number of procedures seems to be required to reduce the TAo-TAVI complication rate.

Evaluation of the learning curve for transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral approach.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve in performing transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI). METHODS: Between October 2006 and October 2013, 312 consecutive TF-TAVI cases performed by 6 interventional cardiologists, using the Edwards Sapien valve and 104 using the CoreValve, were included in the present analysis. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) failure analysis of combined 30-day safety endpoint was used to evaluate learning curves. RESULTS: The CUSUM analysis revealed a learning curve regarding the occurrence of 30-day adverse events with an improvement after the initial 86 cases using the Edwards valve and 40 cases using the CoreValve. We divided the Edwards valve cases into two groups (early experience: Cases 1 to 86; late experience: Cases 87 to 312). The rate of 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality significantly decreased in the late experience group (17% to 7%, p=0.019; 34% to 21%, p=0.035, respectively). We divided the CoreValve cases into two groups (early experience: Cases 1 to 40; late experience: Cases 41 to 104). The rate of 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality significantly decreased in the late experience group (20% to 6%, p=0.033; 38% to 15%, p=0.040, respectively). The groups including both valves were also analyzed after propensity-matching (early [n=52] vs late [n=52]). This model also showed that 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were significantly lower in the late experience group (13% to 1%, p=0.028; 34% to 20%, p=0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An appropriate level of experience is needed to reduce the complication rate and mortality in TF-TAVI.

Prognostic value of aortic root calcification volume on clinical outcomes after transcatheter balloon-expandable aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available about whether aortic root calcification may impact the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of aortic root calcification volume on clinical outcome after TAVI with balloon expandable Edwards Sapien XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). METHODS: A total of 162 TAVI patients (aged 84.0 [Interquartile Range (IQR) 81.0-84.0] years, Logistic EuroSCORE 14.5 [IQR 9.8-25.1]) with preprocedural MDCT were studied. Aortic root calcification volume was measured by MDCT image and using the dedicated software for aortic valve assessment (the automated 3mensio™ Valves 5.1, sp1, 3mensio Pie Medical Imaging BV, Maastricht, the Netherlands). A valve calcification index (VCI) was defined as calcification volume (mm(3))/body surface area (mm(2)). RESULTS: VCI was significantly higher among patients with 30-day mortality. A VCI threshold of 517.4 (area under the curve 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.87, P = 0.03) predicted a higher incidence of annulus rupture (9.1 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.02) and cardiac tamponade (12.7 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.01), lower device success (83.6% vs. 95.3%, P < 0.01) and 30-day survival rate (80.0% vs. 97.2%, P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed only ejection fraction and VCI were identified as independent predictors of 30-day mortality (Odds ratio 0.948 [95% confidence interval 0.909-0.988], P = 0.012, Odds ratio 1.003 [95% confidence interval 1.001-1.005], P = 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly worse acute clinical outcomes after Edwards valve implantation were observed in patients with large amount of aortic annulus calcifications quantitatively measured by dedicated MDCT software. Application of VCI may prove helpful in prediction of clinical outcomes after TAVI.

Usefulness of a Simple Clinical Risk Prediction Method, Modified ACEF Score, for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the predictive accuracy of a simple risk score, modified age, creatinine clearance, ejection fraction (ACEFmodif) score, for outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively included 703 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI. Patients were divided into low, middle and high ACEFmodif tertiles. Increased ACEFmodif score was associated with a significantly higher 1-year mortality rate (22%, 28% and 36%, P<0.01) and higher risk of acute kidney injury (AKI; 10%, 10% and 22%, P<0.01). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, ACEFmodif score was the only independent predictor of AKI. On multivariate Cox regression, ACEFmodif score was an independent predictor of 1-year cumulative mortality. Although the area under curve (AUC) showed that all risk scores poorly predicted the incidence of AKI and 1-year cumulative mortality, ACEFmodif score was more efficient in predicting the incidence of AKI compared with STS, LES and ES II (AUC, 0.61, 0.55, 0.54, 0.57, respectively). Furthermore, ACEFmodif score had similar accuracy in predicting 1-year mortality compared with other risk scores (AUC, 0.61, 0.61, 0.61, 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ACEFmodif score may provide useful information for predicting AKI, 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVI, but these results need further confirmation.

Comparison of multislice computed tomography findings between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: This study sought to compare the multislice computed tomography (MSCT) characteristics of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) before and after implantation of the CoreValve (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) or the Edwards SapienXT (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2009 to March 2013, a total of 67 TAVI patients who had both pre- and post-procedural MSCT were studied. Eleven patients underwent TAVI in BAV with the CoreValve (n = 6) or SapienXT (n = 5) and 56 patients underwent TAVI in TAV with the CoreValve (n = 38) or SapienXT (n = 18). The BAV group was similar to the TAV group except for a higher pre-procedural mean pressure gradient (53.1 ± 17.4 vs. 48.8 ± 20.4 mm Hg, P = 0.03), a larger annulus perimeter (89.3 ± 9.0 vs. 81.8 ± 8.1 mm, P = 0.03) and a higher aortic valve calcium volume (1262.7 ± 396.0 vs. 556.4 ± 461.9 mm(3) , P < 0.01). In the CoreValve group, post-procedural mean pressure gradient was significantly higher in the BAV group (11.0 ± 2.6 vs. 8.2 ± 2.8 mm Hg, P = 0.04) and a smaller valve area/pre-annulus area ratio was observed at each level of the prosthesis (base of the stent frame 81.7% ± 14.9% vs. 94.7% ± 15.0%, P = 0.06, annulus level 74.3% ± 16.7% vs. 89.9% ± 10.5%, P = 0.03, leaflet level 64.6% ± 13.1% vs. 81.2% ± 13.2%, P < 0.01). This was not observed in the Edwards group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TAV, patients with BAV have higher gradients, larger annulus perimeters and more calcified valves. Higher post procedural gradient and valve underexpansion were frequently observed after CoreValve implantation. Further MSCT study is required to demonstrate the efficacy of TAVI in BAV.

Can we predict postprocedural paravalvular leak after Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter aortic valve implantation?

BACKGROUND: Postprocedural paravalvular leak (PVL) ≥ 2 has been shown to be associated with worse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study sought to identify predictive factors of postprocedural PVL ≥ 2 after TAVI with the Edwards valve. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 176 patients with Edwards TAVI (aged 83.4 ± 7.4 years, Logistic EuroSCORE [the Logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation] 18.8 ± 12.0, transfemoral 54.5%) who had preprocedural multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) were studied. A PVL ≥ 2 was observed in 12.5% of cases. By multivariate analysis, only the valve calcification index (VCI) defined as aortic root calcification volume/body surface area (odds ratio [OR] = 1.002, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.001-1.004, P = 0.006) and the valve diameter/the calculated average annulus diameter (CAAD) by MDCT (OR = 0.683, 95% CI = 0.474-0.984, P = 0.041) were identified as independent predictors of postprocedural PVL ≥ 2. A score predicting postprocedural PVL ≥ 2 (PVL score) was determined by allotting one point when the valve diameter/CAAD ratio was <1.055 and one point when VCI was >418.4 mm(3) /m(2) , and summing all points accrued. Area under receiver-operator characteristic curves of PVL score was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.59-0.83, P < 0.01). The incidence of PVL ≥ 2 was 5.3% in patients with a PVL score of 0, 11.8% for a PVL score of 1 and 37.5% for a PVL score of 2. CONCLUSIONS: The only predictors of PVL ≥ 2 after Edwards valve implantation are the valve diameter/CAAD and VCI. The PVL score could prove to be an excellent tool for predicting the risk of PVL.

Is postdilatation useful after implantation of the Edwards valve?

BACKGROUND: Few data are available about postdilatation (PD) for the treatment of significant paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation of the Edwards valve. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 470 patients, aged 83.4 ± 6.4 yrs, with logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation 21.9 ± 12.3, undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards valve were evaluated. PD was performed using the balloon delivery system when significant paravalvular AR was identified. The diameter of the valve was measured from cine acquisition at three different levels. PD was performed in 49 (10.4%) patients with grade 2, 3, or 4 AR as 42.1%, 55.3%, and 2.6%, respectively. After PD, a reduction of at least 1 degree of AR was achieved in 81.5% of cases. Residual AR grades 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 36.8%, 10.5%, and 0%, respectively. A significant increase in the prosthesis diameter was observed at the three valve levels (absolute Δ 3.5%-5.4%, P.< 0.01). For the 23 mm valve, mid level of valve increased from 23.0 ± 0.4 to 24.1 ± 0.5 mm (P < 0.01) and for the 26 mm, from 25.2 ± 0.9 to 26.6 ± 0.9 mm (P < 0.01). Occurrence of annulus rupture (4.1% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.24), cerebrovascular accidents (2.0% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.72), need for new pacemaker (8.2% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.31), and 30-day composite endpoint (24.5% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.48) were not significantly different between PD and non-PD groups. CONCLUSIONS: PD for the treatment of significant paravalvular leak proved to be a feasible treatment allowing a significant increase in valve size and decrease in PVL without increase in stroke rates. This promising approach needs further confirmation.

Double giant coronary aneurysm: improved morphological study by computed tomography.

Coronary artery aneurysm may cause coronary artery rupture, thromboembolism or haemodynamic problems related to compression. We report the case of a 68-year old man who was referred to an intensive cardiological care unit for recurrence of ventricular tachycardia. Coronary angiography revealed two large aneurysms of the mid-right coronary artery. A multislice computed tomography (CT) study demonstrated marked underestimation by invasive angiography because of the large thrombus. The patient was referred for cardiac surgery. The right mammary artery was used as a bypass graft to the distal segment of the right coronary artery and the two aneurysms were ligated proximally and distally after removal of their thrombus filling. The postoperative CT confirmed patency of the bypass graft and the vascular exclusion of the aneurysm, with no opacification. Cardiac CT is a promising tool for the comprehensive study of coronary aneurysms, both before and after surgery.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients of small body size.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients of small body size (SB). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October 2006 and November 2011, 424 patients undergoing TAVI were evaluated. Patients with a small body surface area (BSA; <1.75 m(2)) were defined as the "SB group" (n = 215) and the remaining large BSA patients as the "LB group" (n = 209). In the SB group, mean annulus diameter measured by CT and minimal femoral artery diameter were significantly smaller (23.1 ± 1.92 vs. 24.3 ± 1.91 mm, P < 0.01; 7.59 ± 1.06 vs. 8.29 ± 1.34 mm, P < 0.01, respectively). The logistic EuroSCORE was similar between groups (22.5 ± 10.4 vs. 23.4 ± 12.0; P = 0.43). Equivalent device success (91.2% vs. 91.4%; P = 0.94) and 30-day survival rates (85.1% vs. 87.6%; P = 0.46) were achieved in both groups. Vascular complications and the 30-day combined safety end point rate were significantly higher in the SB group (13.0% vs. 4.3%, P < 0.01; 27.4% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.03, respectively). Similar post-procedural mean pressure gradient was achieved in both groups (10.2 ± 4.3 vs. 11.0 ± 4.6 mmHg; P = 0.12). Multivariate analysis showed that BSA was one of the independent predictors of 30-day combined safety end point (Odds ratio: 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.88; P = 0.03). However, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in mid-term survival rate between groups (log-rank P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI in SB patients resulted in similar clinical outcomes with effective post-procedural hemodynamics compared with LB patients. Care should be taken to avoid vascular complications in SB patients.

Automated 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the accuracy, reproducibility, and predictive value for post-procedural aortic regurgitation (AR) of an automated multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) post-processing imaging software, 3mensio Valves (version 5.1.sp1, 3mensio Medical Imaging BV, the Netherlands), in the assessment of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Accurate pre-operative aortic annulus measurements are crucial for patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: One hundred five patients undergoing MDCT screening before TAVI were evaluated. Aortic annular measurement was compared between automated 3mensio Valves software and manual data post-processing software on a dedicated workstation; we analyzed the discrimination value of annulus measurement for post-procedural AR in 44 recipients of a self-expanding valve. RESULTS: The automated 3mensio Valves software showed good concordance with manual MDCT measurements as demonstrated by Bland-Altman analysis. The automated software provided equally good reproducibility as manual measurement, especially for measurement of aortic annulus area (intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients 0.98 vs. 0.97, interobserver 0.98 vs. 0.95). In 44 patients after implantation of a self-expanding valve, the valve diameter/CT-measured geometric mean annulus diameter ratio by automated 3mensio Valves software showed moderate and better discrimination ability in predicting post-procedural AR compared with manual measurement (p = 0.12, area under the curve 0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.63 to 0.91, area under the curve 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 0.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The automated 3mensio Valves software demonstrated reliable, reproducible aortic annulus measurement and better predictive value for post-procedural AR, suggesting important clinical implications for pre-operative assessment of patients undergoing TAVI.