Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urol Oncol ; 40(11): 490.e13-490.e20, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35676172

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Seventy-five percent of bladder cancers are non-muscle invasive. The treatment strategy includes the transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB) followed by intravesical immunotherapy with the bacillus of Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or chemotherapy, depending on the grade of bladder tumor. Despite a proper BCG intravesical instillations schedule, up to 40% of patients present a failure within 2 years. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the predictive factors in the response to BCG in patients with a high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer from 13 hospitals and academic institutions were identified and treated, from January 1, 2002, until December 31, 2012, with TURB and a subsequent re-TURB for restaging before receiving BCG. Follow-up was performed with urine cytology and cystoscopy every 3 months for 1 year and, successively every 6 months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models addressed the response to BCG therapy. Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates were determined for BCG responsive vs. BCG unresponsive patients. RESULTS: A total of 1,228 patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer were enrolled. Of 257 (20.9%) patients were BCG unresponsive. Independent predictive factors for response to BCG were: multifocality (HR: 1.4; 95% CI 1.05-1.86; P = 0.019), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 1.75; 95% CI 1.22-2.49; P = 0.002) and high-grade on re-TURB (HR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.02-1.91; P = 0.037). Overall survival was significantly reduced in BCG-unresponsive patients compared to BCG-responsive patients at 5 years (82.9% vs. 92.4%, P < 0.0001) and at 10 years (44.2% vs. 74.4%, P < 0.0001). Similarly, cancer-specific survival was reduced in BCG-unresponsive patients at 5 years (90.6% vs. 97.3%, P < 0.0001) and at 10 years (72.3% vs. 87.2%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, and high-grade on re-TURB were independent predictors for response to BCG treatment. BCG-unresponsive patients reported worse oncological outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Invasividade Neoplásica , Progressão da Doença , Administração Intravesical , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico
2.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 5(6): 417-22, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26412339

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate intraprostatic gold coils positional stability analyzing intermarker distance in on-board cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired throughout the entire treatment course. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 29 fiducial markers (FMs) were implanted in 10 patients through the transperineal approach, under ultrasound guidance. After 2 weeks from the FM implantation, all the patients underwent CT and magnetic resonance imaging under radiation therapy-planning conditions. The planning CT was the reference CT (CTref) used to calculate the initial intermarker distances. For every patient, 8 CBCTi (i varying from 1 to 8) acquired once a week during the treatment course were selected to calculate intermarker distances and compared with CTref. Reconstructed images of CBCTi were exported to the treatment planning system, and every FM was contoured. A point of interest at the center of mass of each contoured FM was created. The mean coordinates obtained for point of interest at the center of mass of FMs were used to calculate relative marker distances on CTref and CBCTi. RESULTS: No patient developed postimplantation complications. A total of 224 marker distance variations (MDVs) were calculated for all 29 markers. The average directional variation of all MDVs (± standard deviation [SD]) was -0.14 ± 0.86 mm. The average absolute variations of all MDVs (± SD) were 0.71 ± 0.51 mm. The largest observed variation was 1.9 mm. All patients had not significant temporal trends in their marker distances. The SD of the MDVs was computed for each set of markers in all 10 patients. The SDs ranged between 0.4 and 1.1 mm in individual patients. The average of the mean SDs was 0.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The three-dimensional definition of each fiducial marker volume, using on-board CBCT, demonstrated the stability of FMs position throughout the entire radiation therapy treatment course.


Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Marcadores Fiduciais , Ouro/química , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Próteses e Implantes , Humanos , Masculino , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...