Multidisciplinary Surgical Approach to Increase Survival for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in a Tertiary Gynaecological Oncology Centre.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to report on changes in overall survival, progression-free survival, and complete cytoreduction rates in the 5-year period after the implementation of a multidisciplinary surgical team (MDT). METHODS: Two cohorts were used. Cohort A was a retrospectively collated cohort from 2006 to 2015. Cohort B was a prospectively collated cohort of patients from January 2017 to September 2021. RESULTS: This study included 146 patients in cohort A (2006-2015) and 174 patients in cohort B (2017-2021) with FIGO stage III/IV ovarian cancer. Median follow-up in cohort A was 60 months and 48 months in cohort B. The rate of primary cytoreductive surgery increased from 38% (55/146) in cohort A to 46.5% (81/174) in cohort B. Complete macroscopic resection increased from 58.9% (86/146) in cohort A to 78.7% (137/174) in cohort B (p < 0.001). At 3 years, 75% (109/144) patients had disease progression in cohort A compared with 48.8% (85/174) in cohort B (log-rank, p < 0.001). Also at 3 years, 64.5% (93/144) of patients had died in cohort A compared with 24% (42/174) of cohort B (log-rank, p < 0.001). Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that MDT input, residual disease, and age were independent predictors of overall (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.203-0.437, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.21-0.43, p < 0.001). Major morbidity remained stable throughout both study periods (2006-2021). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the implementation of multidisciplinary-team, intraoperative approach allowed for a change in surgical philosophy and has resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and complete resection rates.

Multidisciplinary Surgical Approach to Increase Complete Cytoreduction Rates for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in a Tertiary Gynecologic Oncology Center.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of ovarian cancer management. In 2017, the authors implemented a multi-disciplinary surgical team comprising gynecologic oncologists as well as colorectal, hepatobiliary, and upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeons to increase gross macroscopic resection rates. This report aims to describe changes in complete cytoreduction rates and morbidity after the implementation of a multi-disciplinary surgical team comprising gynecologic oncologists as well as colorectal, hepatobiliary, and upper GI surgeons in a tertiary gynecologic oncology unit. METHODS: The study used two cohorts. Cohort A was a retrospectively collated cohort from 2006 to 2015. Cohort B was a prospectively collated cohort of patients initiated in 2017. A multidisciplinary approach to preoperative medical optimization, intraoperative management, and postoperative care was implemented in 2017. The patients in cohort B with upper abdominal disease were offered primary cytoreduction with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Before 2017, the patients with upper abdominal disease received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cohort A). RESULTS: This study included 146 patients in cohort A (2006-2015) and 93 patients in cohort B (2017-2019) with stages 3 or 4 ovarian cancer. The overall complete macroscopic resection rate (CC0) increased from 58.9 in cohort A to 67.7% in cohort B. The rate of primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) increased from 38 (55/146) in cohort A to 42% (39/93) in cohort B. The CC0 rate for the patients who underwent primary CRS increased from 49 in cohort A to 77% in cohort B. Major morbidity remained stable throughout both study periods (2006-2019). CONCLUSIONS: The study data demonstrate that implementation of a multidisciplinary team intraoperative approach and a meticulous approach to preoperative optimization resulted in significantly improved complete resection rates, particularly for women offered primary CRS.

A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality in primary cytoreductive surgery compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian malignancy.

Aim The aim of this meta-analysis is to review the morbidity and mortality associated with primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery (NACT + ICS) for advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: A literature search was performed for publications reporting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing PCS compared to NACT + ICS. Databases searched were Cochrane, Medline, Pubmed, Pubmed Central, clinicaltrials.gov and Embase. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to select included papers, with differences agreed by consensus. A total of 1341 citations were reviewed; 17 studies comprising 3759 patients were selected for the analysis. The literature search was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results were reported as mean differences or pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Patients in the PCS group were significantly more likely to have a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 morbidity with an overall rate of 21.2% compared to 8.8% (95%CI 1.9-4.0, p < 0.0001) and were more likely to die within 30 days of surgery (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.1-17.6, p = 0.0008). Patients who underwent NACT + ICS had significantly shorter procedural times (MD -35 min, p = 0.01), lost less blood intraoperatively (MD-382 ml, p < 0.001) and had an average admission 5.0 days shorter (MD -5.0 days, 95% CI -8.1 to -1.9 days, p = 0.002) than those undergoing PCS. While NACT was associated with significantly increased optimal and complete cytoreduction rates (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.9, p = 0.001, and OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.3, p = 0.0001 respectively), this did not confer any additional survival benefit (OR 1.0, p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: NACT is associated with less morbidity and mortality and improved complete cytoreduction compared to PCS, with no survival benefit. Hence NACT is an acceptable alternative in selected patients in particular with medical co-morbidities or a high tumour burden.

Incidental Thoracic Findings on Routine Computed Tomography in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is routinely used in the surveillance of epithelial ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of thoracic findings on routine MDCT surveillance imaging in patients with ovarian carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 100 MDCT studies of patients with a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer was performed at a university teaching hospital. The cross-sectional studies were reviewed by a consultant radiologist with subspeciality training in cross-sectional imaging. RESULTS: Intrathoracic findings were identified in 35% of patients. Pleural effusions were identified in 40%, pulmonary nodules in 37%, mediastinal adenopathy in 17%, and thyroid nodules in 6% of patients. Thirty-five (35%) patients were found to have thoracic findings on computed tomography. Pleural effusions developed in 14 (40%) of these patients. Small lung nodules (<1 cm) were present in 13 (37%) patients. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy was seen in 6 (17%) patients. Two patients (6%) had thyroid nodules of unknown significance. Pleural effusions and small lung nodules were present at a similar level to that of the general population. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study supports the imaging recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology that MDCT protocols for the initial staging and evaluation of recurrent disease in epithelial ovarian carcinoma require only inclusion of the lung bases to the inguinal region reducing exposure to ionizing radiation, alleviating patient anxiety, and offering a cost-benefit to hospitals.