Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Surgical Outcomes: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) examinations using the VOTE Classification and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) surgical outcomes in a large multicenter, international cohort. METHODS: Retrospective, multi-center cohort study of adults without tonsillar hypertrophy who underwent pharyngeal surgery for OSA. The study included only participants without enlarged tonsils. Four independent reviewers performed blinded review of preoperative DISE videos using the VOTE Classification system and scoring of a primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes with univariate analyses and multiple regression. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five study participants were included from 14 centers. Mean age was 51.4 ± 11.8 years, and body mass index was 30.1 ± 5.2 kg/m2 . There was moderate interrater reliability (kappa = 0.40-0.60) for DISE findings. Oropharyngeal lateral wall-related obstruction was associated with poorer surgical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.27, 0.93). Complete tongue-related obstruction was associated with a lower odds of surgical response in moderate to severe OSA (AOR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28, 0.98), with findings that were similar but not statistically significant in other analyses. Surgical outcomes were not clearly associated with the degree and configuration of velum-related obstruction or the degree of epiglottis-related obstruction. Surgical response was associated with tonsil size and body mass index (inversely). CONCLUSION: DISE findings concerning the oropharyngeal lateral walls and tongue may be the most important findings of this evaluation technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2B Laryngoscope, 129:761-770, 2019.

Application of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients treated with upper airway stimulation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of agreement among experienced operators of candidacy for upper airway stimulation (UAS) based on evaluation of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). METHODS: The trial was designed as a single-blinded cross-sectional study. Four otolaryngologists with extensive DISE experience were given 63 video clips from the STAR trial video library. These videos were graded using the VOTE classification. Percentage agreement and Cohen's κ (for inter-rater reliability) were calculated between pairs of reviewers, assessing palatal complete concentric collapse (CCC) and determining UAS eligibility. Subjects were also grouped based on collapse severity for each reviewer. RESULTS: The reviewers had excellent (approximately 90%) agreement on findings at the level of the soft palate and tongue base. The inter-rater reliability for palatal CCC ranged from moderate to substantial. The agreement on determining the criteria for UAS implantation ranged from poor to moderate. All 4 upper airway structures as classified by the criteria of the VOTE were graded by all the reviewers as contributing to obstruction in a majority of subjects who were performed via application of DISE. CONCLUSION: Application of DISE remains a subjective examination, even among those experienced operators, therefore more studies need to be performed for evaluation of improvement in inter-rater reliability after implantation of training videos.

Oral premalignant lesions induce immune reactivity to both premalignant oral lesions and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is an aggressive malignancy, and despite advances in treatments, the 5-year survival has remained at less than 50%. One treatment strategy is to focus on patients with premalignant oral lesions that carry a high-risk for developing recurrent premalignant lesions and HNSCC disease. As an initial attempt to determine if immune therapy has the potential to be protective in these patients, studies determined if premalignant lesions express tumor antigens that have previously been shown to be expressed on HNSCC. Immunohistochemical analyses showed prominent expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in premalignant lesions, even in lesions with mild dysplasia. MUC-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen were expressed in most patient samples, while NY-ESO-1 was less frequently expressed. Each of these antigens was expressed on HNSCC. This provided the rationale for determining if premalignant oral lesions could be used to stimulate autologous peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes (PBML) to react against heterologous premalignant lesions and HNSCC. Following sensitization with autologous premalignant lesions, PBML responded to a challenge with either heterologous premalignant oral lesion cells or HNSCC by releasing IFN-gamma. In addition, sensitization with autologous premalignant lesion lysates generated cytolytic activity by both PBML and T cells against allogeneic premalignant lesion cells and HNSCC. These studies show the feasibility of using premalignant oral lesions to stimulate immune reactivity against both premalignant oral lesions as well as HNSCC.