Rosie, a Health Education Question-and-Answer Chatbot for New Mothers: Randomized Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Stark disparities exist in maternal and child outcomes and there is a need to provide timely and accurate health information. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, we assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a health chatbot for new mothers of color. METHODS: Rosie, a question-and-answer chatbot, was developed as a mobile app and is available to answer questions about pregnancy, parenting, and child development. From January 9, 2023, to February 9, 2023, participants were recruited using social media posts and through engagement with community organizations. Inclusion criteria included being aged ≥14 years, being a woman of color, and either being currently pregnant or having given birth within the past 6 months. Participants were randomly assigned to the Rosie treatment group (15/29, 52% received the Rosie app) or control group (14/29, 48% received a children's book each month) for 3 months. Those assigned to the treatment group could ask Rosie questions and receive an immediate response generated from Rosie's knowledgebase. Upon detection of a possible health emergency, Rosie sends emergency resources and relevant hotline information. In addition, a study staff member, who is a clinical social worker, reaches out to the participant within 24 hours to follow up. Preintervention and postintervention tests were completed to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate Rosie and describe changes across key health outcomes, including postpartum depression and the frequency of emergency room visits. These measurements were used to inform the clinical trial's sample size calculations. RESULTS: Of 41 individuals who were screened and eligible, 31 (76%) enrolled and 29 (71%) were retained in the study. More than 87% (13/15) of Rosie treatment group members reported using Rosie daily (5/15, 33%) or weekly (8/15, 53%) across the 3-month study period. Most users reported that Rosie was easy to use (14/15, 93%) and provided responses quickly (13/15, 87%). The remaining issues identified included crashing of the app (8/15, 53%), and users were not satisfied with some of Rosie's answers (12/15, 80%). Mothers in both the Rosie treatment group and control group experienced a decline in depression scores from pretest to posttest periods, but the decline was statistically significant only among treatment group mothers (P=.008). In addition, a low proportion of treatment group infants had emergency room visits (1/11, 9%) compared with control group members (3/13, 23%). Nonetheless, no between-group differences reached statistical significance at P<.05. CONCLUSIONS: Rosie was found to be an acceptable, feasible, and appropriate intervention for ethnic and racial minority pregnant women and mothers of infants owing to the chatbot's ability to provide a personalized, flexible tool to increase the timeliness and accessibility of high-quality health information to individuals during a period of elevated health risks for the mother and child. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06053515; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06053515.

Practical Guidance for the Development of Rosie, a Health Education Question-and-Answer Chatbot for New Mothers.

Communities of color experience higher maternal and infant mortality, as well as a host of other adverse outcomes, during pregnancy and postpartum. To address this, our team is developing a free, user-friendly, question-answering chatbot called Rosie. Chatbots have gained significant popularity due to their scalability and success in individualizing resources. In recent years, scientific communities and researchers have started recognizing this technology's potential to inform communities, promote health outcomes, and address health disparities. The development of Rosie is an interdisciplinary project, with teams focused on the technical build of the application (app), the development of machine learning models, and community outreach, making Rosie a chatbot built with the input from the communities it aims to serve. From June to October 2022, more than 20 demonstration sessions were conducted in Washington, District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia, where a total of 109 pregnant women and new mothers of color could interact with Rosie. Results from the live demonstrations showed that 75% of mothers searched for maternity and baby-related information at least once a week and more than 90% of participants expressed the likelihood to use the app. Most of the participants inquired about their baby's development, nutrition for babies, and identifying and addressing the causes of certain symptoms and conditions, accounting for about 80% of the total questions asked. Mother-related questions in the community demonstrations were mainly about pregnancy. The high level of interest in the chatbot is a clear indication of the need for more resources. Rosie aims to help close the racial gap in maternal and infant health disparities by providing new mothers with easy access to reliable health information.

Zika discourse in the Americas: A multilingual topic analysis of Twitter.

This work examines Twitter discussion surrounding the 2015 outbreak of Zika, a virus that is most often mild but has been associated with serious birth defects and neurological syndromes. We introduce and analyze a collection of 3.9 million tweets mentioning Zika geolocated to North and South America, where the virus is most prevalent. Using a multilingual topic model, we automatically identify and extract the key topics of discussion across the dataset in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. We examine the variation in Twitter activity across time and location, finding that rises in activity tend to follow to major events, and geographic rates of Zika-related discussion are moderately correlated with Zika incidence (ρ = .398).

Measuring discursive influence across scholarship.

Assessing scholarly influence is critical for understanding the collective system of scholarship and the history of academic inquiry. Influence is multifaceted, and citations reveal only part of it. Citation counts exhibit preferential attachment and follow a rigid "news cycle" that can miss sustained and indirect forms of influence. Building on dynamic topic models that track distributional shifts in discourse over time, we introduce a variant that incorporates features, such as authorship, affiliation, and publication venue, to assess how these contexts interact with content to shape future scholarship. We perform in-depth analyses on collections of physics research (500,000 abstracts; 102 years) and scholarship generally (JSTOR repository: 2 million full-text articles; 130 years). Our measure of document influence helps predict citations and shows how outcomes, such as winning a Nobel Prize or affiliation with a highly ranked institution, boost influence. Analysis of citations alongside discursive influence reveals that citations tend to credit authors who persist in their fields over time and discount credit for works that are influential over many topics or are "ahead of their time." In this way, our measures provide a way to acknowledge diverse contributions that take longer and travel farther to achieve scholarly appreciation, enabling us to correct citation biases and enhance sensitivity to the full spectrum of scholarly impact.

Dirichlet mixtures, the Dirichlet process, and the structure of protein space.

The Dirichlet process is used to model probability distributions that are mixtures of an unknown number of components. Amino acid frequencies at homologous positions within related proteins have been fruitfully modeled by Dirichlet mixtures, and we use the Dirichlet process to derive such mixtures with an unbounded number of components. This application of the method requires several technical innovations to sample an unbounded number of Dirichlet-mixture components. The resulting Dirichlet mixtures model multiple-alignment data substantially better than do previously derived ones. They consist of over 500 components, in contrast to fewer than 40 previously, and provide a novel perspective on the structure of proteins. Individual protein positions should be seen not as falling into one of several categories, but rather as arrayed near probability ridges winding through amino acid multinomial space.