The evolution of health system planning and implementation of maternal telehealth services during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Differential access to healthcare is associated with disparities in maternal outcomes. Telehealth is one approach for improving access to maternal services. However, little is known regarding how health systems leverage telehealth to close the access gap. Objective: This study examines how health systems have approached decisions about using telehealth for maternal services before and during the COVID-19 public health emergency and what factors were considered. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 health system leaders between July and October 2021 and June and August 2022. We used a rapid analysis followed by a content analysis approach. Results: Five health systems did not provide maternal telehealth services before the PHE due to a lack of reimbursement. Two health systems provided limited services as research endeavors, and one had integrated telehealth into routine maternity care. During the PHE, all transitioned to telehealth, with the primary consideration being patient and staff safety. At the time of the interview, key considerations shifted to patient access, patient preferences, patient complexity, return on investment, and staff burnout. However, several barriers impacted telehealth use, including coverage of portable devices and connectivity. These issues were reported to be common among underinsured, low-income, and rural patients. Health systems with particularly advanced capabilities worked on approaches to fill access gaps for these patients. Conclusion: Some health systems prioritized telehealth to improve access to high-quality maternal services for patients at the highest risk of adverse outcomes. However, policy and patient-level barriers to equitable implementation of these services persist.

Disparities in Maternal Health Visits Between Rural and Urban Communities in the United States, 2016-2018.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to estimate the rural-urban differences in the receipt of prepregnancy, prenatal, and postpartum services. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional data analysis using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Monitoring System from 2016 to 2018 to analyze rural-urban differences in the receipt of medical visits and care content delivery during the prepregnancy year, as well as the prenatal and postpartum periods among birthing people in the US, using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Rural-dwelling birthing people were significantly less likely to attend a medical visit in the prepregnancy year or postpartum period, even when controlled for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Compared to their urban counterparts, they were also less likely to receive comprehensive screening and counseling in the prepregnancy and postpartum maternity phases. CONCLUSION: Efforts to ameliorate rural-urban differences in maternal care access and quality should explicitly adopt multilevel, systemic approaches to policy and program implementation and evaluation. Policymakers and practitioners should consider telehealth as a potential complementary tool to minimize gaps in quality of care which disproportionately impact rural-dwelling birthing people.