Prolonged surgery increases the likelihood of admission of scheduled ambulatory surgery patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify variables influencing the likelihood of unanticipated admission following scheduled ambulatory surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case-controlled chart review study. SETTING: A large academic tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 8,549 ASA physical status I, II, III, and IV patients who underwent scheduled ambulatory surgery in 1991. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 8,549 patients, 216 were admitted, with complete medical record information available for 167 of the admitted patients. The most common reasons for admission among the 167 were surgical (43%), anesthetic (28%), and medical (17%) complications. Odds for admission following long surgery (of at least 60 minutes) were 7.5 times (p < 0.001) greater than following short surgery (under 60 minutes). Among long cases, independent variables influencing admission were: general anesthesia [odds ratio 20.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4 to 45.6], and monitored anesthesia care or regional anesthesia (combined odds ratio 8.3; 95% CI 1.7 to 40.8). ASA physical status and patient age did not significantly influence admission rate for long cases. For short cases, patients over 65 years (odds ratio 5.6; 95% CI 2.6 to 12.0), ASA physical status III or IV (odds ratio 4.8; 95% CI 2.0 to 11.6), use of general anesthesia (odds ratio 4.7; 95% CI 1.5 to 14.2), and monitored anesthesia care or regional anesthesia (odds ratio 3.1; 95% CI 1.0 to 10.1) independently influenced the likelihood of admission. Type of surgery and gender had no detectable effect on admission. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery duration of 60 minutes or longer was the most important predictor of unanticipated admission following scheduled ambulatory surgery.

The effect of a propofol-based sedation technique on cumulative embryo scores, clinical pregnancy rates, and implantation rates in patients undergoing embryo transfers with donor oocytes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect, if any, of a propofol-based sedation technique on the reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing embryo transfers with donor oocytes. These ova recipients form a unique subgroup, whose clinical outcomes are unrelated to direct anesthetic effects on their reproductive tracts. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A 1200-bed university medical center. PATIENTS: 117 patients who received fresh embryo transfer cycles between January 1991 and December 1995. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The anesthesia records of 106 women who donated ova were reviewed for propofol usage during the transvaginal needle aspiration of the ova. The medical records of the 117 patients who received these donated embryos were reviewed for cumulative embryo scores, clinical pregnancy rates, and implantation rates. Fourteen patients received ova from women who were sedated with fentanyl and midazolam during ovum retrievals, while 103 patients received ova from women who had been given fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol in doses of 1.87 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg. The pregnancy rate among all patients who received ova from women who received propofol (44 of 103 = 42.7%) was 14.1% greater than those whose ovum donors did not receive propofol (4 of 14 = 28.6). 78.6% of both propofol and non propofol-exposed groups had cumulative embryo scores of greater than 50. Among patients who became pregnant, 52.3% of propofol-exposed and 50% of nonpropofol-exposed cases had greater than 20% implantation rates. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence from our data that the administration of propofol during the aspiration of ovarian follicles for oocyte donation had a negative impact on the oocytes as measured by cumulative embryo scores, probability of a clinical pregnancy, or implantation rate.

Surgical patients' attitudes regarding participation in clinical anesthesia research.

We designed a questionnaire to identify the factors influencing both day of admission surgery (DAS) and ambulatory (AMB) patients in their decision whether to participate in and give informed consent for clinical anesthesia research. On the day of surgery, 276 patients were approached to complete a questionnaire and a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess anxiety. The data collected were observational and are presented as percentages for each group (DAS and AMB). One hundred eighty-two patient (60 DAS and 122 AMB) completed questionnaires. Both DAS and AMB patients desired 20-30 min to read a consent form. Preferred conditions for enrollment by both groups were as follows: interview at the time of preadmission testing; after consulting with their physician; in a private setting while dressed in street clothes; and with assurance that the investigator would also participate in the study, if eligible. Unacceptable conditions were as follows: research associated with any risk and interview in the operating room holding area. All patients responded that they were capable of making the decision whether to participate in research on the day of surgery. Most AMB and DAS patients found it acceptable to be recruited on the day of surgery, if approached appropriately.