RESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection for which empiric antibiotics are prescribed despite limited progression to urosepsis. More than half of antibiotics prescribed to older adults for a suspected UTI are considered unnecessary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding management of older women (>65 years) with symptoms attributed to UTIs among family and internal medicine providers. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study surveyed 330 primary care providers in November 2021 regarding management of UTI symptoms. The primary outcome was the proportion of primary care providers who felt safe waiting for urine culture results before prescribing antibiotics in older women. RESULTS: The response rate was 43.0% (n = 142) with the majority of primary care providers practicing medicine more than 15 years (56.3%). For the primary outcome, 26.1% (n = 37) of primary care providers felt safe waiting for a urine culture result before prescribing antibiotics, while 62.0% (n = 88) felt delaying antibiotics depended on multiple factors, and 9.2% (n = 13) felt it was never safe to delay antibiotics. Primary care providers that either never felt it was safe to delay antibiotics or felt that "it depends" on a variety of factors, attributed their antibiotics administration to concern for progression to sepsis (n = 50, 49.5%) or progression of symptoms (n = 28, 27.7%). A higher proportion of primary care providers practicing more than 15 years felt safe delaying antibiotics compared with primary care providers with less experience (33.8% vs 18.3%, P = 0.04), and 70.3% of those who felt safe delaying antibiotics had more than 15 years of experience. CONCLUSION: Primary care providers with more clinical experience have more comfort delaying antibiotics in older women with UTI symptoms.
Assuntos
Sepse , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Urinálise , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: The impact of a persistently enlarged genital hiatus (GH) after vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on prolapse outcomes is currently unclear. OBJECTIVES: This secondary analysis of the Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized trial was conducted among participants who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. We hypothesized that women with a persistently enlarged GH size would have a higher proportion of prolapse recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension as part of the Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized trial (NCT01802281) were divided into 3 groups based on change in their preoperative to 4- to 6-week postoperative GH measurements: (1) persistently enlarged GH, 2) improved GH, or (3) stably normal GH. Baseline characteristics and 2-year surgical outcomes were compared across groups. A logistic regression model for composite surgical failure controlling for advanced anterior wall prolapse and GH group was fitted. RESULTS: This secondary analysis included 81 women. The proportion with composite surgical failure was significantly higher among those with a persistently enlarged GH (50%) compared with a stably normal GH (12%) with an unadjusted risk difference of 38% (95% confidence interval, 4%-68%). When adjusted for advanced prolapse in the anterior compartment at baseline, the odds of composite surgical failure was 6 times higher in the persistently enlarged GH group compared with the stably normal group (95% confidence interval, 1.0-37.5; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: A persistently enlarged GH after vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse may be a risk factor for recurrent prolapse.
Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Prolapso Uterino , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Útero/cirurgia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/epidemiologia , Ligamentos/cirurgiaRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: This study assesses resting genital hiatus (GH) measurements under anesthesia as compared with in-office measurements for intraoperative planning purposes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of general anesthesia and apical suspension on GH measurements compared with office measurements. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort of women who underwent minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy within an academic urogynecology practice. Genital hiatus for each patient was measured at 4 time points: (1) preoperative office examination (baseline) at rest (GH rest ) and with strain (GH strain ); (2) following anesthesia induction, at rest (GH induction ); (3) immediately after sacrocolpopexy, at rest (GH colpopexy ); and (4) 4- to 6-week postoperative visit, strain (GH postop ). Enlarged baseline GH strain was defined as ≥4 cm. Paired statistics and analysis of variance were used for comparisons. RESULTS: Fifty-one women were included, whose mean age was 61.3 ± 8.2 years; the majority had stage ≥3 prolapse (n = 39 [76.4%]). Concomitant procedures included hysterectomy (n = 33 [64.7%]) and posterior colporrhaphy or perineorrhaphy (n = 8 [15.7%]). The majority had an enlarged baseline GH strain (n = 39 [76.4%]), and overall cohort mean was 4.7 ± 1.3 cm. Compared with baseline GH rest , mean GH induction was larger (GH induction : 4.6 ± 1.4 cm vs GH rest : 3.8 ± 1.2 cm, P < 0.01) but not different from baseline GH strain (GH induction : 4.6 ± 1.4 cm vs GH strain : 4.7 ± 1.3 cm, P = 0.81). GH colpopexy was decreased from baseline GH strain with a mean difference of 1.1 ± 1.3 cm ( P < 0.01). This difference was driven by women with enlarged baseline GH strain who experienced a mean decrease of 1.5 ± 1.1 cm ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Genital hiatus after induction of anesthesia does not significantly differ from preoperative straining GH. Apical suspension with sacrocolpopexy alone resulted in immediate reduction in GH measures, with greater decreases observed in women with enlarged preoperative GH.
Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vulva , Períneo , Período Pós-OperatórioRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration uses the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database to evaluate the safety of urogynecologic meshes; however, reports on individual meshes have not been characterized. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare complications among available urogynecologic meshes reported to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional analysis of medical device reports (MDRs) of urogynecologic mesh from January 2004 to March 2019, using the Reed Tech Navigator (LexisNexis), which codes MDRs. The percentage of reports containing specific complaints (not an adverse event rate) were compared with χ 2 tests with Dunn-Sidak correction. Correlations with time on market, mesh weight, stiffness, and porosity were determined. RESULTS: The 34,485 reports examined included 6 transvaginal meshes, 4 sacrocolpopexy meshes, and 10 midurethral slings. Most reported events were pain, erosion, and infection. For transvaginal prolapse, less than 10% of Uphold Lite (Boston Scientific) reports contained pain or erosion versus greater than 90% of Prolift/Prolift+M (Ethicon, P < 0.001). For sacrocolpopexy mesh, greater than 90% of Gynemesh (Ethicon; Prolift in vaginal form) reports included erosion and pain versus less than 60% for Artisyn (Ethicon), Restorelle (Colpoplast), and Upsylon (Boston Scientific, P < 0.0001). For slings, Gynecare TVT Obturator had the highest proportion of erosion and pain complaints. Heavier sling meshes had more reports. When Ascend (Caldera Medical), an outlier with only 5 reports, was excluded, transvaginal mesh stiffness correlated strongly with number of reports. For transvaginal meshes, number of reports correlated with time on market (ρ = 0.8, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Individual meshes have different properties with different complication profiles, which should inform mesh development and use. Gynemesh MDRs included pain and erosion more frequently than others. Comprehensive registries are needed.
Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Slings Suburetrais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Dor/etiologia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/etiologia , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of repeated evaluations for urinary tract infection (UTI) after a single occurrence and to identify characteristics associated with repeated evaluations in a female Medicare population. METHODS: This was a case-control study of women aged 65 years or older undergoing incident outpatient evaluation for UTI between the years of 2011 and 2018. We defined UTI evaluation as an outpatient encounter with diagnostic codes for UTI and an order for urine culture. We excluded women with diagnostic codes suggestive of a complicated UTI. Among all women with an incident UTI evaluation, cases were defined as those with repeated evaluations, defined as either a total of ≥2 UTI evaluations in 6 months and/or ≥3 in 1 year. The characteristics of cases versus controls were compared with both an unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression model. RESULTS: Our overall cohort consisted of 169,958, of which 13,779 (8.1%) had repeated evaluations for UTI. In unadjusted analyses, cases were more likely to be older than 75 years, of White race, and to have cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, dementia, renal disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (all P's < 0.01) as compared with controls. In adjusted analysis, ages 75 years to 84 years (P < 0.01) and ages older than 84 years (P < 0.01) along with multiple medical comorbidities were significant risk factors for repeated evaluations for UTI. Black women had lower odds of repeated evaluations for UTI (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among women with a single UTI evaluation, repeated evaluations for UTI were associated with older age, White race, and medical comorbidities. Future studies should investigate racial disparities seen in care-delivery behavior and/or care-seeking behavior.