18F-FDG Dedicated Breast PET Complementary to Breast MRI for Evaluating Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Purpose To compare quantitative measures of tumor metabolism and perfusion using fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dedicated breast PET (dbPET) and breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI during early treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods Prospectively collected DCE MRI and 18F-FDG dbPET examinations were analyzed at baseline (T0) and after 3 weeks (T1) of NAC in 20 participants with 22 invasive breast cancers. FDG dbPET-derived standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and MRI-derived percent enhancement (PE), signal enhancement ratio (SER), and functional tumor volume (FTV) were calculated at both time points. Differences between FDG dbPET and MRI parameters were evaluated after stratifying by receptor status, Ki-67 index, and residual cancer burden. Parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results High Ki-67 tumors had higher baseline SUVmean (difference, 5.1; P = .01) and SUVpeak (difference, 5.5; P = .04). At T1, decreases were observed in FDG dbPET measures (pseudo-median difference T0 minus T1 value [95% CI]) of SUVmax (-6.2 [-10.2, -2.6]; P < .001), SUVmean (-2.6 [-4.9, -1.3]; P < .001), SUVpeak (-4.2 [-6.9, -2.3]; P < .001), and TLG (-29.1 mL3 [-71.4, -6.8]; P = .005) and MRI measures of SERpeak (-1.0 [-1.3, -0.2]; P = .02) and FTV (-11.6 mL3 [-22.2, -1.7]; P = .009). Relative to nonresponsive tumors, responsive tumors showed a difference (95% CI) in percent change in SUVmax of -34.3% (-55.9%, 1.5%; P = .06) and in PEpeak of -42.4% (95% CI: -110.5%, 8.5%; P = .08). Conclusion 18F-FDG dbPET was sensitive to early changes during NAC and provided complementary information to DCE MRI that may be useful for treatment response evaluation. Keywords: Breast, PET, Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Clinical trial registration no. NCT01042379 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Impact of body mass index on pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the I-SPY 2 trial.

PURPOSE: Increased body mass index (BMI) has been associated with poor outcomes in women with breast cancer. We evaluated the association between BMI and pathological complete response (pCR) in the I-SPY 2 trial. METHODS: 978 patients enrolled in the I-SPY 2 trial 3/2010-11/2016 and had a recorded baseline BMI prior to treatment were included in the analysis. Tumor subtypes were defined by hormone receptor and HER2 status. Pretreatment BMI was categorized as obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2), and normal/underweight (< 25 kg/m2). pCR was defined as elimination of detectable invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis and ypN0) at the time of surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations between BMI and pCR. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between different BMI categories were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The median age in the study population was 49 years. pCR rates were 32.8% in normal/underweight, 31.4% in overweight, and 32.5% in obese patients. In univariable analysis, there was no significant difference in pCR with BMI. In multivariable analysis adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, menopausal status, breast cancer subtype, and clinical stage, there was no significant difference in pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for obese compared with normal/underweight patients (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.68-1.63, P = 0.83), and for overweight compared with normal/underweight (OR = 1, 95% CI 0.64-1.47, P = 0.88). We tested for potential interaction between BMI and breast cancer subtype; however, the interaction was not significant in the multivariable model (P = 0.09). Multivariate Cox regression showed there was no difference in EFS (P = 0.81) or OS (P = 0.52) between obese, overweight, and normal/underweight breast cancer patients with a median follow-up time of 3.8 years. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in pCR rates by BMI with actual body weight-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this biologically high-risk breast cancer population in the I-SPY2 trial.

Impact of Body Mass Index on Pathological Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results from the I-SPY 2 trial.

Purpose: Increased body mass index (BMI) has been associated with poor outcomes in women with breast cancer. We evaluated the association between BMI and pathological complete response (pCR) in the I-SPY 2 trial. Methods: 978 patientsenrolled in the I-SPY 2 trial 3/2010-11/2016 and had a recorded baseline BMI prior to treatment were included in the analysis. Tumor subtypes were defined by hormone receptor and HER2 status. Pretreatment BMI was categorized as obese (BMI≥30 kg/m2), overweight (25≤BMI < 30 kg/m2), and normal/underweight (< 25 kg/m2). pCR was defined as elimination of detectable invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis and ypN0) at the time of surgery. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine associations between BMI and pCR. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) between different BMI categories were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: The median age in the study population was 49 years. pCR rates were 32.8% in normal/underweight, 31.4% in overweight, and 32.5% in obese patients. In univariable analysis, there was no significant difference in pCR with BMI. In multivariable analysis adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, menopausal status, breast cancer subtype, and clinical stage, there was no significant difference in pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for obese compared with normal/underweight patients (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.68-1.63, p = 0.83), and for overweight compared with normal/underweight (OR = 1, 95% CI: 0.64-1.47, p = 0.88). We tested for potential interaction between BMI and breast cancer subtype; however, the interaction was not significant in the multivariable model (p = 0.09). Multivariate Cox regression showed there was no difference in EFS (p = 0.81) or OS (p = 0.52) between obese, overweight, and normal/underweight breast cancer patients with a median follow-up time of 3.8 years. Conclusions: We found no difference in pCR rates by BMI with actual body weight based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this biologically high-risk breast cancer population in the I-SPY2 trial.

Patient perspectives on window of opportunity clinical trials in early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Window of opportunity trials (WOT) are increasingly common in oncology research. In WOT participants receive a drug between diagnosis and anti-cancer treatment, usually for the purpose of investigating that drugs effect on cancer biology. This qualitative study aimed to understand patient perspectives on WOT. METHODS: We recruited adults diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer awaiting definitive therapy at a single-academic medical center to participate in semi-structured interviews. Thematic and content analyses were performed to identify attitudes and factors that would influence decisions about WOT participation. RESULTS: We interviewed 25 women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. The most common positive attitudes toward trial participation were a desire to contribute to research and a hope for personal benefit, while the most common concerns were the potential for side effects and how they might impact fitness for planned treatment. Participants indicated family would be an important normative factor in decision-making and, during the COVID-19 pandemic, deemed the absence of family members during clinic visits a barrier to enrollment. Factors that could hinder participation included delay in standard treatment and the requirement for additional visits or procedures. Ultimately, most interviewees stated they would participate in a WOT if offered (N = 17/25). CONCLUSION: In this qualitative study, interviewees weighed altruism and hypothetical personal benefit against the possibility of side effect from a WOT. In-person family presence during trial discussion, challenging during COVID-19, was important for many. Our results may inform trial design and communication approaches in future window of opportunity efforts.

Rationale, Study Design, and Cohort Characteristics for the Markers for Environmental Exposures (MEE) Study.

Environmental factors have been linked to many diseases and health conditions, but reliable assessment of environmental exposures is challenging. Developing biomarkers of environmental exposures, rather than relying on self-report, will improve our ability to assess the association of such exposures with disease. Epigenetic markers, most notably DNA methylation, have been identified for some environmental exposures, but identification of markers for additional exposures is still needed. The rationale behind the Markers for Environmental Exposures (MEE) Study was to (1) identify biomarkers, especially epigenetic markers, of environmental exposures, such as pesticides, air/food/water contaminants, and industrial chemicals that are commonly encountered in the general population; and (2) support the study of potential relationships between environmental exposures and health and health-related factors. The MEE Study is a cross-sectional study with potential for record linkage and follow-up. The well-characterized cohort of 400 postmenopausal women has generated a repository of biospecimens, including blood, urine, and saliva samples. Paired data include an environmental exposures questionnaire, a breast health questionnaire, dietary recalls, and a food frequency questionnaire. This work describes the rationale, study design, and cohort characteristics of the MEE Study. In addition to our primary research goals, we hope that the data and biorepository generated by this study will serve as a resource for future studies and collaboration.