RESUMO
Background: Machine learning (ML) can differentiate papilloedema from normal optic discs using fundus photos. Currently, papilloedema severity is assessed using the descriptive, ordinal Frisén scale. We hypothesise that ML can quantify papilloedema and detect a treatment effect on papilloedema due to idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Methods: We trained a convolutional neural network to assign a Frisén grade to fundus photos taken from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT). We applied modified subject-based fivefold cross-validation to grade 2979 longitudinal images from 158 participants' study eyes (ie, the eye with the worst mean deviation) in the IIHTT. Compared with the human expert-determined grades, we hypothesise that ML-estimated grades can also demonstrate differential changes over time in the IIHTT study eyes between the treatment (acetazolamide (ACZ) plus diet) and placebo (diet only) groups. Findings: The average ML-determined grade correlated strongly with the reference standard (r=0.76, p<0.001; mean absolute error=0.54). At the presentation, treatment groups had similar expert-determined and ML-determined Frisén grades. The average ML-determined grade for the ACZ group (1.7, 95% CI 1.5 to 1.8) was significantly lower (p=0.0003) than for the placebo group (2.3, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.5) at the 6-month trial outcome. Interpretation: Supervised ML of fundus photos quantified the degree of papilloedema and changes over time reflecting the effects of ACZ. Given the increasing availability of fundus photography, neurologists will be able to use ML to quantify papilloedema on a continuous scale that incorporates the features of the Frisén grade to monitor interventions.
RESUMO
We previously applied archetypal analysis (AA) using visual fields (VF) from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial (IIHTT) to derive a model, which quantified patterns (or archetypes [ATs] of VF loss), anticipated recovery, and identified residual VF deficits. We hypothesized that AA could produce similar results using IIH VFs collected in clinical practice. We applied AA to 803 VFs from 235 eyes with IIH from an outpatient neuro-ophthalmology clinic and created a clinic-derived model of ATs, with the relative weight (RW) and average total deviation (TD) for each AT. We also created a combined-derived model from an input dataset containing the clinic VFs and 2862 VFs from the IIHTT. We used both models to decompose clinic VF into ATs of varying percent weight (PW), correlated presentation AT PW with mean deviation (MD), and evaluated final visit VFs considered "normal" by MD ≥ -2.00 dB for residual abnormal ATs. The 14-AT clinic-derived and combined-derived models revealed similar patterns of VF loss previously identified in the IIHTT model. AT1 (a normal pattern) was most prevalent in both models (RW = 51.8% for clinic-derived; 35.4% for combined-derived). Presentation AT1 PW correlated with final visit MD (r = 0.82, p < 0.001 for the clinic-derived model; r = 0.59, p < 0.001 for the combined-derived model). Both models showed ATs with similar patterns of regional VF loss. The most common patterns of VF loss in "normal" final visit VFs using each model were clinic-derived AT2 (mild global depression with enlarged blind spot; 44/125 VFs; 34%) and combined-derived AT2 (near-normal; 93/149 VFs; 62%). AA provides quantitative values for IIH-related patterns of VF loss that can be used to monitor VF changes in a clinic setting. Presentation AT1 PW is associated with the degree of VF recovery. AA identifies residual VF deficits not otherwise indicated by MD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Archetypal analysis (AA), a form of unsupervised machine learning, can identify quantifiable visual field (VF) patterns seen in optic neuritis (ON), known as archetypes (ATs). We hypothesized that AT weight changes over time would reflect the course of recovery and the effects of therapy in ON. We explored whether baseline AT weights would be associated with VF status at the clinical trial outcome and if ATs would indicate residual VF defects in eyes with mean deviation (MD) ≥ -2.00 at six months. METHODS: We used a published 16-AT model derived from 3892 Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial VFs (456 eyes) for all analyses. We measured AT weight changes over the six-month study period and used asymptotic regression to analyze the rate of change. We compared AT weights at six months between treatment groups. We evaluated associations between baseline AT weight thresholds and VF outcome or treatment effect. We calculated residual AT weights in eyes with MD ≥ -2.00 dB at six months. RESULTS: Over six months, AT1 (a normal VF pattern) demonstrated the greatest median weight change, increasing from 0.00% (IQR 0.00-0.00%) at baseline to 60.0% (IQR 38.3-70.8%) at six months (p < 0.001). At outcome, the intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) group had the highest median AT1 weight (IVMP: 63.3%, IQR 51.3-72.8%; placebo: 56.2%, IQR 35.1-71.6%; prednisone 58.3%, IQR 35.1-71.6%; p = 0.019). Eyes with AT1 weight ≥ 19% at baseline had superior median MD values (-0.91 vs. -2.07 dB, p < 0.001) and AT1 weights (70.8% vs. 57.8% p < 0.001) at six months. Only eyes with AT1 weight < 19% at baseline showed a treatment benefit for IVMP, with a higher six-month median AT1 weight compared to placebo (p = 0.015) and prednisone (p = 0.016), and a higher median MD compared to placebo (p = 0.027). At six months, 182 (80.2%) VFs with MD ≥ -2.00 had at least one abnormal AT. DISCUSSION: Changes in quantifiable, archetypal patterns of VF loss reflect recovery in ON. Machine learning analysis of the VFs in optic neuritis reveals associations with response to therapy and VF outcome, and uncovers residual deficits, not readily seen with standard evaluations.