Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(8): 1143-1151, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31218780

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To enhance automated methods for accurately identifying opioid-related overdoses and classifying types of overdose using electronic health record (EHR) databases. METHODS: We developed a natural language processing (NLP) software application to code clinical text documentation of overdose, including identification of intention for self-harm, substances involved, substance abuse, and error in medication usage. Using datasets balanced with cases of suspected overdose and records of individuals at elevated risk for overdose, we developed and validated the application using Kaiser Permanente Northwest data, then tested portability of the application using Kaiser Permanente Washington data. Datasets were chart-reviewed to provide a gold standard for comparison and evaluation of the automated method. RESULTS: The method performed well in identifying overdose (sensitivity = 0.80, specificity = 0.93), intentional overdose (sensitivity = 0.81, specificity = 0.98), and involvement of opioids (excluding heroin, sensitivity = 0.72, specificity = 0.96) and heroin (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 1.0). The method performed poorly at identifying adverse drug reactions and overdose due to patient error and fairly at identifying substance abuse in opioid-related unintentional overdose (sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.96). Evaluation using validation datasets yielded significant reductions, in specificity and negative predictive values only, for many classifications mentioned above. However, these measures remained above 0.80, thus, performance observed during development was largely maintained during validation. Similar results were obtained when evaluating portability, although there was a significant reduction in sensitivity for unintentional overdose that was attributed to missing text clinical notes in the database. CONCLUSIONS: Methods that process text clinical notes show promise for improving accuracy and fidelity at identifying and classifying overdoses according to type using EHR data.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/complicações , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Heroína/intoxicação , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Risco , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Washington
2.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(8): 1138-1142, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31095831

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To facilitate surveillance and evaluate interventions addressing opioid-related overdoses, algorithms are needed for use in large health care databases to identify and differentiate community-occurring opioid-related overdoses from inpatient-occurring opioid-related overdose/oversedation. METHODS: Data were from Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), a large integrated health plan. We iteratively developed and evaluated an algorithm for electronically identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation in KPNW hospitals from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. Chart audits assessed accuracy; data sources included administrative and clinical records. RESULTS: The best-performing algorithm used these rules: (1) Include events with opioids administered in an inpatient setting (including emergency department/urgent care) followed by naloxone administration within 275 hours of continuous inpatient stay; (2) exclude events with electroconvulsive therapy procedure codes; and (3) exclude events in which an opioid was administered prior to hospital discharge and followed by readmission with subsequent naloxone administration. Using this algorithm, we identified 870 suspect inpatient overdose/oversedation events and chart audited a random sample of 235. Of the random sample, 185 (78.7%) were deemed overdoses/oversedation, 37 (15.5%) were not, and 13 (5.5%) were possible cases. The number of hours between time of opioid and naloxone administration did not affect algorithm accuracy. When "possible" overdoses/oversedations were included with confirmed events, overall positive predictive value (PPV) was very good (PPV = 84.0%). Additionally, PPV was reasonable when evaluated specifically for hospital stays with emergency/urgent care admissions (PPV = 77.0%) and excellent for elective surgery admissions (PPV = 97.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm performance was reasonable for identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation with best performance among elective surgery patients.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Analgésicos Opioides/intoxicação , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Naloxona/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...