Global sensitivity analysis based on Gaussian-process metamodelling for complex biomechanical problems.

Biomechanical models often need to describe very complex systems, organs or diseases, and hence also include a large number of parameters. One of the attractive features of physics-based models is that in those models (most) parameters have a clear physical meaning. Nevertheless, the determination of these parameters is often very elaborate and costly and shows a large scatter within the population. Hence, it is essential to identify the most important parameters (worth the effort) for a particular problem at hand. In order to distinguish parameters which have a significant influence on a specific model output from non-influential parameters, we use sensitivity analysis, in particular the Sobol method as a global variance-based method. However, the Sobol method requires a large number of model evaluations, which is prohibitive for computationally expensive models. We therefore employ Gaussian processes as a metamodel for the underlying full model. Metamodelling introduces further uncertainty, which we also quantify. We demonstrate the approach by applying it to two different problems: nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery in a complex, multiphase tumour-growth model, and arterial growth and remodelling. Even relatively small numbers of evaluations of the full model suffice to identify the influential parameters in both cases and to separate them from non-influential parameters. The approach also allows the quantification of higher-order interaction effects. We thus show that a variance-based global sensitivity analysis is feasible for complex, computationally expensive biomechanical models. Different aspects of sensitivity analysis are covered including a transparent declaration of the uncertainties involved in the estimation process. Such a global sensitivity analysis not only helps to massively reduce costs for experimental determination of parameters but is also highly beneficial for inverse analysis of such complex models.

Validation and parameter optimization of a hybrid embedded/homogenized solid tumor perfusion model.

The goal of this paper is to investigate the validity of a hybrid embedded/homogenized in-silico approach for modeling perfusion through solid tumors. The rationale behind this novel idea is that only the larger blood vessels have to be explicitly resolved while the smaller scales of the vasculature are homogenized. As opposed to typical discrete or fully resolved 1D-3D models, the required data can be obtained with in-vivo imaging techniques since the morphology of the smaller vessels is not necessary. By contrast, the larger vessels, whose topology and structure is attainable noninvasively, are resolved and embedded as one-dimensional inclusions into the three-dimensional tissue domain which is modeled as a porous medium. A sound mortar-type formulation is employed to couple the two representations of the vasculature. We validate the hybrid model and optimize its parameters by comparing its results to a corresponding fully resolved model based on several well-defined metrics. These tests are performed on a complex data set of three different tumor types with heterogeneous vascular architectures. The correspondence of the hybrid model in terms of mean representative elementary volume blood and interstitial fluid pressures is excellent with relative errors of less than 4%. Larger, but less important and explicable errors are present in terms of blood flow in the smaller, homogenized vessels. We finally discuss and demonstrate how the hybrid model can be further improved to apply it for studies on tumor perfusion and the efficacy of drug delivery.