Impact of antithrombotic agents on outcomes in patients requiring surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

A chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a collection of aged blood between the dura and the brain, typically treated with surgical evacuation. Many patients with CSDH have comorbidities requiring the use of antithrombotic medications. The optimal management of these medications in the context of CSDH remains unknown, as the risk of recurrence must be carefully weighed against the risk of vaso-occlusive events. To better understand these risks and inform the development of clinical practice guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline and Embase databases. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023397061). A total of 44 studies were included, encompassing 1 prospective cohort study and 43 retrospective cohort studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for CSDH recurrence and vaso-occlusive events in patients taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications compared to patients not receiving antithrombotic therapy. GRADE was used to assess the quality of evidence. In patients on anticoagulant therapy at CSDH diagnosis, the pooled OR for CSDH recurrence was 1.41 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.79; I2 = 28%). For patients on antiplatelet therapy, the pooled OR was 1.31 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.58; I2 = 32%). Patients taking antithrombotic medications had a significantly higher risk of vaso-occlusive events, with a pooled OR of 3.74 (95% CI 2.12 to 6.60; I2 = 0%). There was insufficient evidence to assess the impact of time to recommence antithrombotic medication on CSDH outcomes. We found that baseline antithrombotic use is associated with the risk of CSDH recurrence and vaso-occlusive events following surgical evacuation. The evidence base is of low quality, and decisions regarding antithrombotic therapy should be individualised for each patient. Further high-quality, prospective studies or registry-based designs are needed to better inform clinical decision-making and establish evidence-based guidelines.

Endovascular Brain-Computer Interfaces in Poststroke Paralysis.

Stroke is a leading cause of paralysis, most frequently affecting the upper limbs and vocal folds. Despite recent advances in care, stroke recovery invariably reaches a plateau, after which there are permanent neurological impairments. Implantable brain-computer interface devices offer the potential to bypass permanent neurological lesions. They function by (1) recording neural activity, (2) decoding the neural signal occurring in response to volitional motor intentions, and (3) generating digital control signals that may be used to control external devices. While brain-computer interface technology has the potential to revolutionize neurological care, clinical translation has been limited. Endovascular arrays present a novel form of minimally invasive brain-computer interface devices that have been deployed in human subjects during early feasibility studies. This article provides an overview of endovascular brain-computer interface devices and critically evaluates the patient with stroke as an implant candidate. Future opportunities are mapped, along with the challenges arising when decoding neural activity following infarction. Limitations arise when considering intracerebral hemorrhage and motor cortex lesions; however, future directions are outlined that aim to address these challenges.

Management of mild degenerative cervical myelopathy and asymptomatic spinal cord compression: an international survey.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVE: Currently there is limited evidence and guidance on the management of mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and asymptomatic spinal cord compression (ASCC). Anecdotal evidence suggest variance in clinical practice. The objectives of this study were to assess current practice and to quantify the variability in clinical practice. METHODS: Spinal surgeons and some additional health professionals completed a web-based survey distributed by email to members of AO Spine and the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) North American Society. Questions captured experience with DCM, frequency of DCM patient encounters, and standard of practice in the assessment of DCM. Further questions assessed the definition and management of mild DCM, and the management of ASCC. RESULTS: A total of 699 respondents, mostly surgeons, completed the survey. Every world region was represented in the responses. Half (50.1%, n = 359) had greater than 10 years of professional experience with DCM. For mild DCM, standardised follow-up for non-operative patients was reported by 488 respondents (69.5%). Follow-up included a heterogeneous mix of investigations, most often at 6-month intervals (32.9%, n = 158). There was some inconsistency regarding which clinical features would cause a surgeon to counsel a patient towards surgery. Practice for ASCC aligned closely with mild DCM. Finally, there were some contradictory definitions of mild DCM provided in the form of free text. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals typically offer outpatient follow up for patients with mild DCM and/or asymptomatic ASCC. However, what this constitutes varies widely. Further research is needed to define best practice and support patient care.

Osteopathy in the Early Diagnosis and Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and disabling neurodegenerative condition. Surgical decompression is the only evidence-based treatment to halt disease progression; however, diagnosis and access to timely treatment are often delayed, which contribute to significant disability and dependence. Supporting early diagnosis and access to timely treatment is a critical priority. Exploring these challenges, Myelopathy.org has observed that people with DCM may seek osteopathy care for their symptoms, both before and after diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the current interaction between osteopaths and people with DCM and understand how this may be targeted to enhance the DCM diagnostic pathway. METHODS: Registered osteopaths in the United Kingdom completed a web-based survey hosted by the Institute of Osteopathy, as part of their institute's 2021 census. Responses were collected from February to May 2021. Demographic information about the respondents was captured, including age, gender, and ethnicity. Professional information captured included the year of qualification; region of practice; type of practice; and number of undiagnosed, operated diagnosed, and unoperated diagnosed DCM cases encountered per year. The completion of the survey was voluntary; however, a prize draw incentive was offered to participants. RESULTS: The demographics were heterogenous for the 547 practitioners who completed the survey. There was representation from a wide range of demographic groups, including the level of experience, gender, age, and the region of United Kingdom. At least 68.9% (377/547) of osteopaths reported encounters with DCM each year. Osteopaths most frequently encountered patients with undiagnosed DCM, with a mean of 3 patient encounters per year. This compares to 2 encounters per year with patients with diagnosed DCM. The level of practitioner experience was positively correlated with the detection of undiagnosed DCM (P<.005). The influence of practitioner experience was corroborated by a subgroup analysis looking at the relationship between practitioner age on the detection of undiagnosed DCM. Osteopaths older than 54 years encountered an average of 4.2 cases per year, whereas those younger than 35 years detected 2.9 cases per year. Osteopaths in private clinics reported encounters with a greater mean number (4.4) of undiagnosed DCM cases per year than osteopaths in other clinic types (3.0). CONCLUSIONS: Osteopaths reported that they frequently consult people with DCM, including those suspected to have undiagnosed or presurgical DCM. Given this concentrated presentation of early DCM and a workforce professionally trained to examine musculoskeletal disease, osteopaths could have an important role in accelerating access to timely treatment. We included a decision support tool and specialist referral template as a tool to support onward care.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy education in UK medical schools: a national cross-sectional survey of medical students.

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and progressive neurological condition caused by injury of the cervical spinal cord by degenerative spinal pathology. Delayed diagnosis leading to avoidable and irreversible disability is a major current problem limiting patient outcomes. Lack of sufficient representation of DCM in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula may contribute to poor recognition of DCM by non-specialist doctors. The objective of this study was to assess the DCM teaching provision in UK medical schools and the DCM knowledge of UK medical students. METHODS: UK medical students completed a web-based survey distributed nationally through university social media pages, university email bulletins and the national student network of Myelopathy.org. The survey comprised a 19-item questionnaire capturing data on student demographics, myelopathy teaching and myelopathy knowledge. Advertisements were repeated monthly over a 12-month recruitment period and participation was incentivised by entry into an Amazon voucher prize draw. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Psychology Research Ethics Committee, University of Cambridge (PRE.2018.099). RESULTS: A total of 751 medical students from 32 British medical schools completed the survey. Medical students from all year groups participated. Most students (520; 72%) had not received any medical school teaching about DCM. When students had received DCM teaching, the duration of teaching was minimal (75% < 1 h). A total of 350 students (47%) reported conducting private study on DCM. Modal student self-rating of their own knowledge of DCM was 'terrible' (356; 47%). There was no correlation between a student's subjective rating of their knowledge and their answers to objective questions. A total of 723 (96%) of students expressed interest in learning more about DCM, with lectures the preferred format. CONCLUSIONS: DCM appears to be a neglected condition in medical education which has implications for clinical practice. However, student enthusiasm to undertake private study suggests future teaching interventions will be well-received. Future work is necessary to characterise the format of DCM teaching that is most effective and to subsequently measure how educational interventions translate into clinical benefits.

Hard collar immobilisation following elective surgery on the cervical spine: a cross-sectional survey of UK spinal surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Although mostly used in the management of spinal trauma, hard collar immobilisation is also used as an adjunct to recovery after elective cervical spine surgery. Many surgeons believe that bracing reduces the risk of non-union and pain and provides a subjective sense of security for patients. There is little if any, evidence for this practice and immobilisation can be a direct cause of adverse events. The primary aim of this study was to provide an updated assessment of post-operative bracing practice in UK spinal surgeons, including the indications, rationale and perspectives on compliance and complications. METHODS: Neurosurgeons and spinal orthopaedic surgeons completed a web-based survey distributed by email to members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) and the British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS). Professional information captured included level of experience and whether surgeons had a specialist interest in spinal surgery. Questions first focused on the frequency and duration of hard collar immobilisation for common decompressive procedures. Later questions captured surgeon rationale, perceptions of patient compliance, complications, and collar removal. RESULTS: A total of 86 surgeons completed the survey, of whom 83% were spinal specialists. In total, 33 (38%) surgeons recommend a hard collar following at least one of the elective procedures listed. Collars were most commonly recommended following cervical corpectomy (30%). The support of fusion and bone healing was the most common rationale (82%), with post-operative pain (45%) and limiting patient activity (39%) also considered. Most surgeons (69%) believed that their patients were compliant. All listed types of complications were reported, with impaired activities of daily living (41%) and impaired sleep (34%) the most frequently cited. CONCLUSIONS: Current post-operative use of hard collars is much lower in the United Kingdom than previously reported in the United States. Surgeon decision-making is inconsistent and may benefit from greater standardisation. Future work is needed to help develop guidelines as a move away from arbitrary to evidence-based practice.

Adverse Events Relating to Prolonged Hard Collar Immobilisation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate systematically the complications of prolonged cervical immobilisation in a hard collar. METHODS: Following registration with PROSPERO, a systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE) was conducted. Two reviewers independently screened the search results according to pre-determined search criteria. Data was extracted and tabulated. Joanna Briggs Institute checklists were used for assessing the quality of included studies. RESULTS: The search identified 773 articles. A total of 25 studies were selected for final inclusion. The results largely comprised a mixture of case reports/series, cohort studies and reviews. The most commonly reported complications were pressure ulcers, dysphagia and increased intracranial pressure. A pressure ulcer pooled prevalence of 7% was calculated. There was insufficient data for quantitative analysis of any other complication. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant morbidity from prolonged hard collar immobilisation, even amongst younger patients. Whilst based upon limited and low-quality evidence, these findings, combined with the low-quality evidence for the efficacy of hard collars, highlights a knowledge gap for future research.