Outcomes After Hallux Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Hallux interphalangeal joint arthrodesis (HIPJA) is indicated for a variety of pathologies. Despite high nonunion rates, techniques remain unchanged. The aim of this study is to examine nonunion and complication rates and describe risk factors for treatment failure. METHODS: A query of an institutional database was performed to identify all patients undergoing HIPJA procedure over a 10-year period. Records were reviewed to the procedure, evaluate patient factors, indications, and radiographic/clinical arthrodesis. Radiographic union was defined as 2 cortical continuations or bridging at the arthrodesis site, absence of hardware failure, and the absence of lytic gapping of the arthrodesis. Clinical fibrous union was defined as radiographic nonunion with painless toe range of motion and physical examination consistent with fusion across the interphalangeal joint. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven primary HIPJA procedures were identified. Our cohort demonstrated a 25.5% nonunion rate (58/227) and 21.1% reoperation rate (48/227). Patients with diabetes were at higher risk for nonunion (P = .014), but no significant differences were identified based on smoking status or diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. No difference was seen between implant groups: single screw, multiple screws, screw plus other fixation, nonscrew fixation. Patients with prior hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis did not have a significantly higher nonunion rate than patients without prior first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. Patients diagnosed with radiographic nonunion were at higher risk for reoperation (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Our cohort represents the largest single-center series of HIPJA procedures published to date. We found relatively high nonunion and reoperation rates with standard current techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case series.

Outcomes After Use of the Induced Membrane Technique for Fractures of the Upper Extremity.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review a series of cases in which the induced membrane technique was used for fractures with segmental bone loss in the upper extremity. We aimed to examine patient indications, outcomes based on union rates, and complications associated with this technique. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved database at our institution was used to identify patients based on either diagnosis or procedure codes commonly used during the induced membrane treatment. The database was queried between 2003 and 2020 and included patients with segmental bone defects from acute trauma, nonunions, and infections. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, size and extent of the bone defect, treatment indication and methods along with intraoperative and postoperative complications were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: We identified 23 patients who met our inclusion criteria, including 15 patients with traumatic segmental bone loss and 8 patients with chronic nonunions and/or infections. Fourteen cases involving the bones of the forearm, 8 cases involving the metacarpals and 3 cases involving the phalanges were identified. Radiographic union was ultimately demonstrated in 21/23 patients (91.3%) with a median time to union of 20 weeks (range 13-29 weeks). A total of 10 patients required unplanned reoperation, with 4 nonunions requiring repeat plating and grafting procedures, and 1 patient ultimately underwent amputation for persistent infection. CONCLUSIONS: The induced membrane technique represents an effective treatment option for acute traumatic bone loss as well as chronic fracture nonunions. The technique has potential challenges, as 10 patients (43.5%) in our series required unplanned reoperations with 4 patients (17.4%) requiring a repeat intervention for persistent nonunion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Radiologist Overreads of Intraoperative Radiographs-Value or Waste?

BACKGROUND: All aspects of the arthroplasty pathway must be scrutinized to maximize value and eliminate unnecessary cost. Radiology providers' contracts with hospitals often call for readings of all radiographs. This policy has little effect on patient care when intraoperative radiographs are taken and used to make real-time decisions. In order to determine the value of radiologist overreads, we asked 3 questions: what was the delay between the time an intraoperative radiograph was taken and time the report was generated, were the overreads accurate, and what is the associated cost? METHODS: Two hundred hip and knee radiograph reports generated over 6 months during 391 cases were reviewed. The time the report was dictated was compared to the time taken and time of surgery completion. To determine accuracy, each overread was rated as accurate or inaccurate. The cost of the overread was determined by multiplying the number of radiographs times the radiology fee less the technical fee. RESULTS: Median delay between taking the radiograph and filing the report was 45 minutes (range, 0-9778 minutes). Only 31.5% were filed before completion of the procedure. And 18.0% (36/200) were considered inaccurate despite lenient criteria. The reading fee for hip radiographs was $52.00, and for knee radiographs was $38.00, representing a total cost of $10,182 in our select series. This cost projects to $43,614 annually at our facility. CONCLUSION: Radiology overreads of intraoperative radiographs have no effect on real-time decision-making. In the era of value-based care, payors should stop paying for overreads and reimburse providers who actually read the films intraoperatively.

Factors Associated With Progression to Surgical Intervention for Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Military Health System.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine surgery-free survival of patients receiving conservative management of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in the military healthcare system (MHS) and risk factors for surgical intervention. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Radiculopathy from LDH is a major cause of morbidity and cost. METHODS: The Military Data Repository was queried for all patients diagnosed with LDH from FY2011-2018; the earliest such diagnosis in a military treatment facility (MTF) was kept for each patient as the initial diagnosis. Follow-up time to surgical intervention was defined as the time from diagnosis to first encounter for lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression in either a MTF or in the civilian sector. The Military Data Repository was also queried for history of tobacco use at any time during MHS care, age at the time of diagnosis, sex, MHS beneficiary category, and diagnosing facility characteristics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations of patient and diagnosing facility characteristics with time to surgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 84,985 MHS beneficiaries including 62,771 active duty service members were diagnosed with LDH in a MTF during the 8-year study period. A total of 10,532 (12.4%) MHS beneficiaries, including 7650 (10.9%) active duty, failed conservative management onto surgical intervention with lumbar microdiscectomy or lumbar decompression. Median follow-up time of the cohort was 5.2 (interquartile range 2.6, 7.5) years. Among all healthcare beneficiaries, several patient-level (younger age, male sex, and history of tobacco use) and facility-level characteristics (hospital vs. clinic and surgical care vs. primary care clinic) were independently associated with higher risk of surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: LDH compromises military readiness and negatively impacts healthcare costs. MHS beneficiaries with LDH have a good prognosis with approximately 88% of patients successfully completing conservative management. However, strategies to improve outcomes of conservative management in LDH should address risks associated with both patient and facility characteristics.Level of Evidence: 4.

Delayed Presentation of Gluteal Compartment Syndrome due to Pseudoaneurysm Rupture: A Case Report.

CASE: We present a 26-year-old active duty man who sustained a coccygeal fracture and gluteus maximus hematoma after a fall from height during training. The patient returned 3 weeks postinjury with symptoms and physical examination findings concerning for gluteal compartment syndrome. An expanding gluteal hematoma was confirmed on imaging and the patient was taken to the operating room for emergent evacuation and endovascular hemostasis. CONCLUSIONS: This case of gluteal compartment syndrome is a unique contribution to the literature with respect to the specific vascular injury observed and the delayed presentation of gluteal compartment syndrome.