The population of Veneto faced with technological consumption of music during the pandemic.

Objective: This work is the result of one of the lines of research opened in the LabinTic group (UCLM) and a stay in the city of Padua, in the Italian Veneto area, in 2022. After observing the side effects in Italy as a result of COVID-19 and the Great Lockdown, we wanted to know in more depth some aspects related to how the people of Veneto used IT as an important weapon to fight against forced isolation and, if possible, compare this with other similar studies performed in Castilla-La Mancha. Method: To achieve this objective, an ad hoc questionnaire was designed and validated through expert judgment. This questionnaire was administered to a random probabilistic sample by disseminating it through social media and email using the "snowball" method. A total of 338 people who comprised the population sample of the study (n = 338) were obtained. After analyzing the data through SPSS 28, using a mixed methodology considering qualitative and quantitative aspects, the great influence that IT had among the Italian population during the lockdown common aspects of their everyday lives and incorporating some acquired habits (listening to music, for example) into their usual life routines after the return to normality was determined among other features and assessments. In summary, the text highlights how the pandemic influenced music consumption, the popularity of different music genres, the role of social media, and the enduring importance of the music itself in people's lives. It suggests that music remains a source of comfort and entertainment in challenging times.

P-wave and interatrial block: New predictor for atrial high rate episodes in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

BACKGROUND: The presence of interatrial block (IAB) is associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine whether P-wave duration and presence of IAB before the implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) are associated with the presence of atrial high rate episodes (AHRE), during long-term follow-up. METHODS: 380 patients (57% men; 75 ± 10 years) were included. IAB was defined according to the International Consensus Criteria. AHRE was defined as an episode of atrial rate ≥225 beats/min with a minimum duration of 5 minutes. RESULTS: Documented paroxysmal AF before the implantation was present in 24% of the patients; 80% had hypertension and 32% structural heart disease. Mean P-wave duration was 123 ± 23 ms, and 39% of the patients had IAB (32% partial, 7% advanced). After a mean follow-up of 18 ± 12 months, 33% of the patients presented AHRE. Patients with AHRE had a P-wave duration significantly longer (130 ± 24 ms vs 119 ± 21 ms; P < 0.001) and a greater prevalence of IAB (53% vs 32%; P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, predictors of AHRE were: IAB (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.3-3.4], P < 0.001) and previous paroxysmal AF (OR 2.6; 95% CI [1.5-4.3], P < 0.001). In patients without previous AF, the presence of IAB was also a significant predictor of AHRE (OR 3.1; 95% CI [1.8-5.5], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IAB is a strong predictor of AHRE in patients with CIED. This finding is independent of the presence of prior paroxysmal AF.

Prevención primaria de muerte súbita en pacientes con miocardiopatía valvular / Primary prevention of sudden death in patients with valvular cardiomyopathy

Introducción y objetivos: Existe escasa evidencia sobre la evolución de los pacientes con miocardiopatía valvular remitidos para implante de desfibrilador por prevención primaria. Se pretende describir la evolución de este subgrupo particular. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo en 15 centros españoles que incluyó pacientes consecutivos remitidos para implante de desfibrilador en los años 2010 y 2011, y en tres centros desde el 1 enero de 2008. Resultados: De un total de 1.174 pacientes, 73 (6,2%) presentaron miocardiopatía valvular. Comparados con los pacientes con miocardiopatía isquémica (n = 659; 56,1%) o dilatada (n = 442; 37,6%), presentaron peor clase funcional, mayor anchura del QRS y antecedente de fibrilación auricular. Durante un seguimiento de 38,1 ± 21,3 meses, 197 (16,7%) pacientes fallecieron por cualquier causa, sin diferencias significativas entre grupos (19,2% en miocardiopatía valvular, 15,8% en isquémica y 17,9% en miocardiopatía dilatada; p = 0,2). De estos, 136 murieron por causa cardiovascular (11,6%), sin diferencias significativas (12,3%; 10,5% y 13,1%, respectivamente; p = 0,1). Tampoco hubo diferencias en la proporción de intervenciones apropiadas del desfibrilador (13,7%; 17,9% y 18,8%; p = 0,4), pero sí en el de inapropiadas (8,2%; 7,1% y 12,0%, respectivamente; p = 0,03). Conclusiones: Las tasas de mortalidad por cualquier causa y por causa cardiovascular en pacientes con miocardiopatía valvular fueron similares a las del resto de los pacientes remitidos para implante de desfibrilador. También presentaron similares tasas de intervenciones apropiadas. Estos datos parecen indicar que el implante de un desfibrilador en este grupo confiere un beneficio similar al que obtienen los pacientes con miocardiopatía isquémica y miocardiopatía dilatada (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Few data exist on the outcomes of valvular cardiomyopathy patients referred for defibrillator implantation for primary prevention. The aim of the present study was to describe the outcomes of this cardiomyopathy subgroup. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients referred for defibrillator implantation to 15 Spanish centers in 2010 and 2011, and to 3 centers after 1 January 2008. Results: Of 1174 patients, 73 (6.2%) had valvular cardiomyopathy. These patients had worse functional class, wider QRS, and a history of atrial fibrillation vs patients with ischemic (n = 659; 56.1%) or dilated (n = 442; 37.6%) cardiomyopathy. During a follow-up of 38.1 ± 21.3 months, 197 patients (16.7%) died, without significant differences among the groups (19.2% in the valvular cardiomyopathy group, 15.8% in the ischemic cardiomyopathy group, and 17.9% in the dilated cardiomyopathy group; P = .2); 136 died of cardiovascular causes (11.6%), without significant differences among the groups (12.3%, 10.5%, and 13.1%, respectively; P = .1). Although there were no differences in the proportion of appropriate defibrillator interventions (13.7%, 17.9%, and 18.8%; P = .4), there was a difference in inappropriate interventions (8.2%, 7.1%, and 12.0%, respectively; P = .03). Conclusions: All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with valvular cardiomyopathy were similar to those in other patients referred for defibrillator implantation. They also had similar rates of appropriate interventions. These data suggest that defibrillator implantation in this patient group confers a similar benefit to that obtained by patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy (AU)

[Electrical storm in patients with prophylactic defibrillator implantation]. / Evolución de los pacientes portadores de desfibrilador como prevención primaria tras un episodio de tormenta arrítmica.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the prevalence of electrical storm, baseline characteristics and mortality implications of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator in primary prevention versus those patients without electrical storm. We sought to assess the prevalence, baseline risk profile and survival significance of electrical storm in patients with implantable defibrillator for primary prevention. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study performed in 15 Spanish hospitals. Consecutives patients referred for desfibrillator implantation, with or without left ventricular lead (at least those performed in 2010 and 2011), were included. RESULTS: Over all 1,174 patients, 34 (2,9%) presented an electrical storm, mainly due to ventricular tachycardia (82.4%). There were no significant baseline differences between groups, with similar punctuation in the mortality risk scores (SHOCKED, MADIT and FADES). A clear trigger was identified in 47% of the events. During the study period (38±21 months), long-term total mortality (58.8% versus 14.4%, p<0.001) and cardiac mortality (52.9% versus 8.6%, p<0.001) were both increased among electrical storm patients. Rate of inappropriate desfibrillator intervention was also higher (14.7 versus 8.6%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study of patients with desfibrillator implantation for primary prevention, prevalence of electrical storm was 2.9%. There were no baseline differences in the cardiovascular risk profile versus those without electrical storm. However, all cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality was increased in these patients versus control desfibrillator patients without electrical storm, as was the rate of inappropriate desfibrillator intervention.

Primary Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients With Valvular Cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Few data exist on the outcomes of valvular cardiomyopathy patients referred for defibrillator implantation for primary prevention. The aim of the present study was to describe the outcomes of this cardiomyopathy subgroup. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients referred for defibrillator implantation to 15 Spanish centers in 2010 and 2011, and to 3 centers after 1 January 2008. RESULTS: Of 1174 patients, 73 (6.2%) had valvular cardiomyopathy. These patients had worse functional class, wider QRS, and a history of atrial fibrillation vs patients with ischemic (n=659; 56.1%) or dilated (n=442; 37.6%) cardiomyopathy. During a follow-up of 38.1 ± 21.3 months, 197 patients (16.7%) died, without significant differences among the groups (19.2% in the valvular cardiomyopathy group, 15.8% in the ischemic cardiomyopathy group, and 17.9% in the dilated cardiomyopathy group; P=.2); 136 died of cardiovascular causes (11.6%), without significant differences among the groups (12.3%, 10.5%, and 13.1%, respectively; P=.1). Although there were no differences in the proportion of appropriate defibrillator interventions (13.7%, 17.9%, and 18.8%; P=.4), there was a difference in inappropriate interventions (8.2%, 7.1%, and 12.0%, respectively; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with valvular cardiomyopathy were similar to those in other patients referred for defibrillator implantation. They also had similar rates of appropriate interventions. These data suggest that defibrillator implantation in this patient group confers a similar benefit to that obtained by patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy.

Enseñanza de la Cirugía: nuevos tiempos, nuevos métodos / Teaching surgery: new times, new methods

Introducción La organización, seguimiento y calidad de la docencia postgrado es probablemente una asignatura pendiente en nuestro medio. Este proyecto se plantea un objetivo claro: utilizar una herramienta docente más práctica y eficaz que las disponibles hasta el momento. No solo nos planteamos evaluar al residente, sino aportar el material de estudio ya consensuado y revisado por sus responsables. Todo esto mediante un método fácil, accesible y gratuito que garantice su formación básica. Material y método Primeramente identificamos los problemas prácticos de la residencia de cirugía general en nuestro medio. Confeccionamos una encuesta y la enviamos por correo electrónico a todos los residentes a partir de segundo año de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco. Con los resultados diseñamos un sistema de carpetas con Google Documents™ y lo comenzamos a aplicar en los de tercer y cuarto años. Resultados Los métodos tradicionales de la enseñanza de la Cirugía han quedado en parte obsoletos por el empuje tecnológico de las Ciencias de la Información. Las nuevas generaciones dominan de forma natural tanto la red como las aplicaciones informáticas más comunes. A nuestro alcance tenemos una serie de herramientas que por desconocimiento o falta de tiempo no utilizamos. Este trabajo pretende aportar una opción de trabajo que facilite la labor del tutor como figura docente, ya que la actividad asistencial frecuentemente no deja sitio para la interacción con el residente (AU)

Introduction The organisation, follow-up and quality of post-graduate teaching may be in need of appraisal in our area. This study sets out a clear objective: to use a more practical and effective teaching tool than we currently have available. Not only will it set out to assess the resident, but also provide material already approved and reviewed by their tutors. All this will be achieved using an easy, accessible and free method which ensures their basic training. Material and method Firstly, we identified the practical problems in the general surgery residency in our area. We prepared a questionnaire and sent it by e-mail to all second year and over residents of the Basque Country Autonomous Community. From the results obtained, we designed a file system with Google Documents™ and we started to apply it the third and fourth years. Results The teaching methods in Surgery have partly become obsolete due to the initiative of Information Sciences Technology. The new generations naturally dominate the Internet along with the more common computer applications. Within our reach we have a series of tools that, due to lack of knowledge or lack of time, we do not use. This article attempts to provide a working option that will help the job of the tutor as a teaching figure, since the health care activity often has no place for interaction with the resident (AU)

Evaluación del riesgo quirúrgico de 1.000 episodios consecutivos con el sistema POSSUM. Comparación entre cirugía gastrointestinal programada y urgente / Assessment of the surgical risk of 1, 000 consecutive episodes using the POSSUM system. Comparison between elective and emergency gastrointestinal surgery

Introducción El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la capacidad predictiva del sistema POSSUM en nuestro medio y determinar su comportamiento en cirugía gastrointestinal programada y compararla con la urgente. Pacientes y método Se analizaron 1.000 episodios quirúrgicos correspondientes a 909 pacientes intervenidos con anestesia general o loco-regional, de forma programada (n=547 episodios) o urgente (n=453), que precisaron ingreso hospitalario. Resultados La morbilidad total fue 31,9% (32,9% en cirugía programada y 30,7% en cirugía urgente). La capacidad discriminativa de la escala POSSUM evaluada mediante curva ROC fue mayor para la mortalidad Portsmouth (área bajo la curva [ABC] =0,92) que para la morbilidad (ABC=0,74). La bondad de ajuste o grado de calibración entre los valores esperados usando la escala POSSUM y los observados fue reducida para la morbilidad (Hosmer-Lemeshow [H-L] =164,1; p<0,05). La escala POSSUM predijo un número considerablemente mayor de muertes a las observadas, aunque la variante Portsmouth predijo mejor la mortalidad. El grado de calibración de la morbilidad fue mejor para la cirugía gastrointestinal programada (H-L=27,7) que para la cirugía gastrointestinal urgente (H-L=177,3). Mediante análisis de regresión logística se identificó, además del riesgo estimado mediante la propia escala POSSUM, las variables complejidad quirúrgica, tipo de cirugía y edad del paciente como factores significativos predictivos de la aparición de morbilidad y mortalidad. Conclusiones En nuestro medio, el sistema POSSUM predice adecuadamente el riesgo de morbilidad de la cirugía gastrointestinal programada, y sobreestima el riesgo de morbilidad de la cirugía gastrointestinal urgente (AU)

Introduction The aim of the present study was to assess the predictive capacity of the POSSUM system in a Spanish university hospital, and to determine its behaviour in elective gastrointestinal surgery and compare it with emergency gastrointestinal surgery (operation < 24 hours).Patients and method A total of 1,000 surgical episodes corresponding to 909 patients who required hospital admission, operated on under general or loco-regional anaesthesia, either in the elective (n= 547 episodes) or the emergency setting (n= 453), were included in the study. Results The overall morbidity was 31.9% (32.8% in elective surgery; 30.7% in emergency surgery). The discriminatory capacity of the POSSUM scale, evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, was higher for the Portsmouth variant of mortality (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0,92) than for morbidity (AUC= 0,74). The goodness of fit between the expected values using the POSSUM scale and those observed was reduced for morbidity (Hosmer-Lemeshow [H-L] = 164.1; p< 0.05). The POSSUM scale predicted a higher number of deaths than those observed, although the Portsmouth variant was better at predicting mortality. The goodness of fit for morbidity was better for elective gastrointestinal surgery (H-L= 27.7) than emergency gastrointestinal surgery (H-L= 177.3). The logistic regression analysis identified (besides the estimated risk using the POSSUM scale itself), surgical complexity, surgery type (elective, emergency), and age of patient, as significant predictive factors of morbidity and mortality. Conclusions In a Spanish university hospital, the POSSUM system adequately predicts morbidity risk in elective gastrointestinal surgery, and over-estimates morbidity risk in emergency gastrointestinal surgery (AU)

[Assessment of the surgical risk of 1,000 consecutive episodes using the POSSUM system. Comparison between elective and emergency gastrointestinal surgery]. / Evaluación del riesgo quirúrgico de 1.000 episodios consecutivos con el sistema POSSUM. Comparación entre cirugía gastrointestinal programada y urgente.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to assess the predictive capacity of the POSSUM system in a Spanish university hospital, and to determine its behaviour in elective gastrointestinal surgery and compare it with emergency gastrointestinal surgery (operation < 24 hours). PATIENTS AND METHOD: A total of 1,000 surgical episodes corresponding to 909 patients who required hospital admission, operated on under general or loco-regional anaesthesia, either in the elective (n= 547 episodes) or the emergency setting (n= 453), were included in the study. RESULTS: The overall morbidity was 31.9% (32.8% in elective surgery; 30.7% in emergency surgery). The discriminatory capacity of the POSSUM scale, evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, was higher for the Portsmouth variant of mortality (Area Under the Curve [AUC] = 0,92) than for morbidity (AUC= 0,74). The goodness of fit between the expected values using the POSSUM scale and those observed was reduced for morbidity (Hosmer-Lemeshow [H-L] = 164.1; p< 0.05). The POSSUM scale predicted a higher number of deaths than those observed, although the Portsmouth variant was better at predicting mortality. The goodness of fit for morbidity was better for elective gastrointestinal surgery (H-L= 27.7) than emergency gastrointestinal surgery (H-L= 177.3). The logistic regression analysis identified (besides the estimated risk using the POSSUM scale itself), surgical complexity, surgery type (elective, emergency), and age of patient, as significant predictive factors of morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In a Spanish university hospital, the POSSUM system adequately predicts morbidity risk in elective gastrointestinal surgery, and over-estimates morbidity risk in emergency gastrointestinal surgery.