CYAD-01, an autologous NKG2D-based CAR T-cell therapy, in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes or multiple myeloma (THINK): haematological cohorts of the dose escalation segment of a phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: CYAD-01 is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product based on the natural killer (NK) group 2D (NKG2D) receptor, which binds eight ligands that are overexpressed in a wide range of haematological malignancies but are largely absent on non-neoplastic cells. Initial clinical evaluation of a single infusion of CYAD-01 at a low dose in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and multiple myeloma supported the feasibility of the approach and prompted further evaluation of CYAD-01. The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and recommended phase 2 dosing of CYAD-01 administered without preconditioning or bridging chemotherapy. METHODS: The multicentre THINK study was an open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or multiple myeloma, after at least one previous line of therapy. Patients were recruited from five hospitals in the USA and Belgium. The dose-escalation segment evaluated three dose levels: 3 × 108 (dose level one), 1 × 109 (dose level two), and 3 × 109 (dose level three) cells per infusion with a 3 + 3 Fibonacci study design using a schedule of three infusions at 2-week intervals followed by potential consolidation treatment consisting of three additional infusions. The occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities post-CYAD-01 infusion was assessed as the primary endpoint in the total treated patient population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03018405, and EudraCT, 2016-003312-12, and has been completed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 6, 2017, and Oct 9, 2018, 25 patients were registered in the haematological dose-escalation segment. Seven patients had manufacturing failure for insufficient yield and two had screening failure. 16 patients were treated with CYAD-01 (three with multiple myeloma and three with acute myeloid leukaemia at dose level one; three with acute myeloid leukaemia at dose level two; and six with acute myeloid leukaemia and one with myelodysplastic syndromes at dose level three). Median follow-up was 118 days (IQR 46-180). Seven patients (44%) had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. In total, five patients (31%) had grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome across all dose levels. One dose-limiting toxicity of cytokine release syndrome was reported at dose level three. No treatment-related deaths occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Three (25%) of 12 evaluable patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes had an objective response. Among responders, two patients with acute myeloid leukaemia proceeded to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) after CYAD-01 treatment, with durable ongoing remissions (5 and 61 months). INTERPRETATION: Treatment with a multiple CYAD-01 infusion schedule without preconditioning is well tolerated and shows anti-leukaemic activity, although without durability outside of patients bridged to allogeneic HSCT. These phase 1 data support the proof-of-concept of targeting NKG2D ligands by CAR T-cell therapy. Further clinical studies with NKG2D-based CAR T-cells are warranted, potentially via combinatorial antigen targeted approaches, to improve anti-tumour activity. FUNDING: Celyad Oncology.

Early cytopenias and infections after standard of care idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) was FDA-approved in March 2021 for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after 4 lines of therapy. On the KarMMa trial, grade ≥ 3 cytopenias and infections were common. We sought to characterize cytopenias and infections within 100 days after ide-cel in the standard-of-care (SOC) setting. This multi-center retrospective study included 52 patients who received SOC ide-cel; 47 reached day-90 follow-up. Data were censored at day 100. Grade ≥ 3 cytopenia was present among 65% of patients at day 30 and 40% of patients at day 90. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered to 88%, packed red blood cell transfusions to 63%, platelet transfusions to 42%, thrombopoietin (TPO) agonists to 21%, intravenous immunoglobulin to 13%, and CD34+ stem cell boosts to 8%. At day 100, 19% and 13% of patients had ongoing use of TPO agonists and G-CSF, respectively. Infections occurred in 54% of patients and were grade ≥ 3 in 23%. Earlier infections in the first 30 days were typically bacterial (68%) and severe (50%). Later infections between days 31 and 100 were 50% bacterial and 42% viral; only 13% were grade ≥ 3. On univariate analysis, high pre-CAR-T marrow myeloma burden (≥ 50%), circulating plasma cells at pre-lymphodepletion (LD), and grade ≥ 3 anemia at pre-LD were associated with grade ≥ 3 cytopenia at both days 30 and 90. Longer time from last bridging treatment to LD was the only significant risk factor for infection.

Study protocol for THINK: a multinational open-label phase I study to assess the safety and clinical activity of multiple administrations of NKR-2 in patients with different metastatic tumour types.

INTRODUCTION: NKR-2 are autologous T cells genetically modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) comprising a fusion of the natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) receptor with the CD3ζ signalling domain, which associates with the adaptor molecule DNAX-activating protein of 10 kDa (DAP10) to provide co-stimulatory signal upon ligand binding. NKG2D binds eight different ligands expressed on the cell surface of many tumour cells and which are normally absent on non-neoplastic cells. In preclinical studies, NKR-2 demonstrated long-term antitumour activity towards a breadth of tumour indications, with maximum efficacy observed after multiple NKR-2 administrations. Importantly, NKR-2 targeted tumour cells and tumour neovasculature and the local tumour immunosuppressive microenvironment and this mechanism of action of NKR-2 was established in the absence of preconditioning. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This open-label phase I study will assess the safety and clinical activity of NKR-2 treatment administered three times, with a 2-week interval between each administration in different tumour types. The study will contain two consecutive segments: a dose escalation phase followed by an expansion phase. The dose escalation study involves two arms, one in solid tumours (five specific indications) and one in haematological tumours (two specific indications) and will include three dose levels in each arm: 3×108, 1×109 and 3×109 NKR-2 per injection. On the identification of the recommended dose in the first segment, based on dose-limiting toxicity occurrences, the study will expand to seven different cohorts examining the seven different tumour types separately. Clinical responses will be determined according to standard Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria for solid tumours or international working group response criteria in haematological tumours. ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained at all sites. Written informed consent will be taken from all participants. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at international scientific conferences and reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03018405, EudraCT 2016-003312-12; Pre-result.

Developing strategies in the immunotherapy of leukemias.

BACKGROUND: In the current treatment paradigms for leukemias, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is considered the best option with a curative potential although more often than not it simply delays disease progression. Advances are needed, both in current therapies and in the development of new strategies. Partly from studying the nuances of the curative potential of stem cell transplant, we have come to appreciate the relevance of the immune response and the potential of immunotherapy. METHODS: This review article summarizes the recent advances in the field of immunology and immunotherapy for leukemia. RESULTS: In passive immunotherapy, recent progress in chimeric T-cell antigen receptor technology has been encouraging. In active immunotherapy, a cancer vaccine may potentially enhance HSCT. An overview of various clinical studies of peptide vaccination strategies focusing on molecular targets such as the Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1), proteinase 3 (PR3), and receptor for hyaluronan acid-mediated motility (RHAMM) is provided. Cell-based vaccination strategies are also briefly explored. CONCLUSIONS: The immune system clearly has the capacity to recognize and react to leukemic cells, and recent evidence directs our attention to the importance of mounting inflammatory and CD4 T-cell responses to complement and support the cytotoxic activity elicited by peptide vaccines.