Can platelet aggregometry be standardized?

Platelet aggregometry is an important technique which is frequently used by hemostaseologists and researchers. Gustav Born introduced the principle more than 40 years ago. Many different ways to perform aggregometry have been published. The results of aggregometry may become more comparable if some rules would be generally accepted. (1) The pre-analytical procedures are probably the most important factors which influence aggregometry results. Besides correct blood sampling important factors are the preparation of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), incubation of the PRP at room temperature and awareness of time-dependent changes of aggregometry results. (2) A major point concerns the agonists. Agonists of different sources have to be compared to verify that they lead to the expected results. Even different salts of ADP lead to different results and different collagen preparations lead to a large variation of aggregation response (3). The frequently used procedure of adjusting the platelet number in the PRP is cumbersome, affects platelet activation and is not necessary. (4) Aggregometers should comply with some simple rules. The changes in optical density should be linearized so that--if this is required--percentages can be given. The recorder speed should be standardized and all recorders should provide 1?cm/min. Calibration of the aggregometer sensitivity should be possible. (5) If aggregometry is used to define the response to antiaggregating agents agreement on the inducer concentrations is essential. If some rules are applied aggregometry is a relatively simple and reliable method, and well suited for clinical studies and for experimental research.

Thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism. International consensus statement. Guidelines according to scientific evidence.

Thrombophilia is the term now used to describe predisposition to increased risk of venous and occasionally arterial thromboembolism due to hematological abnormalities. It can be a multifactorial disorder where congenital defects of anticoagulant or procoagulant factors may be combined with acquired hematological abnormalities. It should be considered in patients with a documented unexplained thrombotic episode or a positive family history. The aim of this document is to provide guidelines for investigation and management of patients with thrombophilia in the presence or absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

[Modern anticoagulation. Problems of the proven, hope for the new]. / Moderne Antikoagulation. Probleme des Bewährten, Hoffnung auf das Neue.

Anticoagulation is highly effective in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Since decades, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were the only available oral anticoagulants. Even though VKA are very effective, they have numerous practical problems: Due to their narrow therapeutic window, highly variable dose requirements and drug interactions, close monitoring is mandatory, aiming towards an INR of 2-3 for most indications. At present, new oral anticoagulants are being studied, such as the oral direct thrombin inhibitor Ximelagatran, which in trials for prevention and treatment of VTE appears at least equivalent to heparin and VKA. Heparins have to be administered parenterally, and low molecular-weight heparins have been able to overcome some of the shortcomings of standard heparins, such as limited bioavailability, variable dose response and heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Heparinoids and hirudins are alternative anticoagulants to treat HIT. With the development of synthetic pentasaccharides, such as Fondaparinux an increase in efficacy could be achieved in high-risk thromboprophylaxis.

[The value of platelet function tests]. / Wertigkeit von Plättchenfunktionstests.

Platelet function tests are used to detect patients with abnormal platelet function, which may be inborn or acquired or to detect increased platelet activation which may be accompanied by an increased risk of thrombosis. Platelet function tests are also used to monitor platelet function inhibitors as aspirin, clopidogrel or platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-inhibitors. Incorrect blood sampling is a major source of error in measuring platelet function. Global tests besides platelet count and bleeding time are thrombelastography, the platelet function analyzer (PFA) and possibly in the future the new Impact-system. Specific tests measure platelet spreading and adhesion to defined surfaces. In a series of methods platelets are counted before and after passage of a filter. Some of these tests are partially standardized. The most frequently measured platelet function is aggregation induced by ADP, collagen or other substances as first described by Gustav Born. Some newer methods to perform aggregometry are described. Platelet activation can be detected by measuring spontaneous aggregation as in the PAT-test. Prospective trials with this test have shown that enhanced spontaneous aggregation is a risk factor for new vascular occlusions in diabetics and for myocardial infarctions in healthy individuals. The Wu and Hoak-test and the measurement of released platelet factor 4 or betaglobulin are of limited value. Flow cytometric methods are frequently used to measure platelet activation markers as CD 62 and others. Platelet induced thrombin generation is an interesting function to measure drug effects. None of the presently available platelet function tests is well standardized, so there is much room for improvement.

[Experimental and clinical results with the thrombin inhibitor Argatroban]. / Experimentelle und klinische Befunde mit dem Thrombinhemmer Argatroban.

Argatroban is the smallest anticoagulant molecule of direct thrombin inhibitors. The main attributes of this synthetic drug are its rapid onset of anti-thrombin action, the rapid reversibility of its anticoagulant effect, potent inhibition of clot-bound thrombin, the absence of antibody formation and no need for dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment. It is eliminated by hepatic metabolism. These properties make argatroban a predictable anticoagulant with intravenous use in a routine clinical setting. Argatroban is approved in the US and Canada for both prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced throm-bocytopenia (HIT) and in the US as an antithrombotic agent during percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with HIT or a history of HIT. Preliminary reports document the feasibility of using argatroban for anticoagulation during hemodialysis and as adjunct to thrombolysis for treatment of myocardial infarction. Current recommendations for argatroban monitoring are to use the aPTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) for low doses and the ACT (activated clotting time) for high doses. The specific inhibition of thrombin can be measured with the ECT (ecarin clotting time).

Antithrombotic and platelet function inhibiting effects of ML3000, a new antiinflammatory drug with Cox/5-LOX inhibitory activity.

DESIGN: The studies reported were designed to evaluate the effects of ML3000 on platelet aggregation and platelet-induced thrombin generation in human platelet rich plasma and its antithrombotic effect in a rat thrombosis model. ML3000 is a potent inhibitor of both COX-1/2 and 5-LOX with demonstrated antiinflammatory activity and a low incidence of GI mucosal injury in animal and human studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: The antithrombotic activity of ML3000 (10, 30 and 100 mg/kg) and aspirin (30 and 100 mg/kg) was measured in the mesenteric venules of rats using the laser-induced thrombus model. Both ML3000 and aspirin, at all doses tested, showed significant antithrombotic activity. The mean number of laser injuries necessary to induce a thrombus that blocked the vessel was 1.93 +/- 0.28 in the control group, 3.3 +/- 0.53, 3.6 +/- 0.14 or 4.07 +/- 0.37 in the groups treated with ML3000 at 10, 30 or 100 mg/kg p.o. and 3.4 +/- 0.55 or 3.9 +/- 0.3 in the groups treated with Aspirin at 30 or 100 mg/kg p.o. The antithrombotic activity in this model was significant up to 12 h post-administration of 100 mg/kg ML3000 or Aspirin. The aggregation inhibiting activity of ML3000 (1-100 microg/ml) and indomethacin (1 microg/ml) was studied using the following inducing agents: ADP (1 and 2 microM), epinephrine (25 and 50 microM), collagen (0.5 and 1 microg/ml), and the thromboxane mimetic U46619 (0.8 and 1.6 microM). Aggregation inhibitory activity was observed with ML3000 in all assays except with the higher concentration of U46619 at 1.6 microM. Indomethacin (1 microg/ml) inhibited aggregation in all assays. CONCLUSIONS: ML3000 has significant antithrombotic activity and a marked platelet aggregation inhibiting effect. Given its demonstrated antiinflammatory activity, platelet function inhibition, and antithrombotic effects along with a lack of effect on the GI mucosa, ML3000 may offer an alternative to the combination of a COX-2 inhibitor and aspirin in arthritis patients at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Effects of antiplatelet agents on platelet-induced thrombin generation.

OBJECTIVES: The influence of antiplatelet agents on platelet-induced thrombin generation may increase the risk of bleeding. Assessment of the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), is therefore a parameter deserving attention in early pharmacodynamic studies with antiplatelet drugs. The aim ofthis study was to assess whether an automated ETP-assay can be used to determine possible inhibitory effects of antiplatelet drugs on platelet-associated thrombin generation. METHODS: We first characterized the in vitro dose-response relationship of several platelet agonists (ADP, collagen, U46619, TRAP (amino acid sequence: SFLLRNP) and tissue factor (TF) using the generation of ETP. One submaximal concentration of each agonist was then used to assess the influence of in vivo treatment with aspirin (single oral dose of 500 mg as inhibitor of thromboxane synthesis) and clopidogrel (given orally for 6 days, as an inhibitor of the purinergic P2Y12-receptor on platelets) and in vitro treatment with abciximab (which inhibits the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-receptor for fibrinogen), on the ETP. RESULTS: The effect of TF and the other platelet inducers on thrombin generation was dose-dependent. Repeat measurements on samples from the same subject, with the same inducer concentration on 2 different occasions showed a variability of approx. 22% (absolute difference between 2 measurements as % of mean). The coefficient on variation of repeat measurements of one sample varied between 7% and 17%, depending on the inducer. After a single dose of aspirin, ETP was reduced by 25-40%, depending on the platelet activating agent used. The reduction in ETP with abciximab in vitro was more pronounced. In contrast, TF-induced ETP was not influenced by aspirin or abciximab. Clopidogrel, administered for 6 days, reduced the ETP by 60% when platelets were stimulated using 20 microM ADP, whereas collagen-induced ETP and TF-induced ETP remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The ETP-method is a sensitive and reproducible method for the detection of drug effects on platelet-induced thrombin generation of high throughput, and can be recommended for studies on the pharmacodynamic profile of drugs interfering with platelet function.

Current developments in antithrombotic therapy: the role of antithrombin agents.

Hirudin, the specific thrombin inhibitor from medicinal leeches, is now produced by recombinant technology. r-Hirudin and to a lesser extent polyethyleneglycol-coupled hirudin (PEG-hirudin) have been used in many clinical trials. Hirudin has been shown to be more effective than low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after total hip replacement. In (acute) coronary syndromes hirudin as well as a synthetic hirudin analogue bivalirudin have been studied in large clinical trials. Higher doses of hirudin were associated with an increased risk of bleeding. A large-scale study with bivalirudin in patients with acute MI (the HERO-2 trial) has not shown a reduction in mortality but a 30% reduction of reinfarction within 96 h. Hirudin and argatroban have been successfully used in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II. Several orally active thrombin inhibitors are being developed. The combined use of subcutaneous and oral administration of melagatran in patients with hip or knee replacement has led to promising results. It is likely that in the future thrombin inhibitors will replace other forms of anticoagulation in a number of indications.

Reduction in thrombus extension and clinical end points in patients after initial treatment for deep vein thrombosis with the fixed-dose body weight-independent low molecular weight heparin certoparin.

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is effective in the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in adults. This has not been demonstrated for one LMWH alone. The relationship between venographic changes due to LMWH therapy and clinical outcome in the initial treatment period has not been reported. A pooled analysis of two clinical trials was performed. The trials compared a fixed-dose, body weight-independent, subcutaneous LMWH, certoparin (8000 antifactor Xa [aXa] U twice a day [b.i.d.]), with an adjusted-dose intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) with respect to venographic changes expressed as Marder score and occurrence of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and mortality. The Marder score was 23.2 +/- 8.4 in patients randomized to LMWH (n = 299 paired phlebograms) and 23.9 +/- 8.9 in patients allocated to UFH (n = 297 paired phlebograms) at entry (2p = 0.23) and 18.9 +/- 9.7 and 20.5 +/- 9.9 at the end of the initial therapy (2p = 0.04), respectively. The composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and mortality occurred less frequently during treatment with LMWH (n = 393) than it did with UFH (n = 404, 1.3% versus 5.0%, risk reduction [RR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 0.63, 2p = 0.004). Single events of recurrent thromboembolism (2p = 0.12), major bleeding (2p = 0.03), and mortality (2p = 0.12) were observed less frequently with LMWH. A trend toward a lack of regression of thrombus size was observed in recurrent venous thromboembolism (2p = 0.08). Body weight-independent LMWH significantly reduces thrombus size and the incidence of composite outcome during the initial treatment of acute proximal venous thrombosis compared with adjusted dose intravenous UFH. The data indicate a relation between an unimproved Marder score and a recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Pharmacodynamic characterization of the interaction between abciximab or tirofiban with unfractionated or a low molecular weight heparin in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The objective of our study was to define the interaction between either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or a low molecular weight heparin, reviparin (REV), and the pharmacodynamic profile of the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists abciximab (ABC) or tirofiban (T). METHODS: Two studies each containing 18 healthy subjects were performed, and all were pretreated with aspirin (ASA) for 3 days. Volunteers then received UFH (5000 IU bolus/infusion 7 IU kg(-1) h(-1) for 7 h, n = 6), REV (4200-anti-Xa-IU s.c., n = 6) or placebo (n = 6). One hour later, ABC (study I) or T (study II) were given by i.v. infusion for 6 h. The pharmacodynamic effects measured were bleeding time (BT), fibrinogen-binding at the GPIIb/IIIa-receptor (FIB), expression of the platelet secretion marker CD62, and ADP (20 microM)- and collagen (5 microg ml(-1))-induced platelet aggregation. RESULTS: After treatment with both GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists, prolongation of BT occurred to a similar magnitude (approximately 25-30 min) and was not affected by UFH or REV-comedication. ABC or T with ASA alone resulted in nearly the same magnitude of reduction in FIB and platelet aggregation. After coadministration with UFH, FIB was significantly higher (thus less inhibited) than after after T + ASA alone (19 +/- 16% vs 55 +/- 36%) or ABC + ASA alone (8 +/- 9% vs 32 +/- 11%). This attenuation of FIB was not seen with REV. Inhibition of ADP-and collagen-induced aggregation tended to be attenuated by treatment with UFH (e.g. ADP-induced aggregation at 0.25 h after ABC + ASA alone =13 +/- 4%; after coadministration with UFH = 40 +/- 26%). No such changes were noted with REV. Minor reductions in CD62-expression were seen in subjects given ABC or T alone, but expression was not affected by UFH or REV. CONCLUSIONS: Co-medication with UFH attenuated platelet inhibition during treatment with GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists, but these effects were not seen with the low molecular weight heparin reviparin. The results show that administration of reviparin together with abciximab or tirofiban did not adversely affect the pharmacodynamic profile of these GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists.

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant effects of "HN-11 500," a selective thromboxane receptor antagonist.

The antiplatelet and anticoagulant effect of a thromboxane receptor (TX receptor) antagonist developed by Nycomed (Linz) has been studied in a placebo-controlled double-blind phase I study. Sixteen healthy male volunteers received different single oral doses of "HN-11 500" (C(14)H(15)NO(5)S(2); 1, 10, 100, 200, and 400 mg). Eight volunteers received placebo. The washout period between each dosage applied was at least 12 days. Platelet aggregation induced by the thromboxane mimetic "U 46 619" (C(21)H(34)0(4)) and platelet adhesion to siliconized glass were significantly and dose-dependently inhibited. The effect lasted between 3 and 4 h (10 mg) and 8 h (400 mg), respectively, and correlated well with the pharmacokinetic data. Platelet aggregation seems to be more sensitive to monitor the effects of HN-11 500 on platelet function than platelet adhesion. Plasma levels of 300 ng/ml HN-11 500 probably leads to >90% inhibition of platelet aggregation. The template bleeding time slightly increased but did not exceed the normal range. Furthermore, there was a wide variation of results. There were no significant changes in platelet counts, platelet-induced thrombin generation time (PITT), and blood coagulation parameters. All doses of HN-11 500 were well tolerated. HN-11 500 is a potent TX receptor antagonist (TXRA), which inhibits either platelet aggregation or platelet adhesion, which has not yet been described. In clinical routine, TXRAs have to demonstrate the effectiveness in large clinical trials for different clinical indications and to compete with single or combined administrations of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, thienovridines, thromboxane synthase inhibitors, and GIIb/IIIa inhibitors.

In vitro dose response to different GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists: inter-laboratory comparison of various platelet function tests.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-laboratory variation of the concentration-response to the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists abciximab and eptifibatide on platelet aggregometry and to compare results with flow cytometric tests as well as the rapid platelet function analyser (RPFA). METHODS: In five different laboratory sites, blood from three to five healthy donors was spiked with abciximab or eptifibatide, followed by the assessment of: (1) aggregometry (anticoagulant: sodium citrate 3.18% or hirudin 5 microg/ml); (2) flow cytometry (fibrinogen binding or PAC1-expression), or (3) RPFA. Dose-response curves were established on the basis of a sigmoidal Imax)-model [I=(Imax)*Cg)/(IC50g + Cg)]. RESULTS: For citrated blood, aggregation induced by 20 microM ADP was blocked up to 100% by both GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists, IC50 values varied between 0.11-0.22 microg/ml for eptifibatide and 1.25-2.3 microg/ml for abciximab. I(max) of the response to 5 microg/ml collagen ranged from 46% to 100%, and IC50 values varied between 0.28-0.34 microg/ml for eptifibatide and 2.3-3.8 microg/ml for abciximab. In hirudinized blood, IC50 values for eptifibatide were 1.5- to 3-fold higher than those obtained with citrated plasma. Inhibition of PAC1-expression by abciximab (IC50) 0.84 microg/ml) showed results similar those of the RPFA (approx. 1.0 microg/ml); larger differences between PAC1 and RPFA results were observed for eptifibatide. Based on aggregometry, eptifibatide concentrations for 80% inhibition varied from 0.27 to 0.55 microg/ml, and were considerably less when the RPFA was taken as basis (0.15 or 0.22 microg/ml). A similar pattern was observed for abciximab. CONCLUSIONS: We found quite a low inter- and intra-laboratory variation in the in vitro pharmacodynamic characterization of GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists by aggregometry, making results of these tests obtained from different laboratories during clinical trials at least comparable. The RPFA exhibits a higher sensitivity to inhibitory GPIIb/IIIa-effects, in keeping with the "real" inhibition of the activated receptor (PAC1) as assessed with more elaborate flow cytometry.

Effects of a low-molecular-weight heparin on thrombus regression and recurrent thromboembolism in patients with deep-vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins are frequently used to treat venous thromboembolism, but optimal dosing regimens and clinical outcomes need further definition. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudication of end points, we randomly assigned patients with acute deep-vein thrombosis to one of three treatment regimens: intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin; subcutaneous administration of a low-molecular-weight heparin, reviparin, twice a day for one week; or subcutaneous administration of reviparin once a day for four weeks. The primary end point was evidence of regression of the thrombus on venography on day 21; secondary end points were recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding within 90 days after enrollment, and death. RESULTS: Of the patients receiving unfractionated heparin, 40.2 percent (129 of 321) had thrombus regression, as compared with 53.4 percent (175 of 328) of patients receiving reviparin twice daily and 53.5 percent (167 of 312) of the patients receiving reviparin once daily. With regard to thrombus regression, reviparin administered twice daily was significantly more effective than unfractionated heparin (relative likelihood of thrombus regression, 1.28; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.52), as was reviparin administered once daily (relative likelihood, 1.29; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.53). Mortality and the frequency of episodes of major bleeding were similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: In acute deep-vein thrombosis, reviparin regimens are more effective than unfractionated heparin in reducing the size of the thrombus. Reviparin is also more effective than unfractionated heparin for the prevention of recurrent thromboembolism and equally safe.

Prophylaxis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis.

In 1980, unfractionated heparin (UFH) was the established agent for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease in patients undergoing general surgery. VTE prophylaxis was the first indication in which low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) were tested. Approximately 40 trials have demonstrated that LMWHs are at least as effective and safe as UFH. LMWHs exhibit a number of advantages over UFH, including ease of administration, convenient once-daily dosing, and facilitation of outpatient management. The ideal time of administration and the dose of the initial one or two injections of LMWH remain unresolved issues. LMWHs are used with increasing frequency in the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), having been studied in comparison to UFH in 16 major clinical trials. LMWHs are at least as effective as UFH in the prevention of VTE, but higher doses than those used for prophylaxis are required. There is still an ongoing debate about whether the daily dose should be administered in one or two subcutaneous injections. In some recent studies, symptomatic new DVTs or pulmonary emboli (PE) were the primary end points, which had to be verified by objective methods, but such end points may be not be sensitive enough to detect major differences in the efficacy of different LMWHs.

Interaction between the LMWH reviparin and aspirin in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: To investigate potential interactions between reviparin and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA 300 mg o.d. from day 1-5). METHODS: In an open, randomized, three-way-cross over study nine healthy volunteers received reviparin (s.c. injection of 6300 anti-Xa units) or placebo from days 3 to 5 and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA 300 mg) or placebo from days 1 to 5. Assessments included bleeding time (BT), collagen (1 microg ml-1) induced platelet aggregation (CAG), heptest, plasma antifactor Xa-activity and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). RESULTS: Median bleeding time at day 5 was 5.5 min after reverparin alone and after ASA alone and was 9.6 min after the combination of reviparin and ASA. ASA treatment reduced CAG from 84% to 40 to 50% of Amax; values after combined treatment of reviparin with ASA were not different from those after ASA alone. aPTT was prolonged to 32 s after reviparin; this effect was not modified if subjects received ASA. Combined treatment with ASA and reviparin had no effect on plasma anti-Xa-activity and heptest compared with reviparin alone. CONCLUSIONS: We could not entirely exclude a small interaction between reviparin and ASA on bleeding time, but the effect is probably without clinical significance.

Ex vivo--in vitro interaction between aspirin, clopidogrel, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors abciximab and SR121566A.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the interaction between aspirin and clopidogrel in healthy male volunteers and the interaction of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors abciximab and SR121566A with blood from those pretreated subjects (ex vivo-in vitro). METHODS: Aspirin (300 mg/day), clopidogrel (75 mg/day), or the combination of both drugs were administered orally for 8 days. Group 1 (n = 5) started with aspirin and group 2 (n = 5) with clopidogrel. From day 4 to day 8, subjects of both groups received the combined treatment. Blood from these subjects was spiked with abciximab (0.5 and 1.5 microg x mL(-1)) and SR121566A (31 and 62 ng x mL(-1)). RESULTS: In vivo, average bleeding times were 6.8 minutes at baseline, 20.3 minutes for clopidogrel alone (P < .01), 10.9 minutes for aspirin alone (difference not significant), and 24.0 minutes (P < .01) for the combined treatment. Fibrinogen binding to the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor was reduced for aspirin to 69% (difference not significant), to 63% for clopidogrel (difference not significant), and to 63% for the clopidogrel plus aspirin combination (P < .01). CD62 expression as a marker of platelet granular secretion was reduced to 66% by clopidogrel (P < .01) and to 41% by the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin; aspirin alone had no effect. In vitro, with pretreatment with aspirin and clopidogrel, inhibitory effects of the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors on fibrinogen binding were additive to changes observed with aspirin or clopidogrel alone. No effect on CD62 expression was observed with either GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor. Aspirin and clopidogrel reinforced effects of the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors on adenosine diphosphate (5 micromol/L)-induced aggregation in an additive manner, a supra-additive effect was observed with collagen (2 microg x mL(-1))-induced aggregation. CONCLUSION: The augmentation of the antiaggregatory effects of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors by aspirin and clopidogrel and the lack of antisecretory effects of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors may favor their combination with clopidogrel.

Differential in vitro effects of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors abixicimab or SR121566A on platelet aggregation, fibrinogen binding and platelet secretory parameters.

The aim of this study was to compare fibrinogen binding, inhibition of platelet aggregation and secretory potential of the MAb abciximab (0.5-5 microg/mL) and the peptidomimetic compound SR121566A (15-250 ng/mL) in vitro in whole blood. Fibrinogen binding was followed by flow cytometry; platelet function was evaluated by light transmittance and by impedance aggregometry. Secretory functions of platelets were evaluated using ATP as marker for early secretion by dense granulae and P-selectin (CD62) for alpha-granular secretion as well as CD63 for lysosomal degranulation. Results showed that fibrinogen binding induced by 5 microM TRAP was maximally inhibited greater than 80% at 3 microg/mL abciximab or at 250 ng/mL SR121566A. At these concentrations of antagonists, platelet aggregation induced by 5 microM ADP or 2 microg/mL collagen was inhibited completely. Expression of CD62 was reduced 34% with abciximab or 15% with SR121566A; CD63 expression was reduced 22% with both agents. With both agents, the EC50 for inhibition of CD62 and CD63 expressions was in similar magnitudes than the EC50 for fibrinogen binding inhibition. With 3 microg/mL abciximab, ATP secretion was maximally reduced to 50% of the control, whereas SR121566A at 250 ng/mL had no inhibitory effect on this parameter. A slight increase in ATP secretion was seen with 0.5 microg/mL abciximab and with SR121566A in concentrations of less than 45 ng/mL. The data suggest a discoupling between the anti-aggregatory and the antisecretory effects of IIb/IIIa antagonists. Because it is not established to what extend CD62 or CD63 expression can be reduced by any means, the reduction by 20-30% obtained by 3 microg/mL abciximab or 250 ng/mL SR121566A might already be the maximum possible inhibition by these agents.