Teleradiology in urology: comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi.

PURPOSE: Teleradiology systems are now being evaluated as a mechanism to provide rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnostic radiographs to off-site physicians. Little data are available on the role and safety of teleradiology in urology. To address these issues a personal computer based system was developed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and ease of use of transmitted digital images when evaluating for urinary calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 plain abdominal scout films from excretory urograms performed during acute urological referrals was digitized on a laser scanner. The 10 megabyte files were transferred over public telephone lines and written to compact disks. The images were viewed on a 1280 x 1640 resolution monitor using "Imager-3D" software run on a 133 MHz. pentium personal computer with 32 megabytes of random access memory. Two faculty urologists and 2 urology fellows each looked at 50 original radiographs and 50 digital images. Diagnostic interpretations of the presence and location of calculi were recorded, and confidence in the diagnosis, assessment of image quality and diagnostic difficulty were scored using a numerical scale. RESULTS: The accuracy for all readers was 86.5% for plain radiographs and 81.5% for digital images (p >0.2). There was no statistical difference between faculty and fellows. Diagnostic accuracy did not differ between plain films and screen images when the results were assessed with respect to image quality, diagnostic difficulty or the reader confidence in the diagnosis (p >0.1). Compared to plain films, more screen images were classified as lower image quality (60 versus 40%) and the diagnostic confidence was lower (low and medium grade 50 versus 35%), although this did not interfere with diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: These data imply that a high quality affordable teleradiology system is effective and accurate compared to plain films for assessing urinary calculi.

Telesurgical mentoring. Initial clinical experience.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical techniques yield significant individual, economic, and social benefits when performed by experienced surgeons. Unfortunately, many of these techniques, such as laparoscopy, are associated with steep learning curves, and the incidence of complications has clearly been shown to be inversely related to experience. The initial high complication rate and the dearth of experienced endoscopic surgeons have raised concerns over training, granting of hospital privileges, and most importantly patient safety. The goal of this study was to employ current telecommunications technology in a system for the mentoring of relatively inexperienced surgeons. Therefore, we created a telesurgical system that would allow an endoscopic specialist at a central site to offer guidance and assistance to a surgeon during a laparoscopic procedure. METHODS: We developed a system that connected a central site and an operative site, a distance of approximately 3.5 miles, via a single T1 (1.54 Mbs) point-to-point communications link. The system provided real-time video display from either the laparoscope or an externally mounted camera located in the operating room, full duplex audio, telestration over live video, control of a robotic arm that manipulated the laparoscope, and access to electrocautery for tissue cutting or hemostasis. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent laparoscopic procedures using the telesurgical consultation system over the communications link. In all cases, the primary surgeon had limited experience with the laparoscopic approach but still had the basic skills required to obtain intraperitoneal access. All seven cases were completed successfully without complications. CONCLUSION: These initial studies have demonstrated the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of telementoring. Telesurgical applications have the potential to greatly improve surgical education credentialing, and patient care by offering patients and their surgeons global access to surgical specialists.

Digital radiographic imaging transfer: comparison with plain radiographs.

Advances in digital imaging and computer display technology have allowed development of clinical teleradiographic systems. There are limited data assessing the effectiveness of such systems when applied to urologic pathology. In an effort to appraise the effectiveness of teleradiology in identifying renal calculi, the accuracy of findings on transmitted radiographic images were compared with those made when viewing the actual plain film. Plain films (KUB) were obtained from 26 patients who presented to the radiology department to rule out urinary calculous disease. The films were digitalized by a radiograph scanner into ARCNEMA-2 file format, compressed by a NASA algorithm, and transferred via a 28.8-kbps modern over standard telephone lines to a remote section 25 miles away, where they were decompressed and viewed on a 1600 x 1200-pixel monitor. Two attending urologists and two endourologic fellows were randomized to read either the transmitted image or the original radiograph with minimal clinical history provided. Of the 26 plain radiographic films, 24 were correctly interpreted by the fellows and 25 by the attending physicians (92% and 96% accuracy, respectively) for a total accuracy of 94% with no statistical difference (p = 0.16). After compression, all but one of the digital images were transferred successfully. The attending physicians correctly interpreted 24 of the 25 digital images (96%), whereas the fellows were correct on 21 interpretations (84%), resulting in a total 90% accuracy with a significant difference between the groups (p < or = 0.04). Overall, no statistical difference between the interpretations of the plain film and the digital image was revealed (p = 0.21). Using available technology, KUB images can be transmitted to a remote site, and the location of a stone can be determined correctly. Higher accuracy is demonstrated by experienced surgeons.