Arterial events in cancer patients treated with apixaban for venous thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: In a recent interventional study of cancer patients with newly diagnosed venous thrombosis (VT), we found a high risk of arterial thrombotic events (AT) during treatment with therapeutic doses of apixaban. METHODS: Total 298 cancer patients with VT received apixaban as treatment and secondary prophylaxis for up to 36 months. AT was registered as a serious adverse event, and this is a post hoc analysis of risk factors for AT. Clinical risk factors and concomitant medication were assessed through odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence interval using multivariate logistic regression. Biomarkers were assessed by non-parametric testing. RESULTS: AT occurred in 16/298 patients (5.4 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.1-8.6 %). Median leucocyte count at baseline was higher in patients with AT compared with patients without AT (11 vs. 6.8·109/L, p < 0.01). Clinical factors associated with AT were pancreatic cancer (OR 13.7, 95 % CI 4.3-43.1), ovarian cancer (OR 19.3, 95 % CI 2.3-164.4), BMI <25 percentile (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.1-8.8) and previous VT (OR 4.4, 95 % CI 1.4-13.7). Pancreatic cancer had a cumulative incidence of AT of 36 % compared with 0.8 % for all other cancers at 6 months (p < 0.01). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR 4.9, 95 % CI 1.0-26) and antiplatelet treatment (OR 3.8, 95 % CI 1.2-12.2) were associated with AT. CONCLUSION: In cancer patients with apixaban treated VT, pancreatic cancer was strongly associated with AT. In addition, ovarian cancer, BMI < 25 percentile, previous VT, antiplatelet treatment, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and high leucocyte count at baseline were associated with AT. The CAP study is registered with the unique identifier NCT02581176 in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Investigating survival, quality of life and cognition in PROton versus photon therapy for IDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas (PRO-GLIO): a randomised controlled trial in Norway and Sweden.

INTRODUCTION: The use of proton therapy increases globally despite a lack of randomised controlled trials demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Proton therapy enables sparing of non-neoplastic tissue from radiation. This is principally beneficial and holds promise of reduced long-term side effects. However, the sparing of seemingly non-cancerous tissue is not necessarily positive for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2-3, which have a diffuse growth pattern. With their relatively good prognosis, yet incurable nature, therapy needs to be delicately balanced to achieve a maximal survival benefit combined with an optimised quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PRO-GLIO (PROton versus photon therapy in IDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas) is an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase III non-inferiority study. 224 patients aged 18-65 years with IDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2-3 from Norway and Sweden will be randomised 1:1 to radiotherapy delivered with protons (experimental arm) or photons (standard arm). First intervention-free survival at 2 years is the primary endpoint. Key secondary endpoints are fatigue and cognitive impairment, both at 2 years. Additional secondary outcomes include several survival measures, health-related quality of life parameters and health economy endpoints. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: To implement proton therapy as part of standard of care for patients with IDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2-3, it should be deemed safe. With its randomised controlled design testing proton versus photon therapy, PRO-GLIO will provide important information for this patient population concerning safety, cognition, fatigue and other quality of life parameters. As proton therapy is considerably more costly than its photon counterpart, cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated. PRO-GLIO is approved by ethical committees in Norway (Regional Committee for Medical & Health Research Ethics) and Sweden (The Swedish Ethical Review Authority) and patient inclusion has commenced. Trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, relevant conferences, national and international meetings and expert forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05190172).

Survival in a consecutive series of 467 glioblastoma patients: Association with prognostic factors and treatment at recurrence at two independent institutions.

Therapy of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is challenging due to lack of standard treatment. We investigated physicians' treatment choice at recurrence and prognostic and predictive factors for survival in GBM patients from Norway's two largest regional hospitals. Clinicopathological data from n = 467 patients treated at Haukeland and Oslo university hospitals from January 2015 to December 2017 was collected. Data included tumour location, promoter methylation of O6 methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), patient age, sex, extent of resection at primary diagnosis and treatment at successive tumour recurrences. Cox-proportional hazards regression adjusting for multiple risk factors was used. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months and 21.4% and 6.8% of patients were alive at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months. Treatment at recurrence varied but was not associated with difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.201). Age, MGMT hypermethylation, tumour location and extent of resection were independent prognostic factors. Patients who received 60 Gray radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide at primary diagnosis had 16.1 months median OS and 9.3% were alive at 5 years. Patients eligible for gamma knife/stereotactic radiosurgery alone or combined with chemotherapy at first recurrence had superior survival compared to chemotherapy alone (p<0.001). At second recurrence, combination chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab were both superior to no treatment. Treatment at recurrence differed between the institutions but there was no difference in median OS, indicating that it is the disease biology that dictates patient outcome.

Low dose apixaban as secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients - 30 months follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There are no data on the effect of low-dose anticoagulation as secondary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose apixaban for 30 months, after initial 6 months of full-dose treatment. METHODS: We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE in a single arm interventional clinical trial. All patients were treated with full-dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) for 6 months. Total 196 patients with active cancer after 6 months treatment continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for another 30 months. The main endpoints were recurrent VTE, major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. RESULTS: During the 30 months of treatment with low-dose apixaban 14 (7.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0%-11.7%) patients experienced recurrent VTE, six (3.1%; 95% CI 1.1%-6.5%) experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.1%, 95% CI: 4.7%-12.8%) experienced clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The incidence rate per person month of recurrent VTE was 0.8% (95% CI 0.41-1.6) at 2-6 months with full-dose apixaban, and 1.0% (95% CI 0.5-1.9) at 7-12 months with low-dose apixaban. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1% (95% CI 0.6-2.0) at 2-6 months, and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1.0) at 7-12 months. Between 12 and 36 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low. CONCLUSION: Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily seems safe after 6 months of full-dose treatment. After 12 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleeding remained low.

Thrombosis and bleedings in a cohort of cancer patients treated with apixaban for venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: The direct oral anti-coagulants (DOAC) edoxaban and rivaroxaban are suggested treatment alternatives for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) together with low molecular-weight heparins. New studies indicate that the DOAC apixaban also is an option for cancer-associated VTE. The current study assessed recurrent VTE, arterial thrombosis, bleedings and adverse events in a cohort of apixaban treated cancer patients with VTE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-arm, interventional study of apixaban as treatment of cancer-associated VTE. Inclusion criteria were cancer with objectively verified VTE. Patients received apixaban 10 mg bid for seven days, then 5 mg bid for six months. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent VTE and bleeding respectively. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02581176. RESULTS: We recruited 298 cancer patients with VTE. During six months treatment, recurrent VTE or death related to VTE occurred in 12 patients (4.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-6.9%). Major bleeding occurred in 16 patients (5.4%, 95% CI 2.8-7.9), most frequently gastrointestinal bleeding. There were no overrepresentation of major bleedings among patients with gastrointestinal cancer (7/126, 5.5%, 95% CI 2.3-11%). Twenty-six patients experienced one or more clinically relevant non-major bleedings (8.9%, 95% CI 5.5-12%). Twelve patients had arterial thrombosis (4.0%, 95% CI 2.1-6.9%), of which the majority were strokes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Death occurred in 35 patients (12%, 95% CI 8.3-16%). CONCLUSION: The frequency of recurrent VTE and major bleedings are in line with other studies on apixaban in cancer-associated VTE. Arterial thrombosis was a frequent serious adverse event.

Sequential bortezomib and temozolomide treatment promotes immunological responses in glioblastoma patients with positive clinical outcomes: A phase 1B study.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive malignant brain tumor where median survival is approximately 15 months after best available multimodal treatment. Recurrence is inevitable, largely due to O6 methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) that renders the tumors resistant to temozolomide (TMZ). We hypothesized that pretreatment with bortezomib (BTZ) 48 hours prior to TMZ to deplete MGMT levels would be safe and tolerated by patients with recurrent GBM harboring unmethylated MGMT promoter. The secondary objective was to investigate whether 26S proteasome blockade may enhance differentiation of cytotoxic immune subsets to impact treatment responses measured by radiological criteria and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Ten patients received intravenous BTZ 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, and 7 during each 4th weekly TMZ-chemotherapy starting on day 3 and escalated from 150 mg/m2 per oral 5 days/wk via 175 to 200 mg/m2 in cycles 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Adverse events and quality of life were evaluated by CTCAE and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and immunological biomarkers evaluated by flow cytometry and Luminex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Sequential BTZ + TMZ therapy was safe and well tolerated. Pain and performance of daily activities had greatest impact on patients' self-reported quality of life and were inversely correlated with Karnofsky performance status. Patients segregated a priori into three groups, where group 1 displayed stable clinical symptoms and/or slower magnetic resonance imaging radiological progression, expanded CD4+ effector T-cells that attenuated cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 and PD-1 expression and secreted interferon γ and tumor necrosis factor α in situ and ex vivo upon stimulation with PMA/ionomycin. In contrast, rapidly progressing group 2 patients exhibited tolerised T-cell phenotypes characterized by fourfold to sixfold higher interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-10 Th-2 cytokines after BTZ + TMZ treatment, where group 3 patients exhibited intermediate clinical/radiological responses. CONCLUSION: Sequential BTZ + TMZ treatment is safe and promotes Th1-driven immunological responses in selected patients with improved clinical outcomes (Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT03643549)).

Bortezomib administered prior to temozolomide depletes MGMT, chemosensitizes glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter and prolongs animal survival.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) is due in part to enhanced DNA repair mediated by high expression of O6-methyl guanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) that is often characterised by unmethylated promoter. Here, we investigated pre-treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) cells with the 26S-proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BTZ) as a strategy to interfere with MGMT expression and thus sensitise them to TMZ. METHODS: Cell lines and patient GBM-derived cells were examined in vitro, and the latter also implanted orthotopically into NOD-SCID C.B.-Igh-1b/lcrTac-Prkdc mice to assess efficacy and tolerability of BTZ and TMZ combination therapy. MGMT promoter methylation was determined using pyrosequencing and PCR, protein signalling utilised western blotting while drug biodistribution was examined by LC-MS/MS. Statistical analysis utilised Analysis of variance and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Pre-treatment with BTZ prior to temozolomide killed chemoresistant GBM cells with unmethylated MGMT promoter through MGMT mRNA and protein depletion in vitro without affecting methylation. Chymotryptic activity was abolished, processing of NFkB/p65 to activated forms was reduced and corresponded with low MGMT levels. BTZ crossed the blood-brain barrier, diminished proteasome activity and significantly prolonged animal survival. CONCLUSION: BTZ chemosensitized resistant GBM cells, and the schedule may be amenable for temozolomide refractory patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter.

Tumor stromal desmoplasia and inflammatory response uniquely predict survival with and without stratification for HPV tumor infection in OPSCC patients.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) increases wolrd wide. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The objective for this study has been to evaluate tumor phenotypes and tumor host responses with respect to five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) in HPV(+) and HPV(-) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with OPSCC have been treated between 1992 and 2010. Histopathology slides from these patients have been morphologically evaluated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE). From HE-stained sections tumor phenotype (keratinization, fraction of mature cancer cells and pattern of invasion) and tumor host responses (inflammation and stromal desmoplasia) were evaluated with respect to five years DSS. RESULTS: High tumor inflammatory response and low stromal desmoplasia had an independent effect predicting better five-year DSS among all patients and when analyzed separately in the HPV(-) and HPV(+) cohort of patients using a Cox regression survival analysis that also included standard clinical prognostic variables among OPSCC patients. CONCLUSION: Tumor host responses, inflammation and stromal desmoplasia may become part of routine work-up in OPSCC patients due to prognostic value. SIGNIFICANCE: We present a method, accessible in most clinical locations and would give important additional information about prognosis in OPSCC patients.