Nurses' Perceived Effects of Visitor Restrictions in Hospital Maternity Units.

PURPOSE: To explore how perinatal nurses perceive the effects of visitor restrictions on patient care within a hospital setting. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We distributed a cross-sectional survey online to perinatal nurses in May of 2022. Characteristics of respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Responses to an open-ended question were analyzed via conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Among our sample of 101 nurses, we identified seven codes representing positive effects and seven codes representing negative effects. The most frequently reported positive effects were ability to provide person-centered care ( n = 36, 35.6%) and less patient stress and more rest ( n = 29, 28.7%). The most frequently reported negative effects were limited patient support ( n = 22, 21.8%) and emotional distress to the patient ( n = 15, 14.9%). Fourteen percent ( n = 14) of respondents cited both positive and negative effects. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nurses perceived that visitor restrictions resulted in both positive and negative patient experiences. Balancing clinical needs and safety considerations with emotional needs of the childbearing individual requires careful consideration by maternity care clinicians and health care systems. Subsequent research is needed to determine optimal visitation policies during intrapartum and postpartum with consideration to hospital context and patient preferences for optimal care.

Shared Decision Making in Perinatal Care.

XXXX.

Birth Care Gaps in the Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation (CHOICEs) Measure.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to revise and improve the intrapartum items of the shared decision-making (SDM) measure, CH ildbirth O ptions, I nformation and person- C entered E xplanation (CHOICEs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Methodological sequential triangulation was used to select a purposive sample of 29 people who gave birth in the United States between August 2019 and June 2021. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyze and interpret the data. We used an interview guide with questions related to the nine intrapartum items in CHOICEs to address the question: How did decision-making occur during your most recent birth? RESULTS: Four major themes were identified: provider told me what to do ; communication about interventions during labor and birth ; preferences overlooked ; multiple team members . Under the theme of provider told me what to do , there was one sub-theme of induction of labor . CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Participants noted lack of shared decision-making, poor communication, and obstetric violence. We found the need for perinatal providers to improve communication with birthing people on topics such as fetal monitoring, induction of labor, and multiple team members who may participate in their care. Revisions of CHOICEs will include seven new items to further address birth preferences, feeling heard, and multiple team members.

Psychometric Properties of the Resilience Scale in Older Adults Post-Hip Fracture.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified 25-item Resilience Scale (RS-25) in older adults post-hip fracture using Rasch analysis. Methods: This was a descriptive study using baseline data from the Seventh Baltimore Hip Studies (BHS-7). There were 339 hip fracture patients included in this analysis. Results: Findings suggest there was support for reliability of the measure based on person and item separation index. The INFIT and OUTFIT statistics for testing validity were all in the acceptable range indicating that each item on the modified RS-25 fits the appropriate concept. There was no evidence of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) between genders. Conclusions: This study demonstrated evidence that the modified RS-25 is a reliable and valid measure to evaluate resilience among older adults post-hip fracture and therefore can be used in this population in clinical practice and research.

Exploring Factors Associated With Resilience and Physical Activity in Older Men and Women Post-Hip Fracture.

This study aimed to test a model of factors associated with resilience and physical activity post-hip fracture and compare model fit between men and women. We used data from the seventh Baltimore Hip Study that included 339 participants. Model testing indicated that health status (men: ß = .237, p = .002; women: ß = .265, p = <.001), depression (men: ß = -.245, p = .001; women: ß = -.241, p = <.001), and optimism (men: ß = .320, p = <.001; women: ß = .282, p = <.001) were associated with resilience in men and women, but resilience was only associated with physical activity in men (ß = .203, p = .038) and not in women. Social interaction was related to physical activity only among women (ß = .206, p = .044). This study provides support for the relationship between resilience and physical activity at least among men.

Implementation research priorities for addressing the maternal health crisis in the USA: results from a modified Delphi study among researchers.

BACKGROUND: Maternal health outcomes in the USA are far worse than in peer nations. Increasing implementation research in maternity care is critical to addressing quality gaps and unwarranted variations in care. Implementation research priorities have not yet been defined or well represented in the plans for maternal health research investments in the USA. METHODS: This descriptive study used a modified Delphi method to solicit and rank research priorities at the intersection of implementation science and maternal health through two sequential web-based surveys. A purposeful, yet broad sample of researchers with relevant subject matter knowledge was identified through searches of published articles and grant databases. The surveys addressed five implementation research areas in maternal health: (1) practices to prioritize for broader implementation, (2) practices to prioritize for de-implementation, (3) research questions about implementation determinants, (4) research questions about implementation strategies, and (5) research questions about methods/measures. RESULTS: Of 160 eligible researchers, 82 (51.2%) agreed to participate. Participants were predominantly female (90%) and White (75%). Sixty completed at least one of two surveys. The practices that participants prioritized for broader implementation were improved postpartum care, perinatal and postpartum mood disorder screening and management, and standardized management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. For de-implementation, practices believed to be most impactful if removed from or reduced in maternity care were cesarean delivery for low-risk patients and routine discontinuation of all psychiatric medications during pregnancy. The top methodological priorities of participants were improving the extent to which implementation science frameworks and measures address equity and developing approaches for involving patients in implementation research. CONCLUSIONS: Through a web-based Delphi exercise, we identified implementation research priorities that researchers consider to have the greatest potential to improve the quality of maternity care in the USA. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of using modified Delphi approaches to engage researchers in setting implementation research priorities within a clinical area.

Survey of Postpartum People in the United States During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic to Explore Their Perspective on Support After Discharge.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to capture the experiences of postpartum people during the first wave of COVID-19, specifically their access to contraception and lactation support. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed individuals in the United States who used the Ovia Pregnancy and Parenting app. The survey was administered via an email Web link sent to postpartum people who gave birth between March 1, 2020, and June 11, 2020. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 388 postpartum people completed the survey. Most participants had just given birth to their first baby (68.5%; n = 261) at term gestation (37-41 weeks) (92.9%; n = 355). From the qualitative data, using content analysis, we derived 6 themes and 2 subthemes: quarantine, changes in postpartum care, loneliness and isolation, stress, resource changes, and positive impact. The theme loneliness and isolation had 2 subthemes: depression/sadness/hopelessness and anxiety. DISCUSSION: The experience of being postpartum during the COVID-19 pandemic brought unforeseen challenges. Providing care and support to postpartum people during a pandemic, specifically during a time of quarantine, should be reimagined. Increased use of virtual postpartum care services and expanded mental health support could serve to fill the gaps identified by participants.

Comparing Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Hospitals: A Demonstration of the Robson Ten-Group Classification System for Use in Quality Improvement and Benchmarking.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization-endorsed Robson Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) is a standard reporting mechanism for cesarean birth, yet this approach is not widely adopted in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To describe the application and utility of the TGCS to compare hospital-level cesarean births rates, for use in quality improvement and benchmarking. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, secondary data analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor dataset using data from 228 438 women's births, from 2002 to 2008, in 12 sites across the United States. We stratified births into 10 mutually exclusive groups and calculated within-group proportions of group size and cesarean birth rates for between-hospital comparisons of cesarean birth, trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC), and labor induction utilization. RESULTS: There is variation in use of cesarean birth, labor induction, and TOLAC across the 12 sites. CONCLUSION: The TGCS provides a method for between-hospital comparisons, particularly for revealing usage patterns of labor induction, TOLAC, and cesarean birth. Adoption of the TGCS in the United States would provide organizations and quality improvement leaders with an effective benchmarking tool to assist in reducing the use of cesarean birth and increasing the support of TOLAC.

Challenges, Job Satisfiers, and Self-Care among Perinatal Nurses in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: To explore the perceived challenges, job satisfiers, and self-care of perinatal nurses in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In May of 2021, a cross-sectional survey was distributed online to members of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. We calculated descriptive statistics on respondent characteristics and applied conventional content analysis to free-text comments. RESULTS: Perinatal nurses ( N = 297) responded to three open-ended questions on their perceived challenges, job satisfiers, and self-care. Frequently reported challenges included changing guidelines and policies ( n = 101, 34%), personal protective equipment as a barrier ( n = 73, 24.6%), and visitor restrictions ( n = 64, 21.5%). Frequently reported job satisfiers were provision of high-quality care ( n = 137, 46.1%) and visitor restrictions ( n = 77, 25.9%). Respondents reported using mental ( n = 152, 51.2%) and physical ( n = 145, 48.8%) self-care strategies and 12.8% ( n = 38) reported using no self-care strategies. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The ability to provide high-quality care was reported as a leading job satisfier. Poor communication of consistent, evidence-based guidelines, lack of personal protective equipment, and inadequate unit staffing were leading challenges. Visitor restrictions were a challenge and a job satisfier, suggesting opportunities to better include visitors as support people. Most respondents reported engaging in one or more types of self-care outside of the hospital setting. Future research is needed to examine strategies for self-care among perinatal nurses when at work in the hospital setting.

Reliability and Validity of a Perinatal Shared Decision-Making Measure: The Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the psychometric properties of a shared decision-making tool: Childbirth Options, Information, and Person-Centered Explanation (CHOICEs). DESIGN: Multiphase instrument development study beginning with item development through a cross-sectional postpartum survey. SETTING: The cross-sectional postpartum survey was distributed online through convenience and snowball sampling methods. METHODS: We developed instrument items through an iterative process with key stakeholders. We evaluated reliability based on internal consistency and differential item functioning analysis. We evaluated validity on evidence of construct validity. We used criterion-related item mapping to evaluate whether the measure addressed the full spectrum of shared decision making related to maternity care. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 1,171 participants. A Cronbach's α coefficient of .99 supported internal consistency reliability. Infit and outfit statistics that ranged from 0.92 to 1.55 supported item fit. Differential item functioning analysis showed that CHOICEs scores were invariant between different demographic groups. Significant positive correlations between scores on CHOICEs and the Mothers on Respect index (r = 0.75, p = .01) and the Mothers Autonomy in Decision-Making scale (r = 0.75, p = .01) supported criterion-related validity. Item mapping suggested more items were needed to capture the full spectrum of shared decision making. CONCLUSION: We recommend using CHOICEs to evaluate shared decision making in maternity care for research and quality improvement projects.

Place of Birth Preferences and Relationship to Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Within the American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, 2007-2020.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe sociodemographic variations in client preference for birthplace and relationships to perinatal health outcomes. METHODS: Descriptive data analysis (raw number, percentages, and means) showed that preference for birthplace varied across racial and ethnic categories as well as sociodemographic categories including educational status, body mass index, payer status, marital status, and gravidity. A subsample of medically low-risk childbearing people, qualified for birth center admission in labor, was analyzed to assess variations in maternal and newborn outcomes by site of first admission in labor. RESULTS: While overall clinical outcomes exceeded national benchmarks across all places of admission in the sample, disparities were noted including higher cesarean birth rates among Black and Hispanic people. This variation was larger within the population of people who preferred to be admitted to the hospital in labor in the absence of medical indication. CONCLUSION: This study supports that the birth center model provides safe delivery care across the intersections of US sociodemographics. Findings from this study highlight the importance of increased access and choice in place of birth for improving health equity, including decreasing cesarean birth and increasing breastfeeding initiation.

Lessons Learned Recruiting and Retaining Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals in Digital Trials: Viewpoint.

In an increasingly connected world and in the midst of a global pandemic, digital trials offer numerous advantages over traditional trials that rely on physical study sites. Digital trials have the potential to improve access to research and clinical treatments for the most vulnerable and minoritized, including pregnant and postpartum individuals. However, digital trials are underutilized in maternal and child health research, and there is limited evidence to inform the design and conduct of digital trials. Our research collaborative, consisting of 5 research teams in the U.S. and Australia, aimed to address this gap. We collaborated to share lessons learned from our experiences recruiting and retaining pregnant and postpartum individuals in digital trials of social and behavioral interventions. We first discuss the promise of digital trials in improving participation in research during the perinatal period, as well as the unique challenges they pose. Second, we present lessons learned from 12 completed and ongoing digital trials that have used platforms such as Ovia, Facebook, and Instagram for recruitment. Our trials evaluated interventions for breastfeeding, prenatal and postpartum depression, insomnia, decision making, and chronic pain. We focus on challenges and lessons learned in 3 key areas: (1) rapid recruitment of large samples with a diversity of minoritized identities, (2) retention of study participants in longitudinal studies, and (3) prevention of fraudulent enrollment. We offer concrete strategies that we pilot-tested to address these challenges. Strategies presented in this commentary can be incorporated, as well as formally evaluated, in future studies.

Innovations in Prospective Perinatal Research as a Result Of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

In 2020, in-person research activities were stopped because of the spread of the novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and the resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019. Our collaborative team of nurse and midwife scientists at universities across the United States adapted research activities to continue prospective perinatal research during the pandemic. These adaptations included development of new research techniques and the implementation of previously developed, but underused, strategies to conduct research from a distance. These strategies included online recruitment, virtual enrollment and consent, qualitative data collection via video conferencing, new applications of smart phone technology, wearable biological measurement, and participant self-collection of biological samples. In addition to allowing research to continue during the pandemic, these innovative strategies may increase access to research for low-income, rural, and racially diverse pregnant and postpartum populations. Decreased travel requirements, flexible scheduling, wearable devices, and the capacity to self-collect biologic samples may improve recruitment and the experience of research participation. The rapid implementation of these research strategies has advanced innovation toward wider, more inclusive and increasingly diverse perinatal research access, and many of these strategies will continue to be used and refined.

Impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy worry in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies confirm that the COVID-19 pandemic has increased symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression in pregnant persons around world. In this study, we aimed to uncover the impact of COVID-19 on worry during pregnancy. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional descriptive research design. A link to a survey was emailed to users of the Ovia Pregnancy app. Participants (N = 253) completed the survey, which included the Cambridge Worry in Pregnancy Scale, and answered several free text questions. The free-text questions were included to capture worries not listed on the scale and to allow participants the opportunity to more clearly describe COVID-19-related worries. Descriptive statistics were reported, and content analysis performed to determine themes. RESULTS: Overall, respondents reported they were quite or very worried about having their partner with them at birth (31.7%, n = 80), giving birth (28.2%; n = 71), and something being wrong with the baby (27.3%; n = 69). Results on worries also differed by participants' race, parity, and trimester. When comparing White to other racial groups, other racial groups had statistically significantly higher median scores for questions on worries about employment (P = .001), going to the hospital (P = .002), and internal examinations (P = .03). Content analysis revealed isolation, loss of support, anxiety/stress, and grief as major themes. DISCUSSION: The worry, isolation, loss of support, anxiety, and grief reported by pregnant persons during the COVID-19 pandemic may impact maternal pre- and postnatal mental health and are not borne equally. Birthing persons of color appear disproportionately impacted. Prenatally, maternity care providers should assess for worry and provide individualized education and resources to pregnant patients, centering individuals and communities made most vulnerable by structural inequality.

Psychological Safety in Simulation-Based Prelicensure Nursing Education: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Psychological safety, essential in high-quality simulation-based education, positively influences learning behaviors and outcomes in corporate organizations. Current assessment of psychological safety is grounded in Edmondson's work team learning model. To understand applicability of this model in nursing education, a literature review was conducted. We reviewed literature on psychological safety in nursing education to assess support for this learning model constructs. Adapting existing models and assessment instruments in different contexts is an important contribution to the profession. METHODS: A structured narrative review examined psychological safety in nursing education simulation literature to identify support for Edmondson's work team learning model constructs. RESULTS: Included articles (n = 13) supported the Edmondson model constructs. When faculty practiced specific leader behaviors, learners experienced psychological safety and demonstrated specific learning-oriented behaviors. CONCLUSION: Psychological safety literature in nursing education supports the work team learning model constructs. This link offers promise for transfer to an assessment instrument in nursing education.

Giving birth during the COVID-19 pandemic, perspectives from a sample of the United States birthing persons during the first wave: March-June 2020.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic forced hospitals in the United States to adjust policy and procedure in order to provide safe care and prevent the spread of disease. At the beginning of the pandemic, media and case reports described pressure for medical interventions, visitor restrictions, separation from newborns, and an increase in patient demand for community birth (home and birth center). The purpose of this study was to describe birth experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic centering the birthing person's perspective. METHODS: A survey was e-mailed to users of the Ovia Pregnancy app reaching a national convenience sample who gave birth between March 1, 2020, and June 11, 2020. Survey topics included birth location, the Mothers on Respect index, and open-ended questions capturing patient perspectives on the pandemic's effect on their birth experiences. Differences were assessed based on state-level COVID rate and by race. Content analysis was performed to analyze open-ended responses. RESULTS: Respondents from highly impacted COVID-19 states more frequently changed or considered changing their birth location. Racial differences were also found with Black respondents reporting significantly more preterm births and lower respect scores when compared to White respondents. Six themes emerged from the content analysis: Institutional Policies, Changes in Care, Hospital Staff Interactions, Sub-par Care, Issues of Support, and Mental Health. DISCUSSION: The health care community must continue to adapt policies and procedures to best support birthing patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The community must also continue to address the reality that Black patients receive less respectful care compared with White patients.

Challenges in the Triage Care of Low-Risk Laboring Patients: A Comparison of 2 Models of Practice.

Triage and the timing of admission of low-risk pregnant women can affect the use of augmentation, epidural, and cesarean. The purpose of this analysis was to explore these outcomes in a community hospital by the type of provider staffing triage. This was a retrospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women with a term, vertex fetus laboring in a community hospital. Bivariate and multivariable statistics evaluated associations between triage provider type and labor and birth outcomes. Patients in this sample (N = 335) were predominantly White (89.5%), with private insurance (77.0%), and married (71.0%) with no significant differences in these characteristics by triage provider type. Patients admitted by midwives had lower odds of oxytocin augmentation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29-0.87), epidural (aOR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.12-0.69), and cesarean birth (aOR = 0.308, 95% CI = 0.14-0.67), compared with those triaged by physicians after controlling for patient characteristics and triage timing. This study provides additional context to midwives as labor triage providers for healthy, low-risk pregnant individuals; however, challenges persisted with measurement. More research is needed on the specific components of care during labor that support low-risk patients to avoid medical interventions and poor outcomes.

Reliability and Validity Testing of the Quantified Quality of Interaction Schedule.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Quality of Interactions Schedule (QuIS) using a quantification scoring approach. METHODS: Baseline data from the Evidence Integration Triangle for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (EIT-4-BPSD) study was used. RESULTS: A total of 553 residents participated. There was evidence of inter-rater reliability with Kappa scores of .86 to 1.00 and internal consistency based on the Rasch analysis (item reliability of .98). There was some support for validity based on item fit and hypothesis testing as resistiveness to care was significantly associated with total QuIS scores. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of the quantified QuIS to evaluate the quality of interactions over time and to test interventions to improve interactions.

Improving Nurse Self-Efficacy and Increasing Continuous Labor Support With the Promoting Comfort in Labor Safety Bundle.

OBJECTIVE: To increase nurse self-efficacy and the use of continuous labor support and to reduce the rate of primary cesareans among nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies by implementing the Promoting Comfort in Labor safety bundle. DESIGN: A quality improvement project with a pre-post practice implementation design. This practice change was part of the Reducing Primary Cesarean Learning Collaborative from the American College of Nurse-Midwives. SETTING: A Level II regional hospital in Virginia with more than 2,600 births annually. Births are attended by certified nurse-midwives and physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing staff on the labor and delivery unit in March 2016 (n = 27), September 2017 (n = 20), and June 2019 (n = 24). INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: We updated policies, educated nurses, procured labor support equipment, and modified documentation of care. We measured nurse confidence and skill in labor support techniques with the Self-Efficacy Labor Support Scale over 4 years. We tracked how many women were provided continuous labor support and the primary cesarean birth rate among women who were nulliparous and low risk. RESULTS: Nurses' mean self-efficacy scores increased from 76.67 in 2016 to 86.96 in 2019 (p < .001). The proportion of women who were provided continuous labor support increased from a baseline of 4.38% (47/1,074) in January 2015 through March 2016 to 18.06% (82/454) in July through December 2019 (p < .001). The primary cesarean birth rate for nulliparous women with low-risk pregnancies remained stable, at approximately 18% from 2015 to 2019. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the Comfort in Labor Safety Bundle improved nurse self-efficacy in labor support techniques and increased the frequency of continuous labor support.