Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Nutr ; 125(9): 1051-1057, 2021 05 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32723408

RESUMO

This study determined the gluten content of foods and meals consumed by coeliac disease (CD) patients who adhere to a gluten-free diet, and to estimate the total daily intake of gluten of these patients. CD patients fulfilling defined inclusion criteria were preselected and approached for participation in the study. Duplicate portions (DP) of foods and mixed dishes were collected from the CD patients for evaluating complete daily food intake during two individual days. Also, for these days, written food records were completed by the participants. From each DP, a laboratory sample was prepared and analysed for its gluten concentration and total daily gluten intake was calculated. Each individual's total daily intakes of energy and macronutrients were calculated using the Dutch food composition database. In total, twenty-seven CD patients participated, seven males and twenty females, aged between 21 and 64 years. In thirty-two (6 %) of 499 food samples collected in total, more than 3 mg/kg gluten was present. In four of these thirty-two samples, the gluten concentration was above the European legal limit of 20 mg/kg and three of the four samples had a gluten-free label. The maximal gluten intake was 3·3 mg gluten/d. The gluten tolerance for sensitive CD patients (>0·75 mg/d) was exceeded on at least six out of fifty-four study days. To also protect these sensitive CD patients, legal thresholds should be re-evaluated and the detection limit of analytical methods for gluten analysis lowered.


Assuntos
Doença Celíaca/dietoterapia , Dieta Livre de Glúten , Análise de Alimentos , Glutens/análise , Adulto , Registros de Dieta , Ingestão de Alimentos , Ingestão de Energia , Feminino , Glutens/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 56(15): 2455-2466, 2016 Nov 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25779856

RESUMO

Accurate and reliable quantification methods for gluten in food are necessary to ensure proper product labeling and thus safeguard the gluten sensitive consumer against exposure. Immunochemical detection is the method of choice, as it is sensitive, rapid and relatively easy to use. Although a wide range of detection kits are commercially available, there are still many difficulties in gluten detection that have not yet been overcome. This review gives an overview of the currently commercially available immunochemical detection methods, and discusses the problems that still exist in gluten detection in food. The largest problems are encountered in the extraction of gluten from food matrices, the choice of epitopes targeted by the detection method, and the use of a standardized reference material. By comparing the available techniques with the unmet needs in gluten detection, the possible benefit of a new multiplex immunoassay is investigated. This detection method would allow for the detection and quantification of multiple harmful gluten peptides at once and would, therefore, be a logical advancement in gluten detection in food.


Assuntos
Glutens/análise , Imunoensaio/métodos , Doença Celíaca/dietoterapia , Doença Celíaca/imunologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Epitopos/imunologia , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Glutens/imunologia , Humanos , Peptídeos/análise , Peptídeos/imunologia , Triticum/química , Triticum/imunologia
3.
Food Chem ; 185: 333-9, 2015 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25952876

RESUMO

In order to facilitate safe re-introduction of non-ruminant processed animal proteins (PAPs) in aqua feed, two immunoassays have been tested in an interlaboratory study for their capability to detect ruminant PAPs processed under European conditions. The sensitivity of the MELISA-TEK assay was improved by applying a specific extraction kit. Six approved blank pork and poultry samples were adulterated to produce 15 samples spiked at 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% with ruminant material, sterilised at either 133 °C or 137 °C. Fourteen participants investigated the 6 blanks and 15 spiked samples, making 21 samples for the final test. For both assays specificity and sensitivity were at 97% or higher. Concordance and accordance were higher than 95% with one exception. The results indicate that both assays provided correct results at 0.5% and higher for the detecting ruminant PAPs (sterilised at 133 °C) in non-ruminant PAPs. Given the 2% upper limit of ruminant PAPs in non-ruminant PAPs for avoiding an increase in BSE incidents, these methods are fit for monitoring non-ruminant PAPs intended for aqua feed.


Assuntos
Ração Animal/análise , Imunoensaio/métodos , Proteínas/análise , Animais , Inocuidade dos Alimentos , Humanos , Aves Domésticas , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Ruminantes , Suínos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...