Ovulatory Shifts in Sexual Desire But Not Mate Preferences: An LH-Test-Confirmed, Longitudinal Study.

The presented data are part of a longitudinal within-subject study designed to examine ovulatory shifts in human sexuality in a diverse German sample using validated questionnaires. The final sample consists of 78 individuals (76 female, 2 agender) who declared to be mainly or exclusively attracted to males. Questionnaires were completed anonymously online at three cycle phases. Following the gold standard, the fertile window was calculated through the reverse cycle day method and confirmed via urinary tests detecting luteinizing hormone. The questionnaire included the Sexual Desire Inventory, Dresdner Body Image Inventory, the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory, and an adjective list to measure mate preferences. One hundred eighty-four questionnaires were included in the data analysis using linear mixed models. Findings support previous research reporting heightened sexual desire and an improved body image during the fertile window. No shifts were found for mate preference or sociosexual orientation, thus adding to a growing body of literature contesting parts of the ovulatory shift hypothesis.

[Impact of implementation strategies on adherence rates to colorectal cancer (CRC) guidelines after polypectomy in a university hospital]. / Einfluss von Weiterbildungsmaßnahmen auf die leitliniengerechten Nachsorgeempfehlungen nach Polypektomie aus dem Dickdarm in einem Universitätsklinikum.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common malignancy in Germany. Screening colonoscopies with polypectomy have been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of CRC. Detailed recommendations on scheduling screening and follow-up colonoscopies have therefore been included into national guidelines. Knowledge about CRC guidelines and adherence to guideline recommendations varies greatly among physicians. METHODS: We combined different implementation strategies (training courses, case discussion, handouts, wall charts) to improve adherence of recommendations for scheduling follow-up colonoscopy. To assess adherence, written recommendations given at discharge after inpatient treatment for polypectomy were analysed before (n = 111) and after (n = 83) the implementation of the above-mentioned implementation measures. Additional factors possibly influencing the recommendations of physicians were collected (histology, polyp size). RESULTS: The adherence to the CRC guideline before implementation of the above-mentioned measures was moderate. After intervention, there was a non-significant increase from 47 % to 53 %. Senior physician review and editing of the discharge summaries improved guideline adherence of recommendations to 69 %. Neither the education level of residents nor their affiliation to a certain department had an impact on the quality of the recommendations. Histology and in particular information on the resection status of the polyps in the pathology report (complete versus incomplete resection) had an influence of the recommended schedule. Furthermore, size of the polyps, but not the number, had a statistically significant influence on the quality of the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The inadequate improvement of guideline adherence can possibly be explained by the insufficient interactive and repetitive character of interventions. As the histology reports seem to have an influence on the recommendations in regards to the interval to the next colonoscopy, interdisciplinary teaching is necessary to improve guideline concurrent care.