Novel multiparametric bulk and single EV pipeline for adipose cell-specific biomarker discovery in paired human biospecimens.

Obesity is a global health crisis that contributes to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Obesity's comorbid association with a variety of diseases, from metabolic syndrome to neurodegenerative disease, underscores the critical need to better understand the pathobiology of obesity. Adipose tissue, once seen as an inert storage depot, is now recognized as an active endocrine organ, regulating metabolic and systemic homeostasis. Recent studies spotlight the theranostic utility of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as novel biomarkers and drivers of disease, including obesity-related complications. Adipose-derived EVs (ADEVs) have garnered increased interest for their roles in diverse diseases, however robust isolation and characterization protocols for human, cell-specific EV subsets are limited. Herein, we directly address this technical challenge by establishing a multiparametric analysis framework that leverages bulk and single EV characterization, mRNA phenotyping and proteomics of human ADEVs directly from paired visceral adipose tissue, cultured mature adipocyte conditioned media, and plasma from obese subjects undergoing bariatric surgery. Importantly, rigorous EV phenotyping at the tissue and cell-specific level identified top 'adipose liquid biopsy' candidates that were validated in circulating plasma EVs from the same patient. In summary, our study paves the way toward a tissue and cell-specific, multiparametric framework for studying tissue and circulating adipose EVs in obesity-driven disease.

How Does the Sequence of the American Board of Surgery Examinations Impact Pass/Fail Outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: Historically, the American Board of Surgery required surgeons to pass the qualifying examination (QE) before taking the certifying examination (CE). However, in the 2020-2021 academic year, with mitigating circumstances related to COVID-19, the ABS removed this sequencing requirement to facilitate the certification process for those candidates who were negatively impacted by a QE delivery failure. This decoupling of the traditional order of exam delivery has provided a natural comparator to the traditional route and an analysis of the impact of examination sequencing on candidate performance. METHODS: All candidates who applied for the canceled July 2020 QE were allowed to take the CE before passing the QE. The sample was then reduced to include only first-time candidates to ensure comparable groups for performance outcomes. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between the order of taking the QE and the CE, controlling for other examination performance, international medical graduate status, and gender. RESULTS: Only first-time candidates who took both examinations were compared (n=947). Examination sequence was not a significant predictor of QE pass/fail outcomes, OR=0.54; 95% CI, 0.19-1.61, P =0.26. However, examination sequence was a significant predictor of CE pass/fail outcomes, OR=2.54; 95% CI, 1.46-4.68, P =0.002. CONCLUSIONS: This important study suggests that preparation for the QE increases the probability of passing the CE and provides evidence that knowledge may be foundational for clinical judgment. The ABS will consider these findings for examination sequencing moving forward.

Truth of Colorectal Enhanced Recovery Programs: Process Measure Compliance in 151 Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Commonly cited studies have reported substantial improvements (defined as >20%) in process measure compliance after implementation of colorectal enhanced recovery programs (ERPs). However, hospitals have anecdotally reported difficulties in achieving similar improvement gains. This study evaluates improvement uniformity among 151 hospitals exposed to an 18-month implementation protocol for 6 colorectal ERP process measures (oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation, multimodal pain control, early mobilization, early liquid intake, and early solid intake). STUDY DESIGN: One hundred fifty-one hospitals implemented a colorectal ERP with pathway, educational and supporting materials, and data capture protocols; 906 opportunities existed for process compliance improvement across the cohort (151 hospitals × 6 process measures). However, 240 opportunities were excluded due to high starting compliance rates (ie compliance >80%) and 3 opportunities were excluded because compliance rates were recorded for fewer than 2 cases. Thus, 663 opportunities for improvement across 151 hospitals were studied. RESULTS: Of 663 opportunities, minimal improvement (0% to 20% increase in compliance) occurred in 52% of opportunities, substantial improvement (>20% increase in compliance) in 20%, and worsening compliance occurred in 28%. Of the 6 processes, multimodal pain control and use of oral antibiotics improved the most. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to published ERP literature, the majority of study hospitals had difficulty improving process compliance with 80% of the opportunities not achieving substantial improvement. This discordance between ERP implementation success rates reported in the literature and what is observed in a large sample could reflect differences in hospitals' culture or characteristics, or a publication bias. Attention needs to be directed toward improving ERP adoption across the spectrum of hospital types.

Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cancer Risk and Mortality in Adults With Obesity.

Importance: Obesity increases the incidence and mortality from some types of cancer, but it remains uncertain whether intentional weight loss can decrease this risk. Objective: To investigate whether bariatric surgery is associated with lower cancer risk and mortality in patients with obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the SPLENDID (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in Neoplastic Disease Incidence and Death) matched cohort study, adult patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater who underwent bariatric surgery at a US health system between 2004 and 2017 were included. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched 1:5 to patients who did not undergo surgery for their obesity, resulting in a total of 30 318 patients. Follow-up ended in February 2021. Exposures: Bariatric surgery (n = 5053), including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, vs nonsurgical care (n = 25 265). Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable Cox regression analysis estimated time to incident obesity-associated cancer (a composite of 13 cancer types as the primary end point) and cancer-related mortality. Results: The study included 30 318 patients (median age, 46 years; median body mass index, 45; 77% female; and 73% White) with a median follow-up of 6.1 years (IQR, 3.8-8.9 years). The mean between-group difference in body weight at 10 years was 24.8 kg (95% CI, 24.6-25.1 kg) or a 19.2% (95% CI, 19.1%-19.4%) greater weight loss in the bariatric surgery group. During follow-up, 96 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 780 patients in the nonsurgical control group had an incident obesity-associated cancer (incidence rate of 3.0 events vs 4.6 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 10 years was 2.9% (95% CI, 2.2%-3.6%) in the bariatric surgery group and 4.9% (95% CI, 4.5%-5.3%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 2.0% [95% CI, 1.2%-2.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87], P = .002). Cancer-related mortality occurred in 21 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 205 patients in the nonsurgical control group (incidence rate of 0.6 events vs 1.2 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of cancer-related mortality at 10 years was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%) in the bariatric surgery group and 1.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.6%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 0.6% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.31-0.88], P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with obesity, bariatric surgery compared with no surgery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of obesity-associated cancer and cancer-related mortality.

First report from the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery closed-claims registry: prevalence, causes, and lessons learned from bariatric surgery medical malpractice claims.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has demonstrated sustained improvements in quality. Malpractice closed claims have been offered as a means of assessing quality. Few studies have investigated malpractice closed claims and opportunities for improvement in bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence and causes of malpractice claims with examination of prospects for quality improvement. SETTING: University hospital, United States; private practice. METHODS: Four national malpractice insurers participated in the closed-claims registry. Data regarding patients, staff, procedures, and hospital status were gathered from closed-claims files. Following data collection, a clinical summary of each closed claim was collected and later assessed by an expert panel on the basis of the following: contributing diagnosis and treatment events; whether complications were potentially preventable by the surgeon; the role of language, fatigue, distraction, workload, or teaching hospital/trainee supervision; communication concerns; and final care determination. RESULTS: A total of 175 closed claims were collected from index bariatric surgeries within the period from 2006-2014. Of these, 75.9% of surgeons were board certified and 43.3% of the hospitals were accredited for bariatric surgery. Most clinical complications after bariatric surgery that led to malpractice lawsuits were mortality (35.1%) and leaks (17.5%). While they were not the common cause for malpractice suits, bleeding (5.3%), retained foreign body (5.3%), and vascular injury (4.4%) occurred at higher rates than national averages. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of malpractice claims regarding bariatric surgery is low. Failure to diagnose, delay in treatment, postoperative care, and communication domain responses indicate future opportunities for improvement.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Diverticulitis Outcomes and Risk of Recurrent Hospitalizations in Adults with Clinically Severe Obesity.

PURPOSE: Clinically severe obesity (SO) is a known risk factor for worsened outcomes and recurrence of acute diverticulitis. Paucity of data exist on outcomes of diverticulitis after bariatric surgery. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for diverticulitis hospitalizations between the years 2010 and 2014. We restricted analysis to patients with SO and those who had bariatric surgery (BRS). Outcomes of mortality, surgical events, and recurrent diverticulitis admissions were compared using multivariable analysis and one-to-one propensity score matching. RESULTS: Among 52,274 diverticulitis admissions, 91.2% (47,694) patients had SO and 8.8% (4580) had prior BRS. Patients with SO had higher odds of suffering mortality on index diverticulitis admission when compared to those with prior BRS [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 10.55; 95%CI 1.45,76.75]. Patients with SO were also more likely to undergo emergency surgery (aOR: 1.71; 95%CI 1.25,2.34) and colectomy (aOR: 1.45; 95%CI 1.26,1.68). Rates of recurrent diverticulitis readmissions within 30 days and 6 months were also higher in patients with SO compared to BRS patients (aOR: 7.94; 95%CI 1.09,57.83 and aOR: 1.98; 95%CI 1.14,3.43, respectively). Propensity score matching confirmed our findings of increased rates of mortality (OR: 17.28; 95%CI 2.02,147.6), recurrent diverticulitis, and worsened surgical outcomes within 30 days in patients with SO compared to BRS. CONCLUSION: This study is first to show improved outcomes and less recurrent hospitalizations for diverticulitis after bariatric surgery compared to patients with clinically severe obesity. Further studies are needed to understand mechanisms leading to this improvement and the role of weight loss in prevention of severe diverticulitis.

Association of Bariatric Surgery With Major Adverse Liver and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

IMPORTANCE: No therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of serious adverse outcomes in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term relationship between bariatric surgery and incident major adverse liver outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with obesity and biopsy-proven fibrotic NASH without cirrhosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In the SPLENDOR (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in NASH Disease and Obesity Risk) study, of 25 828 liver biopsies performed at a US health system between 2004 and 2016, 1158 adult patients with obesity were identified who fulfilled enrollment criteria, including confirmed histological diagnosis of NASH and presence of liver fibrosis (histological stages 1-3). Baseline clinical characteristics, histological disease activity, and fibrosis stage of patients who underwent simultaneous liver biopsy at the time of bariatric surgery were balanced with a nonsurgical control group using overlap weighting methods. Follow-up ended in March 2021. EXPOSURES: Bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy) vs nonsurgical care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the incidence of major adverse liver outcomes (progression to clinical or histological cirrhosis, development of hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or liver-related mortality) and MACE (a composite of coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, or cardiovascular death), estimated using the Firth penalized method in a multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analysis framework. RESULTS: A total of 1158 patients (740 [63.9%] women; median age, 49.8 years [IQR, 40.9-57.9 years], median body mass index, 44.1 [IQR, 39.4-51.4]), including 650 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 508 patients in the nonsurgical control group, with a median follow-up of 7 years (IQR, 4-10 years) were analyzed. Distribution of baseline covariates, including histological severity of liver injury, was well-balanced after overlap weighting. At the end of the study period in the unweighted data set, 5 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 40 patients in the nonsurgical control group experienced major adverse liver outcomes, and 39 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 60 patients in the nonsurgical group experienced MACE. Among the patients analyzed with overlap weighting methods, the cumulative incidence of major adverse liver outcomes at 10 years was 2.3% (95% CI, 0%-4.6%) in the bariatric surgery group and 9.6% (95% CI, 6.1%-12.9%) in the nonsurgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference, 12.4% [95% CI, 5.7%-19.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.02-0.63]; P = .01). The cumulative incidence of MACE at 10 years was 8.5% (95% CI, 5.5%-11.4%) in the bariatric surgery group and 15.7% (95% CI, 11.3%-19.8%) in the nonsurgical group (adjusted absolute risk difference, 13.9% [95% CI, 5.9%-21.9%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12-0.72]; P = .007). Within the first year after bariatric surgery, 4 patients (0.6%) died from surgical complications, including gastrointestinal leak (n = 2) and respiratory failure (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with NASH and obesity, bariatric surgery, compared with nonsurgical management, was associated with a significantly lower risk of incident major adverse liver outcomes and MACE.

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: Comparison of Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Usual Care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which one of the two most common metabolic surgical procedures is associated with greater reduction in risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 13,490 patients including 1,362 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), 693 sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and 11,435 matched nonsurgical patients with T2DM and obesity who received their care at the Cleveland Clinic (1998-2017) were analyzed, with follow-up through December 2018. With multivariable Cox regression analysis we estimated time to incident extended MACE, defined as first occurrence of coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, nephropathy, atrial fibrillation, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 5 years was 13.7% (95% CI 11.4-15.9) in the RYGB groups and 24.7% (95% CI 19.0-30.0) in the SG group, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.98, P = 0.04). Of the six individual end points, RYGB was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of nephropathy at 5 years compared with SG (2.8% vs. 8.3%, respectively; HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.28-0.79], P = 0.005). Furthermore, RYGB was associated with a greater reduction in body weight, glycated hemoglobin, and use of medications to treat diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Five years after RYGB, patients required more upper endoscopy (45.8% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001) and abdominal surgical procedures (10.8% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.001) compared with SG. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with obesity and T2DM, RYGB may be associated with greater weight loss, better diabetes control, and lower risk of MACE and nephropathy compared with SG.

Patient-reported Outcomes After Metabolic Surgery Versus Medical Therapy for Diabetes: Insights From the STAMPEDE Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of medical and surgical treatments of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). BACKGROUND: Robust data on PROs from randomized trials comparing medical and surgical treatments for T2DM are lacking. METHODS: The Surgical Treatment And Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently (STAMPEDE) trial showed that 5 years after randomization, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were superior to intensive medical therapy (IMT) alone in achieving glycemic control in patients with T2DM and obesity. A subset of 104 patients participating in the STAMPEDE trial were administered two generic health-related quality of life (QoL) questionnaires (RAND-36 and EQ-5D-3L) and a diabetes-specific instrument at baseline, and then on an annual basis up to 5 years after randomization. RESULTS: On longitudinal analysis, RYGB and SG significantly improved the domains of physical functioning, general health perception, energy/fatigue, and diabetes-related QoL compared with IMT group. In the IMT group, none of the QoL components in the generic questionnaires improved significantly from baseline. No significant long-term differences were observed among the study groups in measures of psychological and social aspects of QoL. On multivariable analysis, independent factors associated with improved general health perception at long-term included baseline general health (P < 0.001), insulin independence at 5 years (P = 0.005), RYGB versus IMT (P = 0.005), and SG versus IMT (P = 0.034). Favorable changes following RYGB and SG were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2DM, metabolic surgery is associated with long-term favorable changes in certain PROs compared with IMT, mainly on physical health and diabetes-related domains. Psychosocial well-being warrants greater attention after metabolic surgery.

Foregut Exclusion Enhances Incretin and Insulin Secretion After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with type 2 diabetes experience resolution of hyperglycemia within days after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. This is attributed, in part, to enhanced secretion of hindgut factors following exclusion of the gastric remnant and proximal intestine during surgery. However, evidence of the mechanisms of remission remain limited due to the challenges of metabolic evaluation during the early postoperative period. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the role of foregut exclusion in the resolution of type 2 diabetes after RYGB. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 15) undergoing RYGB had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placed in their gastric remnant at time of surgery. Patients were randomized to receive a mixed meal tolerance test via oral or G-tube feeding immediately prior to and 2 weeks after surgery in a repeated measures crossover design. Plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, incretin responses, and indices of meal-stimulated insulin secretion and sensitivity were determined. RESULTS: Body weight, fat mass, fasting glucose and insulin, and circulating lipids were significantly decreased 2 weeks after surgery. The glycemic response to feeding was reduced as a function of total area under the curve but not after adjustment for the reduction in fasting glucose. Oral feeding significantly enhanced insulin and incretin secretion after RYGB, which was entirely ablated by G-tube feeding. CONCLUSION: Foregut exclusion accounts for the rise in incretin and insulin secretion but may not fully explain the early improvements in glucose metabolism after RYGB surgery.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass restores islet function and morphology independent of body weight in ZDF rats.

Reductions in ß-cell number and function contribute to the onset type 2 diabetes (T2D). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery can resolve T2D within days of operation, indicating a weight-independent mechanism of glycemic control. We hypothesized that RYGB normalizes glucose homeostasis by restoring ß-cell structure and function. Male Zucker Diabetic Fatty (fa/fa; ZDF) rats were randomized to sham surgery (n = 16), RYGB surgery (n = 16), or pair feeding (n = 16). Age-matched lean (fa/+) rats (n = 8) were included as a secondary control. Postprandial metabolism was assessed by oral glucose tolerance testing before and 27 days after surgery. Fasting and postprandial plasma GLP-1 was determined by mixed meal tolerance testing. Fasting plasma glucagon was also measured. ß-cell function was determined in isolated islets by a glucose-stimulated insulin secretion assay. Insulin and glucagon positive areas were evaluated in pancreatic sections by immunohistochemistry. RYGB reduced body weight (P < 0.05) and improved glucose tolerance (P < 0.05) compared with sham surgery. RYGB reduced fasting glucose compared with both sham (P < 0.01) and pair-fed controls (P < 0.01). Postprandial GLP-1 (P < 0.05) was elevated after RYGB compared with sham surgery. RYGB islets stimulated with 20 mM glucose had higher insulin secretion than both sham and pair-fed controls (P < 0.01) and did not differ from lean controls. Insulin content was greater after RYGB compared with the sham (P < 0.05) and pair-fed (P < 0.05) controls. RYGB improves insulin secretion and pancreatic islet function, which may contribute to the remission of type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The onset and progression of type 2 diabetes (T2D) results from failure to secrete sufficient amounts of insulin to overcome peripheral insulin resistance. Here, we demonstrate that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) restores islet function and morphology compared to sham and pair-fed controls in ZDF rats. The improvements in islet function were largely attributable to enhanced insulin content and secretory function in response to glucose stimulation.

Assessment of empiric body mass index-based thromboprophylactic dosing of enoxaparin after bariatric surgery: evidence for dosage adjustment using anti-factor Xa in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite thromboprophylaxis, postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occur after bariatric surgery, perhaps because of failure to achieve optimal prophylactic levels in the obese population. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of prophylactic dosing of enoxaparin in patients with severe obesity by performing an antifactor Xa (AFXa) assay. SETTING: An academic medical center METHODS: In this observational study, all bariatric surgery cases at an academic center between December 2016 and April 2017 who empirically received prophylactic enoxaparin (adjusted by body mass index [BMI] threshold of 50 kg/m2) were studied. The AFXa was measured 3-5 hours after the second dose of enoxaparin. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included; 85% were female with a median age of 47 years. In total, 16 patients (15.2%) had AFXa levels outside the prophylactic range: 4 (3.8%) cases were in the subprophylactic and 12 (11.4%) cases were in the supraprophylactic range. Seventy patients had a BMI <50 kg/m2 and empirically received enoxaparin 40 mg every 12 hours; AFXa was subprophylactic in 4 (5.7%) and supraprophylactic in 6 (8.6%) of these patients. Of the 35 patients with a BMI ≥50 who empirically received enoxaparin 60 mg q12h, no AFXa was subprophylactic and 6 (17.1%) were supraprophylactic. Five patients (4.8%) had major bleeding complications. One patient developed pulmonary embolism on postoperative day 35. CONCLUSION: BMI-based thromboprophylactic dosing of enoxaparin after bariatric surgery could be suboptimal in 15% of patients with obesity. Overdosing of prophylactic enoxaparin can occur more commonly than underdosing. AFXa testing can be a practical way to measure adequacy of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, especially in patients who are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism or bleeding.

Metabolic effects of duodenojejunal bypass surgery in a rat model of type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic surgery has beneficial metabolic effects, including remission of type 2 diabetes. We hypothesized that duodenojejunal bypass (DJB) surgery can protect against development of type 1 diabetes (T1D) by enhancing regulation of cellular and molecular pathways that control glucose homeostasis. METHODS: BBDP/Wor rats, which are prone to develop spontaneous autoimmune T1D, underwent loop DJB (n = 15) or sham (n = 15) surgery at a median age of 41 days, before development of diabetes. At T1D diagnosis, a subcutaneous insulin pellet was implanted, oral glucose tolerance test was performed 21 days later, and tissues were collected 25 days after onset of T1D. Pancreas and liver tissues were assessed by histology and RT-qPCR. Fecal microbiota composition was analyzed by 16S V4 sequencing. RESULTS: Postoperatively, DJB rats weighed less than sham rats (287.8 vs 329.9 g, P = 0.04). In both groups, 14 of 15 rats developed T1D, at similar age of onset (87 days in DJB vs 81 days in sham, P = 0.17). There was no difference in oral glucose tolerance, fasting and stimulated plasma insulin and c-peptide levels, and immunohistochemical analysis of insulin-positive cells in the pancreas. DJB rats needed 1.3 ± 0.4 insulin implants vs 1.9 ± 0.5 in sham rats (P = 0.002). Fasting and glucose stimulated glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) secretion was elevated after DJB surgery. DJB rats had reduced markers of metabolic stress in liver. After DJB, the fecal microbiome changed significantly, including increases in Akkermansia and Ruminococcus, while the changes were minimal in sham rats. CONCLUSION: DJB does not protect against autoimmune T1D in BBDP/Wor rats, but reduces the need for exogenous insulin and facilitates other metabolic benefits including weight loss, increased GLP-1 secretion, reduced hepatic stress, and altered gut microbiome.

Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Sleeve gastrectomy continues to be the most commonly performed bariatric operation worldwide. Development or worsening of pre-existing GERD has been recognized as a significant issue postoperatively. There is a paucity of information concerning the most appropriate preoperative workup and the technical and anatomical factors that may or may not contribute to the occurrence of reflux symptoms. Contemporary data quality is deficient given the predominantly retrospective nature, limited follow-up time, and heterogeneous outcome measures across studies. This has produced mixed results regarding the postoperative incidence and severity of GERD. Ultimately, better-constructed investigations are needed in order to offer evidence-based recommendations that may guide preoperative workup and improved patient selection criteria.

How Much Weight Loss is Required for Cardiovascular Benefits? Insights From a Metabolic Surgery Matched-cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the minimum amount of weight loss required to see a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). BACKGROUND: Although obesity is an established risk factor for morbidity and mortality, the minimum amount of weight loss to have a meaningful impact on cardiovascular health and survival is unknown. METHODS: Patients with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m) and type 2 diabetes who underwent metabolic surgery in an academic center (1998-2017) were propensity-matched 1:5 to nonsurgical patients who received usual care. The adjusted linear and nonlinear effects of weight loss (achieved in the first 18 months after the index date) were studied to identify cut-offs for the minimum weight loss to achieve decreased risk of all-cause mortality and MACE (composite of all-cause mortality, coronary artery events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, nephropathy, and atrial fibrillation). RESULTS: A total of 7201 patients (1223 surgical and 5978 nonsurgical) with a median follow-up time of 4.9 years (interquartile range, 3.5-7) were included. The positive effect of metabolic surgery was still present after adjusting for weight loss amounts, suggesting that there are weight loss-independent factors contributing to a reduction in risk of MACE and all-cause mortality in the surgical cohort. After considering the weighted estimates from a diverse set of models, the risk of MACE decreases after approximately 10% of weight is lost in the surgical group and approximately 20% in the nonsurgical group. For all-cause mortality, the threshold for benefit appeared to be approximately 5% weight loss after metabolic surgery and 20% in the nonsurgical group. CONCLUSIONS: This large matched-cohort study identified the minimum weight loss thresholds for reduction in risk of MACE and all-cause mortality in patients with obesity and diabetes. Furthermore, in our analysis, the effect of surgery was still present after accounting for weight loss, which may suggest the presence of weight-independent beneficial effects of metabolic surgery on MACE and survival.

Effects of gastric bypass surgery on expression of glucose transporters and fibrotic biomarkers in kidney of diabetic fatty rats.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease. Observational studies suggest Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) reduces progression of diabetic nephropathy. OBJECTIVES: To unravel the mechanisms by which RYGB is beneficial and protective for diabetic nephropathy. SETTING: Academic laboratories. METHODS: Forty-eight Zucker diabetic fatty rats were randomized to RYGB, sham surgery (SHAM), or pair-fed (PF) groups. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed at 25 days post intervention and kidneys were harvested at 30 days. Primary outcome measures included expression of key genes and proteins in the glucose transport, oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis pathways. RESULTS: Thirty days post intervention, RYGB rats weighed 349 ± 8 g, which was lower than SHAM (436 ± 14 g, P < .001), but not PF (374 ± 18 g) rats. RYGB rats had lower fasting glucose than PF animals and improved homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance compared with PF and SHAM groups. These enhanced metabolic outcomes were accompanied by reduced sodium-glucose co-transporter 1 (Sglt1) gene expression (-23% versus PF, P = .01) in the kidney of RYGB rats. Expression of Sglt2, Glut1, or Glut2 mRNA, or oxidative stress and inflammation markers did not differ significantly. However, RYGB surgery induced a 19% lower expression of transforming growth factor (Tgfß) mRNA (P = .004) compared with SHAM treated animals. Notably, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase phosphorylation was increased (P = .04) in kidneys of the RYGB surgery animals. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of hyperglycemia after RYGB may reduce the glucose load on the kidney leading to a downregulation of specific glucose transporters. RYGB surgery may also attenuate kidney fibrosis through the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase/TGFß pathway.

Redesigning a Department of Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has created an urgent need for reorganization and surge planning among departments of surgery across the USA. METHODS: Review of the COVID-19 planning process and work products in preparation for a patient surge. Organizational and process changes, workflow redesign, and communication plans are presented. RESULTS: The planning process included widespread collaboration among leadership from many disciplines. The department of surgery played a leading role in establishing clinical protocols, guidelines, and policies in preparation for a surge of COVID-19 patients. A multidisciplinary approach with input from clinical and nonclinical stakeholders is critical to successful crisis planning. A clear communication plan should be implemented early and input from trainees, staff, and faculty should be solicited. CONCLUSION: Major departmental and health system reorganization is required to adapt academic surgical practices to a widespread crisis. Surgical leadership, innovation, and flexibility are critical to successful planning and implementation.

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery, despite being the only effective durable treatment for obesity, remains underused as approximately 1% of all patients who qualify undergo surgery. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery created a Numbers Taskforce to specify annual rate of utilization for obesity treatment interventions and to determine if patients in need are receiving appropriate therapy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to provide the best estimated number of metabolic and bariatric procedure performed in the United States in 2018. SETTING: United States. METHODS: We reviewed data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database, and Nationwide Inpatient Sample. In addition, data from industry and outpatient centers were used to estimate outpatient center activity. Data from 2018 were compared mainly with data from the previous 2 years. RESULTS: Compared with 2017, the total number of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in 2018 increased from approximately 228,000 to 252,000. The sleeve gastrectomy continues to be the most common procedure. The gastric bypass procedure trend remained relatively stable and the gastric band procedure trend continued to decline. The percentage of revision procedures and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch procedures increased slightly. Finally, intragastric balloons placement continues as a significant contributor to the cumulative total number of procedures performed but declined from the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: There was a 10.8% increase in the number of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in 2018, compared with 2017, with an overall increase of approximately 60% since 2011. When taking into account primary procedures only, approximately 1.1% of patients who qualified for metabolic and bariatric surgery were treated with surgery in 2018.