RESUMO
The objective of this study was to compare measurements of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) between the gold standard diagnostic laboratory method and a handheld NEFA meter (Qucare Pro meter, DFI Co. Ltd.). Three experiments were conducted to study the usability of the meter. In experiment 1 we compared results of the meter obtained from measurements in serum and whole blood with results of the gold standard method. Based on the results of experiment 1 we compared the results measured by the meter in whole blood with results obtained from the gold standard method on a larger scale, as we wanted to omit the step of centrifugation with the cow-side test. In experiment 3 we determined the influence of ambient temperature on measurements. Overall, blood samples of 231 cows were collected between 14 and 20 d in milk. The Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated and Bland-Altman plots were created to compare the accuracy of the NEFA meter with the gold standard. In addition, in experiment 2 receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed, to define thresholds for the NEFA meter to detect cows with a NEFA concentration above 0.3, 0.4, and 0.7 mEq/L. In experiment 1, there was a high correlation between NEFA concentrations in whole blood and serum determined by the NEFA meter and the gold standard (ρ = 0.90 for measurement in whole blood; ρ = 0.93 for measurement in serum). In experiment 2, the measurement in whole blood with the NEFA meter was compared with the gold standard. Despite a lower correlation (ρ = 0.79) the ROC curve analyses revealed a high specificity and a moderate sensitivity for lower cut-points (i.e., 0.3 and 0.4 mEq/L). The NEFA meter underestimated especially high concentration of >0.7 mEq/L. Considering thresholds of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.7 mEq/L measured by the gold standard test, sensitivity and specificity were 59.1% and 96.7%, 79.0% and 95.4%, and 86.4% and 95.6%, respectively, when using 0.3, 0.3, and 0.4 mEq/L as thresholds for the NEFA meter. Accuracy was 74.1%, 88.3%, and 93.8% for the 3 thresholds tested. Experiment 3 showed that measurements should be conducted at approximately 21°C (ρ = 0.73) as correlations were poor at 6.2°C and 15.1°C (ρ = 0.18 and 0.22, respectively).
RESUMO
The objective of this observational study was to evaluate the association of transition cow health and estrous expression, detected by an automated activity monitoring system (Smarttag Neck, Nedap Livestock Management), with reproductive performance in lactating Holstein cows. A total of 3,750 lactating Holstein cows (1,563 primiparous cows and 2,187 multiparous cows) from a commercial dairy farm in Slovakia calving from January 2020 until July 2021 were enrolled on an ongoing basis. Activity data were recorded from d 7 until d 60 postpartum. Within this observational period, cows were classified into 3 categories: (1) no estrus event (Estrus0), (2) 1 estrus event (Estrus1), or (3) 2 or more estrus events (Estrus2+). Transition cow health was assessed by farm personnel within the first 30 d in milk (DIM) using standard operating procedures. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze continuous and categorical data. Cox proportional hazard models were used for time to event data. The overall prevalence of anestrus was 20.8%. Multiparous cows had a greater risk for anestrus compared with primiparous cows [odds ratio (OR) = 1.4]. Cows with stillbirth (OR = 1.76), retained placenta (OR = 2.19), puerperal metritis (OR = 1.48), or subclinical ketosis (OR = 1.51) had a greater risk for anestrus. In addition, cows calving in summer (OR = 0.82), autumn (OR = 0.38), or winter (OR = 0.56) had a higher incidence of anestrus than cows calving in spring. Estrous expression from d 7 until d 60 postpartum was associated with estrous duration (DU) and estrous intensity at first artificial insemination (AI). Cows in Estrus0 had the shortest DU at first postpartum AI (9.4 ± 0.18 h) compared with cows in Estrus1 (10.5 ± 0.13 h) and Estrus2+ (11.4 ± 0.12 h). Cows in Estrus2+ had a longer DU at first postpartum AI compared with cows in Estrus1. For Estrus0, Estrus1, and Estrus2+ cows, pregnancy per AI at first service was 42.5%, 50.9%, and 55.4%, respectively. Estrous expression from d 7 until d 60 postpartum was associated with time to first AI and time to pregnancy. Compared with Estrus0 cows, Estrus1 [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.43] and Estrus2+ cows (HR = 1.62) had an increased hazard of being inseminated within 100 DIM. Compared with Estrus2+, Estrus1 cows had a reduced hazard of being inseminated within 100 DIM (HR = 0.89). Compared with Estrus0 cows, Estrus1 (HR = 1.24) and Estrus2+ cows (HR = 1.46) had an increased hazard of becoming pregnant within 200 DIM. Median DIM to pregnancy were 121, 96, and 92 for Estrus0, Estrus1, and Estrus2+ cows, respectively. In conclusion, cows with transition cow disorders (i.e., stillbirth, retained placenta, puerperal metritis, or subclinical ketosis) had a greater chance for anestrus compared with healthy cows. Cows in Estrus0 had reduced estrous expression at first AI and inferior reproductive performance compared with cows that displayed estrous activity from d 7 until d 60.
