Management of acute central retinal artery occlusion: Intravenous thrombolysis is feasible and safe.

Background Although acute central retinal artery occlusion is as a stroke in the carotid territory (retinal artery), its management remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of intravenous thrombolysis delivered within 6 h of central retinal artery occlusion in French stroke units. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with intravenous alteplase (recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator), based on stroke units thrombolysis registers from June 2005 to June 2015, and we selected those who had acute central retinal artery occlusion. The feasibility was assessed by the ratio of patients that had received intravenous alteplase within 6 h after central retinal artery occlusion onset among those who had been admitted to the same hospital for acute central retinal artery occlusion. All adverse events were documented. Results Thirty patients were included. Visual acuity before treatment was limited to "hand motion", or worse, in 90% of the cases. The mean onset-to-needle time was 273 min. The individuals treated with intravenous alteplase for central retinal artery occlusion represented 10.2% of all of the patients hospitalized for central retinal artery occlusion in 2013 and 2014. We observed one occurrence of major bleeding, a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusion When applied early on, intravenous thrombolysis appears to be feasible and safe, provided that contraindications are given due consideration. Whether intravenous thrombolysis is more effective than conservative therapy remains to be determined. In order to conduct a well-designed prospective randomized control trial, an organized network should be in place.

[Cryptogenic cerebral infarction: from classification to concept]. / Infarctus cérébraux cryptogéniques : de la classification au concept.

Since the foundations laid by Sacco and Mohr in 1989, from the Stroke data bank, cryptogenic infarctions have had a predominant place among the causes of ischemic strokes. In that study, they accounted for approximately 40% of the stroke causes. Cryptogenic infarctions are infarctions without a defined cause, despite a complete work-up; they differ from infarctions of undetermined causes, which may involve overlapping causes or an incomplete investigation. The size of this group will probably shrink as knowledge advances. Patent foramen ovale (PFO), with or without a septal aneurysm, is more frequent in patients with a cryptogenic infarction. Transesophageal echocardiography is the reference examination for screening for these abnormalities. A meta-analysis of several case-control studies showed a significant association between PFO and stroke in subjects younger than 55 years. For now, these septal abnormalities constitute a risk factor but not a cause. Complex aortic atheroma affecting area upstream of the left subclavian artery may be a source of cerebral embolisms in some conditions. The prevalence of this disease increases with age. It is identified most frequently in patients older than 60 years with a cryptogenic infarction. The thickness of the atheromatous plaque determines whether it is a risk factor or a cause. Recent stroke classifications do not consider carotid atheromatous lesions less than 50% to be a source of ischemic stroke. Nonetheless some studies identify moderate stenosis of the carotid artery more frequently in infarctions of unknown causes than in other categories. The increased risk of cerebral infarction when parents and homozygous twins have a history of stroke suggests that there may be genetic causes that have not yet been detected. An unknown genetic cause would thus be included in the infarctions of unknown causes. A recent study tested for Fabry disease in young patients with a cryptogenic infarction: 4.9% of the men and 2.4% of the women had a functional mutation of the alpha-galactosidase gene. These findings must be confirmed. Some studies suggest an association between cryptogenic infarction and hereditary thrombophilias. Nonetheless the risk attributable to these thrombophilic disorders is slight and the discovery may be only a coincidence. The work described above shows the importance of stratification in the identification of stroke causes: age older or younger than 55/60 years, type of interatrial abnormality (PFO and aneurysms of the interatrial septum), type of atheroma of the aortic arch (more or less than 4mm). They also show the difficulty involved in attributing cause to an identified abnormality: is carotid stenosis of less than 50% a marker of atherosclerosis or also a cause of stroke? To continue improving our understanding of the mechanisms of strokes, new investigational techniques are under evaluation. They include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomographic angiography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) of carotid plaque and of the aortic arch, transcranial Doppler, cardiac recording by telemetry, and even new biological assays.