Survival, treatment patterns, and costs of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients in Ontario between 2005 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: To enable the integration of novel therapies, it is critical to understand current long-term outcomes in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC), including survival, treatment patterns, and costs. We sought to define these outcomes among patients with mBC in Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-level study in Ontario women diagnosed with breast cancer of any stage between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2019, with follow-up until December 31, 2020. HER2-positivity was based on receipt of a HER2-targeted therapy (HER2-TT) in the first line (1L) metastatic setting. Administrative databases at ICES were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: In Ontario, 2557 patients were diagnosed with mBC and received a HER2-TT, and of these 1606 were diagnosed with early-stage (stage I-III) that became metastatic (recurrent), while 951 were diagnosed with late stage/de novo mBC (stage IV). The average age of all patients was 54.8 years ± 12.7 years. Treatment regimens that included pertuzumab and trastuzumab (cohort name: pert_tras) were the most frequently used HER2-TT for 1L mBC (51.4%), while T-DM1 was the most frequent therapy (87.5%) in second line (2L). The median overall survival (mOS) from initiation of 1L pert_tras was not reached, whereas mOS from initiation of T-DM1 in 2L was 18.7 months. The overall mean cost per patient on pert_tras during 1L was $267,282. The main cost drivers were the cost of systemic therapy, followed by cancer clinic visits, with a mean cost per patient at $158,961 and $73,882, respectively. CONCLUSION: The baseline characteristics and treatment patterns for patients who received HER2-TT in our study align with previously reported results. However, the mOS observed for 2L T-DM1 was shorter than that found in pivotal, clinical trial literature. As expected, anti-cancer systemic therapy costs were the main contributor to the over quarter-million dollar mean cost per patient on pert_tras in 1L.

Use of a vaginal CO2 laser for the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in gynecological cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) may arise from the hypoestrogenism caused by ovarian function destruction following gynecological cancer treatments. GSM may also be present in menopausal women and its symptoms might be exacerbated by cancer treatments. Historically, patients with hormone-dependent gynecological cancer and physicians have been less comfortable using vaginal estrogen due to fear of recurrence. CO2 vaginal laser therapies have demonstrated efficacy as a non-hormonal alternative for GSM treatment in healthy menopausal patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the data on the effect of a CO2 vaginal laser for the management of GSM in gynecological cancer patients. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar. Selected studies assessed use of a CO2 vaginal laser in gynecological cancer patients with GSM. A total of 269 studies were retrieved. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Each study followed a different type of CO2 vaginal laser protocol for the management of GSM in gynecological cancer patients. There are no randomized controlled trials that assess the use of a CO2 vaginal laser in gynecologic cancer patients. The number of published gynecological cancer patients treated with a CO2 laser for the management of GSM is extremely limited (N < 100). There is a lack of literature on the impact and safety of vaginal CO2 laser use to manage GSM in gynecologic cancer patients.

Real-world use of trifluridine/tipiracil for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.

Background: Outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) are improving with the introduction of new treatments. Treatment for patients who are still fit after failure of all available therapies represents a significant unmet need. In the present study, we analyzed real-world treatment patterns for patients enrolled in Health Canada's trifluridine/tipiracil (ftd/tpi) Special Access Program (sap) and Taiho Pharma Canada's Patient Support Program (psp). Methods: Demographic information and clinical treatment data were collected from adults with mcrc who were previously treated with, or were not candidates for, available therapies and who were enrolled in the sap and psp. For all patients, ftd/tpi treatment status, discontinuation reasons, and prior therapies were examined. Results: The analysis included 717 Canadian patients enrolled in the ftd/tpi sap and psp from September 2017 to October 2018. In that cohort, 59.7% were men, median age was 65 years, and median duration of therapy was 77 days (25%-75% interquartile range: 43-106 days). Of treated patients, 67.1% maintained the same dose for the duration of therapy; 28.0% had a dose reduction.On multivariable analysis, duration of therapy was not influenced by sex, age, province, RAS mutation status, or prior therapies. However, prior oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (capox or folfox) appeared to be associated with higher rates of discontinuation because of death or disease progression. Conclusions: In advanced mcrc, ftd/tpi is a well-tolerated therapy. The large number of patients enrolled in the access programs within a short period of time is reflective of major clinical need in this area, with many patients being eligible and interested in pursuing treatment in the refractory setting.

An international survey of healthcare providers' knowledge of cardiac complications of cancer treatments.

BACKGROUND: Cardio-oncology is a young sub-specialty that addresses the needs of cancer patients at risk of, or who have experienced cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). This study assessed clinicians' understanding of cardio-oncology, opinions towards current practice, and approach to diagnosing and managing CTRCD. METHODS: A 45-question survey was administered online via Survey Monkey and WeChat to health care providers (HCPs) comprising of cardiologists, oncologists, and others from September 2017 to March 2018. Implementation of the survey followed a modified Dillman's Total Design Method. RESULTS: In total, 160 responses were collected from 22 countries; majority were from cardiologists (53.8%) and oncologists (32.5%). The remaining 13.7% identified themselves as "others," including general internists, cardio-oncologists, pediatric oncologists, radiation oncologists, cardiac rehabilitation therapists, nurse practitioners, research students, and pharmacists. In the setting of metastatic cancer, there was a difference in risk tolerance for cardiotoxicity between subspecialties. In this case, more cardiologists (36.7%) accepted a 5-10% risk of cardiotoxicity compared to oncologists (20.0%). Majority of cardiologists felt that cardiotoxicity should be monitored, even in asymptomatic cancer patients (55.8%). Only 12% of oncologists selected this response. In contrast, 50.0% of oncologists reported that cardiologists should be involved only when patients develop cardiotoxicity. In comparison, 6.5% of cardiologists selected this response. Majority of cardiologists stated that cardio-oncology clinics would significantly improve cancer patients' prognosis (88.3%); only 45.8% of oncologists shared this opinion. Of all respondents, 66.9% stated they were familiar with a variety of international guidelines for managing cardiotoxicity. Of all oncologists, 65.3% indicated that they referred to these guidelines for clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growth of cardio-oncology clinics, there are significant knowledge gaps regarding prevention and treatment strategies for CTRCD among health care providers. Knowledge translation from guidelines and collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists are needed to improve cardiovascular outcomes of cancer patients.

Overcoming endocrine resistance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Endocrine therapy, a major modality in the treatment of hormone receptor (hr)-positive breast cancer (bca), has improved outcomes in metastatic and nonmetastatic disease. However, a limiting factor to the use of endocrine therapy in bca is resistance resulting from the development of escape pathways that promote the survival of cancer cells despite estrogen receptor (er)-targeted therapy. The resistance pathways involve extensive cross-talk between er and receptor tyrosine kinase growth factors [epidermal growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2), and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor] and their downstream signalling pathways-most notably pi3k/akt/mtor and mapk. In some cases, resistance develops as a result of genetic or epigenetic alterations in various components of the signalling pathways, such as overexpression of her2 and erα co-activators, aberrant expression of cell-cycle regulators, and PIK3CA mutations. By combining endocrine therapy with various molecularly targeted agents and signal transduction inhibitors, some success has been achieved in overcoming and modulating endocrine resistance in hr-positive bca. Established strategies include selective er downregulators, anti-her2 agents, mtor (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitors, and inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. Inhibitors of pi3ka are not currently a treatment option for women with hr-positive bca outside the context of clinical trial. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring more agents that could be combined with endocrine therapy, and biomarkers that would help to guide decision-making and maximize clinical efficacy. In this review article, we address current treatment strategies for endocrine resistance, and we highlight future therapeutic targets in the endocrine pathway of bca.

Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: redrawing the lines.

Estrogen receptor modulators and estrogen deprivation have become standards of care for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. However, after traditional first-line endocrine monotherapy treatment, the disease typically progresses despite the initial high rate of clinical benefit. Multiple studies have aimed at optimizing treatment strategies to improve upon clinical benefit beyond the traditional single-agent endocrine treatment. With the availability of new data and novel therapies, the clinical practice challenge becomes how best to define the optimal treatment sequence to maximize clinical benefit. In this review, we present treatment options clinically relevant to the management of hormone-positive, her2-negative metastatic breast cancer, and we propose a treatment algorithm based on the current literature.

Cancer Screening Recommendations for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at increased risk of developing and dying from cancer. However, controversies exist around cancer screening in this population owing to reduced life expectancy and competing causes of death. This systematic review assesses the availability, quality and consistency of cancer screening recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We systematically searched bibliographic databases and gray literature to identify CPGs and assessed their quality using AGREE II. Recommendations were extracted along with their supporting evidence. Thirteen guidelines were included in the review. CPGs for kidney recipients were the most frequent source of screening recommendations, and recommendations for skin cancer screening were most frequently presented. Some screening recommendations differed from those for the general population, based on literature demonstrating higher cancer incidence among SOTRs versus direct evidence of screening effectiveness. Relevant stakeholders such as oncology specialists, primary care providers and public health experts were not involved in the formulation of the screening recommendations. In conclusion, although several guidelines make recommendations for cancer screening in SOTRs, the availability of cancer screening recommendations varied considerably by transplanted organ. More studies are required to inform cancer screening recommendations in SOTRs, and guideline development should involve transplant patients, oncologists and cancer screening specialists.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy

Modern treatment strategies have led to improvements in cancer survival, however, these gains might be offset by the potential negative effect of cancer therapy on cardiovascular health. Cardiotoxicity is now recognized as a leading cause of long-term morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors. This guideline, authored by a pan-Canadian expert group of health care providers and commissioned by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, is intended to guide the care of cancer patients with established cardiovascular disease or those at risk of experiencing toxicities related to cancer treatment. It includes recommendations and important management considerations with a focus on 4 main areas: identification of the high-risk population for cardiotoxicity, detection and prevention of cardiotoxicity, treatment of cardiotoxicity, and a multidisciplinary approach to cardio-oncology. All recommendations align with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Key recommendations for which the panel provides a strong level of evidence include: (1) that routine evaluation of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and optimal treatment of preexisting cardiovascular disease be performed in all patients before, during, and after receiving cancer therapy; (2) that initiation, maintenance, and/or augmentation of antihypertensive therapy be instituted per the Canadian Hypertension Educational Program guidelines for patients with preexisting hypertension or for those who experience hypertension related to cancer therapy; and (3) that investigation and management follow current Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure guidelines for cancer patients who develop clinical heart failure or an asymptomatic decline in left ventricular ejection fraction during or after cancer treatment. This guideline provides guidance to clinicians on contemporary best practices for the cardiovascular care of cancer patients.

Comparison of international breast cancer guidelines: are we globally consistent? cancer guideline AGREEment.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines are used in health care systems throughout the world to aid in treatment decisions and to ensure quality and consistency in patient care. In breast oncology, guidelines for care are published by several internationally recognized organizations, including those from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The present study compared clinical breast cancer guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO, United States), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO, Canada), and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE, United Kingdom) to determine the quality and consistency of content across international organizations. METHODS: We searched for breast cancer guidelines published by ASCO, CCO, and NICE. Guidelines on the same theme were identified across organizations and appraised by 4 independent reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Content of each guideline was also scored for consistency in overall recommendations across organizations and for consistency in cited evidence. RESULTS: The quality of breast cancer guidelines produced by the targeted organizations was consistently good in the areas of Scope and Purpose, Rigor of Development, and Clarity and Presentation, but variable in the domains of Stakeholder Involvement, Applicability, and Editorial Independence. The content of the guidelines varied slightly in the strength of their recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Our review demonstrated consistency in quality and content for breast cancer practice guidelines published by various organizations. Future guidelines developed by these organizations should focus on how to implement and measure uptake of a guideline.