Effect of single-unit transfusion in patients treated for haematological disease including acute leukemia: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies in hematological unit have suggested that single red blood cell (1-RBC) unit transfusion policy may reduce the number of RBC used without negative clinical impact. METHOD: Acute leukemia patients requiring intensive chemotherapy or patients receiving autologous or allogeneic transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either single RBC (1-RBC arm) or double RBC (2-RBC arm) per transfusion with a hemoglobin trigger of 8 g/dL. The primary composite endpoint was the percentage of patients experiencing serious complications, such as a non-hematological adverse event grade ≥ 3 or intensive care admission or death. FINDINGS: A total of 981 and 592 RBC transfusions were required in the 1-RBC arm (n = 125) and the 2-RBC arm (n = 120), respectively. The mean pre-transfusion hemoglobin levels were 7.49 ± 0.83 g/dL in the 1-RBC arm and 7.46 ± 0.67 g/dL in the 2-RBC arm (p = 0.275). The predefined non-inferiority criteria was achieved with 28/125 patients reaching the primary endpoint in the 1-RBC arm (22.4 %) and 28/120 patients in the 2-RBC arm (23.3 %) (Risk difference 0.009; 95 %, Confidence interval [-0.0791 to 0.0978], p = 0.021). The median (IQR) of RBC units transfused per patient was 7 (4-12) in the 1-RBC arm and 8 (4-12) in 2-RBC arm. Hemoglobin levels at discharge were also comparable in both arms. INTERPRETATION: The results of this trial indicate that a single RBC transfusion policy is not inferior to a double RBC transfusion policy for patients receiving a bone marrow transplant or intensive chemotherapy in a hematological intensive care unit. However, the single RBC transfusion policy did not reduce the number of RBC units transfused per stay. FUNDING: This trial was funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health.

Influence of prenatal urinary incontinence and mode of delivery in postnatal urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is likely that the pathophysiology of urinary incontinence (UI) differs between women who are incontinent before the first delivery and those whose incontinence occurs after. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the association between the mode of delivery and the risk of postpartum UI in primiparous women with and without prenatal UI. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase and CINHAL databases. Prospective studies including primiparous women during their pregnancy with a comparison of the rate of postpartum UI in women who underwent cesarean delivery or vaginal delivery according to continence status before delivery were included. The Risk Ratio (RR) was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using the total number of events and patients extracted from the individual studies. A subgroup comparison analysed the potential influence of women's prenatal continence status. Heterogeneity was estimated using I² statistics. RESULTS: The risk of postpartum UI was significantly higher after vaginal delivery than after cesarean section (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.48- 2.18). According to the subgroup test, the postpartum UI risk following a vaginal delivery, compared to cesarean section, was significantly higher in the subgroup of continent women during pregnancy (RR 2.57, 95% CI 2.17-3.04) than in the subgroup of incontinent pregnant women (1.56, 95% CI 1.27-1.92). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of a cesarean section in preventing postpartum UI appears controversial, particularly in women with prenatal UI.

Retreatment of previously treated intracranial aneurysm: Procedural complications and risk factors for complications.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial aneurysm (IA) is a frequent vascular malformation that can be managed by endovascular treatment (EVT) or microsurgery. A previously treated IA can recanalize, which may require further treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate procedural complications related to IA retreatment and their risk factors. METHODS: All patients retreated for IA between 2007 and 2017 in 4 hospitals were included. We retrospectively reviewed the frequency of procedural complications of IA retreatment, defined as death or≥1-point increase in modified Rankin score 24h after the procedure. We then screened for risk factors of procedural complications by comparing the characteristics of patients with and without complications. RESULTS: During the inclusion period, 4,997 IAs were treated in our 4 institutions. Of these, 237 (4.7%) were retreated. 29 (12.2%) had≥1 procedural complication. However, severe complications, defined as death or dependency at 1 month, occurred only in 3 patients (1.3%). The only risk factor for complications was microsurgical clipping as retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural complications during IA retreatment were frequent but, in most cases, retreatment did not lead to death or severe disability. The only risk factor for complications of IA retreatment was clipping as retreatment. However, the design of the study did not allow any conclusion to be drawn as to the optimal means of aneurysm retreatment, and further studies are needed.