Pattern of Opioid Analgesic Prescription for Adults by Dentists in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Global consumption of prescription opioid analgesics has increased dramatically in the past 2 decades, outpacing that of illicit drugs in some countries. The increase has been partly ascribed to the widespread availability of prescription opioid analgesics and their subsequent nonmedical use, which may have contributed to the epidemic of opioid abuse, addiction, and overdose-related deaths. International studies report that dentists may be among the leading prescribers of opioid analgesics, thus adding to the societal impact of this epidemic. Between 2009 and 2011, dentists in the United States prescribed 8% to 12% of opioid analgesics dispensed. There is little information on the pattern of opioid analgesic prescription by dentists in Canada. The aim of this study was to examine the pattern of opioid analgesics prescription by dentists in Nova Scotia (NS), Canada. This retrospective observational study used the provincial prescription monitoring program's record of oral opioid analgesics and combinations dispensed to persons 16 y and older at community pharmacies that were prescribed by dentists from January 2011 to December 2015. During the study period, more than 70% of licensed dentists in NS wrote a prescription for dispensed opioid analgesics, comprising about 17% of all opioid analgesic prescribers. However, dentists were responsible for less than 4% of all prescriptions for dispensed opioid analgesics, prescribing less than 0.5% of the total morphine milligram equivalent (MMEq) of opioid analgesics dispensed over the 5 y. There was a significant downward trend in total MMEq of dispensed opioid analgesics prescribed by dentists from about 2.23 million MMEq in 2011 to 1.93 million MMEq in 2015 (r = -0.97; P = 0.006). Opioid prescription is common among dentists, but their contribution to the overall availability of opioid analgesics is low. Furthermore, there has been a downward trend in total dispensed MMEq of opioid analgesics prescribed by dentists. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study will serve to inform dentists and policy makers on the types and dosage of opioid analgesics being prescribed by dentists. The study may prompt dentists to reflect on and adjust their practice of opioid analgesic prescription in view of the current opioid analgesic epidemic.

Factors Influencing Adoption of New Technologies into Dental Practice: A Qualitative Study.

The objective of this study was to explore factors affecting decisions to adopt new technologies into dental practice using a colorimetric rinse test for detection of periodontal disease as a model. Focus groups with key informants in Canadian dentistry and dental hygiene were conducted. A deductive approach used Rogers's diffusion of innovation theory as a framework for organizing codes and subcodes. Two members of the research team independently reviewed and analyzed the data using NVivo 10. The attributes of the technology itself emerged as primary influencers. Perceived relative advantages of the diagnostic mouth rinse over existing methods were potential time efficiency, low implementation cost, and utility of the tool. Low complexity, compatibility with existing routines/beliefs, and the potential for reinvention-the use of a technology for other than its intended purpose (i.e., patient education, monitoring of disease, screening tool in nondental settings)-were other important features enhancing adoption. An overarching concern was that any new technology benefit the patient. Contextual factors also play a role. Numerous communication channels, including opinion leaders, patients, marketing, continuing education courses, and strength of evidence, influenced clinicians, with peer interaction being a stronger influence than marketing. Similar themes arose from specialist, general dentist, and dental hygienist focus groups. Adopter characteristics also came into play: participants ranged in their self-reported innovativeness with many considering themselves "early adopters" of new technology. Findings of this study suggest that the innovation adoption process is not straightforward, but attributes of the innovation, contextual factors, and adopter characteristics play important roles in the process. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Various factors affect the adoption of new tools into clinical dental practice. These include attributes of the test or tool itself, the context of the settings in which the tool is introduced to practitioners, and the characteristics of the clinicians themselves. A qualitative study of dentists and dental hygienists investigated these factors. Situations in which dentists and hygienists interact with their peers and colleagues-through social networks, continuing education courses, conventions, or personal contact-were a major driver in the decision to adopt new technologies. However, even among "early adopters," most were reluctant to use new tests or tools unless they perceived a benefit to their patients or practice.

Using interviews to construct and disseminate knowledge of oral health policy.

OBJECTIVES: Policymakers worldwide are challenged by the problem of oral health inequities. The goal of an interprovincial partnership in Canada was to guide policy aimed at improving the oral health of vulnerable populations. Insights regarding barriers and enablers to developing such policy in one province (Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada) were required to enhance collaboration between decision makers and researchers and to contribute to the evidence informing policy development. METHODS: Snowball technique identified fourteen key informants. Semistructured audio-recorded interviews were conducted in person or by telephone. Two researchers independently conducted the analyses of the transcribed interviews, one using NVivo software and the second, manual coding. Triangulation of the analyses confirmed the findings. RESULTS: Agreement between the two approaches showed that most key informants believed that oral health is an important policy issue; however, most felt it was not a high priority among the general public and most were unable to articulate the policy process. Barriers to oral health becoming a governmental priority were related to resource allocation and to poor communication among some groups including dentists and dental hygienists. Current government programmes and initiatives were praised but considered weak in health promotion strategies. Recommendations for enhancing oral health priority varied. CONCLUSIONS: Attention to the methodological considerations of qualitative research enhanced the credibility of the method and confidence in the findings. Leveraging of existing programmes and improving communication were recommended to contribute to raising the priority of oral health within the government, thereby increasing their commitment to address oral health care, particularly for vulnerable populations.

The Pharmacy Diabetes Care Program: assessment of a community pharmacy diabetes service model in Australia.

AIM: To assess the impact of a community pharmacy diabetes service model on patient outcomes in Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study utilized a multisite, control vs. intervention, repeated-measures design within four states in Australia. Fifty-six community pharmacies, 28 intervention and 28 control, were randomly selected from a representative sample of urban and rural areas. Intervention pharmacies delivered a diabetes service to patients with Type 2 diabetes, which comprised an ongoing cycle of assessment, management and review, provided at regular intervals over 6 months in the pharmacy. These services included support for self monitoring of blood glucose, education, adherence support, and reminders of checks for diabetes complications. Control pharmacists assessed patients at 0 and 6 months and delivered no intervention. RESULTS: A total of 289 subjects (149 intervention and 140 control) completed the study. For the intervention subjects, the mean blood glucose level decreased over the 6-month study from 9.4 to 8.5 mmol/l (P < 0.01). Furthermore, significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control were seen in the intervention group compared with the control: the mean reduction in HbA(1c) in the intervention group was -0.97% (95% CI: -0.8, -1.14) compared with -0.27% (95% CI: -0.15, -0.39) in the control group. Improvements were also seen in blood pressure control and quality of life in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: A pharmacy diabetes service model resulted in significant improvements in clinical and humanistic outcomes. Thus, community pharmacists can contribute significantly to improving care and health outcomes for patients with Type 2 diabetes. Future research should focus on clarifying the most effective elements of the service model.

Pharmacy diabetes care program: analysis of two screening methods for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Australian community pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Australian community pharmacy. METHODS: A random sample of 30 pharmacies were allocated into two groups: (i) tick test only (TTO); or (ii) sequential screening (SS) method. Both methods used the same initial risk assessment for type 2 diabetes. Subjects with one or more risk factors in the TTO group were offered a referral to their general practitioner (GP). Under the SS method, patients with risk factors were offered a capillary blood glucose test and those identified as being at risk referred to a GP. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these approaches was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 1286 people were screened over a period of 3 months. The rate of diagnosis of diabetes was significantly higher for SS compared with the TTO method (1.7% versus 0.2%; p=0.008). The SS method resulted in fewer referrals to the GP and a higher uptake of referrals than the TTO method and so was the more cost-effective screening method. CONCLUSIONS: SS is the superior method from a cost and efficacy perspective. It should be considered as the preferred option for screening by community based pharmacists in Australia.

Prevalence of binge eating disorder in different populations of French women.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of binge eating disorder (BED) in nonpatient women in the community and in weight control groups in France and to compare the characteristics of weight history of subjects with and without BED. METHODS: Eating patterns over the past six months were studied by questionnaires in self-report format. The prevalence of binge eating, BED, and bulimia was studied in 447 nonpatient women and in subjects seeking help for weight control either in private practice (PP, n = 292) or in a hospital department of nutrition (H, n = 85). RESULTS: BED was common (PP = 9%; H = 15%) among patients attending weight control clinics but very rare in the community (0.7%). The disorder was associated with a history of weight fluctuations. Many subjects with BED referred to regular use of diet pills (29%) or vomiting (39%) but the prevalence of these strategies of weight control fell short for the requirement for the diagnosis of bulimia. DISCUSSION: BED was common in subjects seeking help for weight control and extremely rare in the community nonpatients.