Outcomes Following Intolerance to Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Although tacrolimus and sirolimus (TAC/SIR) is an accepted graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), toxicity from this regimen can lead to premature discontinuation of immunosuppression. There are limited studies reporting outcomes and subsequent treatment of patients with TAC/SIR intolerance. This study was conducted to assess the outcomes of patients with TAC/SIR intolerance and guide their subsequent management. We retrospectively analyzed transplantation outcomes of consecutive adult patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who underwent allogeneic HCT with TAC/SIR as GVHD prophylaxis between 2009 and 2018. TAC/SIR intolerance was defined as discontinuation of either TAC or SIR due to toxicity before post-transplantation day +100. A total of 777 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median duration of follow-up was 22 months (range, 0.2 to 125 months). Intolerance occurred in 13% (n = 104) of the patients at a median of 30 days (range, 5 to 90 days). The most common causes of intolerance were acute kidney injury (n = 53; 51%), thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 31; 28%), and veno-occlusive disease (n = 23; 22%). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at 100 days was 50% (95% CI, 39% to 64%) in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients and 25% (95% CI, 22% to 29%) in patients tolerant to this regimen (P < .0001). In multivariate analyses, the incidence of grade II-IV 4 acute GVHD was significantly higher in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% CI, 1.59 to 3.61; P < .0001). Similarly, in multivariate analyses, the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients had a higher incidence of chronic GVHD (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.12; P = .03). The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 47% (95% CI, 38% to 59%) in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients and 12% (95% CI, 10% to 15%) in those tolerant to the regimen (P < .0001). The 2-year relapse-free survival was 35% (95% CI, 25% to 44%) in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients and 60% (95% CI, 57% to 65%) in the TAC/SIR-tolerant patients (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.61 to 3.28; P < .0001). Intolerance stratified by early (≤30 days) versus late (31 to 100 days) significantly affected the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 75% (early; 95% CI, 59% to 94%) versus 33% (late; 95% CI, 21% to 50%) (P = .001), as well as the cumulative incidence of NRM at 61% (early; 95% CI, 48% to 77%) versus 35% (late; 95% CI, 24% to 51%) (P = .006). Most patients who developed TAC/SIR intolerance were switched to an alternative 2-drug regimen (71 of 104; 68%), most commonly mycophenolate mofetil in addition to continuing TAC or SIR (68 of 71; 96%). Overall, TAC/SIR intolerance was associated with poorer outcomes. Early intolerance contributed to a higher risk of acute GVHD, increased NRM, and inferior survival. Patients with early intolerance were often switched to an alternative agent, and patients with late intolerance tended to be continued on single-drug therapy without substitution. The use of single-drug versus 2-drug regimens after intolerance did not appear to affect outcomes. Management strategies to mitigate the risks of intolerance are warranted.

Genomics of Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma and Its Implications for Personalized Medicine.

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare, heterogenous group of mature T-cell neoplasms that comprise 10-15% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases in the United States. All subtypes of PTCL, except for ALK+ anaplastic T-cell lymphoma, are associated with poor prognosis, with median overall survival (OS) rates of 1-3 years. The diagnosis of PTCL is mainly based on clinical presentation, morphologic features, and immunophenotypes. Recent advances in genome sequencing and gene expression profiling have given new insights into the pathogenesis and molecular biology of PTCL. An enhanced understanding of its genomic landscape holds the promise of refining the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of PTCL. In this review, we examine recently discovered genetic abnormalities identified by molecular profiling in 3 of the most common types of PTCL: RHOA G17V and epigenetic regulator mutations in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ALK expression and JAK/STAT3 pathway mutations in anaplastic T-cell lymphoma, and T-follicular helper phenotype and GATA3/TBX21 expression in PTCL-not otherwise specified. We also discuss the implications of these abnormalities for clinical practice, new/potential targeted therapies, and the role of personalized medicine in the management of PTCL.

Validation of the Khorana score in acute myeloid leukemia patients: a single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were shown to have an increased risk of thrombosis, no thrombosis risk assessment scoring system has been developed for AML patients. The Khorana Risk Score (KRS), which has been widely used for thrombosis risk assessment in the clinical setting, was developed on the basis of solid tumor data and has not been validated among AML patients. This study aims to validate the use of the KRS as a thrombosis risk-scoring system among patients with AML. METHODS: Using data from H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institution's Total Cancer Care Research Study, we retrospectively identified patients who were histologically confirmed with AML from 2000 to 2018. Clinical and laboratory variables at the time of AML diagnosis were characterized and analyzed. The thrombotic event rate was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 867 AML patients were included in the analysis. The median age at AML diagnosis was 75 years (range, 51-96), and the majority were male (65%, n = 565). A total of 22% (n = 191), 51% (n = 445), 24% (n = 207), and 3% (n = 24) of patients had a KRS of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A total of 42 thrombotic events (3% [n = 6/191] with a KRS of 1; 5% [n = 23/445] with a KRS of 2; 6.3% [n = 13/207] with a KRS of 3) were observed, with a median follow-up of 3 months (range, 0.1-307). There was no statistical difference in the risk of thrombosis between these groups (P = .1949). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was an increased risk of thrombosis associated with a higher KRS among AML patients with a KRS of 1 to 3, the difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, only a few patients were found to have a KRS > 3, and this was largely due to pancytopenia, which is commonly associated with AML. These results indicate the need for a better thrombotic risk-scoring system for AML patients.