Effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on cardiovascular risk markers among women with thrombophilia or previous venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on standard cardiovascular risk markers among women with thrombophilia and/or previous venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: A prospective cohort study enrolled women aged 18-45 years with thrombophilia and/or a history of VTE who received the 52-mg LNG-IUS (20 µg/d initial release) at the University of Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Brazil, from January 2006 to December 2015. Before and 12 months after LNG-IUS placement, the following cardiovascular risk markers were assessed: lipid profile, body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and waist circumference. The primary outcome was changes in cardiovascular risk markers. A subanalysis of anticoagulant users versus non-users was also conducted. RESULTS: In total, 45 women were enrolled. BMI increased by 2.3% after 12 months of LNG-IUS placement (P < 0.01), but the other risk factors did not change. Cardiovascular risk markers were similar between anticoagulant users and non-users after 12 months of LNG-IUS use. CONCLUSION: Among women with thrombophilia and/or previous VTE, cardiovascular risk markers were not found to change significantly after 12 months of LNG-IUS use. The study adds safety information regarding use of the LNG-IUS for women at risk of thromboembolism.

The influence of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system position on bleeding patterns in reproductive age women.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether users of the non-fundal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) present with unfavorable bleeding patterns more frequently than fundal LNG-IUS users. METHODS: A prospective cohort was conducted from June, 2016 to January, 2018 involving women aged 18-45 years who wished to use the LNG-IUS as contraception and had no contraindications, endometrial polyps, submucosal myomas, irregular menstrual cycle, or anticoagulant use. Two study groups comprised women using fundal insertion and non-fundal insertion LNG-IUS. Bleeding was evaluated using a diary and pictogram chart. RESULTS: Of the 92 women who participated in the study, those with non-fundal LNG-IUS insertion sustained bleeding at rates greater than 83% (31) in the first 3 months of use, and 58% (14) at 6 months, versus 51% (22) at 3 months and 33% (19) at 6 months in those with fundal insertion (P=0.002 at 3 months; P=0.037 at 6 months). Blood loss in the non-fundal LNG-IUS group was higher than in the fundal LNG-IUS group according to pictograms drawn by participants. CONCLUSION: Women with non-fundal LNG-IUS placement had a higher frequency of sustained bleeding and blood loss volume according to self-reported charts than those with fundal LNG-IUS placement.

Comparison of the hemostatic effects of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and leuprolide acetate in women with endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The hemostatic and inflammatory systems may activate each other. Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting 10% of women. The objective of this study was to compare the hemostatic effects of two treatments widely prescribed to women with endometriosis: the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa) leuprolide acetate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized open-label controlled trial, 44 women with endometriosis were randomly allocated to one of two groups: 22 women were assigned to use LNG-IUS and 22 to use GnRHa. The assessed variables were D-dimers, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, coagulation factors (F) II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, and XI, antithrombin (AT), protein C, free protein S, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), α2-antiplasmin, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and prothrombin fragment 1+2. All variables were assessed before treatment and six months after treatment onset. RESULTS: In the LNG-IUS group, FVIII decreased 10% after six months of use. In the GnRHa group, there was a 6% increase in AT, 29% reduction in D-dimers, and 19% increase in t-PA. The LNG-IUS users exhibited a significantly greater reduction of FVIII than the GnRHa users (LNG-IUS: -6.4 ± 14.3% vs. GnRHa: 4.2 ± 12.3%, p=0.02). The women in the GnRHa group exhibited a greater increase of AT than the LNG-IUS users (LNG-IUS: -0.7 ± 9.5% vs. GnRHa: 6.5 ± 10.1%, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Both hormonal treatments for endometriosis exhibited no association with a procoagulant profile.

Effect of antiretroviral therapy including lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz on etonogestrel-releasing implant pharmacokinetics in HIV-positive women.

OBJECTIVE: Data on the interaction between the etonogestrel (ENG) implant and antiretroviral therapy are lacking. We evaluated the effect of 2 highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens (1 including efavirenz and the other ritonavir-boosted lopinavir) on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of an ENG-releasing implant in HIV-positive women. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized PK study. METHODS: Forty-five HIV-positive women who desired to use ENG implants were included: 15 had received zidovudine/lamivudine + lopinavir/ritonavir for ≥3 months (LPV/r-based HAART group), 15 had received zidovudine/lamivudine + efavirenz for ≥3 months (EFV-based HAART group), and 15 had not received HAART (non-HAART group). PK parameters were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry at baseline and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks after implant placement. RESULTS: The EFV-based HAART regimen was associated with a reduction in the bioavailability of ENG, which showed decreases of 63.4%, 53.7%, and 70% in the area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax), and minimum concentration (Cmin) of ENG, respectively, compared with the non-HAART group. The LPV/r-based HAART regimen was associated with an increase in ENG bioavailability, which showed 52%, 60.6%, and 33.8% increases in the ENG AUC, Cmax, and Cmin, respectively, compared with the non-HAART group. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of EFV decreased the bioavailability of ENG released from the implant, which could impair contraceptive efficacy. However, the coadministration of LPV/r increased the bioavailability of ENG released from the implant, which suggests that this antiretroviral combination does not impair the ENG implant efficacy.

Effects of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant inserted immediately postpartum on maternal hemostasis: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The puerperium is the period of highest risk for thrombosis during a woman's reproductive life and it is an important time for initiating an effective contraceptive method in order to increase intergestational interval. Thus, the objective of the present study was to evaluated the effects of the etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing contraceptive implant inserted immediately postpartum on maternal hemostasis markers during the first six weeks of delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty healthy women aged 18 to 35 years-old were randomized to receive either the ENG-releasing implant 24-48 h after delivery (implant group; n=20) or nothing (control group) until the sixth postpartum week. Blood samples were collected at 24-48 h and at 6 weeks after delivery, and hemostatic variables, including fibrinogen, coagulation factors, protein C, free protein S, antithrombin, α2-antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), prothrombin fragment (PF)1+2, and D-dimers, as well as normalized activated protein C sensitivity ratio (nAPCsr), thrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time were evaluated. RESULTS: Insertion of the ENG-releasing contraceptive implant did not change the physiological reduction in overall coagulation (TAT and PF1+2) and fibrinolysis (D-dimer) markers, or nAPCsr. Reductions in factors II, VII, X and fibrinogen and increases in factor V were greater in the control than in the implant group. Clotting factors remained within normal limits throughout the study. CONCLUSION: The ENG-releasing contraceptive implant inserted immediately postpartum did not have negative effects on physiological variations of the hemostatic system during the first 6 weeks postpartum.