Epilepsy panels in clinical practice: Yield, variants of uncertain significance, and treatment implications.

OBJECTIVE: There has been increasing utilization of genetic testing for pediatric epilepsy in recent years. Little systematic data is available examining how practice changes have impacted testing yields, diagnostic pace, incidence of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs), or therapeutic management. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at Children's Hospital Colorado from February 2016 through February 2020. All patients under 18 years for whom an epilepsy gene panel was sent were included. RESULTS: A total of 761 epilepsy gene panels were sent over the study period. During the study period, there was a 292% increase in the average number of panels sent per month. The time from seizure onset to panel result decreased over the study period from a median of 2.9 years to 0.7 years. Despite the increase in testing, the percentage of panels yielding a disease-causing result remained stable at 11-13%. A total of 90 disease-causing results were identified, > 75% of which provided guidance in management. Children were more likely to have a disease-causing result if they were < 3 years old at seizure onset (OR 4.4, p < 0.001), had neurodevelopmental concerns (OR 2.2, p = 0.002), or had a developmentally abnormal MRI (OR 3.8, p < 0.001). A total of 1417 VUSs were identified, equating to 15.7 VUSs per disease-causing result. Non-Hispanic white patients had a lower average number of VUSs than patients of all other races/ethnicities (1.7 vs 2.1, p < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: Expansion in the volume of genetic testing corresponded to a decrease in the time from seizure onset to testing result. Diagnostic yield remained stable, resulting in an increase in the absolute number of disease-causing results annually-most of which have implications for management. However, there has also been an increase in total VUSs, which likely resulted in additional clinical time spent on VUS resolution.

Clinical Trial Design for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Genetic Epilepsies.

Although trials with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have not shown clear anti-epileptogenic or disease-modifying activity in humans to date, rapid advancements in genomic technology and emerging gene-mediated and gene replacement options offer hope for the successful development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for genetic epilepsies. In fact, more than 26 potential DMTs are in various stages of preclinical and/or clinical development for genetic syndromes associated with epilepsy. The scope of disease-modification includes but is not limited to effects on the underlying pathophysiology, the condition's natural history, epilepsy severity, developmental achievement, function, behavior, sleep, and quality of life. While conventional regulatory clinical trials for epilepsy therapeutics have historically focused on seizure reduction, similarly designed trials may prove ill-equipped to identify these broader disease-modifying benefits. As we look forward to this pipeline of DMTs, focused consideration should be given to the challenges they pose to conventional clinical trial designs for epilepsy therapeutics. Just as DMTs promise to fundamentally alter how we approach the care of patients with genetic epilepsy syndromes, DMTs likewise challenge how we traditionally construct and measure the success of clinical trials. In the following, we briefly review the historical and preclinical frameworks for DMT development for genetic epilepsies and explore the many novel challenges posed for such trials, including the choice of suitable outcome measures, trial structure, timing and duration of treatment, feasible follow-up period, varying safety profile, and ethical concerns.

Instrumented open-door laminoplasty as treatment for cervical myelopathy in 104 patients.

Treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy remains a challenge. We report on a large series of cervical myelopathy patients treated with instrumented open-door laminoplasty. We retrospectively examined the medical records of 104 patients who had undergone instrumented open-door laminoplasty (titanium plate) for cervical myelopathy (minimum follow-up, 24 months). All patients had been myelopathic, 57 (54.8%) had stenosis, 39 (37.5%) had spondylosis, 66 (63.5%) reported gait disturbance, 18 (17.3%) had handwriting changes, 33 (31.7%) complained of deterioration of dexterity, 56 (53.8%) had grasp weakness, 7 (6.7%) had bowel and bladder complaints, 27 (26.0%) had a positive Hoffmann sign, 10 (9.6%) had sustained clonus, and 10 (9.6%) had a positive Babinski sign. Mean preoperative-to-postoperative improvement in Nurick grade was 1.47. Complications included 4 nerve root injuries (3.8%), 1 of which (at C5) was permanent, and 1 transient neurologic deterioration (<1%), 1 incidental durotomy (<1%), and 5 wound infections (4.8%). Four patients required anterior revision for persistent symptoms. Open-door laminoplasty with miniplate instrumentation is an effective, safe method for preventing progression of myelopathy with multilevel involvement while alleviating the need for multilevel fusion.

Adverse events in patients re-exposed to bone morphogenetic protein for spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series from a single spine specialty clinic. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed wound related or anaphylactic adverse events in patients re-exposed to rhBMP-2. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of recombinant bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) as a bone graft substitute is increasing. There is concern that re-exposing patients to rhBMP-2, might result in a hyper-inflammatory response causing wound problems or an allergic reaction. METHODS: Ninety-six patients who had at least 2 spine surgeries using rhBMP-2 (Infuse, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) were identified. Anteroposterior surgeries, surgeries for infection and trauma were excluded. Demographic and operative data were collected from review of medical records. Surgeries were classified into primary, revision same approach and revision different approach. Logistic regression was used to control for variables associated with increased risk of complications. RESULTS: During the first exposure there were 90 primary fusions and 6 revisions with 2 wound infections requiring debridements and 9 minor wound problems. During the second exposure there were 25 primary fusions, 50 same approach first revisions, 16 different approach first revisions, 1 same approach second revision and 4 different approach second revisions. There were 5 wound infections, 11 minor wound problems and no allergic reactions. There was no significant difference in the number of complications between the first and second surgeries or between patients who had a second primary surgery, a revision through the same approach or through a different approach. There were no wound problems or allergic reactions among twelve patients who had a third surgery with rhBMP-2. CONCLUSION: Multiple exposures to rhBMP-2, whether for a second primary surgery, revision through the same approach or revision through a different approach does not increase the risk of a wound infections/problems or result in clinically detectable allergic reactions.