A Pilot of a Telehealth-Hospice Transition Intervention for Children and Young Adults with Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Telehealth can improve care for patients with progressive cancer enrolling in hospice. Coordinated telehealth visits (patient/family-hospital-hospice) may improve communication, satisfaction with and interdisciplinary hospice collaboration. This pilot examines the impact of three coordinated telehealth visits on these outcomes. METHODS: This is a prospective pilot study of 0-29-year-old patients with cancer initiating hospice care between 2021-2023. Adult patients, caregivers, oncology and palliative care clinicians, hospice nurses and administrators were surveyed about feasibility and acceptability with telehealth (Technology Acceptance Model 2) after first and third telehealth visits. Hospice satisfaction (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) was completed by caregivers after visit 3 and during bereavement. Healthcare professionals completed the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II). Survey responses were summarized and differences in scores were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 40 eligible patients, 24 enrolled, 19 completed visit 1, and 13 completed visit 3. Fourteen caregivers and two adult patients completed visit 1 surveys; nine caregivers and two adult patients completed visit 3 surveys. Participants highly rated telehealth acceptability after visit 1 (Median: 4.5, IQR: 4.0-4.7) and 3 (Median: 4.4, IQR: 4.0-4.7). Hospice services were rated as highly satisfactory at visit 3 (Median: 4.0, IQR: 3.7-4.0) and during bereavement (Median: 3.7, IQR: 3.5-4.0). Healthcare professionals (n = 85 surveys) reported excellent interprofessional collaboration (Hospital clinicians median: 99/115 and hospice teams 111/115). CONCLUSIONS: Participants found coordinated telehealth visits to be feasible, acceptable, and satisfactory. Telehealth may be utilized as an acceptable alternative to clinic visits and fosters hospital-hospice collaboration.

Communicating difficult news in pediatric radiology.

Effective communication is an important aspect of providing quality healthcare. Radiology staff may be called upon to communicate results, even when it is difficult. Simple, efficient communication models can be learned to reduce clinician distress and support patients and families through stressful times. These practical tips ensure essential communication elements are met, including assessing patient and family perspectives, clearly delivering medical information, responding with empathy, and collaborating around next steps. Models such as "Ask-Tell-Ask," "SPIKES," and "NURSE" can be used to disclose results, communicate serious news, and respond to emotion. Lastly, clinicians can also utilize "I wish… I worry… I wonder" statements to align with a patient's hopes and acknowledge a family's concerns, ultimately allowing healthcare professionals to support and guide families through challenging situations.

The Scope of Practice of an Embedded Pediatric Palliative Oncology Clinic.

CONTEXT: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) improves end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for children with cancer. Though PPC visits are the 'intervention' in studies focused on EOL care, the content of PPC visits within pediatric oncology is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the scope of PPC practice during visits for children with cancer and their families. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 0-27 years with cancer seen in PPC clinic within an academic pediatric oncology center between 2017 and 2022. During each PPC visit, documenting providers chose the domains discussed or managed (goals of care, symptom management, and care coordination with respective subdomains). Data was abstracted from the electronic health record, PPC clinic database, and Cancer Registry. The differences in frequency and addressed domains were analyzed by demographics, visit type, diagnosis group, and proximity to EOL. RESULTS: Across 351 patients, 1919 outpatient PPC visits occurred. Median domains were higher in visits <90 days vs. 91+ days from EOL (12.0 vs. 10.0; p < 0.0001); pain and hospice collaboration were particularly discussed closer to EOL. Psychological symptoms like anxiety (30.7% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001) were addressed more in follow-ups than initial visits. Compared to brain tumor or leukemia/lymphoma visits, solid tumor visits addressed more symptom management subdomains, especially pain (79.9%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The scope of PPC practice is broad and varied. Each visit encompasses many subdomains, the most common being care coordination with oncology teams and helping patients/families cope with the disease. More domains were addressed in solid tumor visits and near EOL.

What Constitutes Quality of Life? Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer identify maintaining a good quality of life (QoL) as a central goal of end-of-life care. QoL is a dynamic and subjective overarching concept that refers to an individual's relative satisfaction with their own life. Despite its importance to AYAs with advanced cancer, a patient-centered definition of QoL is lacking in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This qualitative secondary analysis of semistructured interviews was conducted across 3 institutions and 1 online support community among AYA patients with advanced cancer, family caregivers, and health care providers who cared for living or recently deceased AYAs. Interviewees were asked about priorities in receipt of care. Interviews were transcribed using NVivo software for primary analysis, and previously coded excerpts were screened for references to QoL. Relevant excerpts were sorted into organizing domains. RESULTS: Participants included 23 AYA patients, 28 family caregivers, and 29 health care providers (including physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, social workers, and psychologists). Four domains of QoL were identified: psychosocial and physical well-being, dignity, normalcy, and personal and family relationships. Within each domain there was agreement across AYAs, caregivers, and health care providers, with nuanced perspectives provided by AYAs of different ages. Personal and family relationships was the most frequently referenced domain of QoL among all participants. A common feature of each domain was that adaptation to current circumstances impacted perspectives on QoL. Patients valued active participation in the development of a care plan that supported these domains. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs with advanced cancer, their caregivers, and health care providers agree on several broad domains of QoL in this population. To provide high-quality, patient-centered care, care plans should integrate these domains to enable AYAs to maximize their QoL throughout their advanced cancer care.

Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Core Components of Therapeutic Alliance for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Importance: The patient-clinician therapeutic alliance is an important aspect of high-quality cancer care. However, components of the therapeutic alliance in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, aged 12-39 years) with cancer have not been defined. Objective: To identify components of and barriers to the therapeutic alliance between AYAs, caregivers, and clinicians from the perspective of all key stakeholders. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, semistructured in-depth interviews with patients, caregivers, and clinicians were conducted from 2018 to 2021 with no additional follow-up, with content analysis of resulting transcripts. Participants were recruited from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and an online cancer support community (Cactus Cancer Society). Eligible participants were English- or Spanish-speaking. Eligible patients were aged 12 to 39 years with stage IV or recurrent cancer. Eligible caregivers cared for an AYA living with advanced cancer or one who had died within 5 years. Eligible clinicians routinely provided care for AYAs with cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perspectives on therapeutic alliance. Results: Interviews were conducted with 80 participants: 23 were patients (48% were female; 78% were White), 28 were caregivers (82% were female; 50% were White), and 29 were clinicians (69% were female; 45% were White). The mean (SD) age of patients was 29 (7.3) years. Interviews identified 6 components of therapeutic alliance: (1) compassion; (2) sense of connection; (3) clinician presence; (4) information sharing; (5) shared goals; and (6) individualization of care. While some domains were represented in prior models of therapeutic alliance, a unique domain was identified related to the need for individualization of the approach to care for AYA patients and their caregivers. Interviews also identified potential barriers to building the therapeutic alliance specific to the AYA population, including managing discordant needs between patients and caregivers and communication challenges at the end of life. Conclusions and Relevance: This study identified core components and barriers to building therapeutic alliance in the AYA advanced cancer population from the perspective of all the key stakeholders in the relationship. A novel component highlighting the need for individualization was identified. This model enables a deeper understanding of how to build therapeutic alliance in the AYA advanced cancer population, which may guide clinician training and facilitate improved care for this vulnerable population.

Early Versus Late Outpatient Pediatric Palliative Care Consultation and Its Association With End-of-Life Outcomes in Children With Cancer.

Background: There is no consensus on what constitutes "early" pediatric palliative care (PPC) referral within pediatric oncology. Few studies report outcomes based on PPC timing. Objectives: Investigate associations between early (<12 weeks) or late (≥12 weeks from diagnosis) outpatient PPC consultation with demographics, advance care planning (ACP), and end-of-life (EOL) outcomes. Design: Retrospective chart and database review of demographic, disease, visit data, and PPC/EOL outcomes. Setting/Subjects: Deceased pediatric patients with cancer 0-27 years of age seen at an embedded consultative PPC clinic. Measurements: Patient demographics, disease characteristics, PPC/EOL outcomes: timing/receipt of ACP, hospice enrollment, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) documentation, hospital days in last 90 days of life, concordance between actual and preferred location of death, receipt of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at EOL, and death in the intensive care unit. Results: Thirty-two patients received early and 118 received late PPC. Early outpatient PPC was associated with cancer type (p < 0.01). Early PPC (p = 0.04) and ACP documentation (p = 0.04) were associated with documentation of preferred location of death. Early PPC was associated with a preference for home death (p = 0.02). Timing of outpatient PPC was not associated with ACP documentation or other EOL outcomes. In the entire cohort, 73% of PPC patients received hospice, 74% had a DNR order, 87% did not receive CPR at EOL, and 90% died in their preferred location. Conclusions: When using a cutoff of 12 weeks from diagnosis, outpatient PPC timing was only associated with location of death metrics, likely due to high-quality PPC and EOL care among all patients.

"The simple life experiences that every other human gets": Desire for normalcy among adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer identify normalcy as an important component of quality end-of-life care. We sought to define domains of normalcy and identify ways in which clinicians facilitate or hinder normalcy during advanced cancer care. PROCEDURE: This was a secondary analysis of a qualitative study that aimed to identify priority domains for end-of-life care. Content analysis of semi-structured interviews among AYAs aged 12-39 years with advanced cancer, caregivers, and clinicians was used to evaluate transcripts. Coded excerpts were reviewed to identify themes related to normalcy. RESULTS: Participants included 23 AYAs with advanced cancer, 28 caregivers, and 29 clinicians. Participants identified five domains of normalcy including relationships, activities, career/school, milestones, and appearance. AYAs and caregivers identified that clinicians facilitate normalcy through exploration of these domains with AYAs, allowing flexibility in care plans, identification of short-term and long-term goals across normalcy domains, and recognizing losses of normalcy that occur during cancer care. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs with cancer experience multiple threats to normalcy during advanced cancer care. Clinicians can attend to normalcy and improve AYA quality of life by acknowledging these losses through ongoing discussions on how best to support domains of normalcy and by reinforcing AYA identities beyond a cancer diagnosis.

Differences in palliative opportunities across diagnosis groups in children with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer causes significant physical and emotional stress. Patients and families benefit from palliative care (PC) to reduce symptom burden, improve quality of life, and enhance family-centered care. We evaluated palliative opportunities across leukemia/lymphoma (LL), solid tumors (ST), and central nervous system (CNS) tumor groups. PROCEDURE: A priori, nine palliative opportunities were defined: disease progression/relapse, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, phase 1 trial enrollment, admission for severe symptoms, social concerns or end-of-life (EOL) care, intensive care admission, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status, and hospice enrollment. A single-center retrospective review was completed on 0-18-year olds with cancer who died from January 1, 2012 to November 30, 2017. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed. Opportunities were evaluated from diagnosis to death and across disease groups. RESULTS: Included patients (n = 296) had LL (n = 87), ST (n = 114), or CNS tumors (n = 95). Palliative opportunities were more frequent in patients with ST (median 8) and CNS tumors (median 7) versus LL (median 5, p = .0005). While patients with ST had more progression/relapse opportunities (p < .0001), patients with CNS tumors had more EOL opportunities (p < .0001), earlier PC consultation, DNR status, and hospice enrollment. Palliative opportunities increased toward the EOL in all diseases (p < .0001). PC was consulted in 108 (36%) patients: LL (48%), ST (30%), and CNS (34%, p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: All children with cancer incur many events warranting PC support. Patients with ST and CNS tumors had more palliative opportunities than LL, yet received less subspecialty PC. Understanding palliative opportunities within each disease group can guide PC utilization to ease patient and family stress.

Characteristics and outcomes of pediatric oncology patients at risk for guardians declining transfusion of blood components.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of blood products is a necessary part of successful delivery of myelosuppressive regimens in pediatric cancer. There is a paucity of literature characterizing outcomes or management of pediatric patients with cancer when transfusion is declined. AIMS: The objective of this paper is to describe the clinical characteristics, care, and outcomes of patients with cancer at risk for declining transfusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective cohort of patients aged 0-21 years with cancer managed at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta between 2006 and 2020 and with ICD-9 codes indicating risk of "transfusion refusal" or Jehovah's witness (JW) religion was identified. Demographics, disease, and management were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were performed to examine associations with transfusion receipt. Among 35 eligible patients identified as at risk for declining transfusion, 89% had primary guardians who identified as JW, and 45.7% identified as Black, non-Hispanic. Only 40% of guardians actively declined transfusion. Transfusion recipients had significantly lower hemoglobin (g/dl) and platelet counts (1000/µl) at initial presentation (9.6 vs. 11.9, p < .002 and 116.0 vs. 406.5, p = .001, respectively) and at nadir (5.9 vs. 8.7, p < .001 and ≤ 10 vs. 154, p < .001, respectively) than non-recipients. Legal intervention was required in 36.4% of those who ultimately received a transfusion. CONCLUSION: Among pediatric cancer patients whose medical record initially indicated a preference for no transfusion, 60% of guardians accepted blood products when prescribed for oncology care. Guidelines for systematic management and transfusion sparing approaches are needed to honor guardian's preferences when possible yet while maintaining equitable cancer outcomes in this population.

Changes in Opioid Prescriptions and Potential Misuse and Substance Use Disorders Among Childhood Cancer Survivors Following the 2016 Opioid Prescribing Guideline.

Importance: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released an opioid-prescribing guideline in March 2016. Little is known about the guideline's potential effects on childhood cancer survivors, a population at high risk for pain. Objective: To examine changes in opioid prescriptions and potential misuse/substance use disorders (SUD) among childhood cancer survivors and peers without cancer following the guideline release. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, 8969 survivors who completed treatment for hematologic, central nervous system, bone, or gonadal cancers (aged ≤21 years at diagnosis) from 2009 to 2018 and 44 845 age-matched, sex-matched, and region-matched individuals without cancer were identified. With data aggregated based on the quarter-year of survivors' treatment completion, interrupted time series analyses were conducted in this cohort study to estimate the immediate (level) change and change in time trend (trend change) for each outcome after the guideline release, accounting for autocorrelation. Data were analyzed from September 2021 to April 2022. Exposures: Release of the CDC opioid-prescribing guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included any opioid prescription and any indicator for potential misuse/SUD within 1 year following completion of treatment. Results: This study included 8969 childhood cancer survivors (mean [SD] age, 13.7 [6.2] years old; 3814 [42.5%] female patients) and 44 845 peers without cancer (mean [SD] age, 13.7 [6.2] years old; 19 070 [42.5%] female patients). Before the guideline release, the opioid prescription rate (21.1% vs 7.2%) and rate of potential misuse/SUD (5.6% vs 1.9%) were higher among survivors than peers without cancer. After the guideline release, the trend in opioid prescription rate declined among survivors (trend change, -1.1 percentage points [ppt]; P < .001; 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.7). Survivors also experienced an immediate level decrease (-2.1 ppt; P = .04; 95% CI, -4.2 to -0.1) and a decreasing trend (trend change, -0.4 ppt; P = .009; 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1) in rate of potential misuse/SUD. Peers without cancer experienced decreasing trends in opioid prescription rate (trend change, -0.3 ppt; P < .001; 95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1) and rate of potential misuse/SUD (trend change, -0.1 ppt; P = .03; 95% CI, -0.1 to -0.01). By 2 years after the guideline release, relative reductions in opioid prescription rate and rate of potential misuse/SUD among survivors were 36.7% and 65.4%, respectively, with peers without cancer experiencing smaller reductions (15.9% and 29.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the opioid prescription rate and rate of potential misuse/SUD declined among both survivors and peers without cancer following the CDC guideline release, with survivors experiencing greater reductions. More research is needed to understand the guideline's potential effects on access to opioids required for pain control among childhood cancer survivors.

Patient, Family, and Clinician Perspectives on Location of Death for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

PURPOSE: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have high rates of hospital deaths. It is not clear if this reflects their preferences or barriers to dying at home. METHODS: Between December 2018 and January 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with AYAs (age 12-39 years) with stage IV or recurrent cancer, family caregivers including bereaved caregivers, and clinicians of AYAs with cancer. Patients were asked about their priorities for care including location of death, caregivers were asked what was most important in the care of their AYA family member, and clinicians were asked to reflect on priorities identified through caring for AYAs. Directed content analysis was applied to interview data, and themes regarding location of death were developed. RESULTS: Eighty individuals (23 AYAs, 28 caregivers, and 29 clinicians) participated in interviews. Most AYAs and caregivers preferred a home death. However, some AYAs and caregivers opted for a hospital death to alleviate caregiver burden or protect siblings from the perceived trauma of witnessing a home death. Lack of adequate services to manage intractable symptoms at home and insufficient caregiver support led some AYAs/caregivers to opt for hospital death despite a preference for home death. Participants acknowledged the value of hospice while also pointing out its limitations in attaining a home death. CONCLUSION: Although most AYAs prefer to die at home, this preference is not always achieved. Robust home-based services for effective symptom management and caregiver support are needed to close the gap between preferred and actual location of death for AYAs.

The Supportive Care Clinic: A Novel Model of Embedded Pediatric Palliative Oncology Care.

CONTEXT: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) improves quality of life and end-of-life outcomes for children with cancer, but often occurs late in the disease course. The Supportive Care Clinic (SCC) was launched in 2017 to expand outpatient PPC access. OBJECTIVES: To describe the inaugural four years (2017-2021) of an academic, consultative, embedded SCC within pediatric oncology. METHODS: Descriptive statistics (demographic, disease, treatment, visit, and end-of-life) and change over time were calculated. RESULTS: During the first four years, 248 patients (51.6% male; 58.1% White; 35.5% Black; 13.7% Hispanic/Latino) were seen in SCC, totaling 1,143 clinic visits (median 4, IQR 2,6), including 248 consultations and 895 follow-up visits. Clinic visits grew nearly 300% from year one to four. Primary diagnoses were central nervous system tumor (41.9%), solid tumor (37.5%), and leukemia/lymphoma (17.3%). The first point of PPC contact became SCC (70.6%) for most referred patients. Among the 136 deceased patients (54.8%), 77.9% had a do-not-resuscitate or Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment in place, and 72.8% received hospice care. When known (n = 112), 89.3% died in their preferred location. The time from SCC consultation to death increased from 74 to 226 days over the four years (P < 0.0001). The proportion of SCC consultations that occurred greater than 90 days from death increased from 39.1% in year one to 85.0% in year four. CONCLUSION: Embedded SCC clinics can be successful, achieve steady growth, improve referrals and timing of PPC, and enhance end-of-life care for children with cancer. Large pediatric cancer centers should include SCC outpatient services.

Early Posttherapy Opioid Prescription, Potential Misuse, and Substance Use Disorder Among Pediatric Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cancer survivors often have pain, which may be managed with opioids. We examined the prevalence of opioid prescriptions, potential misuse, and substance use disorders (SUDs) among pediatric cancer survivors during the first year posttherapy. METHODS: Using MarketScan Commercial Database, we identified 8969 survivors (aged 21 years or younger at diagnosis) who completed cancer therapy in 2009-2018 and remained continuously enrolled for at least 1 year posttherapy and 44 845 age-, sex-, and region-matched enrollees without cancer as a comparison group. Outcomes included opioid prescriptions, any indicator of potential prescription opioid misuse, and SUDs within 1 year posttherapy. Outcomes were compared between survivors and noncancer peers in bivariate and adjusted analyses, stratified by off-therapy age (children: 0-11 years; adolescents: 12-17 years; young adults: 18-28 years). All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: A higher proportion of survivors than noncancer peers filled opioid prescriptions (children: 12.7% vs 2.0%; adolescents: 22.9% vs 7.7%; young adults: 26.0% vs 11.9%). In models adjusting for sociodemographic factors and health status, survivors remained 74.4%-404.8% more likely than noncancer peer to fill opioid prescriptions (P < .001). The prevalence of potential misuse or SUDs was low, with 1.4% of child, 4.7% of adolescent, and 9.4% of young adult survivors fulfilling at least 1 criterion; however, it was higher than noncancer peers (0.1%, 1.4%, and 4.3%, respectively). In adjusted models, the likelihood of potential misuse among survivors remained at least 2 times higher than that among noncancer peers (P < .001), and the difference in SUDs became nonstatistically significant. CONCLUSION: Statistically significantly higher rates of opioid prescriptions and potential misuse were found among pediatric cancer survivors within 1 year posttherapy as compared with peers without cancer.

Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize pediatric palliative care (PPC) research from 2016 to 2021 as it intersects with pediatric oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). RECENT FINDINGS: Children and adolescents with cancer who receive PPC have improved quality of life (QOL), symptom burden, advance care planning discussions, rates of hospice enrollment, home deaths, and receive less intensive therapy at the end-of-life (EOL). Parents report improved QOL and preparation for EOL. Though barriers to PPC utilization exist, new clinical models, oncology team education, and growing family awareness are leading to culture change. PPC within pediatric oncology is considered a standard of care. Families are accepting of PPC, as most wish for their children to live as well as possible for as long as possible. Although PPC remains underutilized, PPC should work collaboratively with pediatric oncology and HSCT teams to improve QOL and EOL outcomes of patients with cancer and their families.

Evaluating Palliative Opportunities Across the Age Spectrum in Children and Adolescent Patients with Cancer.

Purpose: Adolescent patients with cancer experience unique stressors due to their developmental stage, with increased physical, emotional, and social distress. Palliative care (PC) serves an important role in pediatric cancer care. We examined "palliative opportunities," or events during a patient's cancer course where subspecialty PC would be warranted and compared opportunities between adolescents and younger patients. Methods: Patients from a single center, 0-18 years of age at cancer diagnosis, who died from January 1, 2012, to November 30, 2017, were included. In this secondary analysis, patients were divided into cohorts based on age at diagnosis: 0-12 and 13-18 years. Demographic, disease, and treatment data were collected. Descriptive statistics and modeling were performed. Number, type, and timing of palliative opportunities and PC consultation timing and reason were evaluated across cohorts. Results: Of the 296 patients included for analysis, 27.7% were 13-18 years (82/296) at diagnosis. Frequency of palliative opportunities did not differ by age (median 7.0 [interquartile range 4.0 and 10.0] in both cohorts). PC consultation occurred in 36.5% (108/296), with neither rate nor timing differing by age group. PC consultations in adolescents were more often for symptom management (p = 0.0001). Adolescent patients were less likely to have a do-not-resuscitate order placed before death (61.0%, 50/82) compared to younger patients (73.8%, 158/214, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Adolescent patients with cancer did not experience more palliative opportunities than younger patients in this cohort, although they often have challenging psychological, family, and social stressors that were not identified. Incorporating additional palliative opportunities could enhance identification of stress and symptoms in adolescents with cancer such that PC could be timed to meet their needs.

Relationship of race and ethnicity on access, timing, and disparities in pediatric palliative care for children with cancer.

PURPOSE: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) improves quality of life for children and adolescents with cancer. Little is known about disparities between different racial and ethnic groups in the frequency and timing of PPC referrals. We evaluated the impact of race and ethnicity on the frequency and timing of PPC referral after initiation of an embedded PPO clinic where no formal consultation triggers exist. METHODS: Patients with cancer between 0 and 25 years at diagnosis who experienced a high-risk event between July 2015 and June 2018 were eligible. Demographic, disease, and PPC information were obtained. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to assess likelihood of receiving PPC services by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Of 426 patients who experienced a high-risk event, 48% were non-Hispanic White, 31% were non-Hispanic Black, 15% were Hispanic of any race, and 4% were non-Hispanic Asian. No significant differences were found between race/ethnicity and age at diagnosis/death, sex, and diagnosis. PPC consultation (p = 0.03) differed by race. Non-Hispanic Black patients were 1.7 times more likely than non-Hispanic White patients to receive PPC after adjustment (p = 0.01). White patients spent less days in the hospital in the last 90 days of life (3.0 days) compared with Black (8.0), Asian (12.5), or Hispanic patients (14.0, p = 0.009) CONCLUSION: Disparities exist in patients receiving pediatric oncology and PPC services. Cultural tendencies as well as unconscious and cultural biases may affect PPC referral by race and ethnicity. Better understanding of cultural tendencies and biases may improve end-of-life outcomes for children and young adults with cancer.

COMPLETE (Communication Plan Early Through End of Life): Development of a Research Program to Diminish Suffering for Children at End of Life.

While overall survival has improved significantly for children with cancer over the past 75 years, cancer remains the leading cause of death from disease among children and adolescents. Further, despite the many advances in medical and nursing care, children with cancer still experience significant physical and emotional suffering over the course of their illness, especially at the end of life (EOL). Children endure significant rates of high-intensity medical interventions (e.g., intubation, intensive care unit admission) at the EOL despite many parents, adolescents, and young adult patients identifying home as their preferred location of death. Hospice care has the potential to ease suffering at the EOL and facilitate home deaths, and yet, most children still die in acute care settings without hospice care. Numerous barriers prevent timely enrollment in hospice among children with cancer who are in the EOL period. This report describes the development and testing of a palliative care/EOL communication intervention designed to overcome some of these barriers and improve EOL outcomes (i.e., earlier hospice enrollment, less use of high-intensity medical interventions, reduced pain and suffering) among children with cancer and their parents (i.e., less emotional distress and uncertainty, improved hope and healthcare satisfaction).