Optimization and diagnostic evaluation of monoclonal antibody-based blocking ELISA formats for detection of neutralizing antibodies to Hendra virus in mammalian sera.

Maintenance of Hendra virus (HeV) in pteropid bat populations has been associated with spillover events in horses, humans and dogs. Experimental studies have demonstrated infections for several other species including guinea pigs, cats and ferrets. The criteria of a sensitive and specific serological test that is effective for a range of species, but which does not require use of live virus, has not been satisfactorily addressed by currently available tests. We have evaluated the use of two HeV neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in a blocking format enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) to detect serum antibody against a recombinant expressed HeV G protein (sol G) in several animal species. The human mAb m102.4 neutralises both HeV and the closely related Nipah virus (NiV); the mouse mAb 1.2 neutralises only HeV. Given these functional differences, we have investigated both antibodies using a bELISA format. Diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) were optimized using individual thresholds for mAb 1.2 and m102.4. For mAb 1.2 the positive threshold of >33% inhibition yielded DSe and DSp values of 100% (95% CI 95.3-100.0) and 99.5 (95% CI 98.8-99.8) respectively; for mAb m102.4 a positive threshold of >49% inhibition gave DSe and DSp values of 100 (95% CI 95.3-100.0) and 99.8 (95% CI 99.2-100.0) respectively. At these thresholds the DSe was 100% for both tests relative to the virus neutralization test. Importantly, the occurrence of false positive reactions did not overlap across the assays. Therefore, by sequential and selective application of these assays, it is possible to identify false positive reactions and achieve a DSp that approximates 100% in the test population.

Passive immunization and active vaccination against Hendra and Nipah viruses.

Hendra virus and Nipah virus are viral zoonoses first recognized in the mid and late 1990's and are now categorized as the type species of the genus Henipavirus within the family Paramyxoviridae. Their broad species tropism together with their capacity to cause severe and often fatal disease in both humans and animals make Hendra and Nipah "overlap agents" and significant biosecurity threats. The development of effective vaccination strategies to prevent or treat henipavirus infection and disease has been an important area of research. Here, henipavirus active and passive vaccination strategies that have been examined in animal challenge models of Hendra and Nipah virus disease are summarized and discussed.

Henipaviruses: recent observations on regulation of transcription and the nature of the cell receptor.

Hendra virus (HENV) and Nipah virus (NIPV) are classified in the new genus Henipavirus, within the subfamily Paramyxovirinae, family Paramyxoviridae. The genetic and biological characteristics that differentiate henipaviruses from other members of the subfamily are summarized. Although they do not display neuraminidase and hemagglutination activities and in that regard resemble viruses in the genus Morbillivirus, several recent observations highlight similarities between henipaviruses and respiroviruses (genus Respirovirus) in structure and replication strategy. First, three-dimensional modeling studies suggest that the external globular head domain of the HENV G protein resembles that of respiroviruses rather than morbilliviruses. Second, the pattern of transcriptional attenuation in HENV-infected cells resembles that observed with Sendai virus, a respirovirus, and differs from that found in cells infected with measles virus, a morbillivirus. Henipaviruses have a broad host range in vitro and in vivo, indicating wide distribution of cellular receptor molecules. The extensive host range has been confirmed in a quantitative in vitro cell-fusion assay using recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the attachment and fusion proteins of HENV and NIPV. Cell lines of diverse origin and which are permissive in the in vitro cell fusion assay have been identified and the pattern of relative susceptibilities is the same for both HENV and NIPV, implying that both viruses use the same cell receptor. Protease treatment of permissive cells destroys their ability to fuse with cells expressing viral envelope glycoproteins. Virus overlay protein binding assay (VOPBA) and radio-immune precipitation assays confirm that both HENV and NIPV bind to membrane proteins in the 35-50 kD range. Treatment of cell membrane proteins with N-glycosidase eliminates HeV binding activity in VOPBA whereas treatment with neuraminidase has no effect on binding. Thus preliminary evidence suggests that NIPV and HENV bind to the same glycoprotein receptor via a non-sialic acid-dependant mechanism.

Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 and chemokines: beyond competition for common cellular receptors.

The chemokines and their receptors have been receiving exceptional attention in recent years following the discoveries that some chemokines could specifically block human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection and that certain chemokine receptors were the long-sought coreceptors which, along with CD4, are required for the productive entry of HIV-1 and HIV-2 isolates. Several chemokine receptors or orphan chemokine receptor-like molecules can support the entry of various viral strains, but the clinical significance of the CXCR4 and CCR5 coreceptors appear to overshadow a critical role for any of the other coreceptors and all HIV-1 and HIV-2 strains best employ one or both of these coreceptors. Binding of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 subunit to CD4 and/or an appropriate chemokine receptor triggers conformational changes in the envelope glycoprotein oligomer that allow it to facilitate the fusion of the viral and host cell membranes. During these interactions, gp120 appears to be capable of inducing a variety of signaling events, all of which are still not defined in detail. In addition, the more recently observed dichotomous effects, of both inhibition and enhancement, that chemokines and their receptor signaling events elicit on the HIV-1 entry and replication processes has once again highlighted the intricate and complex balance of factors that govern the pathogenic process. Here, we will review and discuss these new observations summarizing the potential significance these processes may have in HIV-1 infection. Understanding the complexities and significance of the signaling processes that the chemokines and viral products induce may substantially enhance our understanding of HIV-1 pathogenesis, and perhaps facilitate the discovery of new ways for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 disease.

Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of oligomeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp140.

The biologically active form of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope (Env) glycoprotein is oligomeric. We previously described a soluble HIV-1 IIIB Env protein, gp140, with a stable oligomeric structure composed of uncleaved gp120 linked to the ectodomain of gp41 (P. L. Earl, C. C. Broder, D. Long, S. A. Lee, J. Peterson, S. Chakrabarti, R. W. Doms, and B. Moss, J. Virol. 68:3015-3026, 1994). Here we compared the antibody responses of rabbits to gp120 and gp140 that had been produced and purified in an identical manner. The gp140 antisera exhibited enhanced cross-reactivity with heterologous Env proteins as well as greater neutralization of HIV-1 compared to the gp120 antisera. To examine both immunogenicity and protective efficacy, we immunized rhesus macaques with oligomeric gp140. Strong neutralizing antibodies against a homologous virus and modest neutralization of heterologous laboratory-adapted isolates were elicited. No neutralization of primary isolates was observed. However, a substantial fraction of the neutralizing activity could not be blocked by a V3 loop peptide. After intravenous challenge with simian-HIV virus SHIV-HXB2, three of the four vaccinated macaques exhibited no evidence of virus replication.

Functional expression and membrane fusion tropism of the envelope glycoproteins of Hendra virus.

Hendra virus (HeV) is an emerging paramyxovirus first isolated from cases of severe respiratory disease that fatally affected both horses and humans. Understanding the mechanisms of host cell infection and cross-species transmission is an important step in addressing the risk posed by such emerging pathogens. We have initiated studies to characterize the biological properties of the HeV envelope glycoproteins. Recombinant vaccinia viruses encoding the HeV F and G open reading frames were generated and glycoprotein expression was verified by metabolic labeling and detection using specific antisera. Glycoprotein function and cellular tropism were examined with a quantitative assay for HeV-mediated membrane fusion. Fusion specificity was verified through specific inhibition by anti-HeV antiserum and a peptide corresponding to one of the alpha-helical heptad repeats of F. HeV requires both F and G to mediate fusion. Permissive target cells have been identified, including cell lines derived from cat, bat, horse, human, monkey, mouse, and rabbit. Fusion negative cell types have also been identified. Protease treatments of the target cells abolished fusion activity, suggesting that the virus is employing a cell-surface protein as its receptor.

Consistent and significant inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope-mediated membrane fusion by beta-chemokines (RANTES) in primary human macrophages.

Infection and entry of CD4(+) cells by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) requires a coreceptor molecule, which, in concert with CD4, interacts with the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env), leading to membrane fusion. The principal coreceptors are the CCR5 and CXCR4 chemokine receptors. The suppressive effect of beta-chemokines, principally RANTES, on certain HIV-1 isolates was established before the discovery of the CCR5 receptor, and there have since been multiple reports confirming this initial observation. However, the inhibitory effect of beta-chemokines on HIV-1 infection of macrophages has been controversial. The current study focused on this issue in detail, with a reductionist approach, using assays that measure the effect of beta-chemokines solely on Env-mediated fusion. It is shown that under a variety of culture and differentiation conditions, RANTES maintains a significant and consistent inhibitory effect on CCR5-dependent Env-mediated fusion, and the role of these findings is discussed in relation to the role of beta-chemokines in HIV pathogenesis.

Coreceptor competition for association with CD4 may change the susceptibility of human cells to infection with T-tropic and macrophagetropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 were found to function in vivo as the principal coreceptors for M-tropic and T-tropic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) strains, respectively. Since many primary cells express multiple chemokine receptors, it was important to determine if the efficiency of virus-cell fusion is influenced not only by the presence of the appropriate coreceptor (CXCR4 or CCR5) but also by the levels of other coreceptors expressed by the same target cells. We found that in cells with low to medium surface CD4 density, coexpression of CCR5 and CXCR4 resulted in a significant reduction in the fusion with CXCR4 domain (X4) envelope-expressing cells and in their susceptibility to infection with X4 viruses. The inhibition could be reversed either by increasing the density of surface CD4 or by antibodies against the N terminus and second extracellular domains of CCR5. In addition, treatment of macrophages with a combination of anti-CCR5 antibodies or beta-chemokines increased their fusion with X4 envelope-expressing cells. Conversely, overexpression of CXCR4 compared with CCR5 inhibited CCR5-dependent HIV-dependent fusion in 3T3.CD4.401 cells. Thus, coreceptor competition for association with CD4 may occur in vivo and is likely to have important implications for the course of HIV type 1 infection, as well as for the outcome of coreceptor-targeted therapies.

Substitutions in a homologous region of extracellular loop 2 of CXCR4 and CCR5 alter coreceptor activities for HIV-1 membrane fusion and virus entry.

CXCR4 and CCR5 are the principal coreceptors for human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection. Previously, mutagenesis of CXCR4 identified single amino acid changes that either impaired CXCR4's coreceptor activity for CXCR4-dependent (X4) isolate envelope glycoproteins (Env) or expanded its activity, allowing it to serve as a functional coreceptor for CCR5-dependent (R5) isolates. The most potent of these point mutations was an alanine substitution for the aspartic acid residue at position 187 in extracellular loop 2 (ecl-2), and here we show that this mutation also permits a variety of primary R5 isolate Envs, including those of other subtypes (clades), to employ it as a coreceptor. We also examined the corresponding region of CCR5 and demonstrate that the substitution of the serine residue in the homologous ecl-2 position with aspartic acid impairs CCR5 coreceptor activity for isolates across several clades. These results highlight a homologous and critical element in ecl-2, of both the CXCR4 and CCR5 molecules, for their respective coreceptor activities. Charge elimination expands CXCR4 coreceptor activity, while a similar charge introduction can destroy the coreceptor function of CCR5. These findings provide further evidence that there are conserved elements in both CXCR4 and CCR5 involved in coreceptor function.

Interactions of CCR5 and CXCR4 with CD4 and gp120 in human blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells.

Dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages play an important role in the generation of immune responses and transmission of HIV infection. It has been recently found that, in the presence of gp120, CD4 can be efficiently coimmunoprecipitated by anti-CXCR4 antibodies from lymphocytes and monocytes but not from blood monocyte-derived macrophages. The gp120-CD4-CXCR4 complex formation paralleled the ability for these cell types to support X4 (LAV) HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env)-mediated fusion. Here we report that, unlike macrophages but similar to lymphocytes and monocytes, human blood monocyte-derived DC allow efficient complex formation among the HIV-1 coreceptor CXCR4, the primary receptor CD4, and the Env gp120 (LAV) which parallels their fusion ability with cells expressing HIV-1 Env (LAV). In addition, DC behaved similarly to macrophages, lymphocytes, and monocytes in their ability to support formation of complexes between CD4 and the other major HIV-1 coreceptor CCR5 even in the absence of gp120 as demonstrated by CD4 coimmunoprecipitation with anti-CCR5 antibodies. Further, the amount of gp120-CD4-CXCR4 (or CCR5) complexes was proportional to the extent of cell fusion mediated by the HIV-1 Env (LAV or JRFL, respectively). These results demonstrate that of all the major types of host cells important for HIV-1 infection, the first central stage in the entry mechanism, the formation of gp120-CD4-coreceptor complexes, is not impaired except for the formation of the gp120-CD4-CXCR4 complex in macrophages. Therefore, for most CD4+ target cells restraint(s) on productive HIV-1 infection appears to occur at stages of the virus life cycle subsequent to the gp120-CD4-coreceptor complex formation.

Inefficient formation of a complex among CXCR4, CD4 and gp120 in U937 clones resistant to X4 gp120-gp41-mediated fusion.

Certain subclones (designated as minus clones) of the promonocytic U937 cell line do not support efficient infection and fusion mediated by T cell line adapted (TCLA) X4 HIV-1 gp120-gp41 (Env) although the CXCR4 and CD4 concentrations at their surfaces are similar to those at the surfaces of clones susceptible to HIV-1 entry (plus clones) (H. Moriuchi et al., J. Virol. 71, 9664-9671, 1997). To test the hypothesis that inefficient formation of gp120-CD4-CXCR4 complexes could contribute to the mechanism of resistance to Env-mediated fusion in the minus clones, we incubated plus and minus cells with HIV-1 LAI gp120 and coimmunoprecipitated CD4 by using anti-CXCR4 antibodies. The gp120 induced inefficient coimmunoprecipitation of CD4 in the minus clones but not in the plus ones. Overexpression of CD4 resulted in significant restoration of the minus clones' susceptibility to fusion in parallel with an increase in the amount of the gp120-CD4-CXCR4 complexes. These results not only suggest that the resistance to TCLA X4 HIV-1 entry in the U937 minus clones is due to the inability of these cells to efficiently form complexes among CD4, gp120, and CXCR4, but also provide a direct evidence for the correlation between fusion and the cell surface concentration of the complexes among CXCR4, CD4, and gp120. These data and similar recent observations in macrophages suggest that inefficient complex formation among CXCR4, CD4, and gp120 could be a general mechanism of cell resistance to gp120-gp41-mediated fusion and a major determinant of HIV-1 evolution in vivo.

N-linked glycosylation of CXCR4 masks coreceptor function for CCR5-dependent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates.

The chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 are the principal coreceptors for infection of X4 and R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates, respectively. Here we report on the unexpected observation that the removal of the N-linked glycosylation sites in CXCR4 potentially allows the protein to serve as a universal coreceptor for both X4 and R5 laboratory-adapted and primary HIV-1 strains. We hypothesize that this alteration unmasks existing common extracellular structures reflecting a conserved three-dimensional similarity of important elements of CXCR4 and CCR5 that are involved in HIV envelope glycoprotein (Env) interaction. These results may have far-reaching implications for the differential recognition of cell type-dependent glycosylated CXCR4 by HIV-1 isolates and their evolution in vivo. They also suggest a possible explanation for the various observations of restricted virus entry in some cell types and further our understanding of the framework of elements that represent the Env-coreceptor contact sites.

Mutagenesis of CXCR4 identifies important domains for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 X4 isolate envelope-mediated membrane fusion and virus entry and reveals cryptic coreceptor activity for R5 isolates.

CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor and a coreceptor for T-cell-line-tropic (X4) and dual-tropic (R5X4) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. Cells coexpressing CXCR4 and CD4 will fuse with appropriate HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env)-expressing cells. The delineation of the critical regions involved in the interactions within the Env-CD4-coreceptor complex are presently under intensive investigation, and the use of chimeras of coreceptor molecules has provided valuable information. To define these regions in greater detail, we have employed a strategy involving alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the extracellular domains of CXCR4 coupled with a highly sensitive reporter gene assay for HIV-1 Env-mediated membrane fusion. Using a panel of 41 different CXCR4 mutants, we have identified several charged residues that appear important for coreceptor activity for X4 Envs; the mutations E15A (in which the glutamic acid residue at position 15 is replaced by alanine) and E32A in the N terminus, D97A in extracellular loop 1 (ecl-1), and R188A in ecl-2 impaired coreceptor activity for X4 and R5X4 Envs. In addition, substitution of alanine for any of the four extracellular cysteines alone resulted in conformational changes of various degrees, while mutants with paired cysteine deletions partially retained their structure. Our data support the notion that all four cysteines are involved in disulfide bond formation. We have also identified substitutions which greatly enhance or convert CXCR4's coreceptor activity to support R5 Env-mediated fusion (N11A, R30A, D187A, and D193A), and together our data suggest the presence of conserved extracellular elements, common to both CXCR4 and CCR5, involved in their coreceptor activities. These data will help us to better detail the CXCR4 structural requirements exhibited by different HIV-1 strains and will direct further mutagenesis efforts aimed at better defining the domains in CXCR4 involved in the HIV-1 Env-mediated fusion process.

Constitutive cell surface association between CD4 and CCR5.

HIV-1 entry into cells involves formation of a complex between gp120 of the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env), a receptor (CD4), and a coreceptor. For most strains of HIV, this coreceptor is CCR5. Here, we provide evidence that CD4 is specifically associated with CCR5 in the absence of gp120 or any other receptor-specific ligand. The amount of CD4 coimmunoprecipitated with CCR5 was significantly higher than that with the other major HIV coreceptor, CXCR4, and in contrast to CXCR4 the CD4-CCR5 coimmunoprecipitation was not significantly increased by gp120. The CD4-CCR5 interaction probably takes place via the second extracellular loop of CCR5 and the first two domains of CD4. It can be inhibited by CCR5- and CD4-specific antibodies that interfere with HIV-1 infection, indicating a possible role in virus entry. These findings suggest a possible pathway of HIV-1 evolution and development of immunopathogenicity, a potential new target for antiretroviral drugs and a tool for development of vaccines based on Env-CD4-CCR5 complexes. The constitutive association of a seven-transmembrane-domain G protein-coupled receptor with another receptor also indicates new possibilities for cross-talk between cell surface receptors.

A mechanism of resistance to HIV-1 entry: inefficient interactions of CXCR4 with CD4 and gp120 in macrophages.

To test the hypothesis that inefficient interactions of CXCR4 with CD4 and gp120 could affect HIV-1 entry, we incubated macrophages, monocytes, and lymphocytes with gp120 and coimmunoprecipitated CD4 by using anti-CXCR4 antibodies. CD4 was efficiently coimmunoprecipitated in lymphocytes and monocytes but not in macrophages. Overexpression of CD4 in macrophages resulted in detection of CD4-CXCR4 and gp120-CD4-CXCR4 complexes in parallel with the restoration of macrophage fusion susceptibility. These results suggest a mechanism of resistance to entry of some X4 HIV-1 strains into macrophages and a method for dissection of the initial stages of HIV entry.

Characterization of conformation-dependent anti-gp120 murine monoclonal antibodies produced by immunization with monomeric and oligomeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope proteins.

Twenty-five conformation-dependent monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) produced by immunization of mice with oligomeric forms of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope (env) glycoprotein were used to map exposed, immunogenic regions on oligomeric env. Based on MAb cross-competition, reactivity with diverse env proteins, and reactivity with a panel of gp120 mutants, seven distinct epitope clusters were identified. These include the classic CD4 binding site, V1/V2, and V3. in addition, several novel epitope clusters, including one mapping to the N- and C-termini of gp120, were identified. The locations of the seven epitope clusters on the gp120 core structure are proposed.

Increased association of glycoprotein 120-CD4 with HIV type 1 coreceptors in the presence of complex-enhanced anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies.

CD4-specific monoclonal antibodies (CG1, CG7, and CG8), which bind with a 5- to 10-fold higher avidity to preformed CD4-gp120 complexes than to CD4, were previously shown to recognize newly identified conformational epitopes in the D1-CDR3 region of CD4. In the current study, these and other complex-enhanced MAbs were tested in three separate assays of HIV-1 coreceptor (CXCR4/CCR5) recruitment. In these assays, the CD4-specific MAbs CG1, -7, and -8 stabilized the association of coreceptor, gp120, and CD4 in trimolecular complexes. In contrast, the gp120-specific, complex-enhanced MAbs 48d and 17b were inhibitory. These data suggest that conformational changes in the CDR3 region of CD4-D1, induced by gp120 binding, may be involved in coreceptor association and thus play a positive role in the HIV-1 cell fusion process.

Recombinant vaccinia viruses. Design, generation, and isolation.

The technologies of recombinant gene expression have greatly enhanced the structural and functional analyses of genetic elements and proteins. Vaccinia virus, a large double-stranded DNA virus and the prototypic and best characterized member of the poxvirus family, has been an instrumental tool among these technologies and the recombinant vaccinia virus system has been widely employed to express genes from eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral origins. Vaccinia virus is also the prototype live viral vaccine and serves as the basis for well established viral vectors which have been successfully evaluated as human and animal vaccines for infectious diseases and as anticancer vaccines in a variety of animal model systems. Vaccinia virus technology has also been instrumental in a number of unique applications, from the discovery of new viral receptors to the synthesis and assembly of other viruses in culture. Here we provide a simple and detailed outline of the processes involved in the generation of a typical recombinant vaccinia virus, along with an up to date review of relevant literature.

HIV-1 envelope gp120 inhibits the monocyte response to chemokines through CD4 signal-dependent chemokine receptor down-regulation.

Since HIV-1 infection results in severe immunosuppression, and the envelope protein gp120 has been reported to interact with some of the chemokine receptors on human T lymphocytes, we postulated that gp120 may also affect monocyte activation by a variety of chemokines. This study shows that human peripheral blood monocytes when preincubated with gp120 either purified from laboratory-adapted strains or as recombinant proteins exhibited markedly reduced binding, calcium mobilization, and chemotactic response to chemokines. The gp-120-pretreated monocytes also showed a decreased response to FMLP. This broad inhibition of monocyte activation by chemoattractants required interaction of gp120 with CD4, since the effect of gp120 was only observed in CD4+ monocytes and in HEK 293 cells only if cotransfected with both chemokine receptors and an intact CD4, but not a CD4 lacking its cytoplasmic domain. Anti-CD4 mAbs mimicked the effect of gp120, and both anti-CD4 Ab and gp120 caused internalization of CXCR4 in HEK 293 cells provided they also expressed CD4. Staurosporine blocked the inhibitory effect of gp120 on monocytes, suggesting that cellular signaling was required for gp120 to inhibit the response of CD4+ cells to chemoattractants. Our study demonstrates a broad suppressive effect of gp120 on monocyte activation by chemoattractants through the down-regulation of cell surface receptors. Thus, gp120 may be used by HIV-1 to disarm the monocyte response to inflammatory stimulation.