Assessment of the impact of the London Olympics 2012 on selected non-genitourinary medicine clinic sexual health services.

With minimal information on sexual health provision during mass-gathering events, our aim was to describe the use of sexual health, contraceptive, sex worker and sexual assault services during the London 2012 Olympics. We analysed data from five sources. One contraceptive service provider reported a 10% increase in attendance during the main Games, while emergency contraception prescriptions rose during the main Olympics, compared to the week before, but were similar or lower than at the beginning and end of the summer period. A health telephone advice line reported a 16% fall in sexual health-related calls during the main Olympics, but a 33% increase subsequently. London sexual assault referral centres reported that 1.8% of sexual assaults were Olympics-linked. A service for sex workers reported that 16% started working in the sex industry and 7% moved to London to work during the Olympics. Fifty-eight per cent and 45% of sex workers reported fewer clients and an increase in police crack-downs, respectively. Our results show a change in activity across these services during the 2012 summer, which may be associated with the Olympics. Our data are a guide to other services when anticipating changes in service activity and planning staffing for mass-gathering events.

The use of an electronic checklist in the electronic patient record to achieve annually recommended outcomes based on British HIV Association guidelines.

An electronic search was performed of the electronic patient record (EPR) system to identify whether each of 13 key interventions recommended by the British HIV Association (BHIVA) had been performed for all eligible patients attending in 2009 and 2010 at one of our HIV clinics: 345 and 358 eligible HIV-positive patients were identified in 2009 and 2010, respectively. The success rates for having completed each intervention in 2009 and 2010, respectively, were all better for 2010 and none was <94%. These improved results in 2010 over those of 2009 could be attributed to the clinicians' improved experience in using the checklist and the facility of EPR to provide flagged reminders.

The effect of electronic patient records (EPR) on the time taken to treat patients with genital Chlamydia infection.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the time taken to recall and treat patients with untreated Chlamydia attending a sexual-health clinic before and after the introduction of electronic patient records (EPR). METHODS: 52 consecutive qualifying patients were identified for January to March 2007 (paper case records) and 2009 (EPR). For each, the patient time intervals were measured between each of following dates: first attendance, first positive result received, first attempted patient contact and attendance for treatment. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2009, the median time taken to treat a patient after receipt of a positive Chlamydia result fell by 11.5 days (median 15 days in 2007, 3.5 days in 2009). The time between first attendance and treatment was reduced by 9.5 days (median 21 days in 2007, 11.5 days in 2009) despite results taking 2 days longer to arrive in 2009. The proportion of patients treated within 2 weeks of a positive result rose from 38% in 2007 to 94% in 2009. Compared with paper notes, EPR decreased the time to recall, by eliminating three time-delaying patient recall processes. By ensuring more accurate patient recall information, EPR also lead to a higher proportion of patients successfully recalled by telephone (26/44, 59% vs 46/52, 88% in 2007 and 2009 respectively), leading to earlier treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The 'time to treat' interval was dramatically reduced following the introduction of EPR. Clinics using paper notes should consider switching to EPR as a means of improving STI recall efficiency.

Is accelerated partner therapy a feasible and acceptable strategy for rapid partner notification in the UK?: a qualitative study of genitourinary medicine clinic attenders.

Partner notification (PN) in the UK is of limited effectiveness. Expedited partner therapy improves PN outcomes but does not comply with existing UK professional guidance. We developed two new strategies, known as accelerated partner therapy (APT), based on elements of PN practice for which there is evidence of efficacy, and which conform to UK prescribing guidance. We explored the acceptability and feasibility of these models qualitatively in genitourinary medicine clinic attenders. Both strategies were viewed favourably. Preference was influenced by age, relationship type, whether participants were delivering or receiving APT and whether the sex partner was aware of the participant's clinic visit. APT provides a new approach to PN, which has strong patient support and complies with existing UK regulations. The complex factors that influence patients' choice of PN method suggest that provision of a range of PN options including APT may be central to improving the effectiveness of PN in the UK.

Trends in HIV testing and recording of HIV status in the UK primary care setting: a retrospective cohort study 1995-2005.

OBJECTIVES: To provide nationally representative data on trends in HIV testing in primary care and to estimate the proportion of diagnosed HIV positive individuals known to general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study between 1995 and 2005 of all general practices contributing data to the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD), and data on persons accessing HIV care (Survey of Prevalent HIV Infections Diagnosed). We identified all practice-registered patients where an HIV test or HIV positive status is recorded in their general practice records. HIV testing in primary care and prevalence of recorded HIV positive status in primary care were estimated. RESULTS: Despite 11-fold increases in male testing and 19-fold increases in non-pregnant female testing between 1995 and 2005, HIV testing rates remained low in 2005 at 71.3 and 61.2 tests per 100,000 person years for males and females, respectively, peaking at 162.5 and 173.8 per 100,000 person years at 25-34 years of age. Inclusion of antenatal tests yielded a 129-fold increase in women over the 10-year period. In 2005, 50.7% of HIV positive individuals had their diagnosis recorded with a lower proportion in London (41.8%) than outside the capital (60.1%). CONCLUSION: HIV testing rates in primary care remain low. Normalisation of HIV testing and recording in primary care in antenatal testing has not been accompanied by a step change in wider HIV testing practice. Recording of HIV positive status by GPs remains low and GPs may be unaware of HIV-related morbidity or potential drug interactions.

Management of rape/sexual assault cases within genitourinary medicine clinics: results from a study in North Thames.

A regional audit was undertaken to evaluate current practice in the management of survivors of sexual assault (SA) seen in genitourinary (GU) medicine clinics in the North Thames. The majority of the survivors were women. Most were fast-tracked, or seen in dedicated SA clinics. Over 60% of staff had specific training in management of SA. Core services provided included screening and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, emotional support, emergency contraception and hepatitis B vaccination. The sexual health needs of these survivors of SA are being met by most clinics. The development and use of a standardized care proforma across the region may be a means to further improve the care provided.

Survey of HIV and hepatitis B or C co-infection management in the UK 2004.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the current management practices of patients with HIV and hepatitis B or C co-infection. A postal survey was made of 186 clinics in the UK between October 2003 and January 2004. In total, 100/186 (54%) clinics responded: 16% estimated their hepatitis B prevalence to be above 10%, 27% estimated their hepatitis C to be above 10%. Problems were identified in a minority of clinics including: not routinely screening HIV-positive patients for hepatitis C (6%), restrictions on diagnostic tests required for the management of hepatitis infection and offering inappropriate treatment for hepatitis B infection. The use of diagnostic liver biopsies varied and clinics reported restrictions on access to hepatitis C therapy, with a consequent impact on waiting times. In conclusion, we identified several areas of concern in the diagnosis and management of HIV/hepatitis co-infection in several UK HIV treatment centres.

Management of HIV-related lymphoma in HIV treatment centres in North Thames Region.

We describe an audit of lymphoma care in HIV-positive patients. In the smaller units (< 500 patients) areas of potentially sub-optimal care were identified.

Findings from the British HIV Association's national clinical audit of first-line antiretroviral therapy and survey of treatment practice and maternity care, 2002.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of and adherence to the British HIV Association (BHIVA) guidelines in routine clinical practice in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: A self-completed postal survey of practice with regard to HIV management and maternity care of HIV-positive women was carried out. A case-note review of all patients starting their first antiretroviral (ART) therapy (up to a maximum of 25 patients) between April and September 2002 was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 113 treatment centres participated. Ninety-nine units (88%) use the BHIVA ART guidelines as part of their treatment policy. Problems revealed by the survey include limited access to some ARTs in a small number of units and a wait longer than 4 weeks before the first assessment of patients started on ART in some units. Thirty-one centres (33%) felt that their maternity services had reached the government target of >90% antenatal HIV testing by October 2002. A total of 942 case-notes audited showed shortfalls in reported pretreatment testing of blood glucose, lipids and hepatitis C virus. Three patients had not strictly met the BHIVA guidelines for starting ART, but all had a high viral load (>100 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL). The majority (844 patients; 90%) had started on recommended therapies, most commonly two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. The other 98 patients (10%) were given a variety of nonstandard triple or quadruple ART. CONCLUSIONS: This audit again shows a high rate of consistency and quality of care of patients with HIV across the UK and Ireland. Problems with pretreatment assessment and early follow up of patients starting ART have been found.

Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in North Thames region 2003.

A multi-centre re-audit of tests used for chlamydia diagnosis in GU medicine clinic attendees from February 2003 to March 2003 in the North Thames region showed improvements since our previous audit in 1999, with a significant increase in the proportion of clinics using nucleic acid amplification tests and non-invasive testing.

Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis in North Thames region 2003.

Following on from the survey of techniques used for testing chlamydia, a multi-centre re-audit of the treatment of C. trachomatis in genitourinary clinic attendees in the North Thames region from February to March 2003 was performed. This showed an improvement since our previous audit with a significant increase in the number of centres following national guidelines in antibiotic prescribing and offering test of cure in clinically indicated cases.

Management of HIV and hepatitis B or C co-infection in 15 HIV treatment centres. Disparity between protocols and practice.

Our aim was to ascertain current guidelines and clinical practices prevalent in HIV treatment centres in the North Thames Region of England on the care of patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B or C. A self-completed postal survey of clinic guidelines and retrospective case-note reviews was performed. Fifteen of the 27 units completed the survey and generally had clinic guidelines consistent with current national guidelines. Stated policy was usually to screen HIV patients for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to offer specific therapy for the hepatitis as well as the HIV. Many units were unable to contribute cases to the case-note review, probably through lack of case-identification, and therefore 11 units contributed 27 case-note reviews on HIV/HBV and five units contributed 11 case-note reviews on HIV/HCV. Fifty-six percent (25/45) of patients of HBV patients were HBeAg+ve and 88% (22/25) of these had received specific hepatitis B therapy although for 59% (13/22) this was with lamivudine as part of a highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen. None of the HIV/HCV patients had received or been referred for HCV-specific therapy. Testing for hepatitis A immunity in HBV or HCV patients with a view to vaccination was done in only 50% although 96% of HIV/HCV patients had been screened for HBV. There are significant differences between the clinics' intended and actual management of HIV and chronic viral hepatitis co-infection.