The effects of intervention with intravenous edaravone in Study 19 on hospitalization, tracheostomy, ventilation, and death in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Intravenous (IV) edaravone is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), shown in clinical trials to slow physical functional decline. In this study we compared the effect of IV edaravone (edaravone-first group) versus placebo followed by IV edaravone (placebo-first group) on survival and additional milestone events. METHODS: This work is a post hoc analysis of Study 19/MCI186-19, which was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study investigating IV edaravone versus placebo. Study 19 and its 24-week extension have been described previously (NCT01492686). Edaravone-first versus placebo-first group time to events for specific milestone(s) were analyzed post hoc. Time-to-event composite endpoints were time to death; time to death, tracheostomy, or permanent assisted ventilation (PAV); and time to death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization. RESULTS: The risk for death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization was 53% lower among patients in the edaravone-first vs placebo-first groups (hazard ratio = 0.47 [95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.88], P = .02). The overall effect of IV edaravone on ALS progression could be seen in the significant separation of time-to-event curves for time to death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization. ALS survival composite endpoint analyses (ALS/SURV) suggested a treatment benefit (least-squares mean difference) for the edaravone-first versus the placebo-first group at week 24 (0.15 ± 0.05 [95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.25], P < .01) and week 48 (0.11 ± 0.05 [95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.21], P = .02). DISCUSSION: These analyses illustrate the value of timely and continued IV edaravone treatment, as earlier initiation was associated with a lower risk of death, tracheostomy, PAV, or hospitalization in patients with ALS.

A revision to the United States national ALS registry's algorithm to improve Case-Ascertainment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of 1) updating the existing algorithm to improve case-finding sensitivity and 2) reclassifying the Registry's diagnostic status nomenclature into four new categories ("confirmed ALS," "likely ALS," "undetermined ALS," or "not ALS") versus the current three ("definite ALS," "possible ALS," or "not ALS") to be more inclusive and descriptive of cases and individuals. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Registry data from 2011-2017 was conducted to follow "possible ALS" individuals over time to determine what qualifier caused them to convert, if at all and when, to Registry-eligible cases (i.e. "confirmed ALS" or "likely ALS"). RESULTS: In 2011, 720 individuals were classified by the Registry algorithm as having "possible ALS". By 2017, 42% of these had converted to Registry-eligible ALS cases. Approximately 14% of those who were identified solely based on an ALS prescription drug never converted to Registry-eligible cases. This analysis indicates that "possible ALS" individuals with a single prescription for an ALS drug should be converted to Registry-eligible cases which would add between 300-500 cases per year on average. CONCLUSIONS: The Registry's existing algorithm likely results in the under-ascertainment of ALS cases. However, updating the algorithm with the inclusion of patients having been prescribed ALS-specific drugs, even with a single prescription, leads to improved epidemiologic estimates of ALS in the US. This and future algorithmic updates will help the Registry more accurately depict the true disease burden of ALS in the US.

Intravenous edaravone treatment in ALS and survival: An exploratory, retrospective, administrative claims analysis.

Background: We aimed to evaluate overall survival in US patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) treated with intravenous (IV) edaravone compared with those not treated with IV edaravone in a real-world setting. Methods: This exploratory retrospective comparative effectiveness observational analysis included patients with ALS who were enrolled in an administrative claims database from 8 August 2017 to 31 March 2020. Propensity score matching identified IV edaravone-treated patients (cases) and non-edaravone-treated patients (controls) matched for covariates: age, race, geographic region, sex, pre-index disease duration, insurance, history of cardiovascular disease, riluzole prescription, gastrostomy tube placement, artificial nutrition, noninvasive ventilation, and all-cause hospitalisation. For cases, the index date was the date of the first claim for IV edaravone. For controls, it was the date IV edaravone was available (8 August 2017). The effect of IV edaravone on all-cause mortality was estimated with shared frailty Cox regression analysis. Findings: 318 cases were matched to 318 controls. In both groups, 208 patients (65.4%) had a history of riluzole prescription. As of 31 March 2021, there were 155 deaths (48.7%) among the cases and 196 among the controls (61.6%). Median overall survival time was 29.5 months with edaravone and 23.5 months without, respectively, and the risk of death was 27% lower in cases than in controls (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91; p=0.005). Interpretation: In this real-world analysis, IV edaravone treatment in a large predominantly riluzole-treated US cohort was associated with prolonged overall survival compared with not using IV edaravone. Data from adequately powered RCTs are needed to support this finding. Funding: Funded by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America.

Analysis of the US Safety Data for Edaravone (Radicava®) From the Third Year After Launch.

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease with no curative therapies. Edaravone (Radicava®) (Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), approved in the United States (US) for ALS in adults in 2017, was shown in a clinical trial to slow the rate of physical functional decline in ALS and is administered intravenously. The aim of this paper is to summarize the observed safety profile from real-world patient use during the first 3 years of edaravone availability in the US. METHODS: Edaravone usage data were collected, and adverse events (AEs) were identified from a postmarketing safety database from August 8, 2017 through August 7, 2020 (cutoff date). RESULTS: As of October 3, 2020, 5207 ALS patients had been treated with edaravone. As of August 7, 2020, the most commonly reported AEs included death (not specified), drug ineffective, disease progression, therapeutic response unexpected, fall, asthenia, fatigue, muscular weakness, gait disturbance, and dyspnea. The most commonly reported serious AEs (SAEs) included death (not specified), pneumonia, disease progression, ALS, fall, dyspnea, respiratory failure, device-related infection, hospitalization, and injection-site infection. There were 687 deaths, with 494 reported as death without specifying the cause. Deaths were most commonly attributed to ALS, disease progression, respiratory failure, or pneumonia. Review for administration-site reactions revealed 95 AEs, including 34 site infections, with 22 SAEs (all non-fatal). Five non-fatal SAEs of anaphylaxis were reported. CONCLUSION: In the postmarketing reporting to date, no new safety signals were identified beyond those already known from the edaravone clinical trial program.

Edaravone efficacy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with reduced forced vital capacity: Post-hoc analysis of Study 19 (MCI186-19) [clinical trial NCT01492686].

BACKGROUND: Edaravone slowed the rate of functional decline in subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in phase 3 study MCI186-19 (Study 19). One of the Study 19 inclusion criteria was forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥80% of predicted (≥80%p). Therefore, the study provided no information on edaravone efficacy in subjects with FVC <80%p. In Study 19, 24-week, double-blind treatment was followed by open-label treatment where all subjects received edaravone. At 24 weeks, some subjects had FVC <80%p (FVC24 <80%p). This allowed for post-hoc assessment of the effects of edaravone in subgroups of subjects with FVC24 ≥80%p vs <80%p. OBJECTIVE: To address the question of the efficacy of edaravone in ALS patients with FVC <80%p. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of Study 19 comparing edaravone efficacy at week 48 in subjects with FVC24 ≥80%p vs <80%p. RESULTS: With edaravone treatment, subjects in both the FVC24 ≥80%p and the FVC24 <80%p subgroups experienced a reduction in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score loss vs placebo subjects through week 48. For the FVC24 ≥80%p subgroup, the changes in ALSFRS-R scores from baseline to week 48 were -7.63 for edaravone-edaravone vs -9.69 for placebo-edaravone, a difference of 2.05 (P = .034; 95% CI: 0.16, 3.94). For the FVC24 <80%p subgroup, the changes in ALSFRS-R scores from baseline to week 48 were -10.26 for edaravone-edaravone vs -15.20 for placebo-edaravone, a difference of 4.94 (P = .0038; 95% CI: 1.64, 8.25). Linear regression analysis indicated that, in the FVC24 <80%p subgroup, there was a notable change in the slope of the ALSFRS-R score-vs-time graph after the start of edaravone treatment. CONCLUSION: ALS subjects in the Study 19 placebo arm had a slowing in disease progression, even when edaravone was added with an FVC of <80%p prior to starting edaravone. A randomized, placebo-controlled study is needed to validate these post-hoc findings.

Evidence for generalizability of edaravone efficacy using a novel machine learning risk-based subgroup analysis tool.

Introduction: The edaravone development program for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) included trials MCI186-16 (Study 16) and MCI186-19 (Study 19). A cohort enrichment strategy was based on a Study 16 post hoc analysis and applied to Study 19 to elucidate a treatment effect in that study. To determine whether the Study 19 results could be generalized to a broader ALS population, we used a machine learning (ML) model to create a novel risk-based subgroup analysis tool. Methods: A validated ML model was used to rank order all Study 16 participants by predicted time to 50% expected vital capacity. Subjects were stratified into nearest-neighbor risk-based subgroups that were systematically expanded to include the entire Study 16 population. For each subgroup, a statistical analysis generated heat maps that revealed statistically significant effect sizes. Results: A broad region of the Study 16 heat map with significant effect sizes was identified, including up to 70% of the trial population. Incorporating participants identified in the cohort enrichment strategy yielded a broad group comprising 76% of the original participants with a statistically significant treatment effect. This broad group spanned the full range of the functional score progression observed in Study 16. Conclusions: This analysis, applying predictions derived using an ML model to a novel methodology for subgroup identification, ascertained a statistically significant edaravone treatment effect in a cohort of participants with broader disease characteristics than the Study 19 inclusion criteria. This novel methodology may assist clinical interpretation of study results and potentially inform efficient future clinical trial design strategies.

Slowing the loss of physical function in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with edaravone: Post hoc analysis of ALSFRS-R item scores in pivotal study MCI186-19.

INTRODUCTION: Phase 3 study MCI186-19 demonstrated less loss of physical function with edaravone versus placebo, as measured by the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) total score. A 1-point drop in an individual ALSFRS-R item may be clinically meaningful. We assessed ALSFRS-R item score changes to identify clinical features protected by edaravone treatment. METHODS: Time-to-event analysis was used to assess the cumulative probabilities of reductions in ALSFRS-R item scores and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ-40) subdomain scores. RESULTS: Edaravone use was accompanied by: (1) delayed drop of ≥1 point in ALSFRS-R item score for four items: salivation, walking, climbing stairs, orthopnea (unadjusted), or for two items: walking, climbing stairs (after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); (2) delayed score transition from 4 or 3 at baseline to ≤2 for five items: swallowing, eating motion, walking, climbing stairs, orthopnea (unadjusted), or for one item: climbing stairs (after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); and (3) delayed worsening of ALSAQ-40 domain scores representing daily living/independence, eating and drinking (unadjusted). DISCUSSION: These post-hoc analyses identified the ALSFRS-R item scores and ALSAQ-40 domain scores that were associated with preserved gross motor function and health-related quality of life, respectively, after edaravone treatment. Limitations of post-hoc analyses should be considered when interpreting these results. We recommend that clinical trials employing the ALSFRS-R include this type of analysis as a pre-specified secondary outcome measure.

MN-166 (ibudilast) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a Phase IIb/III study: COMBAT-ALS study design.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease with motor neuron loss as a defining feature. Despite significant effort, therapeutic breakthroughs have been modest. MN-166 (ibudilast) has demonstrated neuroprotective action by various mechanisms: inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines and macrophage migration inhibitory factor, phosphodiesterase inhibition, and attenuation of glial cell activation in models of ALS. Early-phase studies suggest that MN-166 may improve survival outcomes and slow disease progression in patients with ALS. This article describes the rationale and design of COMBAT-ALS, an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb/III study in ALS. This study is designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability and assess the efficacy of MN-166 on function, muscle strength, quality of life and survival in ALS.

Lay abstract Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurological disease defined by the loss of the nerve cells going to the muscles. Despite significant effort, we still do not have good treatments for ALS. MN-166 (ibudilast) can protect nerve cells by calming inflammation in several ways in models of ALS. Early human studies suggest that MN-166 may extend life and slow disease progression in ALS patients. This article describes the rationale and design of COMBAT-ALS, an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb/III study. This study will show the drug's safety and tolerability and its effects on physical function, muscle strength, quality of life and survival in people living with ALS. Trial registration number: NCT04057898 (ClinicalTrial.gov).

Psychometric Properties of Rapid Word-Based Rate Measures in the Assessment of Bulbar Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Comparisons With Syllable-Based Rate Tasks.

Purpose Rapid maximum performance repetition tasks have increasingly demonstrated their utility as clinimetric markers supporting diagnosis and monitoring of bulbar disease in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A recently developed protocol uses novel real-word repetitions instead of traditional nonword/syllable sequences in hopes of improving sensitivity to motor speech impairments by adding a phonological target constraint that would activate a greater expanse of the motor speech neuroanatomy. This study established the psychometric properties of this novel clinimetric protocol in its assessment of bulbar ALS and compared performance to traditional syllable sequence dysdiadochokinetic (DDK) tasks. Specific objectives were to (a) compare rates between controls and speakers with symptomatic versus presymptomatic bulbar disease, (b) characterize their discriminatory ability in detecting presymptomatic bulbar disease compared to healthy speech, (c) determine their articulatory movement underpinnings, and (d) establish within-individual longitudinal changes. Method DDK and novel tongue ("ticker"-TAR) and labial ("pepper"-LAR) articulatory rates were compared between n = 18 speakers with presymptomatic bulbar disease, n = 10 speakers with symptomatic bulbar disease, and n = 13 healthy controls. Bulbar disease groups were determined by a previously validated speaking rate cutoff. Discriminatory ability was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Within-individual change over time was characterized in a subset of 16 participants with available longitudinal data using linear mixed-effects models. Real-time articulatory movements of the tongue front, tongue dorsum, jaw, and lips were captured using 3-D electromagnetic articulography; effects of movement displacement and speed on clinimetric rates were determined using stepwise linear regressions. Results All clinimetric rates (traditional DDK tasks and novel tasks) were reduced in speakers with symptomatic bulbar disease; only TAR was reduced in speakers with presymptomatic bulbar disease and was able to detect this group with an excellent discrimination ability (area under the curve = 0.83). Kinematic analyses revealed associations with expected articulators, greater motor complexity, and differential articulatory patterns for the novel real-word repetitions than their DDK counterparts. Only LAR significantly declined longitudinally over the disease course. Conclusion Novel real-word clinimetric rate tasks evaluating tongue and labial articulatory dysfunction are valid and effective markers for early detection and tracking of bulbar disease in ALS.

Real-world evidence of riluzole effectiveness in treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of riluzole on median survival in population studies of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with that observed in clinical trials. Methods: Two independent PubMed searches were conducted, to identify population studies that reported median survival for ALS patients who were either treated with riluzole or remained riluzole-free. Results: We identified 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria of reporting median survival and an additional study that reported mean survival of both riluzole and riluzole-free patients. Analysis of the 15 studies found that a majority reported increased survival of riluzole vs. riluzole-free patients. In 8 studies, the median survival for patients treated with riluzole was 6-19 months longer compared with patients not treated with riluzole (p < 0.05). Three additional studies reported a clinically meaningful treatment effect (range 3-5.9 months) but did not meet statistical significance. The remaining 4 studies did not show a meaningful treatment effect between riluzole and riluzole-free groups (<3 months), and differences among the groups were not significant. Also, 5 of the studies used multivariate regression analysis to investigate the level of association between treatment with riluzole and survival; these analyses supported the positive effect of riluzole on survival. Conclusions: A majority of population studies that compared riluzole vs. riluzole-free ALS patients found significant differences in median survival between the two groups, ranging from 6 to 19 months. This is substantially longer than the 2- to 3-month survival benefit observed in the pivotal clinical trials of riluzole.

The Oral Secretion Scale and Prognostic Factors for Survival in Subjects With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be tolerated in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), unless bulbar impairment becomes severe. Excessive oral secretions may result in NIV intolerance and insufficient ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of the Oral Secretion Scale (OSS) for predicting the tolerance of NIV, when to initiate hospice or transition to tracheostomy, and prognostic factors for survival of users of NIV. METHODS: A validated OSS was developed to measure oral secretions in correlation with the ability to swallow saliva and clear the upper airway: OSS score of 4 = normal (automatic swallow); OSS score of 3 = infrequent secretions (automatic swallow decreased); OSS score of 2 = occasional drooling and/or pooling (conscious swallow required); OSS score of 1 = severe, frequent drooling and/or pooling (conscious swallow difficult); OSS score of 0 = most severe, constant drooling/pooling (conscious swallow impossible). A total of 137 subjects were followed up prospectively during ongoing patient visits from NIV initiation until death or tracheostomy. Survival was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis. OSS scores when NIV became intolerable were determined. Uni- and/or multivariate Cox-regression analyses showed prognostic factors that affect survival. RESULTS: The median months of survival from NIV initiation were the following: 11 (95% CI 7.3-14.0), 5 (95% CI 3.1-6.1), and 1 (95% CI 1.1-1.5) stratified by OSS scores of 4, 3-2, and 1, respectively; and 21 (95% CI 8.6-33.2), 8 (95% CI 3.4-11.5), 6 (95% CI 4.2-8.2), and 2 (95% CI 1.5-2.7) stratified by 24, 17-23, 4-16, and <4 h/d of NIV use, respectively. Survival was significantly (P < .001) longer with an OSS score of 4 than an OSS score of 1 at NIV initiation; and significantly (P < .001) longer when NIV used 24 h/d than <24 h/d. In the subjects unable to tolerate NIV, ≥80% had OSS score of 1 or 0. Univariate and multivariate analyses hazard ratio 4.91, 95% CI 2.98-8.09, P < .001, and hazard ratio 4.60, 95% CI 2.66-7.96, P < .001), respectively, showed hours per day of NIV use was a significant factor associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: The subjects with an OSS score of 4 tolerated NIV and survived significantly longer than subjects with an OSS score of <4. An OSS score of 1 signaled NIV intolerance and the need for hospice or transition to planned tracheostomy. Use of OSS can help guide NIV management decisions.

Selection design phase II trial of high dosages of tamoxifen and creatine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Objective: To conduct a phase-II trial using a ranking and selection paradigm where multiple treatments are compared with limited sample size and the best is chosen for a subsequent efficacy trial versus placebo. This strategy can find an effective treatment faster than traditional strategy of conducting larger trials against placebo. Methods: Sixty amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) participants were randomized 1:1:1 to creatine 30 g/day (CRE), tamoxifen 40 mg/day (T40), or tamoxifen 80 mg/day (T80), with matching placebo. The primary outcome was 38-week change in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), analyzed in a repeated-measures ANOVA. Secondary outcomes included slow vital capacity (SVC), quantitative muscle strength, early drug discontinuation (EDD), adverse events (AEs), and survival. Results: CRE participants experienced higher rates of drug-related AEs (82% vs. 43% T40, 47% T80) and EDD (50% vs. 24% T40, 29% T80). T80 participants experienced slower adjusted mean decline in ALSFRS-R in points/month (-0.80 vs. -0.84 T40, -0.85 CRE) and quantitative muscle strength but not in SVC and higher rates of mortality. Conclusion: Efficacy of T80 ranked numerically superior to CRE and T40 with respect to ALSFRS-R decline. Following the selection paradigm, T80 would be chosen to test against placebo. The approach was not designed to distinguish among treatments that are nearly equally effective or ineffective. If treatments are equivalent, then under the paradigm, it does not matter which treatment is selected. Newer approaches for increasing trial efficiency, including an adaptive platform trial design, may mitigate limitations of the selection design.

Riluzole Oral Suspension: Bioavailability Following Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube-modeled Administration Versus Direct Oral Administration.

PURPOSE: During amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression, up to 85% of patients develop dysphagia. Riluzole oral suspension 50 mg/10 mL is bioequivalent to riluzole 50-mg film-coated tablets administered orally under fasting conditions. Here, we compare the bioavailability of a single 50-mg dose of riluzole oral suspension via intragastric tube, a proxy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy administration, with that of oral administration in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. Secondary objectives included the plasma pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of each administration route. METHODS: This was a single-center, single-dose, open-label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover bioequivalence/bioavailability study. Healthy volunteers were randomized to riluzole oral suspension 50 mg/10 mL either via nasogastric tube or orally, with a 5-day washout before crossover. FINDINGS: A total of 32 subjects were randomized (safety population); 30 were eligible for pharmacokinetic analysis. The ratios (nasogastric tube/oral) of the geometric least squares means and the geometric 90% CIs of AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and Cmax were calculated to be 90.60% (85.66%-95.82%), 90.43% (85.47%-95.67%), and 96.99% (89.40%-105.23%), respectively, indicating bioequivalence. No significant differences in Cmax, Tmax, Kel, and t1/2el between treatments were found. Overall, riluzole oral suspension was well tolerated. No deaths or other serious adverse events were reported. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, riluzole oral suspension was bioequivalent when administered intragastrically and orally in healthy subjects under fasting conditions. Both administration methods were well tolerated. These results show that intragastric administration of riluzole oral suspension may provide an important formulation option in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who have a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube.

Revised Airlie House consensus guidelines for design and implementation of ALS clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To revise the 1999 Airlie House consensus guidelines for the design and implementation of preclinical therapeutic studies and clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: A consensus committee comprising 140 key members of the international ALS community (ALS researchers, clinicians, patient representatives, research funding representatives, industry, and regulatory agencies) addressed 9 areas of need within ALS research: (1) preclinical studies; (2) biological and phenotypic heterogeneity; (3) outcome measures; (4) disease-modifying and symptomatic interventions; (5) recruitment and retention; (6) biomarkers; (7) clinical trial phases; (8) beyond traditional trial designs; and (9) statistical considerations. Assigned to 1 of 8 sections, committee members generated a draft set of guidelines based on a "background" of developing a (pre)clinical question and a "rationale" outlining the evidence and expert opinion. Following a 2-day, face-to-face workshop at the Airlie House Conference Center, a modified Delphi process was used to develop draft consensus research guidelines, which were subsequently reviewed and modified based on comments from the public. Statistical experts drafted a separate document of statistical considerations (section 9). RESULTS: In this report, we summarize 112 guidelines and their associated backgrounds and rationales. The full list of guidelines, the statistical considerations, and a glossary of terms can be found in data available from Dryad (appendices e-3-e-5, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.32q9q5d). The authors prioritized 15 guidelines with the greatest potential to improve ALS clinical research. CONCLUSION: The revised Airlie House ALS Clinical Trials Consensus Guidelines should serve to improve clinical trial design and accelerate the development of effective treatments for patients with ALS.

Provisional best practices guidelines for the evaluation of bulbar dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Universally established comprehensive clinical bulbar scales objectively assessing disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are currently lacking. The goal of this working group project is to design a best practice set of provisional bulbar ALS guidelines, available for immediate implementation within all ALS clinics. METHODS: ALS specialists across multiple related disciplines participated in a series of clinical bulbar symposia, intending to identify and summarize the currently accepted best practices for the assessment and management of bulbar dysfunction in ALS Results: Summary group recommendations for individual speech, Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC), and swallowing sections were achieved, focusing on the optimal proposed level of care within each domain. DISCUSSION: We have identified specific clinical recommendations for each of the 3 domains of bulbar functioning, available for incorporation within all ALS clinics. Future directions will be to establish a formal set of bulbar guidelines through a methodological and evidence-based approach. Muscle Nerve 59:531-531, 2019.

Edaravone in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: efficacy and access to therapy - a roundtable discussion.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and fatal neuromuscular disease affecting approximately 5 out of every 100,000 individuals living in the United States. ALS is associated with 50% mortality within 30 months of initial symptom onset. The rarity of the disease, along with the significant inter- and intra-patient variability in clinical course and a lack of reliable biomarkers, have rendered the development of effective agents to treat ALS a challenge. Because oxidative stress is considered a contributing factor to ALS onset and progression, drugs that eliminate free radicals may protect motor neurons from damage potentially caused by free-radical and oxidative stress. Edaravone is an antioxidant free-radical scavenger approved by the FDA in 2017 for the treatment of ALS. A review of the edaravone clinical development program offers a clearer view of the clinical utility of this agent. Broader treatment success is also influenced by factors such as limited patient access and the restrictive payer environment. Cooperation within the healthcare community, among clinicians, patient advocacy groups, pharmaceutical companies, and managed care payers, must occur to advance ALS management and treatment and improve patient access. Moreover, collaborative discussions are useful in identifying potential solutions to problems currently surrounding patient access.