RESUMO
Diffuse and point sources of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in streams influence its composition, interactions and fate in the aquatic ecosystem. These inputs can be very numerous at the scale of a watershed, and their identification remains a challenge, especially for diffuse sources related to land use. The complexity of the transfer mechanisms and the reactivity of DOM throughout the soil-water column continuum raise questions about the sampling of diffuse sources in watercourses. To answer this issue, we compared the characteristics of soil-extracted DOM influenced by a particular land use (homogenous sub-catchment of forest and vineyard) and DOM collected from the watercourse adjacent to the soil samples. A 28-day incubation experiment of soil extracts was designed to remove the labile fraction of DOM. During the first 3 days, between 40 and 70 % of the DOC mass was lost for both types of soils. A set of optical indicators (UV-Visible, EEM fluorescence and HPSEC/UV-fluorescence) showed that the labile fraction was mostly composed by low (<1 kDa) and high (>10 kDa) protein-like molecules. At the end of the incubation, soil-extracted DOM was mainly composed of medium molecules (1-10 kDa) associated to terrigenous humic-like compounds. Its optical and size molecular signature tended towards that in the adjacent watercourses and was specific to land use. However, the characteristics of DOM in watercourses was also influenced by the hydrological conditions, probably due to a transfer of top soil DOM during high water periods and both deep soil and autochthonous DOM during low water periods. These results were obtained by a set of indicators, including novel ones derived from HPSEC/UV-fluorescence. Finally, this study demonstrated that it is possible to sample the DOM representative of a land use directly in the river downstream of the homogeneous sub-basin by multiplying the samples during contrasting hydrological conditions.
RESUMO
Five betablockers (oxprenolol, metoprolol, propranolol, bisoprolol, betaxolol) were analysed in effluents collected over a 3-month period from wastewater treatment plants (WTP) from the Lyon area in France. The analytical protocol consisted of solid phase extraction of the dissolved aqueous phase on HLB cartridges and analysis by gas chromatography coupled with mass detection (GC-MS) after derivatization. Concentrations of metoprolol, propranolol and bisoprolol varied from 45 to 2838ng/L whereas oxprenolol and betaxolol were never detected in these effluent samples. A high variability of betablockers concentrations and fluxes was observed between WTP effluents and within each WTP over the time period studied. Considering a flux per person for a dry weather period, Fontaine plant was pointed out as the less efficient WTP, which might be explained by its type of treatment (biological aerated filters). But we need additional analysis of effluent and influent waters to confirm this hypothesis. A tentative approach of local environmental risk assessment of propranolol based on the calculation of PEC/PNEC (predicted environmental concentration/predicted non effect concentration) ratio approach lead us to conclude on a negligible risk for the downstream rivers (Rhône river at Ternay and Saône river at Couzon Mt d'Or).