Brief resolved unexplained event: Severity-associated factors at admission in the pediatric emergency ward.

OBJECTIVE: A brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) is a recent clinical entity that has now replaced the term "infant discomfort". Despite the availability of recent recommendations, identification of patients requiring further examination remains difficult. METHOD: We aimed to identify factors associated with severe pathology and/or recurrence by studying the medical files of 767 patients admitted to the pediatric emergency department of a French university hospital for a BRUE. RESULTS: Overall, 255 files were studied; 45 patients had a recurrence and 23 patients had a severe diagnosis. The most frequently found etiology was gastroesophageal reflux in the benign diagnosis group and apnea or central hypoventilation in the severe diagnosis group. Prematurity (p = 0.032) and time since last meal >1 h (p = 0.019) were the main factors associated with severe disease. Most of the routine examination results remained non-contributive to the etiology. CONCLUSION: As prematurity is a factor associated with severe diagnosis, special attention should be given to this population, without subjecting them to multiple tests, since the main complication was found to be apnea or central hypoventilation. Prospective research is needed to establish the usefulness and prioritization of diagnostic tests for infants who are at "high risk" of experiencing a BRUE.

Dexmedetomidine sedation vs. inhaled general anesthesia for pediatric MRI: A retrospective cohort study: Dexmedetomidine sedation vs. inhaled general anesthesia for MRI.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of a dexmedetomidine-based protocol followed by anesthesiologists unaccustomed to using dexmedetomidine during pediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations compared to conventional halogenated general anesthesia. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study including patients younger than 18 years who underwent sedation for MRI between August 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. Patients who received dexmedetomidine were included in the DEX group and patients who had general anesthesia formed the GA group. Patients were matched with a ratio of 2 GA:1 DEX, based on age and type of MRI examination. RESULTS: Overall, 78 patients were included (DEX=26; GA=52). Dexmedetomidine was significantly associated with a decrease in invasive ventilation (p<0.001) with no impact on image quality. The sedation failure rate was 42% with dexmedetomidine vs. 0% with general anesthesia (p<0.001). All cases of failure followed the intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine seems to be a suitable sedation option for pediatric MRI. It provides an alternative to halogenated general anesthesia with the aim of limiting exposure to conventional anesthetic agents and invasive ventilation.

From hypotonic maintenance fluid to severe hyponatremia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The principles for maintenance intravenous fluid prescription in children were developed in the 1950s. These guidelines based on the use of hypotonic solutions have been challenged regularly for they seem to be associated with an increased risk of hospital-acquired hyponatremia. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 4-week-old Caucasian child admitted for acute bronchiolitis who received hypotonic maintenance fluids and developed severe hyponatremia (94 mmol/L) with hyponatremic encephalopathy. CONCLUSION: This clinical situation can serve as a reminder of the latest recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics regarding the use of intravenous fluids that promote the use of isotonic fluids in children.

Assessment of general emergency medicine physicians' medical education regarding management of pediatric emergencies in western Normandy, France.

OBJECTIVES: General emergency medicine physicians sometimes have to deal with acute management of pediatric emergencies. The objectives of this study were to assess the pediatric medical education background of emergency physicians, how often they encounter pediatric emergencies, as well as the knowledge and organizational gaps regarding the management of children in general emergency departments. METHODS: A survey was conducted from March 25 to June 25, 2017, by emailing an anonymized questionnaire to all senior emergency physicians of the 22 general emergency departments of western Normandy public hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 81 responses were analyzed. In all, 83% percent of respondents had previously worked in a pediatric department. In total, 90% of the respondents reported caring for children within their emergency department and 93% out-of-hospital (100% of them during primary interventions and 39% during secondary interventions such as inter-hospital transfers). Fourteen percent of the respondents considered that the pediatric medical education they received was adapted to their current practice, while 73% reported experiencing difficulties during management of pediatric emergencies (technical difficulties, unsuitable material and therapeutics, relational problems, personal apprehension, disease- or age-specific difficulties, especially with children under the age of 2-3 years). CONCLUSION: Most general emergency physicians report caring for children despite a lack of medical education in pediatrics. Pediatric medical education as well as collaborations between general practitioners and specialized pediatric teams should be enhanced to better match the needs of general emergency departments and improve the quality of primary and acute care for children.

Caffeine treatment for bronchiolitis-related apnea in the pediatric intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Apnea is commonly encountered in children with bronchiolitis. Despite the lack of recommendations regarding bronchiolitis-related apnea (BRA) management, some pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) practitioners use caffeine treatment based on extrapolation from the recommendations for prematurity-related apnea management. The objectives of this study were to describe the management of BRA in our PICU, evaluate the caffeine prescription rate for this indication, and explore its potential effects on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in a university hospital PICU between January 1st, 2009 and December 31st, 2016. All children under 1 year of age admitted to the PICU with a diagnosis of BRA were included. Patients were allocated to a control group or a caffeine group depending on the administration of caffeine. RESULTS: In total, 54 infants were included and caffeine treatment was administered to 49 (91%) of them. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Ventilatory support was initiated for 50 patients (93%). Supportive care and length of PICU stay were similar between the two groups. Caffeine was not associated with adverse events. CONCLUSION: Caffeine treatment in BRA could be considered as a local standard practice. This retrospective study was underpowered to show any benefit of caffeine treatment on clinical outcomes. This treatment was not associated with significant adverse effects. We raised the question of the appropriate caffeine dosing regimen for BRA in this postterm population. Further studies on this topic are warranted.

The role of the neuropediatrician in pediatric intensive care unit: Diagnosis, therapeutics and major participation in collaborative multidisciplinary deliberations about life-sustaining treatments' withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: In Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) two types of population require the intervention of neuropediatricians (NP): chronic brain diseases' patients who face repetitive and prolonged hospitalizations, and patients with acute brain failure facing the risk of potential neurologic sequelae, and both conditions may result in a limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LLST) decision. OBJECTIVE: To assess NP's involvement in LLST decisions within the PICU of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Retrospective study of medical reports of patients hospitalized during 2014 in the Necker-Hospital PICU. Patients were selected using keywords ("cardiorespiratory arrest", "death", "withdrawal of treatment", "palliative care", "acute brain failure", or "chronic neurological disease"), and/or if they were assessed by a NP during the hospitalization. Demographic and medical data were analysed, including the NP's assessment and data about Collaborative Multidisciplinary Deliberation (CMD) to discuss potential LLST. RESULTS: Among 1160 children, 274 patients were included and 142 (56%) were assessed by a NP during their hospitalization for diagnosis (n = 55) and/or treatment (n = 95) management. NP was required for 59%-100% of patients with neurological acute failure, and for 14-44% of patients with extra neurological failure. A LLST decision was taken after a CMD for 27 (9.8%) of them, and a NP was involved in 19/27 (70%) of these decisions that occurred during the hospitalization (n = 19) or before (n = 8).12 patients died thereafter the LLST decision (40% of the 30 dead patients). CONCLUSION: NP are clearly involved in the decision-process of LLST for patients admitted in PICU, claiming for close collaboration to improve current practices and the quality of the care provided to children.

Hemodynamic support of a 15-year-old waiting for a heart transplant: Is there a role for levosimendan in pediatric heart failure?

Decompensated heart failure in children requires rapid and aggressive support. In refractory cases, invasive supportive care is essential to ensure cardiac output. This results in lengthy pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stays, secondary morbidity, and high cost. Levosimendan may help palliate the pitfalls encountered with the usual treatment. It has been shown to improve hemodynamics and decrease morbidity and mortality from heart failure in adult trials and pediatric cohorts. We report the case of a 15-year-old boy with dilated cardiomyopathy and refractory ventricular dysfunction who was weaned from continuous inotropes and discharged from the PICU with levosimendan while waiting for heart transplantation.

Implementation and assessment of a training course for residents in neonatology and pediatric emergency medicine.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Residents must balance patient care and the ongoing acquisition of medical knowledge. With increasing clinical responsibilities and patient overload, medical training is often left aside. In 2010, we designed and implemented a training course in neonatology and pediatric emergency medicine for residents in pediatrics, in order to improve their medical education. The course was made of didactic sessions and several simulation-based seminars for each year of residency. We conducted this study to assess the impact of our program on residents' satisfaction and self-assessed clinical skills. METHODS: A survey was conducted at the end of each seminar. The students were asked to complete a form on a five-point rating scale to evaluate the courses and their impact on their satisfaction and self-assessed clinical skills, following the French National Health Institute's adapted Kirkpatrick model. RESULTS: Sixty-four (84%) of the 76 residents who attended the courses completed the form. The mean satisfaction score for the entire course was 4.78±0.42. Over 80% of the students felt that their clinical skills had improved. CONCLUSION: Medical education is an important part of residency training. Our training course responded to the perceived needs of the students with consistently satisfactory evaluations. Before the evaluation of the impact of the course on patient care, further studies are needed to assess the acquisition of knowledge and skills through objective evaluations.

[Management of patients under 18years of age by adult intensive care unit professionals: Level of training, workload, and specific challenges]. / Prise en charge de patients mineurs par les équipes de réanimation pour adultes : expérience pédiatrique, estimation de l'activité et difficultés ressenties par les soignants.

In routine practice, intensive care physicians rarely have to manage children under 18years of age, particularly those under 15. This study's objectives were to assess the quality of training in pediatrics of adult intensive care teams, to document the workload generated by care of pediatric patients, and to identify the difficulties encountered in managing minors as patients. A survey was administered in Lower Normandy from 4 April 2012 to 1 September 2012. Physicians, residents, nurses, and nurses' aides practicing in one of the nine intensive care units of Lower Normandy were asked to complete an electronic or paper format questionnaire. This questionnaire assessed their level of pediatric training, the workload management of pediatric patients entailed, and the challenges posed by these patients. One hundred and nine questionnaires were returned (by 26 attending physicians, 18 residents, 38 nurses, and 27 nurses' aides). Eighty-three of the respondents (76%) had no experience in a pediatric unit of any kind. Forty-two percent thought that the pediatric age range lies between 3months and 15years of age. However, more than 50% of respondents would like the upper limit to be 16years or even older. Ninety-three respondents (85%) estimated having some exposure to pediatric patients in their routine practice, but this activity remained quite low. Seventy-three (67%) reported difficulties with the management of these young patients. This survey provides current information regarding the level of training of adult intensive care unit professionals and their concerns about managing patients under 18years of age, both in terms of workload and specific challenges.